logo
Housing market weakness triggers Lennar to offer biggest incentives since 2009

Housing market weakness triggers Lennar to offer biggest incentives since 2009

Yahoo2 days ago

Want more housing market stories from Lance Lambert's ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter.
Housing market weakness triggers Lennar to offer biggest incentives since 2009
The Trump administration is trying to bring back asbestos
3 tiny behaviors that make you the calmest person in the room
There is a consensus among major publicly traded homebuilders that the spring 2025 housing market—especially in many parts of the Sun Belt, where inventory has climbed above pre-pandemic 2019 levels—was softer than they expected.
While some builders have started focusing more on maintaining margins—and some have slowed their housing starts—Lennar has continued to push forward.
Instead of defending short-term profitability, Lennar—America's second-largest homebuilder—is using this period of housing market softness as an opportunity to capture market share and maintain sales pace through bigger affordability adjustments.
The ResiClub team reviewed Lennar's Monday earnings report and listened in on its Tuesday earnings call.
Here are our top nine takeaways:
According to Lennar, it has observed at least some 'softening' across all its markets this spring. Even its 'strongest' markets have lost some momentum. This aligns with ResiClub's reporting.
'All of the markets we operate in experienced some level of softening [this quarter],' Lennar co-CEO John Jaffe said on the company's June 17 earnings call. 'Even in our strongest performing markets, buyers needed the assistance of incentives. Incentives will vary across the different markets, but primarily in the form of assistance with mortgage rate buy downs.'
Jaffe added: 'The markets that experienced more challenging conditions during the quarter were the Pacific Northwest markets of Seattle and Portland, the Northern California markets of the Bay Area and Sacramento, the Southwestern markets of Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Colorado, and some Eastern markets such as Raleigh, Atlanta, and Jacksonville.'
Lennar's average sales price net of incentives came in at $389,000 in Q2 2025—that's down 8.7% from $426,000 in Q2 2024.
And oh, boy, is Lennar spending a lot on incentives.
In Q2 2025, Lennar spent an average of 13.3% of the final sales price on sales incentives, such as mortgage-rate buydowns. At that incentive rate, a home with a $450,000 sticker price would come with nearly $60,000 in incentives.
According to John Burns Research and Consulting [see its historical chart here], that's the highest incentive level Lennar has offered since 2009—and it's significantly higher than Lennar's cycle low in Q2 2022, when it spent 1.5% of the final sales price on sales incentives.
Earlier this year, Lennar co-CEO Stuart Miller noted: 'These are outsized [incentives] for the moment and normalized incentives should be around 5% to 6%.'
Pretty much: Where and when needed—especially in pockets of Florida, Arizona, Colorado, and Texas, where active inventory has bounced back and buyers have gained leverage—Lennar is cutting net effective prices through larger incentives to find the market and keep sales rolling.
The biggest net price cuts occurred in Lennar's East division—which, while it includes Florida, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, is dominated by operations in the Sunshine State—the epicenter of housing market weakness over the past year.
During the pandemic housing boom, many publicly traded homebuilders achieved record profit margins as home prices soared and buyer demand ran red hot. Once the national housing demand boom fizzled out in the summer of 2022, many large homebuilders made affordability adjustments where and when needed to maintain their sales pace. Despite some profit margin compression, almost every major homebuilder entered 2024 with gross margins still above pre-pandemic 2019 levels.
However, in recent quarters, margin compression has returned—especially for Lennar.
During the company's December 2024 earnings call, Lennar CFO Diane Bessette stated that the company anticipates further margin compression, with gross margins expected to range between 19.0% and 19.25% for Q1 2025.
Lennar's Q1 2025 gross margin ended up being 18.7%, and its Q2 2025 gross margin on home sales came in on June 16 at 17.8%.
On the June 17 earnings call, Miller said he expects Lennar's gross margin to be 18.0% in Q3 2025.
As highlighted above, amid the softening market, Lennar has chosen to maintain sales pace over margin. Among the big builders, it has been the most aggressive on that front. It's now spending 13.3% of final sales price on incentives—and doing some of the biggest net effective price cuts in the Sun Belt—in order to keep sales up.
'We are not there yet, but we are certain that we are finding a floor with margin and getting close to building it back even in a softer housing market environment,' Miller said on the June 17 call. 'As the current market softness unfolded, we focused on consistent [sales] volume by matching our production pace with our sales pace.'
Miller added: 'Although some have questioned why we have maintained volume rather than protect our margin, we are very clear and steadfast on our strategy. Historically, we protected margin as market conditions stalled, and we generally led the way in protecting short-term profitability. But we learned through those times that once we step backwards and lose momentum, it becomes increasingly more and more difficult to restart and recapture volume. The machine slows and does not restart easily. We have concluded that by maintaining volume, we can create new efficiencies and new solutions that are durable for the future and will result in meaningful long-term efficiencies in our cost structure.'
Lennar's Q2 2025 division-level performance was relatively steady once you account for its February 10 acquisition of Rausch Coleman Homes, which largely explains the sharp year-over-year jump in the South Central division.
The Western division was a bit softer, reflecting broader cooling trends across many Western housing markets over the past six months. In contrast, Lennar saw a bit more growth in its Eastern division, particularly in Florida. Why? It's likely that Lennar's earlier and more aggressive discounting in Florida is now paying off, attracting buyers who are still encountering resale sellers resisting the shifted pricing environment in their local neighborhoods.
'With respect to the question regarding tariffs, consistent with our commentary last quarter, we have had no impact to date on our costs from tariffs,' Lennar's Jaffe said on the earnings call. 'We work closely with the supply chain to prepare for alternative sourcing if it becomes necessary as well as the expectation that our trade partners will work with us to mitigate and offset cost impacts should they present themselves.'
'Initially, many in the housing market held on to the hope that higher interest rates were temporary, expecting inflation to subside and rates to drift back to lower levels. However, this expectation has not materialized,' Miller said on the June 17 call. 'Looking ahead, there's little evidence to support expectations of materially lower interest rates in the near term. As a result, elevated interest rates have solidified as the new normal. The environment is about recognizing that short supply is keeping prices higher and that only lower prices enabled by lower cost structures will define affordability.'
This post originally appeared at fastcompany.comSubscribe to get the Fast Company newsletter: http://fastcompany.com/newsletters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices jump as market awaits Iran response to attacks
Oil prices jump as market awaits Iran response to attacks

Politico

time16 minutes ago

  • Politico

Oil prices jump as market awaits Iran response to attacks

Oil prices surged Sunday evening to the highest levels since President Donald Trump returned to office as energy markets digested the U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities — and the risk that Tehran may try to disrupt the flow of crude oil out of the Middle East. U.S. crude oil futures rallied more than 6 percent to peak at $78 a barrel, more than $1 higher than the price on Jan. 20 when Trump was inaugurated. That jump is likely to filter through to gasoline prices just as drivers prepare to hit the road for the long July 4th weekend next week. Trump had campaigned on promises to lower consumer energy prices as part of his 'energy dominance' agenda, but the current average pump price of nearly $3.22 a gallon for regular gasoline is about 10 cents above the price when he was inaugurated — and likely to climb this week. How much higher oil prices might go now depends on how Tehran responds to the attacks. Iran's parliament's voted to close the Strait Of Hormuz, the narrow waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf where a quarter of the world's seaborne oil passes, but only an appointee of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei can make that determination. Even if that were to happen, the impact on the oil market would depend on whether Iran and its allies are satisfied harassing the oil tankers traversing Hormuz or resort to a full-scale campaign to block traffic altogether. Reports that the White House gave Iran a head's up on the bombings and said there wouldn't be more to follow suggests the Trump administration is trying to avoid a full-scale war — and helping to keep oil prices in check. Energy analysts have said a disruption in the shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz could send oil prices above $100 a barrel. 'This choreography underscores that both sides want to calibrate this crisis, not lose control of it,' said Scott Modell, chief executive officer at energy and geopolitics analysis firm Rapidan Energy Group. 'We expect Iran's response to be stage-managed: think harassment of commercial shipping, symbolic seizures of tankers, and limited rocket fire on US military outposts — but not a full-scale campaign to choke energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz.' Some market analysts are confident that even if the fighting does escalate, the United States, OPEC countries such as Saudi Arabia and other suppliers will have enough product to meet demand. But others are warning that a price increase may have only just begun. 'True, these oil market dynamics indicate that investors have incorporated a greater risk premium to account for the increased probability of an oil supply shock,' BCA Research analyst Roukaya Ibrahim said in a note. 'Yet the more important question is whether this pricing adequately reflects the level of risk. Our sense is that crude price pressures will remain tilted to the upside over the near term.'

Wealthy business-owning Trumpers are clashing with MAGA purists over who should get deported
Wealthy business-owning Trumpers are clashing with MAGA purists over who should get deported

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wealthy business-owning Trumpers are clashing with MAGA purists over who should get deported

What's behind President Donald Trump's flip-flop on raiding farms, hotels, and restaurants for immigrant workers? In a repeat of the conflict over H-1B visas, Trump-supporting businesses that rely on immigrant labor are clashing with MAGA purists who see deportation as a key strategy to get higher-paying jobs for Americans. The Trump administration's hardline immigration enforcement is careening headlong into pressure from business owners who stand to lose huge portions of their workforces if President Donald Trump fulfills his campaign promise of deporting millions of immigrants. The deportation crackdown might even be impossible to pull off without undermining the U.S. economy. A series of high-profile raids earlier this month have put a chill on the agriculture sector, with employees now terrified to show up for work, leaving cows unmilked and crops unpicked, Bloomberg reported. Trump has cited complaints from farmers and hoteliers that ICE raids were 'taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' according to a Truth Social post that presaged a brief pause in enforcement for those industries. The reprieve lasted barely a day, though, with Trump vowing to double down on immigration raids, with an emphasis on Democratic-controlled states and worksites. In a Truth Social post, Trump decreed ICE officers 'to do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History,' including 'expand[ing] efforts to detain and deport Illegal Aliens in America's largest Cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside.' The following day an email went out directing ICE to continue raids at food and agriculture businesses. The sudden and complete reversal highlights a fundamental schism within the party of Trump: Wealthy hotel, hospitality, and agriculture executives and business owners have complained to Trump about losing a reliable workforce. But the MAGA base and immigration hardliners see the most stringent immigration enforcement policies as a core promise of the Trump campaign. The conflict between the two factions is playing out in real time as workers fear for their jobs and relatives while business leaders—many of whom believed that promised ICE raids would focus on criminals and gang members rather than law-abiding workers—watch their revenue streams go up in smoke. 'Fear is really the common thread,' said Emily Knight, president and CEO of the Texas Restaurant Association, a trade group that advocates for the restaurant industry in Texas, which employs 1.4 million workers. 'The fear is not only the workforce not coming but customers staying home, and what that economic reality is.' Foot traffic to restaurants has been dropping since Trump's inauguration, with a particularly steep drop in heavily Mexican areas, according to data the TRA shared with Fortune. 'It's a ridiculous fantasy that somehow you can deport the immigrants that are doing the work of this country and not blow up this economy,' said Ted Pappageorge, head of the Culinary Workers Union Local 226, which represents 60,000 hotel and hospitality workers in Las Vegas at hotels, restaurants and casinos. The group represents a vastly diverse membership with immigrants from some 170 countries. Pappageorge noted that recent rapid-fire policy changes, such as revoking Temporary Protected Status for migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, quickly turned 'legal' workers into 'illegal ones.' The change affected 'thousands of workers in the state of Nevada, hundreds on the [Las Vegas] Strip,' he said. 'They had permission; were law-abiding, going to work every day and powering this economy—they had their status revoked.' 'Guns pointed at cows' Immigrants, many without legal status, work throughout the food chain. One in five food production workers—a 22-million-strong chain that stretches from fields to meatpacking plants to restaurants and supermarkets—is an immigrant, according to the Migration Policy Institute and the National Restaurant Association. In some niches, like the dairy industry, more than half the 160,000-strong workforce is foreign-born. It was a videotaped ICE raid on a New Mexico dairy that reportedly changed the president's mind. A routine check on June 3 escalated, and half the farmer's workforce was arrested and ICE enforcers 'even came into milking parlors with guns out pointed at cows,' Beverly Idsinga, executive director of Dairy Producers of New Mexico, told reporters this week. The dairy owner went from 50 employees to 24 employees overnight, she said. 'He's getting high school students on break; he's stopping his farming operations,' Idsinga said. Notably, following this raid and other high-profile clashes including at a popular San Diego Italian restaurant, GOP members of Congress raised concerns to Trump. Rep. David Valadao, who represents California's Central Valley, an agricultural powerhouse that produces 25% of the nation's crops and is known for its almonds, peaches, olive oil, and grapes, said on X the administration should 'prioritize the removal of known criminals over the hardworking people who have lived peacefully in the Valley for years.' 'They need to knock it off,' House Agriculture Chair G.T. Thompson, of Pennsylvania, told reporters of the administration's targeting of the food sector. 'Let's go after the criminals and give us time to put processes in place so we don't disrupt the food supply chain.' Andy Harris, the Maryland Republican who chairs the highly influential conservative House Freedom Caucus, told reporters Tuesday he supported expanding legal visas for immigrant workers, including possibly creating a new category. 'With an unemployment rate of 4% you're not going to find American workers for a lot of these tasks. You haven't found them even when the unemployment rate was higher,' Harris said. Harris was speaking at a press conference held by the American Business Immigration Coalition, which is pushing Congress to create a new type of long-term work visa for immigrants. That desire runs counter to the policies of Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump's immigration crackdown, who has been widely described as an ideological purist. According to the Wall Street Journal and Washington Examiner, an impatient Miller urged top ICE officials to 'do more' and, rather than targeting criminals, show up at Home Depot and 7-Eleven and round up people waiting for work. Miller later nearly doubled the administration's arrest target to 3,000 arrests a day. The labor is the point For a sizable contingent of Trump's base, getting rid foreign labor is precisely the point. ' Our position is there should be no carveouts for anyone,' said Ira Mehlman, a spokesperson for the conservative Federation for American Immigration Reform, which advocates for restricting immigration. For FAIR, there is a simple solution to industries who say they can't attract domestic workers: Raise pay. 'You can turn any job in this country into a job an American won't do simply by degrading wages and working conditions. We shouldn't do that,' Mehlman told Fortune. 'Even in lower-skilled jobs, there are a lot of people looking for work at wages that can support their families. We should hold the employer accountable.' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, also came out against the carve-out, posting a poll on X indicating a majority of respondents disagreeing with the brief enforcement pause and retweeting a farm touting its citizens-only hiring policy. And rightwing commentator Matt Walsh posted, 'Employers who knowingly rely on illegal immigrant labor should be in prison. Instead we're going to back off of immigration enforcement for their sake? Hell no. We can't tolerate this.' Asked for clarification on the administration's enforcement policy, Department of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement to Fortune: 'The President has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts.' 'Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safeguard public safety, national security and economic stability. These operations target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation,' she said. What will employers do? What most observers agree on is this: Achieving the stated goal of 3,000 immigration arrests per day is near-impossible without sweeping up people whose only crime consists of unlawfully entering the U.S. The full impact of these sweeps, however, remains to be seen. A Nebraska meatpacking plant that lost 76 employees to the state's largest workplace raid to date has since been inundated with applications for the newly opened positions, NBC reported. And the optics of using a heavy militarized force to arrest low-level workers are turning off a large portion of Americans, according to Pappageorge. 'When you bring the Marines in to arrest dishwashers and cooks and farmworkers it's going to create a backlash—–not just in the industry but among citizens,' he said. Employers bear a large part of the responsibility for the 'broken immigration system,' he added. 'The employers need to come to the table with the labor movement and the Democrats and Republicans that represent these massive industries,' he said. It's uncertain that will happen—at least not in the way MAGA envisions. The last time MAGA clashed with Trump's business supporters it was over H-1B visas, which allow highly skilled immigrants to be hired in the U.S.—at the cost, according to critics, of undermining Americans' wages. Trump, after having decried H-1B visas during the campaign, sided with business in that fight.

NATO to increase defense spending to Cold War levels
NATO to increase defense spending to Cold War levels

UPI

time19 minutes ago

  • UPI

NATO to increase defense spending to Cold War levels

June 22 (UPI) -- Britain and its NATO allies will increase defense spending by at much as 5% of GDP in the next decade, officials have announced. The alliance's 32 member states agreed to the plan in advance of a heads of nations summit this week in The Hague. The meeting is scheduled to take place Tuesday and Wednesday, where the new spending increase is expected to be approved. This is a boost from 2% of defense spending, and seen as a play to appease the Trump administration in addition to addressing a growing military threat from Russia and China. The hike to 5% of GDP spending would bring NATO back to defense spending not seen since the Cold War. By comparison, Britain has said it has plans to increase that nation's defense spending by closer to 3% by 2034, which would be a boost of .7%. Britain was hesitant about the 5% agreed to be NATO and pushed for the timeline to 2035, which would move the increase beyond the next Parliament. Spain was the last country to sign on to the NATO deal. NATO secretary Mark Rutte was largely seen as the driving force behind the spending hike, and said the actual defense spending would amount to 3.5% of GDP and that the other 1.5% could be used for cyber security and other infrastructure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store