Tesla launches long-discussed robotaxi service

NEW YORK: Tesla began offering robotaxi services Sunday in the US city of Austin, Texas, an initial step that Elon Musk's backers believe could lead to the company's next growth wave.
"Super congratulations to the @Tesla_AI software & chip design teams on a successful @Robotaxi launch!!" Musk posted on the X platform that he owns.
"Culmination of a decade of hard work."
The kickoff -- which comes as Musk refocuses on his business ventures following a contentious stint in Donald Trump's administration -- will employ the Model Y sport utility vehicle rather than Tesla's much-touted Cybercab, which is still under development.
The long-awaited launch follows the dramatic meltdown earlier this month in relations between the US president and the world's richest person, which saw a cascade of bitter attacks from both men.
Since then, Musk has publicly expressed regret for some of his statements, while his company's Texas operation has readied the Austin push -- part of a major drive on autonomous technology and artificial intelligence that Tesla believes will yield huge profits.
Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives said autonomous technology could be a catalyst for potentially US$1 trillion or more in additional market value.
"There are countless skeptics of the Tesla robotaxi vision with many bears thinking this day would never come," said Ives, who predicted Trump's administration would clear roadblocks for Tesla and pivot from the recent "soap opera."
One of the robotaxi's self-described first users was Tesla fan Herbert Ong, who livestreamed his ride Sunday in a red vehicle that included a person in the passenger seat monitoring the trip for operational safety.
The unveiling in the Texas state capital comes amid questions about how Tesla will try to overcome criticism of Musk's activities for Trump.
Tesla saw profits plunge 71 per cent in the first quarter following poor sales in several markets.
In picking Austin for the debut of the autonomous vehicle (AV) service, Musk is opting for a US state known for its business-friendly approach to regulation.
"Texas law allows for AV testing and operations on Texas roadways as long as they meet the same safety and insurance requirements as every other vehicle on the road," the Texas Department of Transportation told AFP.
The Texas legislature this year passed a bill requiring prior authorization from the state's Department of Motor Vehicles before companies can operate on a public street without human drivers, a group of Democratic lawmakers said in a June 18 letter to Tesla.
Citing the enhanced system, the lawmakers asked Tesla to delay testing until after the law takes effect on September 1.
The lawmakers asked for "detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be compliant with the new law" should the company choose to proceed.
Musk had initially planned the launch for June 12, before pushing back, saying he was being "super paranoid" about safety.
"We want to deliberately take it slow," Musk said May 20 on CNBC, telling the network that Tesla would probably only operate 10 autonomous vehicles the first week.
But that number will rise to perhaps 1,000 "within a few months," Musk added. "And then we will expand to other cities... San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Antonio."
The service will be offered from 6:00 am until midnight and will be available to "early access" users on an invitation-only basis in a geofenced area, Sawyer Merritt, who owns a Tesla, said Friday on X.
He added that the company had given him permission to release the information.
Musk last fall unveiled the Cybercab, which has no steering wheel or pedals. Its production is not expected to begin until 2026.
Tesla's robotaxi launch comes well after Waymo's offering of commercial robotaxi service.
The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in October 2024 opened a probe into Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after receiving four reports of crashes.
Last month the agency asked Tesla for additional information on its technology in light of the Austin launch.
But the NHTSA told AFP it does not "pre-approve" new technologies.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Focus Malaysia

an hour ago

• Focus Malaysia

Global markets on edge as conflict risks push oil prices higher

THE US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend has marked its direct involvement in the Israel-Iran war, which we fear could escalate an already volatile situation in the Middle East. If this conflict is prolonged, it could further destabilise the fragile market sentiment, which has been weighed down by weak economic conditions. In the short-term, the uncertainty could prop up oil prices, exacerbating inflationary pressure and sending bond yield higher, especially in the developed countries – US, Europe, Japan. Iran's parliament has now voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, where c.30% of global seaborne oil trade flows through the chokepoint. 'We believe the market will remain in a cycle of risk aversion with investors shying away from risky assets, until peace and stability prevail,' said Public Investment Bank (PIB). Although global market has regained losses since the announcement of a 90-day tariff pause in April, this trend could reset. We maintain our bearish outlook, favouring defensive stocks that predominantly focusing on the domestic market i.e. Maybank, Telekom, TNB, CCK and IGB Comm REIT. While we have a neutral call on the oil and gas sector, we believe there is upside risk in the immediate term, we have Outperform rating on Hibiscus and Bumi Armada. Since the start of the Israel-Iran conflict on 13 June, the US has largely refrained direct engagement in the war with its Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressing Israel has acted unilaterally while President Donald Trump announcing, just last week, that he will decide whether or not the US gets involved within the next two weeks. However, within days, the US has changed the course of the conflict, launching strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on 21 June. Promising to be a 'peacemaker' in his run up to return to the White House, Trump has taken a dramatic step by bringing US directly into the conflict. Should this escalate into a protracted conflict, it could strain the US' fiscal deficit even further, which is projected at about 6.2% of GDP in 2025. This should also increase its swelling debt, which stood at about 123% of GDP. Note that US artillery stockpiles are depleting quickly due to increased demand while the urgency to replenish may be constrained by limited rare earth supplies from China. The US military industrial base is already facing challenges in ramping up production to meet increasing demand from Ukraine and Gaza. Although Trump claimed the Iranian nuclear facilities had been destroyed by the US bunker-blaster, the extent of damage to the underground enrichment plants remains unclear, especially Fordow which is believed to be buried at a depth of 80-90m with mountain above ground. Iran could retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz or launching attacks on the US military base. The US operates a broad network of military sites, both permanent and temporary, across approximately 19 locations in the Middle East. The uncertainty in the Middle East is likely to cause a spike in oil prices as the region contributes to 30% of the world's total output, with Iran being the third-largest OPEC producer. If there is no material disruption to global supply of oil with the Strait of Hormuz remains accessible (the final decision now lies with Iran's national security council after the parliament voted to close the critical oil trade route), this may well be short-lived, as there is still ample supply of oil in the market while global demand could weaken due to slowdown in international trade following the increase in tariffs. Nonetheless, given the uncertainty and risk of escalation, oil prices are likely to surge in the immediate term while investors would rush to safe-haven assets (likely to be gold or JPY instead of USD or Treasuries) and avoid risky investments such as equities. US CPI remains under control partly due to low energy prices but a protracted conflict in the Middle East could potentially lead to a sustainable rise in energy prices, increasing the likelihood of the US economy slipping into a stagflation in 2H 2025. —June 23, 2025 Main image: Maukerja

The Star

3 hours ago

• The Star

Driverless disruption: Tech titans gird for robotaxi wars with new factory and territories

A Waymo robotaxi Jaguar I-PACEs driverless car parks next to The Broad in downtown Los Angeles on March 11, 2024. — Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times/TNS As three key players vie for dominance, the race to put driverless taxis on roads across the country is heating up. Waymo, owned by Google's parent company Alphabet, already offers paid autonomous rides in a handful of cities, including San Francisco and Los Angeles. Amazon's robotaxi effort, known as Zoox, opened a new production facility in the Bay Area this week. The company has been testing its unique pill-shaped vehicles in California and Nevada since 2023. Meanwhile, in Austin, Texas, Elon Musk just started testing driverless Teslas with the hopes of launching a commercial service soon. Musk unveiled a prototype for Tesla's Cybercab late last year, touting his vision for an autonomous future and "an age of abundance." The arrival of self-driving tech could eventually affect society as much as the internet and smartphones did years ago, some experts predict. With Waymo leading the way and Tesla and Zoox trying to catch up quickly, a new status quo could be on the horizon, said Karl Brauer, an analyst with "Tesla has tried to catch up, and Zoox is a more recent competitor that's hoping to be a serious player," he said. "Waymo has been slow and steady and, as a result, is winning the race." According to some industry insiders, the US is about 15 years from seeing widespread use of robotaxis, Brauer said. While Waymo taxis have become a common sight in the cities where they operate, weather conditions and charging infrastructure still limit their expansion. On Wednesday, Waymo expanded its service area in Los Angeles County, where its vehicles now roam an area of more than 120 square miles. The company also increased its service area in San Francisco, expanding access to suburbs and Silicon Valley. Days after Waymo's announcement, Zoox opened a 220,000-square-foot facility in Hayward, Calif., that the company says will be able to produce 10,000 robotaxis per year. Zoox is preparing to launch its public ride-hailing service in Las Vegas and San Francisco this year. Unlike Waymo vehicles, which are retrofitted Jaguars, Zoox is developing a purpose-built taxi with no steering wheel or gas pedals. Zoox also has a manufacturing plant in Fremont, Calif., where the company develops its test fleets of retrofitted Toyota Highlanders. Tesla has a manufacturing facility in Fremont as well. Musk has promised for years to deliver autonomous vehicles and a robust ride-hailing service. Lawmakers in Austin requested this week that he delay the rollout of his service in the city. Tesla, Zoox and Waymo are the three remaining major US companies in what was once a more crowded field, Brauer said. General Motors' autonomous taxi company Cruise suspended operations in 2023 after one of its vehicles struck and dragged a pedestrian in San Francisco. Last year, Uber and Cruise announced a partnership that could put Cruise vehicles back on the road. A company called Argo AI, backed by Ford and Volkswagen, was also developing driverless technology until it shut down in 2022. The continued expansion of robotaxis depends on safe and successful testing, Brauer said. There have been several incidents related to Tesla's Full Self-Drive mode, a technology currently available but still in development. Waymo has issued recalls of some of its vehicles on multiple occasions. "If there's a tragic result for any of these three companies during the testing and development process, it would likely slow down the entire industry," Brauer said. – Los Angeles Times/Tribune News Service

Free Malaysia Today

5 hours ago

• Free Malaysia Today

Nato looks to thrash out spending deal under US pressure

NATO chief Mark Rutte proposed 3.5% GDP for core military spending and 1.5% for security infrastructure by 2032. (EPA Images pic) BRUSSELS : US defence chief Pete Hegseth will seek on Thursday to drive home a deal on ramping up Nato defence spending that can satisfy President Donald Trump at a summit later this month. The volatile US leader has demanded that alliance members agree to boost defence spending to 5% of their GDP at the June 24-25 meeting in The Netherlands. Nato chief Mark Rutte has put forward a compromise agreement for 3.5% of GDP on core military spending by 2032, and 1.5% on broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. Multiple diplomats say that Rutte looks on track to secure the deal for the summit in The Hague – but that some allies are still hesitant about committing to such spending. 'I'm really, absolutely, positively convinced that at the summit with the 32, we will come to an agreement when it comes to this really big increase in defence spending,' the Nato chief said on Wednesday. Most vocal in its reluctance is Spain, which is only set to reach Nato's current target of 2% of GDP by the end of this year. Diplomats say that other countries are also haggling over making the timeline longer and dropping a demand for core defence spending to increase by 0.2 percentage points each year. But the deal appears an acceptable compromise to most that will allow Trump to claim that he has achieved his headline demand, while in reality setting the bar lower for struggling European allies. Hegseth looks set to use a meeting with his Nato counterparts in Brussels to pressure them into signing up to the agreement. The US has backed Rutte's plan – but its ambassador to Nato insisted on Wednesday that Washington wants to see 'plans, budgets, timelines, deliverables' to meet the target. In a connected move, Nato ministers will sign off at their meeting in Brussels on new capability targets for the weaponry needed to face the threat from Russia. Nato officials have estimated that, on average, meeting the new targets would cost countries between 3.5% and 3.7% of GDP. Hegseth, a former TV presenter, rocked Nato on his last visit in February with a fiery warning that Washington could look to scale back its forces in Europe to focus on China. Since then there has been no concrete announcement from the US on troop withdrawals but Nato allies remain on tenterhooks. Ukraine question With Nato appearing headed for the defence spending deal, another thorny issue now threatens to overshadow the summit in three weeks time: what to do about Ukraine? Trump's return to the White House ripped up Washington's support for Ukraine and upended the West's approach to Russia's three-year-long war. Hegseth underlined US disengagement with Kyiv by skipping a meeting of Ukraine's backers in Brussels on Wednesday. Kyiv's European allies are pressing strongly to overcome US reluctance and invite Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to The Hague as a sign of support. So far, Nato has only said that Ukraine will be represented at the gathering – but has not confirmed that Zelensky will be in attendance.