Lost in the coffee aisle? Navigating the complex buzzwords behind an ‘ethical' bag of beans is easier said than done
You're shopping for a bag of coffee beans at the grocery store. After reading about the effects of climate change and how little farmers make – typically $0.40 per cup – you figure it might be time to change your usual beans and buy something more ethical. Perusing the shelves in the coffee aisle, though, you see too many choices.
First up is the red tub of Folgers '100% Colombian,' a kitchen staple – 'lively with a roasted and rich finish.' On the side of the tub, you see the icon of Juan Valdez with his donkey, Conchita – a fictional mascot representing the Colombian Coffee Growers Federation.
Next might be Starbucks 'Single-Origin Colombia.' One side of the green bag tells 'the story' of the beans, describing 'treacherous dirt roads' to '6,500 feet of elevation' that are 'worth the journey every time.' The other shows a QR code and promises Starbucks is 'Committed to 100% Ethical Coffee Sourcing in partnership with Conservation International.'
Then again, you've heard that a 'better' choice would be to buy from local cafes. The bag from your local roaster introduces you to La Familia Vieira of Huila, Colombia, who have worked as coffee farmers for four generations at 1,600 meters above sea level – about a mile. But then there's a flood of unfamiliar lingo: the 88-point anerobic-processed coffee was sourced directly from an importer who has a six-year relationship with the family, paid $3.70 per pound at farmgate, and $6.10 per pound FOB at a time when the C-market price was $1.60 per pound.
If you're about ready to toss in the towel, you're hardly alone. Consumers are often asked to make more responsible choices. Yet when it comes to commodity goods like coffee, the complex production chain can turn an uncomplicated habit into a complicated decision.
As a coffee enthusiast and marketing professor who researches marketplace justice, I've long been fascinated with how ethics and coffee consumption are intertwined. Before COVID-19, my family adopted a cat and named him Yukro, after a coffee-producing community in Ethiopia. While we were quarantining at home, I ordered Yukro-originating coffee from as many roasters as I could find to try to understand how consumers were supposed to make an informed choice.
Paradoxically, the more information I gleaned, the less I knew how to make a responsible decision. Indeed, prior research has indicated that information overload increases the paradox of choice; this is no different when factoring in ethical information. Additionally, as with a lot of consumer-facing information, it can be difficult to tell what information is relevant or credible.
Marketers attempt to simplify this overload by using buzzwords that sound good but may not get across much nuance. However, you might consider some of these terms when trying to decide between '100% Colombian' and the Vieira family.
As a benchmark, the coffee industry typically uses the 'C-price': the traded price on the New York Intercontinental Exchange for a pound of coffee ready for export. 'Fair trade' implies the coffee is fairly traded, often with the goal of paying farmers minimum prices – and fixed premiums – above the C-price.
There are a few different fair trade certifications, such as Fairtrade America or Fair Trade Certified. Each of these has its own, voluntary certification standards linked with the associated organization. Yet obtaining certification can come at significant additional cost for farms or importers.
In contrast, some importers, or even roasters, have established relationships with specific farms, rather than buying beans at auction on the open market. These relationships potentially allow the importers to work directly with farmers over multi-year periods to improve the coffee quality and conditions. Longer-term commitment can provide farmers more certainty in times when the C-price is below their cost of production.
Yet these arrangements can be just as volatile for farmers if the importers they've committed to cannot find roasters interested in buying their beans – beans they could have sold at auction themselves.
There are several species of coffee, but approximately 70% of the world's production comes from the arabica species, which grows well at higher altitudes. Like with wine, there are several varieties of arabica, and they tend to be a bit sweeter than other species – making arabica the ideal species for satisfying consumers.
In other words, a label like '100% arabica' is meant to signal deliciousness and prestige – though it's about as descriptive as calling a bottle of pinot noir '100% red.'
When it comes to the environment, though, arabica isn't necessarily a win. Many arabica varieties are susceptible to climate change-related conditions such as coffee rust – a common fungus that spreads easily and can devastate farms – or drought.
Other coffee species such as robusta or the less common eugenioides are more climate-change resistant, reducing costs of production for farmers, and are cheaper on commodity markets. However, they have a bit of a different taste profile than what folks are normally used to, which could mean lower earnings for farmers who make the switch, but could also provide new opportunities in areas where coffee was not previously farmed or to new markets of consumers' tastes.
If someone labeled a peach as 'American,' a consumer would rightly wonder where exactly it came from. Similarly, 'single-origin' is a very broad description that could mean the coffee came from 'Africa' or 'Ethiopia' or 'Jimma Zone' – even the zone's specific town of 'Agaro.' 'Single-estate' at least gives slightly more farm-level information, though even this information may be tough to come by.
Consumers have tended to want their coffee's journey from seed to cup to be traceable and transparent, which implies that everyone along the production chain is committed to equity – and 'single-origin' appears to provide those qualities.
As a result, some coffee marketers invest quite a bit in being able to craft a narrative that emotionally resonates with consumers and makes them feel 'connected' to the farm. Others have developed blockchain solutions where each step along the coffee's journey, from bean to retail, is documented in a database that consumers can look at. Since blockchain data are immutable, the information a consumer gets from scanning a QR code on a label of a coffee bag should provide a clear chain of provenance.
Shade-grown labels indicate that farms have adopted a more environmentally sustainable method, using biomatter like dead leaves as natural fertilizer for the coffee shrubs growing beneath a canopy of trees. Unlike other methods, shade-grown coffee doesn't increase deforestation, and it protects habitats for animals like migratory birds – which is why the Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, which has developed its own coffee certification program, calls it 'bird-friendly.'
But as with fair trade, there are costs associated with certification, and those costs are often passed on to consumers. Farmers or importers are left justifying the cost and wondering if the specialized label can attract a large enough market to validate their decision to certify. That said, many farmers who have the ability will do shade-grown regardless, since it's a better farming practice and saves some costs on fertilizer.
In the end, all this information – or lack thereof – is a tool for consumers to use when making their coffee choices. Like any tool, sometimes it's helpful, and sometimes not. These labels might not make your decision any easier, and might drive you right back to your 'usual' bag of beans – but at least your choice can be more nuanced.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Spencer M. Ross, UMass Lowell
Read more:
How a coffee company and a marketing maven brewed up a Passover tradition: A brief history of the Maxwell House Haggadah
What can board games teach students about climate change?
Starbucks fans are steamed: The psychology behind why changes to a rewards program are stirring up anger, even though many will get grande benefits
Spencer M. Ross is a former member of the Specialty Coffee Association (SCA) and has presented seminars twice at SCA events.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
UBS Boosts Hess (HES) Price Target, Keeps Buy Rating
Hess Corporation (NYSE:HES) is one of the 10 Best Oil and Gas Stocks to Buy Now. On June 11, UBS increased its price target on Hess Corporation (NYSE:HES) from $163 to $173 while keeping a 'Buy' rating. UBS analysts raised the price target because of the firm's updated valuation of Hess Corporation's (NYSE:HES) Guyana operations. UBS expects stronger production in Guyana. This outlook is supported by tiebacks and infill drilling, as well as lower operating costs. An oil tanker sailing across the horizon, conveying the importance of crude oil transportation for the company. The firm also noted that Hess Corporation (NYSE:HES) is currently involved in an arbitration process, which is expected to last until late August or September of this year. Additionally, UBS increased its downside case valuation for Hess Corporation (NYSE:HES) to $126 per share. This suggests that there is now less risk of the stock declining. This new assessment relies on the reported discoverable resources of over 11 billion barrels of oil equivalent (Bpoe). The firm believes that if the resources reach 15 Bpoe, the downside potential could be even lower. UBS highlighted that Hess Corporation (NYSE:HES) offers a positive 3.4:1 risk/reward ratio compared to Chevron's price target. The firm believes that Hess Corporation (NYSE:HES) is 'the more levered way to gain upside exposure to CVX.' Hess Corporation (NYSE:HES) is an American global independent energy company that specializes in the exploration and production of oil, gas, and energy solutions. While we acknowledge the potential of HES as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Stocks That Will Bounce Back According To Analysts and 11 Best Stocks Under $15 to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Statkraft to streamline operations, targeting $291m cost cuts and layoffs
Statkraft has announced plans to enhance its core competitive advantages by focusing on its flexible hydropower fleet in the Nordics and on solar, wind and battery ventures across Europe and South America, following a strategic review of its business. The move comes amidst slower progress in energy transition due to heightened global uncertainty, rising costs and declining power prices. The company now aims to build scale, bolster competitiveness and drive value creation by narrowing its focus on select technologies and markets. Statkraft's revised approach prioritises cash flow over volume expansion while simplifying operations to cut costs. The company has set complexity reduction goals, which include slashing payroll and other operating expenses by Nkr2.9bn ($291m) annually by 2027, a 15% decrease relative to predictions for 2025. The specific cost efficiency measures, including redundancies, will be determined during the annual business planning process in the second half of 2025. Statkraft president and CEO Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal stated: 'By concentrating on our core competitive advantages and prioritising investments in near-term profitable opportunities, we will be able to continue our growth and value creation, while contributing significantly to the energy security and energy transition. 'Statkraft needs to adapt to the changing market and increased geopolitical uncertainty. Unfortunately, this also impacts our most important asset: our people. We will do what we can to limit uncertainty and mitigate negative effects on employees.' The company plans to make investments between Nkr16-20bn ($2bn) each year into projects such as large-scale hydropower upgrades in Norway and maintenance of its extensive operational assets. In alignment with announcements made in May 2025, Statkraft will cease new hydrogen project developments. The company will also cease new offshore wind initiatives except for ongoing commitments such as the North Irish Sea Array (NISA) project. Assessments regarding investment positions within solar power sectors, wind farms and batteries in Poland are underway, while development activities in Portugal will be discontinued, although market activities will continue. Although growth rates will be moderated compared with previous projections, solar power and wind power projects will advance in both Europe and South America. These measures will be in addition to the previously announced and ongoing divestment processes, including the district heating and biofuels activities in the Nordics, the development business in Croatia and the Netherlands, and business activities in India. In May 2025, Statkraft agreed to sell its Colombian renewable energy portfolio, Enerfín Colombia, to Ecopetrol, the national oil company of Colombia. "Statkraft to streamline operations, targeting $291m cost cuts and layoffs" was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
3 hours ago
Starbucks testing new protein cold foam, here's what to know
Starbucks announced a new product being developed that taps into the growing consumer obsession with protein-packed diets, this time in the form of foam. The Seattle-based coffee company first shared the news of a protein cold foam innovation earlier this month at its 2025 Leadership Experience conference. The company said it's reimagining its beverage and food offerings to build a more modern and hype-worthy global menu in an effort to resonate with customers. Starbucks introduced its new approach for testing menu items in the U.S. that -- the Starting Five process -- in which it will consider employee and customer feedback before a national launch. Starbucks tests new banana protein cold foam One such relevant health trend-informed products that's quickly drawing online attention from protein and coffee consumers that will be using this test to market model is a new banana protein cold foam. While the protein foam currently being tested contains 15 grams of protein, the company suggested that the beverages may continue to evolve.
