'Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae)' rapper Silentó sentenced to 30 years in cousin's murder, lawyer speaks out
The rapper Silentó, known for his viral hit "Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae)," has been sentenced to 30 years in prison after pleading guilty in the 2021 shooting death of his cousin.
Ricky Lamar Hawk, 27, who performs as Silentó, entered the plea on Wednesday for charges including voluntary manslaughter, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime and concealing the death of another, according to DeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Boston.
"This was not a crime of passion or a crime of a morally depraved person. He was mentally ill," Hawk's attorney, Keith Adams, told ABC News. "Unfortunately, Ricky's mental illness has been an issue since the age of 12, even during his success as an artist and beyond."
The charges stem from the Jan. 21, 2021, shooting of Frederick Rooks III, 34, who was found with multiple gunshot wounds at the intersection of Deep Shoals Circle and Corners Crossing in the Panthersville area of unincorporated Decatur, Georgia.
According to police, several neighbors reported hearing gunshots, and security footage captured a white BMW SUV fleeing the scene.
MORE: Baby dies in sweltering car as temperatures hit 90 degrees, foster parent faces charges
Authorities say a family member shared that Hawk had picked up Rooks in the same BMW SUV from a friend's home shortly before the incident. Police later matched bullet casings from the scene to a gun found in Hawk's possession, and GPS data placed his vehicle at the location of the shooting, the DeKalb County Police Department said.
"The benefit of him pleading to voluntary manslaughter is that it makes him eligible for parole sometime within the next decade or so," Adams explained. "If he had been convicted of murder, he would not have been eligible for parole for at least 30 years."
Due to the nature of his plea, Hawk will likely be placed in a facility equipped to address his mental health needs.
"His plea of guilty but mentally ill acknowledges his mental illness, and it instructs the Department of Corrections to place him not in a regular prison, but in a facility that will treat his mental illness," Adams said.
Hawk will be transferred to the Georgia Diagnostic Center in Jackson, Georgia, located about an hour outside Atlanta, where all state prisoners undergo initial processing. According to Adams, officials there will determine his permanent placement among the state's specialized mental health facilities.
"I'm hoping that he won't be at the Diagnostic Center for too long, because they're already familiar with his mental health issues," Adams said. "I expect within the next month to two months, he'll be placed where he's supposed to be."
Adams expressed hope for his client's future.
"No one is beyond redemption... I think he has an opportunity to come out and resume his position as a productive member of society, while properly being treated for his mental health."
'Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae)' rapper Silentó sentenced to 30 years in cousin's murder, lawyer speaks out originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After Years Behind Bars, Henry Ruggs Eyes NFL Comeback
PITTSBURGH, PA - SEPTEMBER 19: Las Vegas Raiders wide receiver Henry Ruggs III (11) goes long for a touchdown reception during the game on September 19, 2021 at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh, PA. (Photo by Shelley Lipton/Icon Sportswire) Former Las Vegas Raiders wide receiver Henry Ruggs III spoke publicly for one of the first times since the 2021 incident that led to his incarceration, expressing remorse and a desire to one day return to the NFL. Ruggs was granted special release privileges to appear at a 'Hope for Prisoners' event, where he reflected on the tragedy and his path forward. Advertisement 'Yes, I would love to [play again],' Ruggs said, via Bryan Horwath of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 'I'm in this newfound spiritual space, and I'm confident in who I am and what I can do, so when the time comes, I'm sure I'll be ready.' On the night of Nov. 2, 2021, Ruggs was driving 156 mph when he rear-ended a Toyota RAV4, causing a fiery crash that killed 23-year-old Tina Tintor and her golden retriever, Max. His blood alcohol level was later revealed to be 0.161, more than twice Nevada's legal limit. The Raiders released Ruggs just hours after the incident. In August 2023, he was sentenced to three to 10 years in prison. He is eligible for parole in August 2026 and has reportedly demonstrated good behavior during his incarceration, improving his chances of early release. If granted parole, Ruggs would be 27 years old, still young enough to realistically compete in the NFL. Former college and NFL teammate Josh Jacobs recently spoke about Ruggs during an appearance on The Pivot Podcast with Ryan Clark. Advertisement 'He's positive about everything. He's training. They let him train and things like that,' Jacobs said. 'I've been talking to some people for him. They've been saying a couple of teams are willing to give him a chance. I'm like, 'When you get that chance, man, you better not ever look back, and prove to yourself and prove to everybody that one decision doesn't define you and who you are as a man.'' Ruggs was selected No. 12 overall by the Raiders in the 2020 NFL Draft and appeared to be on the verge of a breakout second season, including a standout performance against the Pittsburgh Steelers in which he recorded five catches for over 100 yards and a touchdown. Still, parole would only be the first step in Ruggs' long road back to the NFL. He would need to be reinstated by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and could still face league discipline. Any team that considers signing him would also face significant public backlash for taking a chance on a player responsible for a fatal DUI crash. There is precedent for players returning to the league after incarceration. Michael Vick served 18 months in federal prison for his involvement in a dogfighting operation but returned to play several more seasons, including a Pro Bowl campaign with the Philadelphia Eagles and a brief stint with the Steelers. 171110-N-VC599-106 NORFOLK (Nov. 10, 2017) Fox Sports analyst and former NFL quarterback Michael Vick, center, poses with referees during a flag football game held on board Naval Station Norfolk. Fox Sports coverage across the Veterans Day weekend provides the opportunity to showcase for the American people the professionalism and commitment of the men and women of the U.S. Navy. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Justin Wolpert/Released) Ruggs' case, however, involves the loss of human life, raising more complex questions about redemption and accountability. If he is released and proves to be in football shape, it is possible some teams will evaluate his potential. The former Alabama speedster ran a 4.27-second 40-yard dash at the NFL Combine and still possesses elite athletic traits. Advertisement Whether he deserves another chance remains a deeply polarizing issue. But with teams reportedly monitoring his situation and August 2026 drawing closer, a Ruggs resurgence, even in a city like Pittsburgh, may not be as far-fetched as it once seemed. This article originally appeared on Steelers Now: After Years Behind Bars, Henry Ruggs Eyes NFL Comeback Related Headlines
Wall Street Journal
41 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Faces Uphill Climb as Trial Defense Is Set to Begin
After more than five weeks of testimony from some three dozen witnesses, federal prosecutors have offered a mountain of evidence in their sex-trafficking case against Sean 'Diddy' Combs. The hip-hop mogul now faces the tough task of trying to scale it. The drama has played out in a Manhattan courtroom where jurors have been forced to grapple with questions of consent, love, power and abuse. Combs faces five criminal counts, including allegations of sex trafficking. Prosecutors, who could rest their case as soon as Monday, have introduced graphic evidence to show Combs coerced ex-girlfriends into drug-fueled, dayslong sex parties that he called 'freak offs.'
Associated Press
44 minutes ago
- Associated Press
DEA Judge Mulrooney's MMJ Marijuana Ruling May Be DEA's Last Stand Before the Constitution Strikes Back
Judge Mulrooney's decision may have handed MMJ BioPharma Cultivation a defeat inside the DEA's walls, but in doing so, he may have handed MMJ a powerful victory in federal court. The record of constitutional violations and DEA violations is now preserved - the 'Axon-Jarkesy defense' is primed - and the very administrative law judge system the DEA clings to may not survive scrutiny. WASHINGTON, D.C. / ACCESS Newswire / June 22, 2025 / In a move that now appears both unconstitutional and strategically reckless, the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) Chief Administrative Law Judge John J. Mulrooney II has ruled against MMJ BioPharma Cultivation - not by adjudicating evidence, but by canceling the hearing altogether, shutting the courtroom door before any facts could be presented. This denial of due process is not just procedural misconduct. It stands in direct violation of recent Supreme Court precedent - namely, Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC (2023) and Jarkesy v. SEC (2024) - which fundamentally altered the authority of federal agencies to conduct internal administrative hearings shielded from constitutional scrutiny. Why DEA's ALJ System is Constitutionally Cracked In Axon v. FTC, the Supreme Court held that constitutional challenges to federal administrative adjudication systems need not wait until after the agency's internal process is complete. The ruling opened the door for early judicial review - precisely to prevent agencies like the DEA from causing irreparable harm to regulated parties before a federal court can weigh in. Justice Gorsuch put it plainly: 'A proceeding that has already happened cannot be undone.' But that is exactly what happened to MMJ BioPharma Cultivation. Despite spending seven years pursuing a legally sound registration to grow marijuana for FDA-sanctioned clinical trials, MMJ was denied the chance to be heard. Judge Mulrooney ruled - without trial - that the case could be decided on the papers, ignoring contested facts, ignoring ex parte communications concerns, and ignoring the constitutional structure of justice itself. Jarkesy and the Death Knell for DEA's Shadow Court The Supreme Court's decision in Jarkesy v. SEC went even further. The Court ruled that administrative adjudications violate the Constitution on multiple fronts: The DEA's administrative system which allowed Judge Mulrooney to operate unchecked, issue rulings without testimony, and sabotage a life sciences company without judicial oversight - now sits squarely in the crosshairs of both Axon and Jarkesy. MMJ BioPharma Cultivation: The Victim of an Unconstitutional Machine MMJ BioPharma Cultivation is not a fringe operation. It is the only DEA applicant actively pursuing pharmaceutical-grade cannabinoid therapies under FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) protocols, including a manufactured softgel formulation for Huntington's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis. Despite this, Judge Mulrooney's June 2025 ruling canceled a long-scheduled hearing without any opportunity for MMJ to introduce its DEA-compliant facility documentation, binding supply agreements, or evidence of DEA ex parte interference. Even worse, the company was never formally noticed of the pretrial decision - a basic requirement of any fair proceeding. Instead of adjudicating facts, Mulrooney rubber-stamped DEA's bureaucratic inertia. What's Next? The Courts Must Clean Up the DEA's Mess The Supreme Court has been crystal clear: agencies like the DEA do not have unreviewable authority over people's rights, livelihoods, or innovations. Congress did not create 'mini-courts' within executive agencies to bypass the Constitution. Judge Mulrooney's decision may have handed MMJ a defeat inside the DEA's walls, but in doing so, he may have handed MMJ a powerful victory in federal court. The record of constitutional violations is now preserved - the 'Axon Side-Step' is primed - and the very administrative law judge system the DEA clings to may not survive scrutiny. If MMJ's case advances to the D.C. Circuit or even the Supreme Court, it may well be the case that dismantles the DEA's internal adjudication regime once and for all. In the end, the question is no longer whether MMJ BioPharma has been mistreated. The question is whether the DEA's system can survive the Constitution. MMJ is represented by attorney Megan Sheehan. CONTACT: Madison Hisey [email protected] 203-231-8583 SOURCE: MMJ International Holdings press release
