Five Reasons Why Amit Shah's Threat of English Speakers Being 'Ashamed' is Dangerous

Union Home Minister Amit Shah's statement that 'time is not far away for a society where people speaking in English in this country feel ashamed' has sparked a major controversy, after Asian News International and other media houses deleted their media reports and social media updates about the speech.
While such statements have appeared before in Indian politics, Shah's position as the de facto 'number two' leader in the ruling BJP and as the union home minister lends extra weight to his words.
With the dark shadow of Hindutva's longstanding ideological 'Hindi-Hindu-Hindusthan' slogan, Shah's comment is not just a cultural observation. It carries deep political and global implications, touching on issues of national identity, social mobility, intellectualism and India's international image.
Here are five reasons why Shah's statement is significant.
Fuels linguistic chauvinism and division
India's strength lies in its linguistic diversity. There is no one national language, but 22 of them. By framing English as a foreign imposition and linking it to shame, Shah's statement fans the flames of linguistic chauvinism. This is especially dangerous in a country where language has often been a flashpoint for regional and communal tensions.
English often serves as a neutral bridge language in India, especially in higher education, business, and inter-state communication. Non-Hindi speaking states, especially those in the South, East and the Northeast, are likely to see Shah's statement as yet another attempt by the Hindutva regime to impose a narrow, Hindi-centric identity on the entire country, further deepening regional divides and resentment.
Colonial legacy as an excuse for furthering Hindutva
Shah's statement aligns with the BJP's long-standing agenda of promoting Hindi as being central to the Indian identity. By framing English as a symbol of colonial legacy and 'shame,' he appeals to nationalist sentiments and consolidates the party's core base. His rhetoric helps create the narrative that true patriotism is tied to embracing Indian languages, a euphemism for Hindi in the BJP's view.
While there is merit in shedding colonial hangovers, English has evolved into a global lingua franca and a practical tool for international engagement. Shah's framing of English as a source of 'shame' risks using a sensitive issue for ideological and political gains. It can polarise public opinion and distract from the much-needed debate about the quality of public education, as exemplified by the rewriting of textbooks in the BJP ruled states.
Threatens India's global competitiveness
India's rise as an Information Technology and services powerhouse is built on its large pool of English-speaking talent. This linguistic advantage has been an envy of a country like China. Casting English in a negative light sends a regressive message to the world and risks undermining India's attractiveness to global investors, multinational companies and academic collaborators.
It will discourage young Indians from acquiring the very skills that make them globally competitive, damaging the country's future economic prospects. Shah's statement, if seen as official policy of the Hindutva regime, will create concerns about India's openness and modernity, and affect India's image as a cosmopolitan, globally connected nation.
Impact on social mobility and education
English in India is often seen as a gateway to better education, jobs, and upward mobility. By stigmatising English, Shah's statement risks alienating millions who aspire to learn the language for practical reasons.
It could also influence policy decisions on language in education, potentially restricting access to global opportunities for students from non-elite backgrounds. This could deepen social divides between urban and rural populations, and between those with and without access to English medium education.
Encourages anti-intellectualism and cultural backwardness
Equating English proficiency with cultural shame is a form of anti-intellectualism from Shah. It delegitimises those who are comfortable in English, often the best-educated and most globally connected Indians, and suggests that cosmopolitanism is un-Indian. This closes minds, discourages openness and promotes a parochial, inward-looking mindset at a time when India needs to engage with the world, not retreat from it.
To sum up, Shah's statement is not just divisive; it is dangerous. It threatens social mobility, sows linguistic discord, risks India's global standing, fosters anti-intellectualism and distracts from the real challenges facing the country. Shah's ideological rhetoric of 'shame' is out of place, and is actively harmful to the country.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Today

34 minutes ago

• India Today

Kerala woman dies by suicide after moral policing, three SDPI men arrested

Three men were arrested by Kerala police over the death of a young woman, Raseena, who was allegedly subjected to public harassment in a suspected case of moral arrested men have been identified as MC Mubsheer, KA Faisal and VK Rafnas, all residents of Parambayi area. They are reportedly affiliated with the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), with alleged links to the banned Popular Front of India (PFI). The polic, in Kannur's Pinarayi town, said the arrests were made following an investigation into a complaint by the victim's family and the contents of a suicide note left incident occurred on the evening of June 15 near Achankara Mosque, where Raseena was seen sitting inside a parked car with her male friend. The accused allegedly dragged the man out of the car, assaulted him in a nearby ground and seized his mobile phone and tablet. The following day, Raseena was found dead by suicide at her home. She had hanged herself in her bedroom. In her suicide note, she reportedly named the three accused, one of whom is believed to be a have registered a case and said further investigation is April 11, in a similar incident of moral policing in Bengaluru, five individuals, including a minor, were detained by the police for allegedly harassing a Hindu boy and his Muslim classmate at a public incident occurred when the group confronted the girl, who was wearing a burqa and sitting on a bike with her male friend. They allegedly questioned her for being with a Hindu boy, demanded her family's phone numbers, and verbally abused her. When she refused, the group reportedly tried to intimidate and assault the boy. They also filmed the encounter and circulated the video on social media. IN THIS STORY#Kerala

Time of India

34 minutes ago

• Time of India

UP has become land of expressways from bimaru state: UP CM Yogi Adityanath

UP has become land of expressways from bimaru state: UP CM Yogi Adityanath (Image: ANI) AZAMGARH: Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath hailed the state government on Friday and said that it is working towards fulfilling the goal of 'Viksit Bharat' by the year 2046. CM yogi asserted that Uttar Pradesh has changed its reputation and has become a state of "expressways" from a "bimaru" state. CM Yogi inaugurated the 91.35 km long Gorakhpur Link Expressway in Azamgarh on Friday, connecting several districts to Gorakhpur including Azamgarh He recalled the time when people were afraid of the name of Azamgarh but expressed his happiness that it has joined the path of "development" "The double engine government of the BJP is working to fulfil the goal of 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047... Uttar Pradesh has now made its reputation as a state with expressways from a 'bimaru' state.. Eight years ago, people were afraid to take the name of Azamgarh, UP.. Azamgarh has now joined the path of development... Purvanchal Expressway was inaugurated by PM Modi in 2021", CM Yogi said Critising the previous state government, CM Yogi Adityanath said that the work of the Agra-Lucknow Expressway was half done but during his tenure projects related to six expressways in the state have been completed. "The work on the Agra Lucknow expressway was half done. Today I am happy to tell you that we have completed six projects. You are witnessing the journey of the Purvanchal Expressway. We are continuously building it 300 km long. The 340km long Purvanchal Expressway has already been completed and its connectivity to Patna is about to be completed. Now remember how easy the connectivity from Patna to Lucknow and Lucknow to Delhi will become" CM Yogi said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo He stated that the 340 km- long Purvanchal Expressway is about to extend its connectivity to Patna. He called freedom fighters Veer Kumar Singh and said that if the Purvanchal Expressway had been built in 1857, India would have become independent at that time. "When Veer Kunwar Singh, the hero of the first war of independence in 1857, fought the British till Azamgarh to defeat them, there was no connectivity. If this Purvanchal expressway had been there at that time, the people of Azamgarh would have beaten the British along with Veer Kunwar Singh and then this country would have become independent in 1857 itself. There was no connectivity at that time", he added Hailing Dinesh lal Yadav Nirahua, during his tenure as the MP of Azamgarh, CM Yogi stated that when he was sent to the parliament, a music college in Hariharpur was approved. He attacked the opposition and asserted that people who made Azamgarh a "stronghold" of terror didn't have enough time to honour the black pottery, sarees and music of the district. "He was sent to the country's parliament, and as soon as Dinesh Lal Yadav became an MP, a gharana of this music college in Hariharpur. Just think, in Hariharpur a gharana of this music needed recognition. the Kayan Badal dance was performed by all the MLAs here together, but those who had made Azamgarh a stronghold of terror could not find them. They did not have enough time to honour black pottery, to honour the sarees of Azamgarh, to honour the music department of Hariharpur village, to give a university to Azamgarh, to connect Azamgarh with air connectivity", CM Yogi added.

First Post

35 minutes ago

• First Post

Should India worry about Trump's lunch with Pakistan's Asim Munir?

US President Donald Trump and Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir had lunch at the White House on Wednesday (June 18). This is the first time that a US president has made such an invitation to the chief of the Pakistan Army. What's brewing? Should New Delhi be vigilant? read more US President Donald Trump and Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir had lunch at the White House on Wednesday (June 18). This is the first time that a US President has made such an invite to the head of the Pakistan Army who is not head of state. New Delhi will be undoubtedly watching the events with interest. While many in India had celebrated the return of Trump to the White House, others questioned whether it would be to New Delhi's benefit. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But how worried should India be about the lunch? Let's take a closer look: What happened? Munir, who is on a five-day trip to the United States , has thus far received the red-carpet treatment. Trump at the luncheon was accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Special Representative for the Middle East Steve Witkoff. Munir was accompanied by National Security Advisor Lt Gen Asim Malik, who is also the head of the intelligence agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Trump, speaking at the White House, said he wanted to thank Munir for not going to war with India. 'The reason I had him here, I want to thank him for not going into the war, ending the war (with India). And I want to thank, as you know, Prime Minister Modi,' he said. Asim Munir was recently promoted to Field Marshal. AFP Trump said that 'two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war'. 'That could have been a nuclear war. Those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided (to end the conflict),' he added. When asked if the talks included the Iran-Israel conflict, Trump said: 'They (Pakistan) know Iran very well, better than most, and they're not happy about anything. It's not that they're bad with Israel. They know them both, actually, but they know Iran better." 'The engagement marks a significant moment in the ongoing efforts to reinforce the longstanding partnership between Pakistan and the United States, built upon shared objectives of peace, stability, and prosperity,' the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan Army, said in a statement after the lunch. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Apart from lunch at the White House with Trump, Munir also met a number of top US security officials at the Pentagon, the state department, and Central Command headquarters in Florida. How worried should India be? Some argue that New Delhi should be worried. After all, this is the first time a US President has invited a Pakistani military chief who isn't head of state to the White House. Ayub Khan, Zia ul-Haq and Pervez Musharraf were all heads up state at the time they were hosted at the White House. This despite Pakistan continuing to back terror groups and Indian intelligence agencies even investigating if Munir's remarks instigated the Pahalgam atta ck in April. Trump's tone on Pakistan has also undergone a jarring shift. Trump just a few years ago accused Pakistan of offering the United States 'nothing but lies and deceitful'. However, this must be seen in light of what Trump can personally get from Pakistan. Trump, since returning to office, has made cryptocurrency and rare earth minerals a top priority. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan, which recently established a Crypto Council, has tied up with a firm with links to the Trump family. US President Donald Trump speaks with reporters while flying aboard Air Force One en route from Calgary, Canada to Joint Base Andrews. AP Incidentally, Zachary Witkoff, the son of Steve Witkoff, represented the firm at the meetings with senior Pakistani officials including Munir. Pakistan has also invited US companies to invest in its mineral reserves – which are estimated to be worth trillions of dollars. Pakistan is also eager to reach a trade deal with the US – another Trump priority. 'President Trump expressed keen interest in forging a mutually beneficial trade partnership with Pakistan based on long-term strategic convergence and shared interests,' the ISPR statement added. Analysts says this is Trump's modus operandi – dealing with a country strictly on a quid pro quo basis. 'The Trump-Munir meeting shouldn't be seen only through the lens of the Israel-Iran war,' Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based south Asia analyst, told The Guardian. 'There's been US-Pakistan engagement on crypto, minerals and counter-terrorism, and Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This is classic Trump: 'What can you do for me? What can I get out of this?'' Trump's claims about also being responsible for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan are also causing a backlash for the Modi government. Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a phone call with Trump Tuesday denied that the United States played any role in the ceasefire. Modi said that India has never sought third party mediation and would never do so. Modi said that the ceasefire came at the behest of Pakistan. Some argue that India should not be surprised given the United States' history of prioritising Pakistan – given its strategic location and its pliability to Washington many demands – since the Cold War. They say that India has positioned itself as a far more reliable and trustworthy partner. They add that the US is likely courting Pakistan at the moment in case it needs a base from which to launch operations against Iran. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Marvin Weinbaum, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute (MEI), and former state department official, speaking to Al Jazeera, warned Pakistan that 'nothing is permanent in this administration'. 'If Pakistan does play some role in the Iran crisis, they have could have more substantial meaning to these ties. But it needs to be prepared that there is nothing settled with this administration. It can change on a dime, at any hour,' he added. With input from agencies