The USAID shutdown could make China more powerful. Beijing is already pouring billions into countries around the world.
The end of USAID could mean more space for China to expand its global influence.
The agency "assists US commercial interests," the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service said last month.
Most of China's global investments come through the Belt and Road Initiative, not through aid.
The abrupt shuttering of the US Agency for International Development — a process the White House put into motion this week — is likely to benefit China on the world stage.
"The chaotic end of USAID will undoubtedly rebound to China's benefit, even if it is unlikely to change Beijing's international development strategy in the short term," Jeremy Chan, a senior analyst on the China and Northeast Asia team at risk consultancy Eurasia Group, told Business Insider.
If USAID is shuttered, "there may be opportunities for other aid givers like China to exert soft power influence through dispensing aid," said Tai Wei Lim, a professor specializing in the political economy of Northeast Asia at Japan's Soka University.
USAID spent $32.5 billion in fiscal year 2024. Exact figures for China's foreign aid spending aren't fully public, but estimates from Japanese academics put the country's 2022 spend as high as $7.9 billion.
While China is far from the US's clout in terms of aid, the East Asian giant has been trying to expand its influence — politically and economically — beyond its shores, namely through its Belt and Road Initiative, as its economy remains in a long downturn.
Concerns about America's positioning without USAID come amid intensifying geopolitical rivalry between the world's two largest economies.
On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump's administration slapped a 10% tariff on all Chinese goods — on top of prevailing levies. In response, China announced retaliatory tariffs on targeted US goods, including crude oil and machinery.
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk have called USAID wasteful and unaligned with American values. Nearly all USAID staff will be put on administrative leave starting Friday at midnight.
Founded at the Cold War's height, USAID has never operated as a purely altruistic agency.
USAID works with "strategically important countries" and "assists US commercial interests" by helping countries develop economically, per a report from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service last month.
Some US politicians have argued that USAID — or a similar aid program — is essential to matching China's foreign aid and investment efforts.
About half of USAID's 2024 spending went to humanitarian purposes or health and population purposes, such as funding HIV programs.
USAID has long garnered bipartisan support. In 2022, then-Sen. Marco Rubio — now the Secretary of State — asked then-President Joe Biden to use his coming budget requests for USAID and other government agencies to counter China's "expanding global influence."
Now, politicians from both parties are highlighting the agency's role amid its uncertain future. All US foreign aid accounts for about 1% of the federal budget.
"Our assistance abroad helps fight disease and stop starvation and famine, but it's also a tool to stave off the expansionist reach of authoritarian leaders in China, Russia, and Iran," Democratic New Jersey Sen. Andy Kim told Bloomberg earlier this week.
"I have felt for a long time that USAID is our way to combat the Belt and Road Initiative, which is China's effort to really gain influence around the world, including Africa and South America in the Western Hemisphere," Republican Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker told reporters on Tuesday.
For more than a decade, China has championed its flagship Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure project, through which Beijing has spent more than $1 trillion on gas pipelines, trains, and other trade and infrastructure projects globally. Much of the financing has been in the form of loans to the countries involved.
China has said BRI programs come with no political strings attached. However, critics say China is trying to ensnare developing countries into debt traps — thus boosting Beijing's political leverage over debtor countries.
The China-based Green Finance & Development Center estimates that between 145 and 149 countries — around three-quarters of the world's total nations — are directly involved in BRI projects or have indicated interest in cooperating.
An analysis of 2023 data, the most recent year available, from the Green Finance & Development Center based at China's Fudan University showed how aid was geographically disbursed.
At the country level in 2023, China invested most heavily through BRI in Indonesia at $7.3 billion, followed by Hungary at $4.5 billion and Peru at $2.9 billion.
In Africa — where nearly every country has received Chinese investments — new roads, railways, and ports have been constructed over the last 10 years, while billions have been invested in energy infrastructure projects to give more residents electricity.
China overtook the US as Africa's largest trading partner in 2009. Africa typically imports electronics, machinery, and manufactured goods from China and exports fuel and metals.
In Asia, China has invested in new ports in Sri Lanka, high-speed rail in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, and infrastructure projects in Uzbekistan.
In September, Chinese leader Xi Jinping said China would commit over $50 billion to Africa in financial aid. This was intended to strengthen Beijing's relationships with developing countries amid tensions with the US and other Western nations.
To be sure, China's aid efforts are likely not able to match the gargantuan hole left by USAID in the short term. Beijing has also moved its BRI focus from mega infrastructure deals to what it calls "small and beautiful" projects, analysts told BI.
But Beijing could shift its emphasis increasingly eastward, particularly to Africa and Southeast Asia, said Eurasia Group's Chan.
China is already winning some clout from the abrupt potential shutdown of USAID.
"China looks like the good guy on the international stage simply by doing nothing," Chan told BI.
"While Beijing's calls for stronger multilateral cooperation, more free trade, and improved global governance at the UN and Davos will do little to actually further multilateral solutions to pressing global issues — such as the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, supply chain resilience, or AI governance — China will win points at the US's expense by at least keeping up appearances of being a responsible global stakeholder," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
43 minutes ago
- Washington Post
How Trump has targeted Harvard's international students — and what the latest court ruling means
President Donald Trump and his administration have tried several tactics to block Harvard University's enrollment of international students, part of the White House's effort to secure policy changes at the private, Ivy League college. Targeting foreign students has become the administration's cornerstone effort to crack down on the nation's oldest and wealthiest college. The block on international enrollment, which accounts for a quarter of Harvard's students and much of its global allure , strikes at the core of Harvard's identity. Courts have stopped some of the government's actions, at least for now — but not all.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Harvard has acted ‘appropriately' and deal could soon be announced
President Donald Trump said Friday that Harvard has 'acted extremely appropriately' during negotiations that could soon result in a deal, signaling a possible major shift in his administration's efforts to target the university. 'Many people have been asking what is going on with Harvard University and their largescale improprieties that we have been addressing, looking for a solution. We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so,' Trump said in a late afternoon post to social media. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right. If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be 'mindbogglingly' HISTORIC, and very good for our Country,' he added. Talks between a very small circle of Harvard leadership and the White House are ongoing, and a source familiar with those discussions cautioned that a final agreement has not been reached. The source characterized the status of talks as more likely than unlikely to produce an agreement following what they described as good-faith negotiations. An agreement, the source indicated, could potentially resolve outstanding legal battles between the administration and the university. It remains unclear what or who prompted Trump's Friday afternoon social media post, but the news was met with surprise among sources in the Harvard and higher education communities who have been closely observing developments. The White House, the Department of Education and Harvard did not immediately respond to CNN's requests for comment. CNN has reported that the White House has remained open to negotiation with Harvard, with which it is embroiled in multiple lawsuits. A federal judge on Friday indefinitely blocked the Trump administration from revoking Harvard's ability to host international students and scholars while legal challenges continue. Harvard also sued the Trump administration in April over its decision to freeze federal funding and asked for an expedited final decision in the case. Oral arguments are scheduled for July 21. The Trump administration has launched multiple investigations into the school. Efforts to target Harvard began even before Trump returned to office, with his allies arguing they were cracking down on antisemitism on campus amid the Israel-Hamas war. Education Secretary Linda McMahon said last week that the administration believes Harvard has taken steps to combat antisemitism on campus and that some progress has been made. 'We are, I think, making progress in some of the discussion, where even though they have taken a hard line, they have, for instance, replaced their head of Middle East Studies,' McMahon said during a moderated conversation with Bloomberg in Washington, DC. Asked whether Harvard should expect additional actions from the administration, she said, 'At this particular time, we're continuing with the things we've already talked about.' This story has been updated with additional reporting.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Mahmoud Khalil released from federal immigration detention
Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil was released from federal immigration detention on Friday following a judge's ruling, the Associated Press reported. Khalil, a lawful permanent resident and lead negotiator for the encampment at Columbia University while he was a student, was detained more than three months ago as the first case in a wave of crackdowns against foreign students involved in campus protests. 'My priority now is to get back to my wife and son,' Khalil told reporters after his release. 'Although justice prevailed, it is very long overdue.' As a condition of his release, Khalil must surrender his passport and cannot travel internationally. His movement within the United States will be restricted to New York and Michigan to visit family, Washington to lobby Congress, and New Jersey and Louisiana for court appearances. A judge ordered earlier Friday that Khalil should be released, calling it 'highly, highly unusual' that the government still sought to detain him. 'Together, they suggest that there is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner — and, of course, that would be unconstitutional,' the judge, Michael Farbiarz, wrote in his ruling. The Trump administration had argued that Khalil could be deported under a rarely-used law that allows them to do so if they determined his presence in the country would have significant negative consequences for American foreign policy. Khalil has not been charged with a crime. Farbiarz had previously held that the government could not continue to hold Khalil under the determination by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, the judge allowed his detention to continue under a claim by the administration that Khalil had omitted some prior work experience from his green card application. Khalil's release follows the releases of several students apparently detained for pro-Palestine speech, including fellow Columbia alum Mohsen Mahdawi, who was arrested at his citizenship interview, and Tufts student Rumeysa Ozturk, who co-wrote an opinion in her campus newspaper calling for divestment from Israel. Khalil's arrest on March 8 was the first shot from the Trump administration in a dramatic salvo against international student visas. The administration has since declared it will ask student visa applicants to make their social media accounts available for inspection. Also on Friday, a judge indefinitely blocked the government's move to bar Harvard University from being able to enroll international students. The Associated Press contributed to this report. This is a developing story.
