Donald Trump hints at Israel-Iran ceasefire, warns Iran has ‘maximum' two weeks

President Donald Trump on Friday indicated he may support a ceasefire in the ongoing aerial conflict between Israel and Iran, now in its second week, but said it would depend on how events unfold. US President Donald Trump expressed doubt over Europe's ability to mediate the ongoing Israel Iran conflict.(Bloomberg)
Asked by reporters if he would back a truce while diplomatic talks continue, Trump replied, "I might, depending on the circumstances." He also warned that Iran has a limited timeframe to avoid possible U.S. military action. "I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum," Trump said, hinting that a decision could come sooner.
Trump expressed doubt over Europe's ability to mediate the conflict. "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one," he said.
On the same day, Iran's foreign minister held talks with British, French, German, and EU counterparts in Geneva to discuss restarting diplomatic efforts on its nuclear program. European leaders urged Tehran to engage directly with Washington, but the discussions ended without a breakthrough.
When asked whether U.S. ground troops would be required if conflict escalates, Trump said, "Well, I'm not going to talk about ground forces, because the last thing you want to do is ground forces."
The Israel-Iran air war began on June 13, when Israel launched strikes on Iranian territory, claiming the goal was to stop Iran from advancing its nuclear weapons capability. Israel, which is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons, is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iran, which insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, is a member of the NPT and responded with retaliatory strikes.
According to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, Israel's attacks have killed 639 people in Iran. Meanwhile, Israel has reported 24 civilian deaths from Iranian strikes.
Trump and the White House have said a decision on US involvement in the conflict will be made within two weeks. So far, Trump's stance has ranged from promoting a diplomatic resolution to signalling potential military support for Israel, leaving global observers uncertain about the US course of action. Europe joins Tehran talks as two-week clock ticks
President Donald Trump on Friday dismissed the prospects of European diplomacy resolving the Israel-Iran conflict, reiterating that Iran is uninterested in engaging with European leaders. "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this," Trump said upon arriving in Morristown, New Jersey.
He also played down the possibility of urging Israel to pause its military actions, responding to Iran's demand that Israel cease its strikes before Tehran resumes dialogue with Washington. When asked if he would press Israel to halt attacks, Trump said it was "very hard to make that request right now," adding, "If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody's losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens."
Addressing the timeline for a potential US military response, Trump said, "I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum," explaining that the goal was to "see whether or not people come to their senses."
A day earlier, Trump had said he would "make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks" because of a "substantial chance of negotiations" with Iran. That statement was interpreted as opening a short diplomatic window, prompting European leaders to meet with Iran's foreign minister in Geneva. However, Trump said the discussions "didn't help," and his latest remarks suggest he may act sooner if there's no progress on Iran's nuclear programme.
(With inputs from agencies)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

20 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Sonia slams govt's silence on Gaza, Iran, calls it 'surrender of values'

Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi on Saturday strongly criticised India's silence on Israel's devastation in Gaza and Iran as "not just a loss of its voice, but also a surrender of values". In an article - "It is still not too late for India's voice to be heard", she accused the Narendra Modi government of abandoning India's long-standing and principled commitment to a peaceful two-nation solution envisioning an independent Palestine along with Israel. Gandhi, in the article, was also critical of US President Donald Trump for following a "destructive path" in West Asia, after having spoken against America's endless wars. "New Delhi's silence on the devastation in Gaza and now on the unprovoked escalation against Iran reflects a disturbing departure from our moral and diplomatic traditions. This represents not just a loss of voice but also a surrender of values," the Congress leader said in her article in 'The Hindu'. "It is still not too late. India must speak clearly, act responsibly, and use every diplomatic channel available to defuse tensions and promote a return to dialogue in West Asia," Gandhi asserted. She also said that in the face of this humanitarian catastrophe, "the Narendra Modi government has all but abandoned India's long-standing and principled commitment to a peaceful two-state solution, one that envisions a sovereign, independent Palestine living side-by-side with Israel in mutual security and dignity." Sonia Gandhi noted that on June 13, 2025, the world has, once again, "witnessed the dangerous consequences of unilateral militarism when Israel launched a deeply troubling and unlawful strike against Iran and its sovereignty". She said the Indian National Congress has condemned these bombings and targeted assassinations on Iranian soil, which represents a dangerous escalation with grave regional and global consequences. "As with so many of Israel's recent actions, including its brutal and disproportionate campaign in Gaza, this operation was executed with utter disregard for civilian lives and regional stability. These actions will only deepen instability and sow the seeds of further conflict," she noted. Gandhi also alleged that the current Israeli leadership under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, "has a long and unfortunate record of undermining peace and nurturing extremism". She alleged that given the record, "it is not surprising that Netanyahu would choose escalation over engagement". Referring to the US President, she said, Trump's statement of June 17 dismissing its own intelligence chief's assessment and claiming that Iran was "very close" to acquiring nuclear weapons is "deeply disappointing". "The world expects and needs leadership that is grounded in facts and driven by diplomacy, and not by force or falsehoods," she said. Gandhi said Iran has been a long-standing friend to India and is bound to us by deep civilisational ties. "It has a history of steadfast support, including in Jammu and Kashmir at crucial junctures. In 1994, Iran helped block a resolution critical of India at the UN Commission on Human Rights on the Kashmir issue," she noted. "Indeed, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been much more cooperative with India than its predecessor, the Imperial State of Iran, that had tilted towards Pakistan in the 1965 and 1971 wars," she added. Referring to the India-Israel strategic relations in recent decades, she said, "This unique position gives our country the moral responsibility and the diplomatic leverage to act as a bridge for de-escalation and peace." "This is not simply an abstract principle. Lakhs of Indian citizens are living and working across West Asia, which makes peace in the region an issue of vital national interest. "Israel's recent actions against Iran have taken place in an atmosphere of impunity, enabled by near-unconditional support from powerful western nations," Gandhi said. She said while the Indian National Congress unequivocally condemned the "absolutely horrific and totally unacceptable attacks" by Hamas on October 7, 2023, "we cannot remain silent in the face of Israel's catastrophic and disproportionate response. "More than 55,000 Palestinians have lost their lives. Entire families, neighbourhoods, and even hospitals have been obliterated. Gaza stands on the brink of famine, and its civilian population continues to suffer unspeakable hardship," she added. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

The Hindu

25 minutes ago

• The Hindu

Israel-Iran conflict: India to evacuate citizens of Nepal, Sri Lanka from Iran

The Indian Embassy in Iran has said that the embassy will make efforts to evacuate citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka. The embassy noted that the efforts will be made at the request of the Governments of Nepal and Sri Lanka. "On request of the Governments of Nepal and Sri Lanka, the Indian Embassy's evacuation efforts in Iran will also cover Citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka," the Indian Embassy in Iran posted on X. The Union Government has launched Operation Sindhu to evacuate Indian nationals from Iran, given the deteriorating situation as a result of the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel. Israel-Iran conflict LIVE: Diplomatic breakthrough elusive as Israel-Iran war stretches into second week Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) official spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said on Saturday (June 21, 2025) that so far, 517 Indian nationals have returned to India from Iran under Operation Sindhu. Mr. Jaiswal stated that a special flight from Turkmenistan's Ashgabat carrying Indians from Iran arrived in New Delhi on June 21, 2025. In a post on X, Mr. Jaiswal stated, 'Operation Sindhu continues.' 'A special evacuation flight from Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, landed in New Delhi at 03:00 hours on June 21, bringing Indians from Iran home. With this, so far 517 Indian nationals from Iran have returned home under Operation Sindhu.' The conflict between Israel and Iran entered its ninth day on Saturday (June 21, 2025.) The conflict started after Israel, on June 13, launched a massive airstrike on Iranian military and nuclear sites, dubbed "Operation Rising Lion". In response, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched a large-scale drone and missile operation, 'Operation True Promise 3', targeting Israeli fighter jet fuel production facilities and energy supply centres. It is pertinent to note that this is not the first time that the Union Government has launched an operation to evacuate citizens from another country. Earlier in 2023, India launched Operation Kaveri to evacuate its citizens during violent military clashes in Sudan. India had launched Operation Ajay to evacuate Indian nationals from Israel during the Israel-Hamas conflict in 2023. Israel-Iran conflict updates: Trump says two weeks is 'maximum' for Iran decision Operation Ganga was launched by the Union Government in 2022 to evacuate Indian nationals when war erupted between Russia and Ukraine. Earlier in 2021, the Union Government launched Operation Devi Shakti to evacuate Indian citizens from Afghanistan after Taliban takeover. India launched Operation Samudra Seta to evacuate Indians through sea during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. India launched Operation Raahat to evacuate citizens after civil conflict erupted in Yemen in 2015. Earlier in 2011, India launched Operation Safe Homecoming to evacuate Indian nationals during civil war in Arab Spring in Libya.

Time of India

30 minutes ago

• Time of India

Trump wants a Nobel Prize: These four US Presidents including Obama had received it

As U.S. President Donald Trump continues to publicly express frustration over not receiving a Nobel Peace Prize, he has once again pointed to his self-claimed diplomatic successes as proof of deserving the world's most prestigious peace honour. As of date only four US Presidents and one Vice President has been recognised with the honour since its inception. Each of them earned the prize under vastly different historical circumstances, often after significant international consensus and, at times, long-standing public service. Theodore Roosevelt (1906) The first U.S. president to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize was Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. He was honoured for mediating the peace settlement between Russia and Japan through the Treaty of Portsmouth, which ended the 1904–05 Russo-Japanese War. Also Read: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the war between India and Pakistan': Trump does it again Live Events Roosevelt's intervention was significant in halting hostilities in East Asia and marked a turning point in U.S. global diplomacy. Despite the award, critics of the time questioned Roosevelt's broader imperialist policies. Woodrow Wilson (1919) In 1919, President Woodrow Wilson was awarded the Peace Prize for his role in ending World War I and founding the League of Nations, the first global intergovernmental organisation aimed at maintaining peace. Although Wilson's vision helped shape the post-war order, the U.S. Senate refused to ratify the treaty, and the U.S. never joined the League. The prize, presented in 1920, reflected both Wilson's aspirations and the limitations of U.S. isolationism at the time. Jimmy Carter (2002) Former President Jimmy Carter received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002—21 years after leaving office. The Nobel Committee recognised his decades-long work in advancing human rights, promoting democracy, and facilitating peaceful conflict resolution globally. His post-presidency work through Also Read: 6 times in one post- Trump brings up Nobel Peace Prize again and again The Carter Center, including efforts in global disease eradication and free elections, contributed to the honour. Carter had earlier facilitated the 1978 Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel during his presidency. Barack Obama (2009) Barack Obama was awarded the Peace Prize in 2009, less than a year into his presidency. The Nobel Committee cited his 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples' and for promoting nuclear non-proliferation. However, the decision sparked global debate, with critics pointing to his limited record at the time. The prize was seen by many as an encouragement for future action rather than a reward for past achievement. Al Gore (2007) Although not a U.S. president, former Vice President Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, shared with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The prize recognised their joint efforts in raising awareness about global warming and pushing for action against climate change. Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and his international campaigning were central to the award. Trump's case President Trump has been nominated multiple times, for the 2018, 2020, 2021, and 2024 Peace Prizes, for a series of diplomatic moves, including the Abraham Accords , which normalised ties between Israel and several Arab states, and his summit diplomacy with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. In 2025, U.S. Representative Darrell Issa officially nominated Trump for the prize. Trump has repeatedly voiced frustration over not receiving the award. In his latest social media post, Trump said, 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me.' He also referenced his claimed role in preventing a war between India and Pakistan and in easing tensions between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Nile dam. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )