Trump talks of regime change in Iran and insists US ‘obliterated' nuclear sites

Donald Trump raised the prospect of regime change in Iran and defended his claim that its nuclear enrichment sites had been 'totally obliterated' by US strikes over the weekend, insisting it was an 'accurate term' even as a US damage assessment was still underway.
The US president said in a social media post that the sites – which were struck by GBU-57 'bunker buster' bombs and Tomahawk cruise missiles on Saturday night – sustained 'monumental damage', adding: 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!'
Trump also highlighted the possibility of regime change in Tehran if the country's leaders were unable to 'make Iran great again', going further than remarks by his senior officials. Defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the mission 'was not and has not been about regime change' but instead 'a precision operation' targeting Iran's nuclear programme. Vice-president JD Vance said the US was 'not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear programme' while US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the US was 'not looking for war in Iran'.
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said the US strikes revealed Washington was 'behind' Israel's campaign against the Islamic republic and vowed a response.
US defence officials were re still working to determine just how much damage Operation Midnight Hammer did. General Dan Caine, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, said earlier it was not clear whether Iran retained some nuclear capability and he stopped short of using the same language as Trump.
UN nuclear chief Rafael Grossi said: 'At this time, no one, including the [International Atomic Energy Agency], is in a position to assess the underground damage at Fordow.'
Meanwhile, unprecedented attacks continued to send shockwaves through the Middle East and further afield. Airlines sought to help thousands of travellers stranded in the region while countries arranged repatriation flights for citizens. The US Department of Homeland Security issued a terrorism bulletin on Sunday warning of cyber attacks and violence in the US, including antisemitic hate crimes.
It said there were 'no specific credible threats against the homeland' but noted that a 'heightened threat environment across the United States' was expected to last throughout the summer.
Oil prices briefly surged early on Monday amid concerns that Iran might seek to inflict economic pain on the US by closing the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important waterway through which over a fifth of the world's oil supply passes.
Iran's parliament has reportedly approved the closing of the route, although any decision would be made by Iran's supreme national security council, Reuters reported. Rubio sought head off that scenario, telling Fox News on Sunday: 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them [Iran] about that because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil.'
Tehran's next move may be influenced by advice from Russia. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi landed in Moscow early on Monday to discuss 'common threats' with President Vladimir Putin. Earlier, Araqchi warned would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated. 'The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force,' he said.
Amid continuing turmoil, France said on Sunday it would send military aircraft to Israel to fly any of its citizens who wish to leave out to Cyprus. France has 250,000 of its citizens in Israel. A crisis team at the French foreign ministry has received more than 4,500 phone calls in the past week.
On Monday, the first group of Filipinos will be repatriated, mainly from Israel. At least 30,742 Filipinos are living and working in Israel, many of them in the care sector, while 1,180 are living in Iran. A total of 223 Filipino nationals in Israel and eight in Iran have requested repatriation after the weekend strikes, according to local media.
The number of Australian citizens seeking government help to evacuate the Middle East reached 3,800 as of Sunday morning, including 2,600 people in Iran and 1,200 in Israel. Australia said it has sent two defence planes to the region to assist with any civilian evacuations.
Air France KLM said on Sunday that it cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Riyadh on Sunday and Monday. British Airways also cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Doha for Sunday. It was still reviewing the situation, it said in a statement on Sunday evening, when asked about later flights.
The Middle East route has become more important for flights between Europe and Asia in the wake of the Ukraine war.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

12 minutes ago

• The Independent

In the wake of Trump's strikes on Iran, what are Keir Starmer's options?

The choices Keir Starmer makes in the next few days could define his premiership. Tony Blair never escaped the accusation he had been George Bush 's 'poodle' over the invasion of Iraq. And how far the current Labour PM goes in backing another US president in another foreign conflict could help or haunt him for years to come. Despite the prime minister last week repeatedly saying ' de-escalation is the priority ', the Trump administration pressed ahead with strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran overnight on Saturday. The prime is now walking a tightrope between supporting the UK's closest ally and attempting to call for calm. In the wake of the strikes, Sir Keir appeared to give the US his cautious backing – describing Iran's nuclear programme as a 'grave threat to international security'. But he has also issued stark warnings about the conflict escalating beyond the region. As the situation in the Middle East continues to escalate, the prime minister is caught between a rock and a hard place. He is currently sat firmly on the fence - with his most senior ministers refusing to say whether Trump's strikes were either legal or even 'the right thing to do'. And while the US did not ask Britain for help in its first round of strikes, at some point, the prime minister will be forced to make a decision. So what are his options? One option – albeit the most diplomatically tricky – is to withhold support entirely. Sir Keir has spent months trying to build a special relationship with President Trump. Anything less than support for their actions is likely to go down badly in the White House. However, the Attorney General Lord Hermer, a close political ally of Sir Keir, is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies. Lord Hermer is reportedly reluctant to sign off any offensive operations, with a source telling The Spectator: 'The AG has concerns about the UK playing any role in this except for defending our allies.' The weight the Labour leader places on his old friend's legal judgement could limit the extent of any support for the US, if Trump does decide to act militarily. The PM's own background will also play a role in the decision. The energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said on Thursday that he 'who is a lawyer and a human rights lawyer, he will obviously do everything that is in accord with international law.' But will he really risk infuriating President Trump at a time when the Republican's tariffs on goods entering the US have already led economists to downgrade their forecasts for the UK economy? Another option, considered the most likely, is to allow the use of the UK-US airbase at Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. On Saturday, Trump's strikes on Iran were launched directly without the use of the Diego Garcia base. But in future military actions, the US may ask Britain's permission to use the joint airbase in the Chagos archipelago. The type of B-2 stealth bombers which are often based there are the ones that are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which were used in the operation over the weekend. This is a middle ground seen as the most likely option for the UK government to back. It would not require action from the UK, but could protect the relationship with the US by seeming to offer support. He is already under pressure over the issue at home. Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel has said the UK should give permission for the US to use Diego Garcia to launch bunker-buster bombs. One step beyond the Diego Garcia option is to provide logistical support to the US, and what that would look like in practice is being wargamed in Whitehall. The benefit of this option is that it would allow the UK to appear to be more supportive of Present Trump than just simply allowing him to use a US airbase, and at the same time risking only a limited response from Iran. The UK is keen not to allow Tehran a pretext to strike British bases or interests and has sent extra assets to the region, with another six Typhoon jets sent to RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, joining the eight already there. The final option, considered the least likely, is full UK military intervention. Britain is still pushing hard behind the scenes for a de-escalation in the Middle East. The UK's most favoured outcome is a diplomatic solution, in which both sides dial down the aggression. Keir Starmer is also, as a politician, a gradualist and as such is considered less likely than some of his predecessors as prime minister to commit the UK military to support this kind of intervention, even if it is in the aid of one of our key allies, the United States.

Reuters

12 minutes ago

• Reuters

Hague NATO summit aims to focus on Trump's spending goal but Iran looms large

THE HAGUE, June 23 (Reuters) - The NATO alliance has crafted a summit in The Hague this week to shore itself up by satisfying U.S. President Donald Trump with a big new defence spending goal - but it now risks being dominated by the repercussions of his military strikes on Iran. The two-day gathering is also intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united, despite Trump's previous criticism of the alliance, and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Moscow. The summit and its final statement are meant to be short and focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defence - a big jump from the current 2% goal. It is to be achieved by investing more in both militaries and other security-related spending. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, however, upset NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's preparations on Sunday as he declared Madrid did not need to meet the new spending target even as Spain approved the summit statement. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening - rather than a formal session with the leaders when they meet on Wednesday - due to his volatile relationship with Trump. The U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend makes the summit much less predictable than Rutte - a former prime minister of the Netherlands hosting the gathering in his home city - and other NATO member countries would like. Much will depend on the precise situation in the Middle East when the summit takes place - such as whether Iran has retaliated against the U.S. - and whether other NATO leaders address the strikes with Trump or in comments to reporters. If the meeting does not go to plan, NATO risks appearing weak and divided, just as European members confront what they see as their biggest threat since the end of the Cold War - Russia - while bracing for possible U.S. troop cuts on the continent. Under the new defence spending plan, countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on "core defence" - essentially, weapons and troops - and a further 1.5% on security-related investments such as adapting roads, ports and bridges for use by military vehicles, protecting pipelines and deterring cyber-attacks. Such an increase - to be phased in over 10 years - would mean hundreds of billions of dollars more spending on defence. Last year, alliance members collectively spent about 2.6% of NATO GDP on core defence, amounting to about $1.3 trillion, according to NATO estimates. The lion's share came from the United States, which spent almost $818 billion. Washington has insisted it is time for Europeans to take on more of the financial and military burden of defending their continent. European leaders say they have got that message but want an orderly and gradual transition, fearful that any gaps in their defences could be exploited by Putin. They are particularly keen to stress their spending commitment as Trump has previously threatened not to protect allies that do not spend enough on defence. A prepared text summit statement agreed by NATO governments and seen by Reuters says: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty - that an attack on one is an attack on all." As part of their efforts to keep Trump onside, NATO officials have shunted difficult topics to the sidelines of the summit or kept them off the agenda altogether. While many European nations see Russia as an ever-growing threat, Trump has expressed a desire for better economic relations with Moscow - a prospect that Europeans think would help Russia to strengthen its military and threaten them more. Similarly, many Europeans are deeply wary of Trump's moves to lessen Russia's diplomatic isolation as part of his efforts to secure a deal to end the war in Ukraine. The brief summit statement will include just one reference to Russia as a threat to Euro-Atlantic security and another to allies' commitment to supporting Ukraine, diplomats say.

The Sun

12 minutes ago

• The Sun

First vid of Trump's B2s after mammoth 37hr ‘bullseye' Iran blitz… as Russia warns US ‘Pandora's Box has been opened'

Starmer calls for Iran to return to the negotiating table Sir Keir Starmer has warned there is a risk of the Middle East crisis spiralling beyond the region after Donald Trump ordered an attack on Iran's nuclear programme. The Prime Minister spoke to the US President on Sunday night after an air raid by B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles hit Iran's nuclear facilities. Downing Street said the leaders agreed Tehran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and called for Iran to return to negotiations. "The leaders discussed the situation in the Middle East and reiterated the grave risk posed by Iran's nuclear programme to international security," Downing Street said. "They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. "They discussed the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table as soon as possible and to make progress on a lasting settlement. "They agreed to stay in close contact in the coming days." Earlier, Sir Keir - whose previous calls for restraint appear to have been ignored by the American leader - said there was a "risk of escalation", adding: "That's a risk to the region. It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme." The UK was not involved in the US operation but there is the prospect of British forces being dragged into the conflict if Ayatollah Ali Khamenei orders a retaliation.