You might think it's Your Friends & Neighbors, but And Just Like That... is the only true aspirational show on TV
Sometime in April a new fantasy dropped: a walk-in wardrobe swish enough for
Jon Hamm
to want to break into it.
Hamm's role as Andrew 'Coop' Cooper, a sacked hedge-fund manager turned neighbourhood burglar, in
Your Friends & Neighbors
has been a rare source of unalloyed television pleasure this year, with each Friday episode notification from
Apple TV+
becoming the starting pistol for the weekend.
Still, forget what I said about wardrobes. This dark comedy with a dash of Dynasty might be set in a fictional 'exclusive hamlet' in New York state, but no one in their right mind would actually want to be one of the neighbours in Your Friends & Neighbors.
They are, as Coop's conspiratorial voiceover tells us, 'assholes'. It makes for a fun blend of soap, satire and farce, but it's not aspirational, not unless you genuinely fancy being in the market for torn jeans that cost more than monthly rent.
READ MORE
The now completed, already renewed nine-parter, created by Jonathan Tropper, instead fits into the recent vogue for depicting the ultrawealthy as venal, ludicrous and unhappy, prompting chicken-and-egg questions about which came first, the money or the grasping personality.
[
Your Friends & Neighbors: Jon Hamm is hilarious in this riotous, satirical romp
Opens in new window
]
To be clear, I loved it. Rich people have very funny problems sometimes. Perhaps their greatest flaw is their desire to hang around only with other rich people, which in Your Friends & Neighbors means going to parties organised by your ex-wife's new boyfriend.
Westmont Village has those eye-popping American proportions going on but is as oppressive as elite enclaves come. Even the 'keeping up with the Joneses' theme-tune refrain is all pressure, no joy. Yes, how nice to have the time to laze about sharing local arrest gossip in a sauna with four other women wearing matching towels, but how claustrophobic, too. And who really wants to be a member of the sort of stultifying country club that won't stick by you when you're charged with murder?
But at least Westmont Village isn't a five-star hotel so suffocating it would put you off the entire concept of holidays. In
The White Lotus
the lifestyles of the rich and tedious have their own hypnotic quality. I certainly felt as if I was being hypnotised into watching the third season's slow depiction of wellness hell.
Never mind the gunfire. It was the forced phone-detoxing and poolside man-pests that were the true horror. That third run reaffirmed my long-held belief that there's never been a massage that hasn't been enlivened by some kind of security emergency.
By the finale I felt sorry for the Thailand tourism authorities, who got such a raw deal compared to Taormina, in Sicily, the HBO show's second-season star.
And that's the essence of this recent fashion for wealth porn. It's not aspirational lives we're watching, it's aspirational scenery. Maybe the more the real world falls apart, the more audiences – and producers – gravitate towards glimpses of picture-postcard unreality.
In Netflix's
Sirens
, for instance, we're presented with an unnervingly pristine shoreline as the camera follows a perky personal assistant skipping up endless flights of beach steps to the Cliff House. This island mansion has a perfectly positioned swimming pool and grounds so enormous you need a buggy to drive around them.
I don't recommend Sirens – it's not so much escapist as a series to escape – though it should be noted that it also possesses some enviably spacious walk-in wardrobe action. To access it, however, you must put up with
Julianne Moore
being creepy for the best part of five episodes. Never work for someone who might suddenly demand you procure a harp.
[
Sirens review: An anaemic White Lotus cover that hits the right notes but has no tune of its own
Opens in new window
]
Speaking of work, it remains gloriously incidental to the only true aspirational show on television: the Sex and the City spin-off
And Just Like That...
Carrie Bradshaw, the never-knowingly-underwardrobed Manhattanite played by
Sarah Jessica Parker
, has rats in her back garden, but her back garden is in a Gramercy Park townhouse, where her new apartment is otherwise shaping up delightfully. Because real estate is no bother to Carrie, she has once again moved on from the rent-controlled studio apartment that Elle Decor has
dubbed
her 'emotional support brownstone'.
[
And Just Like That... Season 3 review: Nostalgia served up like a gift box of premium cupcakes
Opens in new window
]
The women of And Just Like That... occasionally have to contend with woes such as malfunctioning alarms and demanding podcast producers, but they are radically content, in the main, with being rich. They know their money allows them to enjoy everything from eccentric headwear to ballet. They're free.
This seems a good time to revisit remarks made in 2022 by
Candace Bushnell
, the columnist who inspired the original series, about how much she used to be paid.
[
Candace Bushnell at the Ambassador: A fun, girly night out for Sex and the City fans
Opens in new window
]
In the 1990s she received $5,000 a month for writing the People Are Talking About column for Vogue. The New York Observer, home of Sex and the City, 'paid less', but she could afford that because of Vogue. Before these columns she would 'get an assignment for 3,000 words, $2 per word', which she described as 'failing'. Ah. Failure has never sounded so aspirational.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Return-to-office edicts aren't always what they seem
What a busy life Filippo Gori must lead. The JPMorgan banker used to live in Hong Kong, where he headed the Wall Street bank's Asia-Pacific business. He moved to London last year after he was given two big new jobs, co-head of global banking and head of Europe, the Middle East and Africa, or EMEA as it is known in business speak. You might think that move made sense, considering his EMEA responsibilities. But as FT readers learned last week, Gori is about to up sticks again and guess what: he is not going anywhere in Europe, the Middle East or Africa. He is heading to New York. I found this news arresting for several reasons, starting with a dilemma that those of us who are not international bankers rarely need to consider. READ MORE How does one stay across affairs in, say, Lagos, Dubai and London when one wakes up in Manhattan, or whichever bit of New York Gori ends up in? People familiar with the situation have told my colleagues that Gori will spend at least half of his time in EMEA for the rest of this year and will 'continue to be highly visible among employees and clients in the region'. I can believe them. I can also believe Gori will do his best to oblige his boss, Jamie Dimon , a loud critic of remote working practices. In keeping with Dimon's view that such practices sap efficiency, creativity and the development of young people, thousands of JPMorgan employees were this year told to get back to the office five days a week. We must imagine Gori will also be aiming to do this at whichever office he is near on any given day. Alas, not everyone agrees. One popular online reader response to news of Gori's move was this: 'RTO for thee, work from NYC for me.' That may be unfair to Gori. Certainly there is a logic in his global banking role being based out of New York. But one thing is clear: highly valued executives have always been able to negotiate deals that give them more freedom than the average employee. And the average employee is still a big fan of the freedom remote working offers. Add these two facts together and you come up with yet another reason why working from home is far more persistent than one might think from all the headlines about big employers ordering their staff back to the office. For a lot of smaller organisations, it promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people or, put another way, it's easier – especially if you don't run a big Wall Street bank with the market power to take its pick of talented would-be staff. I suspect this helps to explain a puzzle I wrote about at the start of the year: the lack of data showing that return-to-office rules are producing a big fall in remote work. Researchers who have spent years tracking the share of work US employees do at home say rates were well below 10 per cent before Covid pushed them up above 60 per cent. But they have stayed at about 27 per cent since late 2023, with the latest data out this month showing the same figure. So much for my theory that 2025 might be the year remote working rates finally started to fall as tighter in-office rules came into effect at companies such as Amazon and PwC in January, the same month Donald Trump began ordering federal workers back to the office full-time. The data does suggest such orders are increasing, and worker resistance to them may be softening. It shows that 43.5 per cent of people who still work from home reported in June that their employer had issued an RTO mandate in the past six months, up from 39 per cent at the end of last year. And the share of those working at least one day a week from home who said they would comply with such rules rose from 46 per cent at the end of last year to 49 per cent. But this still suggests half of those facing such mandates would be ready to quit or look for another job. And I would bet a lot of them would be even keener to jump ship if they worked for a boss who didn't have to obey the same rules as they did. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
19 hours ago
- Irish Times
This is the moment when we find out just how mad a king Donald is
Maybe the mad king, the other one, wasn't so mad after all. 'George III is Abraham Lincoln compared to Trump,' said Rick Atkinson, who is vivifying the Revolutionary War in his mesmerising histories The British are Coming and The Fate of the Day. The latter, the second book in a planned trilogy, has been on the New York Times bestseller list for six weeks and is being devoured by lawmakers on Capitol Hill. As the 'No Kings' resistance among Democrats bristles, and as President Trump continues to defy limits on executive power, it is instructive to examine comparisons of President Trump to George III. 'George isn't the 'royal brute' that Thomas Paine calls him in Common Sense,' Atkinson told me. 'He's not the 'tyrant' that Jefferson calls him in the Declaration of Independence, and he's not the sinister idiot who runs across the stage in Hamilton every night singing You'll Be Back.' READ MORE ('And when push comes to shove, I will send a fully armed battalion to remind you of my love!') Yes, George III had manic episodes that scared people – depicted in Alan Bennett's The Madness of George III, a play made into a movie with Nigel Hawthorne and Helen Mirren. Palace aides are unnerved when the king's urine turns blue. 'He was in a straitjacket for a while, that's how deranged he was,' Atkinson said. 'His last 10 years were spent at Windsor, basically in a cell. He went blind and deaf. He had long white hair, white beard.' This is a poisonous moment for our country, with Trump unleashing our military on American citizens and letting ICE officers rough up Democratic lawmakers King George was relentless about his runaway child: America. 'He's ruthless,' Atkinson explained, 'because he believes that if the American colonies are permitted to slip away, it will encourage insurrections in Ireland, in Canada, the British Sugar Islands, the West Indies, in India, and it'll be the beginning of the end of the first British empire, which has just been created. And it's not going to happen on his watch.' Unlike Trump, who loves to wallow in gilt and repost king memes and rhapsodise about God's divine plan for him, George III did not flout the rule of law. 'The stereotype of him as an ogre is not historically true,' Atkinson said. 'He's called Farmer George because he's interested in agronomy and writes essays on manure.' The historian added: 'You can dislike him, but he's not a reactionary autocrat. He is very attentive to the requirements imposed on him as a consequence of the reforms in the 17th century, where he must be attentive to both houses of parliament. 'He's a child of the Enlightenment. He is a major supporter of both the arts and the sciences.' He plays the harpsichord and the organ and he's a great patron of the theatre.' (And doesn't try to co-opt it or force people to watch Cats.) Unlike Trump, Atkinson said, George III is not a narcissist: 'He's very committed to the realm, to his family. He marries this obscure, drab German princess, Charlotte, as in Charlottesville, Virginia, and Charlotte, North Carolina. They marry six hours after they meet. She learns to play God Save the King on the harpsichord on the voyage from Germany to England. He has the marriage bedroom decorated with 700 yards of blue damask and large basins of goldfish. 'Because, as you know, nothing says 'I love you' like a bowl of goldfish. He's devoted to her through 15 kids.' Atkinson said the only similarity between the pious monarch and the impious monarch manqué is 'the use of the military against their own people to enforce the king's will. There are incidents, the Boston Massacre, the Boston Tea Party.' He added: 'This proclivity for using armed forces for domestic suppression of dissent. That's a slippery slope in this country. It led to an eight-year war when George did it, and Lord knows where it's going to lead this time.' This is a poisonous moment for our country, with Trump unleashing our military on American citizens and letting ICE officers rough up Democratic lawmakers. He's still posting, madly, about the 2020 election being 'a total FRAUD,' and now he's calling for a special prosecutor to look into it. With the juvenile delinquent Pete Hegseth leading our military, Trump is recklessly jousting with Iran and threatening to assassinate the Iranian leader. The former opponent of forever wars in the Middle East is debating dropping bombs in the Middle East without military provocation against the United States – which did not work out well for us in the past – and dragging us into another unpredictable, interminable war. We find this truth to be self-evident: this is the moment when we find out just how mad a king Donald Trump is. Atkinson concedes he is as mystified as the rest of us by Trump's affinity for 'those who aren't bound by the rules by which we insist our leaders be bound. The fact that we're looking for a monarch to draw parallels to him is telling in and of itself, because that's not what we do. That's what the whole shooting match was about in the 1770s.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
In today's US, saying ‘be careful with crypto' sounds like socialism
Is it wrong to say advisers should be cautious when adding cryptocurrencies to retirement accounts? The Trump administration thinks so. In 2022, US regulators issued guidance urging fiduciaries to exercise 'extreme care' before adding volatile assets such as Bitcoin to retirement plans. Now, that caution has been cast aside, and its rollback is being framed as a win for free markets by the new administration. The Biden administration should have remained neutral, said US secretary of labour Lori Chavez-DeRemer. 'We're rolling back this overreach and making it clear that investment decisions should be made by fiduciaries, not DC bureaucrats.' This stance comes as the president and vice-president actively court crypto fans, appearing at Bitcoin conventions and, in Trump's case, launching a meme coin that briefly surged to a $15 billion market cap over inauguration weekend. READ MORE When the first lady is flogging her own coin, caution doesn't just sound dull: it sounds disloyal, unpatriotic, un-American. Suggesting restraint for retirees used to be common sense. In today's America, it sounds suspiciously like socialism. Even boring financial advice can't escape the culture wars.
