Two Ohio State football players are among the top 10 Heisman odds for 2025
Two Ohio State football players are among the top 10 Heisman odds for 2025
There's little debate the Heisman Trophy is the most prestigious individual award in all of American sports. It, of course, goes to the college football player annually who is judged and voted to be the best in college football. It can go to any player at any position, but we all know it leans very heavily to offensive players, especially quarterbacks. Ohio State has a record of producing Heisman winners, just one shy of the record eight produced by USC.
Running backs and wide receivers used to also be among the favorites for the Heisman Trophy annually, but now that the game is more wide open with signal-callers being a huge part of the offense, that's where most of the awards have gone, and also what the odds seem to favor.
For the 2025 season, that hasn't changed. In fact, our friends at BetMGM published a list of best odds to win the Heisman and there are a bunch of quarterbacks on the list. Two of those among the top 10 odds will be wearing Scarlet and Gray this season, and you can probably make a pretty educated guess on who they are.
But, hey, why not go through the top 10, including the Ohio State players, and hash out why they are there and what could hold them back. We'll start at No. 10 and work our way down to the player with the best odds at this point.
College football odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub.
No. 10 (tie) - Sam Leavitt, Arizona State (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +2500
Why he could win the Heisman: Leavitt burst on the scene last season and helped lead the Sun Devils to a College Football Playoff appearance, nearly knocking off Texas to reach the semifinal. Leavitt has sneaky athleticism to keep plays alive, but he is able to stay away from huge mistakes. He elevates those around him, and that's about the best you can say for a player.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: Leavitt might not be flashy enough, and there might not be enough weapons around him to put up the numbers necessary to sway many of the voters making the call. Add that to the fact he doesn't play for one of the blue bloods, and it's going to be an uphill climb to be taken seriously.
No. 10 (tie) - John Mateer, Oklahoma (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +2500
Why he could win the Heisman: Mateer had a very good season last year for Washington State, but not many outside of the Pacific Northwest took notice. Now he is at Oklahoma, and that means a lot more eyeballs will be watching in a wide-open year. He'll have more options to throw to and will do it with the Oklahoma uniform on. That already puts him in a good spot to enter the season.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: Oklahoma hasn't been the same offensively since Lincoln Riley left for USC. The Sooners are thought of as a fringe top-25 team coming into the season, and if that's the case, it'll be hard to impress enough people to get to New York.
No. 10 (tie) - Carson Beck, Miami (Fla.) (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +2500
Why he could win the Heisman: Beck was an early favorite to win the Heisman last year and has all the talent to get it done at a place that will allow him to throw the ball around the yard, just as we saw with Cam Ward last year. If he stays healthy and can run the Mario Cristobal offense, he'll be in the front of voters' minds.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: Did you see last year? Beck struggled, making far too many mistakes and producing too much inconsistent play while leading Georgia. Do we really think a change in scenery is going to make him a better decision maker? That's going to be tall task to swallow.
No. 6 (tie) - DJ Lagway, Florida (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +1800
Why he could win the Heisman: Lagway showed what he can do last season. His dual-threat ability and explosiveness made Florida a much-improved team through the tail-end of last year. Now he has another year of seasoning and a full schedule to make an impact, he could turn some heads.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: The Florida program hasn't been able to figure things out since Urban Meyer left, and it doesn't feel like the Gators are at the point where they can give Lagway the exposure and wins needed to keep him in the limelight. Are there enough weapons around him?
No. 6 (tie) - Julian Sayin, Ohio State (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +1800
Why he could win the Heisman: Sayin was a five-star talent coming out of high school when he committed to Nick Saban and Alabama. He has the arm strength, accuracy and athletic ability to be one of the best signal-callers in an offense that will afford him plenty of opportunities to showcase his talents.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: Despite all those God-given abilities, Sayin is still learning the offense and is actually in a quarterback competition to win the starting job. The thought is he'll eventually be named the starter, but it might still take him some time to show what he can do.
No. 6 (tie) - Dante Moore, Oregon (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +1800
Why he could win the Heisman: Oregon seems to have this transfer to Heisman candidate thing down, and Moore might be the next in line. He showed flashes of what he can be at UCLA, and he'll have more abilities around him in an offense that could churn out Heisman stats.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: Is Moore even going to win the starting job? Reports indicate redshirt sophomore Austin Novosad is doing more than holding the clipboard in practice. He's really pushing Moore and if the job turns into a platoon situation, well, it's hard to see how that equates to a Heisman campaign.
No. 6 (tie) - LaNorris Sellers, South Carolina (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +1800
Why he could win the Heisman: Seller took the college football world by storm last year in a breakout sophomore campaign. He's a true dual-threat quarterback who has size and explosiveness in the running game to go along with a big, accurate arm in the passing game. He should be even better during his junior season and will have every opportunity to make a mark during the SEC campaign.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: South Carolina isn't the name-brand program that will get Sellers noticed like those at other places. The Gamecocks will have to spring a couple of upsets with him putting the team on his back without the national spotlight games that other programs will benefit from.
No. 5 - Drew Allar, Penn State (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +1400
Why he could win the Heisman: Allar is a seasoned veteran, and he has a firm grasp on the Penn State offense. He has a backfield that should open up the passing game for his big arm and provide ample opportunities to make plays down the field.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: The receiving corps might hold Allar back. It's adequate but not game-breaking, and Allar isn't exactly a dual-threat quarterback. He's also shown a penchant for inconsistency because of poor judgment and mistakes. He'll have to cut down on those.
No. 3 (tie) - Jeremiah Smith, Ohio State (wide receiver)
Heisman Odds | +1000
Why he could win the Heisman: Have you seen Smith play? You could have made a very sound argument that he was the best player in college football last season. He has a rare, generational blend of size, explosiveness, hands and athletic ability to set him apart from others. He'll have a slew of highlight-reel catches and moments again in 2025.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: The best player doesn't always win the Heisman. It's hard for a receiver to win the award because there are games in which a game plan can take players away. Also, Ohio State has other talented playmakers on offense and could spread the ball around just enough to keep his stats from comparing to others with Heisman buzz.
No. 3 (tie) - Cade Klubnik, Clemson (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +1000
Why he could win the Heisman: Klubnik turned in a career year last season and led the Tigers to an ACC championship and College Football Playoff. However, his rather pedestrian stat line in a bad loss to Georgia in the season opener buried him behind others. This year, Clemson is expected to be a national player and that'll boost the dual-threat quarterback into the spotlight.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: We could see a repeat of last year because Clemson plays LSU straight out of the gate. There's opportunity there, but a bad showing would again deal a blow to his Heisman campaign before it even starts. There is also a lack of spotlight games in the ACC, which doesn't figure to have the best competition in the country. He'll have to put up gaudy numbers and not have an off week or there will be doubters.
No. 2 - Garrett Nussmeier, LSU (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +850
Why he could win the Heisman: Nussmeier returns as arguably the best quarterback in the country. He has a slew of talent surrounding him, plays in the SEC and should put up the kind of numbers voters will want to see. It doesn't hurt to be the best quarterback in a conference that still gets the benefit of the doubt from media members, if that's what he ends up being.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: For all the talent Nussmeier possesses, the offense has been overhauled. While it looks like there are upgrades through the transfer portal, you never really know how that'll play out. Also, Nussmeier does like to force throws into small windows, resulting in him leading the SEC in interceptions with 12. If he can't cut down on those mistakes, he could be left out in the cold with the Heisman race.
No. 1 - Arch Manning, Texas (quarterback)
Heisman Odds | +600
Why he could win the Heisman: Let the hype train roll out of the station. College football has been waiting for Manning to take over as a starter in Austin and do many of the things his uncles have done. He has the pedigree, can do things with his arms and legs and will be on a Texas team that should have a bunch of talent and numerous nationally televised games to prove himself.
What could keep the Heisman on the shelf: Can Manning really be that good straight out of the box as the new starter? And that schedule that provides opportunity also has pitfalls aplenty throughout. There will not be much time to dip his toe in the water either. A game against defending national champion Ohio State awaits in Week 1. It might be a little unrealistic to believe Manning will just click along without some growing pains that could knock him out of the Heisman race early.
[gambcom-standard rankid="5" ]
Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
an hour ago
- NBC Sports
Kaori Sakamoto to retire from figure skating after Olympic season
Kaori Sakamoto, a three-time world champion and Olympic silver and bronze medalist, plans to retire from competitive figure skating after the upcoming 2026 Olympic season, a move she previously hinted at over the past year. 'I feel like I have less than a year left,' she said in her native Japan on Thursday, according to a Kyodo News translation. 'I'll be 29 at the following Olympics (in 2030), which is out of the question. I'll try to bring things to a close the year I turn 26. 'I've made the decision really fast. I felt now was the time. I was more or less fixed on it since saying, 'I see two years as one cycle' last year.' Sakamoto, speaking at the opening of a new rink in her hometown of Kobe, said she plans to continue in the sport as a coach, according to Japanese media. Sakamoto followed her 2022 Olympic team silver and individual bronze medals by becoming the first women's singles skater to win three consecutive world titles (2022-24) since American Peggy Fleming from 1966-68. This past March, she earned silver at the worlds, just missing becoming the first woman to win four titles in a row since American Carol Heiss from 1956-60. At worlds in Boston, she was fifth after the short program and improved to second in the free skate. She finished 4.99 points behind Alysa Liu, who won both programs to become the first American to claim a women's singles world title since 2006. Sakamoto had the highest total international event score over the entire season, recording that in last fall's Grand Prix Series. Sakamoto's short program for the 2025-26 season is set to 'Time To Say Goodbye' by Sarah Brightman and Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli, a fitting choice for her final season and the Milan Cortina Games. 'Winning at least silvers in both the individual and team events (at the Olympics) would be mission completed,' she said, according to Kyodo. 'The time left is short, so I'll live each day to the fullest, and hopefully the results turn out to be what I'm wishing for.' Nick Zaccardi,
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Will Trump cuts to universities affect college sports? 'Touchy topic'
Will Trump cuts to universities affect college sports? 'Touchy topic' As universities face financial cuts from the Trump Administration, college sports tries to find a way to fund huge new expenses . Show Caption Hide Caption Livvy Dunne on NIL and how female athletes can benefit from it Meghan Hall chats with Livvy Dunne about the world of NIL and how she's setting a course for future college athletes to succeed like she did. Sports Seriously Hardly anybody in charge of major college athletics wants to talk about this publicly. It's the Trump effect. Will the Trump administration's plan to defund American universities trickle down to college sports in the form of funding cuts? USA TODAY Sports contacted more than 25 universities and college leadership organizations to ask them about concerns that athletics could be affected at least indirectly by this federal funding uncertainty. Almost all of them dodged the question by not responding at all, or by providing vague, undetailed answers, or by saying they didn't want to talk about it on the record. 'I'm not surprised that nobody wants to talk, particularly at red-state public universities,' said Robert Kelchen, a professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Tennessee. 'It's such a touchy topic right now.' At the same time, many of the same colleges are bracing for another coming financial earthquake after a federal judge recently approved the House vs. NCAA legal settlement. This allowed colleges to start paying their athletes directly for the first time ever, creating a massive new cost of up to $20.5 million per school per year starting July 1, according to the NCAA. Trouble and tension in major college sports Add it all together and tensions have started simmering during a titanic moment in history for higher education and college sports. Expenses are going up in athletic departments while the other side of campus remains anxious about Trump cuts to higher education, such as grants for medical and scientific research. 'There's never been a time in college sports where so many issues have hit at once − both with the squeeze on institutional support and now this brand-new way of doing business in college sports,' said Amy Perko, CEO of the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. USA TODAY Sports examined how it might affect athletics, why it's a sensitive topic and what some schools are doing about it. How the federal uncertainty trickles down Trump's attempted funding cutbacks at American universities aren't directly related to college sports. They instead largely involve funding for research at these universities, including from the National Institutes of Health, which faces $18 billion in cuts under the Trump administration. But as part of their universities, most athletic departments depend on university financial support to pay the bills. And when universities face funding shortfalls, they have to make decisions about what to cut and where. That's where that institutional support for athletics could get squeezed. Out of 232 Division I public schools tracked by USA TODAY Sports in fiscal year 2023, only 12 athletic departments reported receiving no institutional support from their schools, including from student fees or university transfers. That includes big football schools such as Ohio State, Penn State, Texas and LSU. On the other end of the spectrum, 75 Division I public schools received at least $20 million in university support from their schools in fiscal year 2023, including from student fees. Sixteen received direct institutional support from their schools of more than $20 million, not counting student fees, led by Houston ($39.7 million), California ($36.7 million), Cincinnati ($35.5 million) and Connecticut ($30.2 million). 'As a matter of basic math, less money from any source will constrain any university's ability to make discretionary decisions about how to allocate their finite resources,' said Roger Pielke, emeritus professor at the University of Colorado. 'Something then has to give − either more revenues are needed or some activities must be cut back. If athletics demands more funding (such as for paying athletes) that compounds the issues.' A number of examples have emerged. At the University of Washington In March, the provost at the University of Washington sent out a message outlining the financial risks the university was facing, including state budget shortfalls and the 'unprecedented and rapid policy changes at the federal level.' The provost mentioned possible cutbacks including 'pausing non-essential staff hiring,' limiting faculty hiring and reducing food purchases and other discretionary spending. 'These measures apply to all units that report to the President and Provost, including Athletics,' university spokesman Victor Balta confirmed to USA TODAY Sports. How that applied to athletics isn't clear. The university didn't get into detail about that when asked about it. But the athletic department received $10 million direct institutional support in fiscal 2024. Now the House settlement is also pressuring the Huskies, too, just like all the other schools in major college sports. The Huskies are projecting a $19 million deficit in athletics for fiscal year 2026. Loans will help cover the gap, including $10 million from the Big Ten Conference in the form of a revenue-sharing advance and more from an 'internal loan of institutional funds,' Balta said. 'Rising expenses and back damages related to the House settlement are factors, as are expenses associated with transitioning to the Big Ten Conference,' Balta said. 'UW Athletics did execute required budget reductions and revenue enhancements in their approved FY26 operating budget – they were not held harmless in this exercise related to overall budget concerns.' At Michigan State This is happening to different degrees at other universities, too, each dealing with it in different ways. At Michigan State, for example, President Kevin Guskiewicz sent a message to faculty and staff fin May, noting financial challenges that included navigating 'federal policies and directives that undercut our ability to advance our land-grant mission and continue essential research projects that make life better.' A subsequent memo went to university leaders calling for a 9% base reduction in university-wide general funds over the next two years. Asked if that included MSU athletics, university spokeswoman Amber McCann replied, 'The reductions are to general funds across the university.' Additional details were not provided. MSU athletics received less than $650,000 in direct institutional support in fiscal 2024 and $3.6 million in indirect institutional support in the form of costs covered by the university but not charged to athletics. MSU athletics also reported an annual operating deficit of $16.7 million for fiscal 2024. But even at the small number of schools that provide little or no institutional support for athletics, disharmony can increase across campus if athletic departments are insulated from university budget cuts. Take Nebraska, for example. Is athletics 'sharing the pain?' The University of Nebraska Board of Regents on June 19 approved a 5% tuition increase amid financial challenges that included less state funding than they asked for and an estimated federal funding reduction of nearly $12 million. The new budget included $18 million in cuts and no funding for pay increases for university staff. But over in the athletic department, football coach Matt Rhule is set to get a $1 million pay increase this year, then another $1 million more in 2026, according to the terms of his contract. Athletic director Troy Dannen is set for a $100,000 annual raise. The athletic department didn't respond to an inquiry about it. 'There is a feeling that the athletic department should be sharing the pain,' said Jordan Gonzales, president of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Staff Senate. Nebraska is one of the relatively few schools in the nation that reported receiving no university support for athletics in fiscal 2023. Even so, any immunity from university austerity measures adds to the perception that athletic departments are becoming increasingly detached from their universities as they move to become more like professional sports. 'When the university asks its core academic support staff to tighten their belts and absorb budget cuts while the athletic department appears to operate under a separate set of financial rules, it fosters a sense of two separate universities − one that's facing austerity and another that is investing in and entering into multimillion deals and contracts,' Gonzales said. Why it's a sensitive subject As the Trump administration targets certain colleges such as Harvard for funding cuts, others are wary of becoming the next target. When resources shrink on campus, discord also intensifies about university priorities and who is or isn't taking on a fair share of the burden. Some colleges might not even want to talk about any cutbacks in sports because now is the time they want to appear flush with cash to pay athletes. Among those that didn't respond to inquiries about federal funding cuts affecting athletics were UCLA, Virginia, Stanford, Minnesota, Houston, Northwestern, Harvard and the National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics. "I think people are laying low," said Ruth Johnston, vice president of consulting at the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO). "I think people are wanting to wait and see a little bit." In the meantime, the pressure mounts for Division I athletic departments to spend money on players, all the way up to the initial cap of $20.5 million. Not doing so would mean falling behind the competition. 'They need more money right now,' said James Nussbaum, a former Northwestern football player and in-house counsel at Indiana University now at the firm Church Church Hittle + Antrim. 'It's those schools in the middle that are going to be really interesting to watch as they try to figure out if they want to continue to fund athletics at the level they have been as it becomes more and more clear that they're not going to be able to compete with those top-tier schools, just from a resource standpoint.' Where will the money come from? Some athletic departments are getting students to help pay the bills. Some are getting more from their universities. Some might pursue other sources: ∎ The Board of Governors for the State University System of Florida on June 18 granted permission for state universities to give a $22.5 million annual lifeline to athletics through at least June 2028. ∎ At the University of Michigan, athletic director Warde Manuel sent a letter to supporters after the House settlement was approved, saying his department faced a projected deficit of $27 million for the 2025-26 academic year, including $20.5 million for paying players. The letter asked for support and mentioned a planned 10% reduction in staff, in addition to other cost-cutting moves. Spokesman Dave Ablauf said the university also has offered the department a loan of up to $15 million. ∎ Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry recently signed a bill to increase taxes on sports gambling, helping raise more than $20 million to be divided among 11 state universities for athletics, including LSU. Incidentally, LSU athletics is not subject to university cutbacks there because it is considered 'auxiliary' to the university, according to the Louisiana Illuminator in April. LSU didn't respond to a follow-up question about that from USA TODAY Sports. ∎ At the University of Colorado Boulder, the school approved an increase of the student athletic fee from $28.50 to $90 per semester, the first change to this fee since 1994. Funding from it was to support women's sports scholarships and non-revenue sports. ∎ At Virginia Tech, student athletic fees are set to go up by $295 annually, up to $732. ∎ At Wichita State, the university proposed a 3.5% tuition increase, citing the challenging financial landscape for higher education, as well as the House settlement. ∎ At the University of Kansas, Chancellor Douglas Girod told the Lawrence Journal-World that KU athletics possibly could pay the university a reduced tuition rate for its athletes. ∎ Private investment in athletics is on the way. Elevate, a sports strategy and marketing company, recently announced the launch of the Collegiate Investment Initiative to provide colleges with 'capital and strategic resources to develop revenue-generating projects.' What those schools must provide in return for that is not yet clear. Johnston of NACUBO said 'everything is going to be affected' by federal funding cuts at the top, in addition to the big new cost for athletic departments. New sources of funding are needed in the absence of cutbacks. 'It's not gonna go back to normal,' Johnston said. 'I think we' re in an inflection point.' Contributing: Steve Berkowitz Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Why three-time world champion Kaori Sakamoto will retire after the 2026 Winter Olympics
TOKYO (AP) — Kaori Sakamoto, the three-time figure skating world champion, will retire after next year's 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan-Cortina, she said Friday. The 25-year-old Japanese star won an Olympic bronze medal in the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing and took the silver medal in the world championships in March with gold to American Alysa Liu. Sakamoto acknowledged that age is catching up with her. ___
