Agnico Eagle CEO Sees Only One Reason to Buy a Gold Stock
The head of one of the world's most valuable gold miners believes there's only one reason to buy a gold mining stock — and too few companies in the industry are offering it to investors.
'The only reason you want to buy an equity is if it gives you a better return than just buying gold,' Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. Chief Executive Officer Ammar Al-Joundi said in an interview with Bloomberg.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hims & Hers, healthcare stocks, BNY: Trending Tickers
Novo Nordisk (NVO) ended its weight-loss drug partnership with Hims & Hers (HIMS), sending shares of both companies lower. UnitedHealth (UNH), CVS (CVS), and Cigna (CI) are in focus as health insurers are set to simplify the authorization process, according to AHIP. BNY (BNY) is reportedly considering a merger with Northern Trust (NTRS), according to the Wall Street Journal. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vince Meets Expectations With Slight Q1 Declines
Updated 4:16 p.m. ET on June 17 Vince, the contemporary brand, ended its first quarter with a loss and slight dip in sales but indicated that the results fell in line with expectations. More from WWD CaaStle Meltdown: P180 Sues 'The Hunsicker Enterprise' for Conspiracy Vince Sees Q4 Sales and Profitability Gains, but Projects Q1 Declines Amid Macro Uncertainties Fashion's Enron? P180 Blasts CaaStle's Christine Hunsicker in Fraud Lawsuit The net loss for the quarter ended May 3 was $4.8 million, or 37 cents a share, compared to net income of $4.4 million, or 35 cents a share, in the same period last year. Excluding the gain on the sale of a subsidiary, the adjusted net loss was $3.3 million, or 26 cents a share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2024. During fiscal 2024, the company completed the wind down and sale of the Rebecca Taylor brand, and determined that its Parker brand would not be part of the company's future. The loss from operations was $4.4 million compared to income from operations of $5.6 million in the same period last year. Excluding the gain on the sale of Rebecca Taylor in the first quarter of fiscal 2024, the adjusted loss from operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2024 was $2 million. Total company net sales decreased 2.1 percent to $57.9 million compared to $59.2 million in the first quarter of 2024. The year-over-year decline was driven by store closures and remodels which negatively impacted the retail store channel in the direct-to-consumer segment, the company indicated. 'I continue to be encouraged by the strong execution and commitment to excellence I see across our organization, and while we are navigating a challenging environment marked by uncertainty, our first-quarter performance was relatively in line with our expectations,' Brendan Hoffman, chief executive officer, said in a statement Tuesday morning. 'As an organization, we quickly pivoted all efforts in the latter portion of the quarter to develop and put into action mitigation plans in light of the evolving tariff policies. In short order we have diversified our supply chain, negotiated with vendors, and leveraged other opportunities to mitigate near-term costs. As we look ahead, we will continue these efforts along with providing customers a high-quality product offering and an engaging experience across our channels.' For the second quarter of fiscal 2025 the company expects net sales to be about flat to down 3 percent compared to the prior year period. Operating income as a percentage of net sales is projected to be about down 1 percent to up 1 percent. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, as a percentage of net sales are seen about up 1 to 4 percent. Due to the uncertainty related to the potential impact and duration of current tariff policy, vince did not provide guidance for the full year. Vince shares fell 11.9 percent to $1.48 on Tuesday. Vince ended the quarter with 58 company-operated stores, a net decrease of four stores since the first quarter of fiscal 2024. Wholesale sales increased 0.1 percent to $30.3 million compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2024. Direct-to-consumer segment sales decreased 4.4 percent to $27.6 million compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2024. Income from operations relating to reportable segments, Vince Wholesale and Vince Direct-to-consumer, was $8.6 million compared to income from operations of $10.1 million in the same period last year. Last January, P180, a venture formed by Hoffman, acquired a majority stake in Vince from Sun Capital Partners, putting Hoffman, the former CEO of Wolverine Worldwide, Vince, Lord & Taylor and back at the helm of Vince. Hoffman partnered with Christine Hunsicker, the CEO of CasStle, to cofound P180 and buy control of Vince. But just two months later, Hunsicker was out as CaaStle's CEO, accused of doctoring financial statements. Now P180 is suing Hunsicker. CaaStle enables retailers and brands to run rental businesses by providing all the logistics functions and data and analytics. Best of WWD Macy's Is Closing 66 Stores in 2025 — Here's the List, Live Updates Inside the Demise of Lord & Taylor COVID-19 Spikes Elevate Retail Concerns
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Still Working At 69, Eligible For Social Security: Should He Keep Waiting Or Claim Now?
At 69, many Americans are thinking about slowing down, if they haven't already — but not everyone. One Reddit user recently shared that her husband, born in January 1956, is still working full time and loves his job. He's also the only one at his hospital who performs certain specialized tests, so his employer is eager to keep him. While he's already enrolled in Medicare, he hasn't yet started collecting Social Security retirement benefits. So, their question is: should he claim now or keep waiting? Let's look at how Social Security works in this scenario. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can First, it's important to know that once someone reaches their full retirement age, there's no limit on how much they can earn while receiving Social Security benefits, per Social Security Administration rules. For someone born in January 1956, full retirement age is 66 years and 4 months. That means this man reached FRA back in May 2022. Since then, he's been eligible to collect his full retirement benefit with no penalty for working full-time. In other words, yes — he can collect Social Security now and keep working as much as he wants. There's no reduction in benefits due to his job income, and he'll still be contributing to Social Security through payroll taxes. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . If he chooses not to claim just yet, his benefit amount will continue to grow. Social Security increases your benefit by about 8% each year you delay claiming after your full retirement age, up until age 70. Because he's now 69, he's less than a year away from maxing out that delayed retirement credit. If he waits until he turns 70, his monthly benefit could be roughly 24% higher than it would have been at his FRA. That increase lasts for the rest of his life — and could also benefit a surviving spouse if she later receives spousal or survivor benefits. Yes. Even if he starts collecting Social Security now, his benefit might still increase over time. That's because the Social Security Administration continues to review earnings records. If his recent work years are among his 35 highest-earning years, the agency could recalculate his benefit upward. He'll receive a notice if his payment increases due to these new no one-size-fits-all answer. If the couple wants to lock in the higher monthly benefit, they might wait until he turns 70. On the other hand, if they'd like to start receiving money now — and he's already past his full retirement age — there's no financial penalty for doing so. He can collect benefits while continuing his career. Factors to consider include their overall financial situation, life expectancy, how long he plans to work, and whether the added income would help meet their current goals. At 69 and past his full retirement age, this worker has options. He can safely claim his Social Security benefits now without reducing his payments — even if he continues to earn a full-time income. But if he waits just a little longer, he'll lock in a bigger monthly check for life. Either path can work; it all depends on what fits their needs best. Before making a decision, it may help to speak with a financial advisor or use Social Security's online tools to estimate benefits. Read Next: Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Still Working At 69, Eligible For Social Security: Should He Keep Waiting Or Claim Now? originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
