Is beating the benchmark enough? What the information ratio reveals
In a world increasingly leaning towards passive investing, how can you truly evaluate the value an active fund manager brings to the table? In this exclusive conversation, ET's Neha Vashishth speaks with Chirag Muni, who breaks down the Information Ratio—a lesser-known but powerful metric that goes beyond just returns and looks at how efficiently those returns are generated.
Excerpts:
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Roteirizador Pathfind - O planejador de rotas mais completo do mercado
Sistema TMS embarcador
Saiba Mais
Undo
Q. Let's start with the basics—what exactly is the Information Ratio?
Chirag Muni:
The Information Ratio (IR) is a performance metric that measures a fund manager's ability to generate excess returns over a benchmark, adjusted for the volatility of those excess returns.
It shows how effectively a manager delivers better
risk-adjusted returns
compared to the benchmark.
A higher IR indicates more consistent and efficient outperformance, while a lower IR suggests the fund is underperforming relative to its benchmark.
Live Events
Let me give you a comparison: Suppose two large-cap fund managers both deliver a 15% return, beating their 12% benchmark by 3%. Now, if one of them took less risk than the other to achieve this, the Information Ratio will reflect that. The fund manager with the higher Information Ratio would be the preferred choice because he delivered the same return with less risk.
This ratio highlights both consistency and efficiency in return generation.
Q. How do you see the IR reshaping the way investors assess fund managers, especially in an era of passive investing?
Chirag:
Great question. There are two aspects here. First, should investors choose active or passive fund management?
When we analysed mutual fund performance over the past five years—across categories like large-cap, flexi-cap, multi-cap, contra, etc.—we found that 60% to 100% of active funds beat the Nifty, and around 70% beat their own benchmarks, except in the large-cap category.
So yes, if you choose the right fund, active strategies still offer superior excess returns. Passive funds can't outperform the benchmark—they just mirror it.
Secondly, within active strategies, the Information Ratio helps you evaluate the quality of excess return. It allows you to choose fund managers who are not only outperforming but doing so with less risk. That's where this metric really becomes relevant.
Q. How is Information Ratio different from other ratios?
Chirag:
Most investors use the Sharpe Ratio, which compares a fund's return to a risk-free rate like a 6.5% government bond, adjusted for volatility.
But the Information Ratio compares the fund's return to its own benchmark, not to a risk-free asset. That makes it more relevant for mutual funds, because we're evaluating whether the manager added value over what the benchmark would have given.
So, while Sharpe is useful, the Information Ratio gives a truer picture of a fund manager's active performance.
Q. What's the ideal time frame to evaluate the Information Ratio?
Chirag:
Time frame is very important. Looking at short-term data can mislead you due to market noise and volatility. On the other hand, a very long-term period like 10 years might not reflect the current fund strategy or manager, as those could have changed.
The ideal period is between three to five years. This allows you to evaluate consistent performance while accounting for a reasonably stable strategy and risk profile.
Q. I noticed that multicap and contra funds often show a higher Information Ratio compared to large-cap or mid-cap funds over 3–5 years. Why is that?
Chirag:
Good observation. It's because of investment flexibility.
ETMarkets.com
In large-cap funds, 80% of the money must go to the top 100 stocks, leaving little room for creativity or deviation from the benchmark. That limits the potential to generate alpha or excess return.
But in multicap, smallcap, flexicap, or contra funds, fund managers can explore beyond the benchmark and use different strategies. That freedom leads to higher alpha, and therefore, a better Information Ratio.
Q. How should investors use Information Ratio in conjunction with other metrics like Alpha, Beta, or Sharpe Ratio when selecting funds?
Chirag:
You should never rely on any one ratio in isolation.
Information Ratio shows how efficiently a fund manager has beaten the benchmark considering the risk taken.
Alpha tells you how much excess return the fund generated.
Beta indicates how sensitive the fund is to market movements—i.e., how volatile it is compared to the benchmark.
Sharpe Ratio assesses return per unit of total risk, compared to a risk-free asset.
Sortino Ratio focuses only on downside risk.
The right approach is to combine all these and assess a fund from multiple angles—consistency, volatility, downside protection, and benchmark-beating ability.
Q. How can one interpret whether an Information Ratio is good or not?
Chirag:
You don't need to calculate it yourself—it's already available in the fund fact sheets. You can simply compare the Information Ratio of a fund to the category average.
For instance, in the focused fund category, ICICI Prudential Focused Fund has an Information Ratio of 0.9, while the category average is 0.07—a clear indication of superior risk-adjusted performance.
In the smallcap space, Invesco India Smallcap Fund has a ratio of 0.5, compared to a 0.1 category average.
So yes, the more positive the Information Ratio, the better. It means the fund manager is taking less risk for every unit of extra return.
Q. What are some limitations of the Information Ratio? Are there risks to over-relying on it?
Chirag:
Absolutely. It's just one part of the puzzle.
Choosing the right fund starts with knowing your market cap allocation, then shortlisting funds that consistently beat benchmarks, and only then applying tools like the Information Ratio.
You can't make a decision solely based on this metric. A fund might have a good Information Ratio today but not fit your overall strategy or allocation. So, use it as a filter, not the final decision-maker.
Q. Lastly, SEBI is pushing for greater fund disclosures and transparency. Should the Information Ratio be highlighted more prominently in fact sheets?
Chirag:
Definitely. Fact sheets are already loaded with data, but unless key metrics like the Information Ratio are better communicated and explained, investors won't benefit.
If more people understand and look at the Information Ratio, they can hold their advisors accountable and make more informed, risk-conscious decisions.
So yes, SEBI should definitely promote awareness and ensure standardized, visible reporting of such metrics.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Nifty trades below 25,050; European mrkt opens lower
The frontline indices traded with modest cuts in the afternoon trade as escalating geopolitical tensions between the US and Iran, coupled with a rise in crude oil prices and concerns over potential economic fallout, triggered broad-based risk aversion among investors. The Nifty traded below the 25,050 mark. IT, auto and FMCG shares declined, while media, metal and consumer durables stocks advanced. At 13:30 IST, the barometer index, the S&P BSE Sensex, tanked 344.25 points or 0.42% to 82,063.92. The Nifty 50 index slipped 84.90 points or 0.34% to 25,026.60. The broader market outperformed the frontline indices. The S&P BSE Mid-Cap index rose 0.28% and the S&P BSE Small-Cap index added 0.40%. The market breadth was negative. On the BSE, 1,700 shares rose and 2,241 shares fell. A total of 198 shares were unchanged. Economy: The HSBC Flash India Composite Output Indexa seasonally adjusted index that measures the month-on-month change in the combined output of India's manufacturing and service sectorsclimbed to a 14-month high of 61.0 in June. Rising from 59.3 in May, the latest reading was consistent with a sharp rate of expansion that was well above the long-run series average. The HSBC Flash India Manufacturing PMI rose from 57.6 in May to 58.4 in June, signalling the best improvement in operating conditions since April 2024. Gainers & Losers: Trent (up 3.77%), Bharat Electronics (up 2.87%), Hindalco Industries (up 2.37%), Adani Enterprises (up 1.21%) and SBI Life Insurance Company (up 0.74%) were the major Nifty50 gainers. Infosys (down 2.29%), Larsen & Toubro (down 1.98%), Mahindra & Mahindra (down 1.65%), Hero MotoCorp (down 1.64%) and HCL Technologies (down 1.43%) were the major Nifty50 losers. Stocks in Spotlight: Ideaforge Technology hit an upper limit of 10% after the company secured an order worth approximately Rs 137 crore, inclusive of all charges to supply Mini UAVs with accessories to Ministry of Defence. NBCC (India) rose 1.75% after the company secured an order worth Rs 296.53 crore from the Meerut Development Authority (MDA) for redevelopment projects in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. Bharat Electronics (BEL) advanced 2.81% after the company announced it had secured additional orders worth Rs 585 crore since its last disclosure on 5 June 2025. Zen Technologies hit an upper limit of 5% after the companys board approved the acquisition of TISA Aerospace (TISA) through a mix of share purchases plus compulsorily convertible debentures (CCDs) from current shareholders of TISA. Global Markets: European markets opened lower and Asian markets traded mixed on Monday as investor jitters grew following the US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, which pushed oil prices higher and reignited fears of a wider Middle East conflict. Brent Crude climbed to $78.52 a barrel, continuing its upward trend amid regional tensions. On the macro front, Japan delivered a pleasant surprise. Its manufacturing sector returned to expansion in June, with the au Jibun PMI rising to 50.4 from Mays 49.4. The services sector also saw steady growth, with the index nudging up to 51.5 from 51.0. Back in the US, two of the three major indices closed lower on Friday. The S&P 500 slipped 0.22%, marking its third straight loss, while the Nasdaq dropped 0.51%. The Dow managed a modest gain of 0.08% as investors weighed geopolitical developments and the Feds next move on rates.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Strong FY25 financial performance supports standalone credit profiles of banks: Fitch
Fitch Ratings on Monday said Indian banks ' strong financial performances in the financial year ended March 2025 support the standalone credit profiles of rated banks and position the sector for future growth. The sector reported improved asset quality , stronger capital buffers and stable profitability despite the slowest sector loan growth in four years. "We expect steady performance to continue, though sustaining sound core financial metrics that strengthen loss-absorption buffers and resilience to economic shocks relative to the previous cycle would support positive momentum for rated banks' standalone credit profiles," Fitch said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dementia and Memory Issues Have Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It? gofitlifeguide Click Here Undo The rating agency believes banks can sustain steady performance across most credit metrics in FY26, except for earnings due to cyclical pressures on margins and credit costs. "Indian banks' strong financial performances in the financial year ended March 2025 (FY25) support the standalone credit profiles of rated banks and position the sector for future growth," Fitch Ratings said in a statement. Live Events As per the net profit reported by public sector banks for 2024-25 (FY25) fiscal, cumulative profit rose to a record level of Rs 1.78 lakh crore, 26 per cent growth over Rs 1.41 lakh crore in FY24. Market leader State Bank of India (SBI) alone contributed over 40 per cent of the total earnings, as per the published numbers on stock exchanges.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NBFC-MFIs get to cast net wider: Lower qualifying asset threshold supportive; recovery processes, technology adoption key
It is now time the sector, an essential pillar of financial inclusion and economic development, overhauls its playbook. (AI image) By Binaifer Jehani and Abbas Master The recent move by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to relax the qualifying asset norm of non-banking financial companies-microfinance institutions (NBFC-MFIs) promises to address several challenges bogging down the sector. Primarily, it enables MFIs to diversify asset allocation by assigning a greater proportion of their resources to products and services that extend beyond traditional microfinance. It gives NBFC-MFIs the flexibility to adjust without the fear of any regulatory repercussions. How the revised regulation benefits NBFC-MFIs: Strengthens financial stability by improving risk mitigation: By reducing reliance on microfinance loans, NBFC-MFIs are better placed to withstand market turbulence Boosts regulatory adherence: The regulation addresses the reasons that led to non-compliance among non-banking financial companies, microfinance institutions. Further, If NBFC-MFI is unable to maintain the revised threshold for four consecutive quarters, they need to submit a remediation plan to the RBI, outlining the steps taken to rectify the situation Unlocks new growth avenues: NBFC-MFIs can boost profitability by offering specialised products to clients transitioning to small and medium-sized enterprises, micro-housing and other such new segments MFIs in India already serve more than 7 crore (70 million) unique borrowers, with the majority being women in rural areas. Though the sector plays a vital role by providing marginalised households and micro-entrepreneurs access to credit and other financial services, it faces challenges such as lack of product diversification. The RBI's move to reduce the qualifying asset (net of intangible assets) threshold from 75% to 60% provides NBFC-MFIs the flexibility to diversify operations by giving credit to more segments and to improve financial stability. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Coming on the back of the MFIN guardrails rolled out recently, the latest directive will enable NBFC-MFIs to maintain a more balanced portfolio. It also reduces their dependence on microfinance loans — which is high, making them vulnerable to asset quality risks and funding constraints — thereby helping them derisk their portfolios and improve their financial health. Besides, it will give them more room to manoeuvre and respond to changing market conditions. What the sector should do now It is now time the sector, an essential pillar of financial inclusion and economic development, overhauls its playbook. A shift towards digital integration, better risk management and customised credit products is necessary for MFIs to improve their reach and service. Digital integration can be particularly helpful to resolve an issue that has been plaguing the sector for long: poor recovery practices. While a code of conduct establishes ethical standards that loan officers should follow to ensure transparency, accountability and integrity while dealing with customers, the use of technology can help MFIs reduce the dependence on human resources. Robust credit assessments using tech tools can also avoid over-leveraging by borrowers and prevent the use of coercive recovery methods. MFIs must integrate digital tools such as mobile applications, automated credit assessments and other verifications to streamline processes and reduce in-person interactions. By leveraging technology, MFIs can scale up operations without being constrained by workforce limitations, while also maintaining a balanced human touch — necessary to reach the marginalised populace. A balanced approach In conclusion, the relaxation of qualifying asset norms will help NBFC-MFIs promote financial inclusion in a much more effective manner and also provide stability to the microfinance sector. The revised regulation is expected to enable MFIs to diversify their operations and increase access to credit for marginalised communities. Of course, challenges such as collections, portfolio quality, recovery practices, technology adoption and risk management need to be addressed. As the sector continues to evolve, it is essential for regulators, industry players and stakeholders to work together to ensure that microfinance reaches the most vulnerable sections of society and promotes financial inclusion and economic well-being among them — an important step to drive the country's economic growth. To achieve these goal, the sector has to find a balanced way to use technology, human touch and adherence to regulatory framework. (Binaifer Jehani is Business Head, Risk Solutions – Assessments & Social Sector Consulting, Crisil Intelligence. Abbas Master is Associate Director, Risk Solutions – Assessments & Social Sector Consulting, Crisil Intelligence) Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
