Canada will ‘adjust' counter tariffs on US metals if no deal in 30 days
[OTTAWA] Canada will 'adjust' its 25 per cent counter tariffs on US steel and aluminum in response to a doubling of US levies if a bilateral trade deal is not reached within 30 days, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Thursday.
'Canada will adjust its existing counter tariffs on US steel and aluminum products on the 21st of July, at the end of that 30-day period,' he said.
Carney also announced a raft of measures to support the Canadian steel and aluminum sectors facing 50 per cent US tariffs, including procurement rules that favour domestic suppliers and anti-dumping measures.
Canada is the largest supplier of foreign steel and aluminum to the United States, and Carney earlier this month had denounced the doubling of US tariffs on Canadian imports of steel and aluminum, calling them 'unjustified' and 'illegal.'
At the same time, Canada and the United States launched 'intensive discussions' to rewrite Canada-US trade relations.
G7 leaders at the Group of Seven summit in Canada on Monday pushed US President Donald Trump to back away from his punishing trade war.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
After Carney and Trump met on the sidelines of the summit, the Canadian government indicated the two sides could reach a trade deal within the next 30 days.
The talks are ongoing.
A good outcome in those negotiations, Carney said Thursday, would be to 'stabilise the trading relationship with the United States' and 'ready access to US markets for Canadian companies' while 'not having our hands tied in terms of our dealings with the rest of the world.'
Canada exported 5.95 million tonnes of steel and 3.15 million tonnes of aluminum to the United States last year, according to US government data. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Four candidates assessed for Fu Yu's board, with no findings against suitability
[SINGAPORE] Four proposed directors for Fu Yu Corporation have been assessed by an independent party, with no findings made against their suitability for the role, said the company on Friday (Jun 20) evening. Fu Yu currently only has one director – chief executive David Seow – after all three of its independent directors resigned on Jun 15. The company has since appointed Asian Corporate Advisors (ACA) to assess four candidates proposed as independent directors: Gilbert L Rodrigues, Ralf Pilarczyk, Yang Zhenrong and Haytham Al Essa. In its bourse filing, Fu Yu said that 'nothing has come to (ACA's) attention that the proposed new independent directors may not be deemed suitable', and that its board 'sees no reason to disagree'. 'To the best of the current board's knowledge, the proposed new (directors) are not involved in matters relating to FYSCS,' the company added, in reference to its unit Fu Yu Supply Chain Solutions, which has been under investigation. The update comes ahead of Fu Yu's annual general meeting (AGM) on Jun 27. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In an earlier filing on Friday, the company addressed questions from the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, as well as shareholders. Fu Yu said that its 'day-to-day operations and decision-making processes remain unaffected' by the resignation of all its previous independent directors – Royston Tan, Christopher Huang and Daniel Poh. It also addressed queries on its ongoing investigations into FYSCS – relating to Fu Yu's acquisition of the unit, purported misuse of the FYSCS' resources and a pre-paid commission. 'Currently, no fraud (in the legal sense) has been uncovered,' said Fu Yu, adding that there was no potential liability arising from the transactions in question, 'as well as FYSCS in general'. Asked by Sias if it would release findings by Rajah & Tann and PwC Risk Services ahead of the AGM, Fu Yu said that it would first conduct a 'full Maxwellisation process' relating to the people mentioned in the report, which could take between four to six weeks. Maxwellisation is a legal procedure in which those subject to potential criticism are given an opportunity to respond. 'The company (will) seek legal advice and will deliberate on its next steps after considering the information obtained through the Maxwellisation process, and will update shareholders thereafter,' said Fu Yu. In June last year, FYSCS also received a letter of demand for US$925,773.57 in compensation from another company, Evertree Hongkong. On Jun 5 this year, an arbitral tribunal ruled in favour of Evertree, with Fu Yu required to pay S$1.67 million. Asked about the matter, Fu Yu said that FYSCS had fulfilled its payment obligations on Jun 9 and is solvent. Fu Yu ended Friday at S$0.09, down 4.3 per cent.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Big-name porn sites back online in France after age check row
A court suspended a decision requiring pornographic platforms based in the EU to verify users' ages. PHOTO: AFP PARIS – Major adult websites Pornhub, YouPorn and RedTube were back online in France on June 20 after a court here suspended a decision requiring pornographic platforms based in the EU to verify users' ages. France has gradually introduced requirements for all adult websites to have users confirm their age with details such as a credit card or ID document. The aim is to prevent minors from accessing pornography. But the Paris administrative tribunal on June 16 suspended a government decree while investigating whether it was compatible with EU legislation. The French government has shared its intention to appeal to the Council of State, France's highest administrative court. The three platforms' owner, Aylo, said the decree's suspension was an 'opportunity to reconsider more efficient approaches' to age verification. Aylo, based in Cyprus, made its websites unavailable in France in early June as a protest against the French decree. Failure to comply could have led to sanctions, including fines or the blocking of the websites. Aylo argued that this was an ineffective mechanism that exposed people's data to bad actors, hacks or leaks. 'Requiring you to repeatedly provide sensitive personal information creates an unacceptable security risk that we refuse to impose on our users,' the company said in a message displayed on the sites' home pages earlier in June. About 40 per cent of children in France access porn sites every month, according to a 2024 study by France's Arcom audiovisual watchdog. In a bid to preserve privacy, the government decree also required operators to offer a third-party 'double-blind' option that would prevent the platforms from seeing users' identifying information. Aylo, which reports seven million visitors in France daily across its various platforms, has called instead for governments to require makers of operating systems such as Apple, Microsoft and Google to verify users' ages at the level of individual devices. The platform also argues that the French law 'diverts users to thousands of sites that deliberately circumvent regulations' and fails to moderate videos for issues such as the age and consent of performers. Other countries such as Britain and Germany also enforce age-related access restrictions to adult websites. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Can Nato keep Trump on-message about Russia threat?
Since coming back into office on Jan 20, US President Donald Trump has upended the West's approach towards Russia's war on Ukraine by opening the door to closer ties with Moscow. PHOTO: EPA-EFE BRUSSELS - When leaders from Nato's 32 countries gather for a summit in The Hague next week, most want to send a clear message: Russia is the main threat to their alliance. But the loudest voice in the room likely won't be on the same page. Since coming back to office, US President Donald Trump has upended the West's approach towards Russia's war on Ukraine by undercutting Kyiv and opening the door to closer ties with Moscow. While the volatile leader has expressed some frustration with Russia's Vladimir Putin for refusing a ceasefire, he has steered clear of punishing the Kremlin. At a Group of 7 summit this week, Mr Trump made waves by saying the group of industrialised countries should never have expelled Russia. Ahead of the Hague gathering, diplomats at Nato have been wrangling over a five-paragraph summit statement, with many countries pressing for a full-throated assertion of the menace from Moscow. That, they say, will help explain the main thrust of the meeting: an agreement for countries to ramp up defence spending to satisfy Mr Trump's demand for it to reach 5 per cent of GDP. Statement on Russia 'threat' Since the Kremlin launched its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the alliance has called Russia 'the most significant and direct threat to allies' security and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area'. But this time around the United States – backed up by Moscow-friendly Hungary and Slovakia – has been intent on watering that down. Diplomats have been juggling with variants such as referring to 'threats, including Russia' or mentioning 'the long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security'. The verbal nuances may seem slight, but they mean a lot to those countries being asked to massively ramp up spending and those on Nato's eastern flank most threatened by the Kremlin. Nato has warned that Russia could be ready to attack an alliance country within five years. 'If we can get Trump to sign off on calling Russia a long-term threat then that would be a good result,' a senior European diplomat told AFP. 'Near threat' As US peace efforts between Russia and Ukraine have stalled, the diplomat said that Washington appeared to have 'moved a centimetre in our direction' on taking a stronger stance on Russia. 'Of course more hawkish countries want to go further – but just getting Trump to agree that would still be fine,' the diplomat said. Part of the US reasoning is that Washington is more worried about the threat China poses worldwide – and that Russia is more a problem just in Europe. 'Russia is the near threat,' said US ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker. 'But China is obviously a big challenge for all of us, and we need to be allied and address those threats as well.' Mr Camille Grand of the European Council on Foreign Relations said that beneath the diplomatic fine-tuning, Nato was being confronted by a 'fundamental question'. 'How does the United States view Russia?' he said. 'So far, we haven't really got an answer.' Even if Nato does opt for stronger wording on Moscow, there is always the possibility that Mr Trump could show up in The Hague and directly contradict it. But the debate could come into sharper focus in the months after the summit when the United States could announce a pull-back of forces in Europe as part of a review of its global deployments. Division on Ukraine One area where Washington appears clearly not on board with most other allies is on backing Ukraine. Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky is set to attend on the sidelines of the summit but his involvement is being kept to a minimum to avoid a bust-up with Mr Trump. Diplomats said there should be a reference in the summit statement linking new defence spending to helping Ukraine – but there will be no talk of Kyiv's long-term push to join Nato. 'The US does not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security,' said Mr Kurt Volker, a former US ambassador to Nato. 'Our European allies do, so they feel that if Putin is allowed to prevail in Ukraine, or if Ukraine does not survive as a sovereign, independent state, they are at risk.' AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
