MACC to question Tan Sri again Thursday over sukuk fund probe
KUALA LUMPUR, June 16 — The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is scheduled to resume recording a statement this Thursday from an individual with the title Tan Sri, as part of investigations into the alleged misappropriation of sukuk funds for a highway construction project in the Klang Valley.
Its Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki, when contacted, confirmed that the statement will be recorded at the individual's residence in the federal capital at 9am.
On June 11, the MACC recorded an initial statement from the individual over a six-hour period, which was temporarily halted due to health reasons.
Earlier, media reports stated that the MACC had seized various assets, including handbags, jewellery, luxury vehicles, watches, cash and high-end properties, collectively estimated at RM32 million, believed to belong to a highway concessionaire bearing the Tan Sri title. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Lawyers for Daim's widow decry NFA decision as 'unacceptable'
KUALA LUMPUR: The lawyers for Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid, widow of former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin, have described the police's No Further Action (NFA) decision on her report as "unacceptable" and a breach of the rule of law. Lawyers Rajesh Nagarajan and Sachpreetraj Singh Sohanpal said this in a statement after the police classified the case as NFA recently. Na'imah lodged the police report on Sept 30 last year, following a Bloomberg News article alleging political interference in the MACC's investigation against Daim. The article had claimed that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki were involved in a coordinated abuse of investigative powers. "This sudden NFA decision was conveyed to us via a letter received on June 21 from the Sentul police chief. "This decision is unacceptable, shocking, and contradicts principles of good governance and the rule of law. "For nine months, the police and the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) remained silent on Na'imah's police report. "The NFA decision came only days after she lodged a complaint with the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) over the continued failure of authorities to act on her report. "No information was provided regarding who was questioned, what steps were taken, or the actual reasons behind the NFA decision," said the statement. The statement said the report contained serious matters of public interest and should not have been dismissed without proper explanation or accountability. The decision severely undermines the integrity of the police and the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC), and confirms the deterioration of institutional independence under the current federal administration, it said. "We will not remain silent or be deterred in our pursuit of justice. "This matter will be pursued until the truth is revealed and justice is served. "The Malaysian people deserve institutions that serve the rakyat, not those in power," it added. Last year, a Bloomberg report, citing sources, claimed that the MACC was instructed to investigate Daim as well as former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and his sons. According to the report, the instruction was purportedly given by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, a claim the Prime Minister's Office denied. Anwar had said that the government was considering legal action against Bloomberg over the report that MACC acted on his instructions during investigations into certain individuals.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Whistleblower protection only applies if procedures are followed, says MACC
MACC senior director (legal and prosecution) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said informants must follow proper procedures and cannot go public. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission has reminded the public that whistleblower protection is only granted if reports are made directly to enforcement agencies and through proper legal channels. MACC senior director (legal and prosecution) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said there is a growing misconception that anyone who exposes misconduct is automatically protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. He said some believe they can post information on social media or speak to the press first and still claim protection. 'The law is clear. Once information is made public before a report is submitted through proper legal channels, the protection no longer applies,' Bernama quoted him as saying. Wan Shaharuddin said the law requires the whistleblower to act in good faith, without motives such as revenge, personal gain, or defamation. He said whistleblowers cannot be involved in the offence they report, citing the revocation of protection if they are found complicit under Section 11(1) of the Act. 'This is to ensure that whistleblower status is not used as a shield to escape responsibility. Integrity and intent matter,' he said. While the Act protects informants from legal repercussions, he said, many still face stigma, fear of reprisals, and a lack of public understanding about how whistleblower protection actually works. To encourage more reports, especially from civil servants, the government has introduced cash rewards and official recognition for those who report corruption through official channels. Wan Shaharuddin said as of last year, 514 civil servants had received rewards totalling more than RM1 million, with the highest individual reward amounting to RM100,000. He also noted that the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 was tabled in Parliament on March 6 to expand protections further, including immunity from civil or criminal action and safeguards against harmful retaliation. With this amendment it is hoped more individuals will come forward to report misconduct without fear, he said.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Court rules company director not entitled to get favourable statements
Sim Choo Thiam is facing four charges of soliciting and accepting bribes of RM15 million to secure projects from a home ministry agency. (Bernama pic) PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has ruled that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission is not obliged by law to furnish a written statement containing facts favourable to a company director charged with receiving RM15 million in bribes to secure projects linked to the home ministry. A three-member bench led by Justice Hashim Hamzah said the High Court erred in ruling that Section 51A (1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code stands on the same legal footing as Section 51 of the same law. 'The High Court was wrong in compelling MACC to give two paragraphs of a written statement in favour of the accused to the defence,' he said, referring to Sim Choo Thiam, in the unanimous ruling which restored a sessions court ruling. Section 51 deals with summonses to produce documents or other things, while Section 51A(1)(c) states that the prosecution shall, before trial, deliver to the accused a written statement of facts favourable to the defence. Also on the panel hearing the appeal were Justices Azizul Azmi Adnan and Faizah Jamaludin. A case management will be held in the sessions court on June 30 to fix trial dates. Earlier today, deputy public prosecutor Farah Ezlin Yusop Khan submitted that the High Court ruling had usurped the role of the prosecution in determining whether there were statements in favour of Sim under Section 51A (1)(c) of the CPC. She said the prosecution would be prejudiced if the statements were provided before the trial. 'It amounts to conceding the case, and the defence will only have to tender the statements in court and would not need to cross-examine the investigating officer,' she said. Lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik said the law obliged the prosecution to provide an accused person with exculpatory statements for the benefit of their defence. 'There must be an honest pre-trial disclosure,' he said. Last year, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur allowed Sim's revision application to compel MACC to furnish a fresh written statement of facts favouring his defence. Sim, 55, is facing four charges of soliciting and accepting bribes of RM15 million to secure projects from a home ministry agency. According to him,, the fact in favour of the defence is that he was charged in court before MACC recorded a statement from former home minister Hamzah Zainudin, whose name was mentioned in Sim's charges. Sim also claimed that his cautioned statements, recorded by MACC on Feb 16 and 28, 2023, did not support the alleged corruption charges against him. In his ruling, Justice K Muniandy directed MACC to furnish the statement, after finding there were favourable facts to be disclosed by the prosecution to the accused before trial to ensure his right to a fair trial. Sim had filed the revision application in the sessions court on July 4, 2023, claiming he was entitled to the statement under Section 51A of the CPC. Judge Rozina Ayob dismissed his application two months later. On May 10, 2023, Sim was charged with soliciting a RM15 million bribe from Hep Kim Hong, the managing director of Asia Coding Centre Sdn Bhd, through Syed Abu Zafran Syed Ahmad, as an inducement for Hamzah to award projects to the company. He was also charged with three counts of accepting RM15 million in bribes from the same individual as an inducement for Hamzah to award other projects on a similar basis. The offences are alleged to have been committed at the Shaas Holdings office and a parking lot at Solaris Dutamas, Jalan Dutamas 1 here between June and July 2021. The charges were framed under Section 16(a)(B) of the MACC Act 2009, punishable under Section 24(1) of the same Act, carrying a maximum imprisonment of 20 years and a fine of at least five times the value of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher, upon conviction. Lawyers Low Wei Loke and Kee Wei Lon also represented Sim, while deputy public prosecutors Asraf Tahir, Qistini Qamarul Abrar and Ifa Sirhu Samsudin assisted Farah.
