Frogan removes all twitch videos and clips amid viral legal dispute with Ethan Klein

(Image via YouTube/@EthanKleinH3/@frogan)
In a surprising turn of events, Twitch streamer Frogan appears to have wiped her entire video archive following a lawsuit filed by YouTuber Ethan Klein. The sudden move comes in the wake of Klein's legal action against three creators, accusing them of copyright infringement linked to his viral 'Content Nuke' video.
What Sparked the Lawsuit?
On June 19, Ethan Klein publicly confirmed he is suing three Twitch streamers—Frogan, Kaceytron, and Denims—for what he claims is blatant copyright infringement.
At the center of the dispute is Klein's "Content Nuke" video, a critical breakdown of fellow creator HasanAbi. Klein alleges that the streamers used his video without proper commentary or transformation, violating fair use laws.
Frogan, a political content creator known for her sharp takes and Twitch debates, was specifically called out by Klein for offering minimal input during her reaction streams.
He also accused her of encouraging viewers to 'watch through her,' implying a deliberate attempt to divert traffic away from the original video.
Frogan Reportedly Deleted All of Her Twitch Clips
Shortly after the lawsuit became public knowledge, Frogan's Twitch channel underwent a drastic transformation. Viewers noticed that nearly all of her past VODs and clips had vanished.
The only piece of content left standing was a now-viral clip of AI HasanAbi telling Frogan her therapy sessions weren't working—an odd remnant amidst the digital purge.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Cardiologists Shocked: 1 Spoonful a Day Melts Lower Belly Fat Fast
Hollywood News | USA
Click Here
Undo
Frogan hasn't issued a formal statement addressing the lawsuit or her decision to delete her content. Her silence stands in contrast to fellow defendant Denims, who has launched a crowdfunding campaign to help cover legal fees.
Ethan Klein is Suing EVERYONE
Ethan Klein's Case Against Frogan
Klein didn't hold back when explaining why Frogan is among the specific individuals targeted in his legal action.
In a recent video, he highlighted a moment where Frogan left his video running while stepping out of frame, adding no commentary or value to the original work.
He argued that such behavior fails the 'transformative' test required for fair use protection.
He also mentioned that Frogan's own viewers criticized her lack of engagement during the stream. For Klein, the final straw came when Frogan allegedly encouraged others to view his content 'through her,' framing it as ethical consumption.
According to him, this move indicated an intentional effort to divert viewership, what he calls 'malicious intent to steal.'
What's Next?
With over 66,000 followers and an average of nearly 100 viewers per stream, Frogan's Twitch career is now under intense scrutiny.
Whether her mass deletion was legal damage control or an emotional response remains unknown. For now, her content void speaks louder than any tweet.
Ethan Klein's legal claims are likely to ignite broader discussions around the ethics of 'react content,' fair use, and where creators should draw the line. And while some fans stand divided, one thing's for sure—the drama's far from over.
Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

11 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Flying Beast freezes as he simulates Air India Flight 171 crash: ‘All you can do is watch the ground come at you'

YouTuber Gaurav Taneja, aka Flying Beast, suggested that overloading might be one of the reasons behind the recent Air India Flight 171 crash in Ahmedabad, which claimed the lives of 270 people. In a new video posted on his YouTube channel, which has nearly 10 million subscribers, he simulated the crash under different settings, and debunked several theories around it. At first, he had suggested that a dual engine failure could be the only reason behind a Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashing in the manner that Flight 171 did. In the new video, he seemed to point in the direction of pilot error, combined with several other issues. Carrying out further analysis of the dual engine failure theory, he conducted a simulation. 'I was fixated on this reason until today evening. In the sim, everything was falling into place. After takeoff, we killed both engines at 100 feet,' he said, adding that he made the aircraft 'a little heavy'. He said, 'Usually, this aircraft is 62 tonnes, but considering that it was a long flight to London, I've made it 70 tonnes.' After conducting the first simulation, he said, 'It was scary. I froze. There was nothing that you could do. What could you do? All you can do is pray and watch the ground come at you.' Also read – Gaurav Taneja, aka Flying Beast, reveals 'every flight has snags' but airlines have 'habit' of ignoring safety issues Citing the video of the crash, he said that the aircraft's nose seemed to tilt up in the moments ahead of the crash, which suggests that the pilot made a last-ditch effort to pull up. 'It's very scary. You have 10 seconds, basically. You can do nothing. You pull the nose up to avoid a heavy impact, and perhaps save a few lives on the ground. It fell like a rock on the ground,' he said. He conducted another simulation with an even heavier aircraft, and discovered that, like Flight 171, it didn't take off at the normal stage. 'I was terrified, I could see the runway about to end. 'Because of the late liftoff, the pilots' were too distracted to pull the landing gear up,' he speculated. In the same video, Taneja suggested that the pilots aboard the aircraft might've been startled when the first engine failed during takeoff, and were left with no choice but to proceed because the engine failure happened after the point of no return on the runway. Once the aircraft was airborne, they mistakenly killed the second engine, and forgot to pull the landing gear up. Previously, Taneja had defended the pilots against any criticism, saying that they are the easiest people to blame in such events, because they aren't around to defend themselves. He has also said that both engines of a Boeing 787 failing is practically unheard of. He said, 'They were distracted. They were supposed to pull up the landing gear at around 100 feet. Now, listen carefully. They climbed for 100-150 feet with a damaged engine, and forgot to pull the landing gear up. In the Boeing 787, pilots are required to follow 'memory items' in the event of an engine failure. When they hit 400 feet, the pilot 'flying' pulled the thrust idle switch for the faulty engine, and the pilot 'monitoring' pulled the fuel control switch off for the wrong engine… One engine was damaged on the ground, the other engine they killed themselves.' In the wake of several flight cancellations following the Flight 171 disaster on June 12, Taneja praised pilots for putting their foot down and refusing to fly potentially unsafe machines. On Saturday, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) ordered immediate action against three senior Air India officials following 'serious and repeated violations,' the Hindustan Times reported.

Time of India

17 minutes ago

• Time of India

NYT Strands Hints and Answers Today: Solutions of puzzle #475 for June 21, 2025 and simple tips to play the game

Each NYT Strands puzzle comes with a theme and a hidden Spangram. On June 21, 2025, the puzzle uses terms linked to zero. This guide breaks down the structure of the game, shares helpful solving tips, and reveals today's complete solution, including the Spangram and all theme-related words. Theme for June 21 Strands The theme of today's puzzle is 'Goose eggs.' This phrase represents the idea of nothing or a value of zero. All the theme words relate to this concept. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Average Price of a 6-Hour Gutter Guards Upgrade Read More Undo Clues or Hints If you need help solving today's puzzle, the following hints can help: Hint #1: An informal word used to describe zero. Hint #2: A Yiddish term for something worthless. Live Events These hints focus on the idea of emptiness or a lack of value. Spangram Direction and Hint The Spangram for June 21 is mostly vertical. It begins with the letters 'DI.' The hint for the Spangram: A slang term in the US that means 'a small worthless amount.' Today's Spangram Revealed The Spangram for June 21, 2025, is DiddlySquat . This long word links to the theme of zero or nothing. It spans across the grid, helping identify other words. Full List of Theme Words The puzzle contains several theme words, all of which point to the idea of nothing: NADA ZERO NOTHING ZILCH NAUGHT ZIPPO BUPKIS These words align with the puzzle's theme and complete the board. How the NYT Strands Puzzle Works? Strands is a daily word game by The New York Times. It involves linking letters in a 6x8 grid to form words based on a given theme. Players must find theme words and a special word called the Spangram. This spans the board and relates directly to the theme. Solving the Spangram often helps in solving other clues. What Makes the Spangram Important Each puzzle contains one Spangram. This is a key word or phrase that crosses the grid and explains the theme. It may start or end at any point, not just the edges. The Spangram simplifies the puzzle by acting as a central idea. Once found, other theme words become easier to spot. Simple Tips for Playing Better Here are some tips to improve your solving: Start from the corners of the grid. Use hints early if you feel stuck. Think about both direct and hidden meanings. Try to solve the Spangram early. These steps can improve your success rate in solving the puzzle. FAQs What is the Spangram in NYT Strands on June 21, 2025? The Spangram for today is DiddlySquat, which means something that has little or no value. How do theme words relate to the puzzle's topic? Each theme word is connected to the idea of 'nothing' or 'zero,' which matches the 'Goose eggs' theme.

News18

18 minutes ago

• News18

Vivah Actor Lataa Saberwal Confirms Separation From Husband Sanjeev Seth, Requests Privacy

Last Updated: Actor Lataa Saberwal confirmed her separation from husband-actor Sanjeev Seth on Instagram, requesting privacy. Fans expressed shock at the news. Actor Lataa Saberwal, known for her work in Vivah and several hit daily soaps, have officially confirmed her separation from husband, Sanjeev Seth, who has worked in shows such as Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai. Taking to Instagram, she dropped an official post, updating her well-wishers about her life. She also urged everyone to respect her family's peace and privacy. Against a black background, Lataa Saberwal posted a written statement confirming her separation after 15 years of marriage. She thanked her estranged husband for 'giving her a lovely son". Her note began with the words, 'After a prolonged silence….". She continued, 'I declare that I (Lataa Saberwal) have been separated from my husband (Mr. Sanjeev Seth). I give gratitude to him for giving me a lovely son. I wish him all the best for his future life. I request everyone to please respect my and my family's peace and not to ask any questions or call regarding this. GRATITUDE #lataasaberwal (sic)." Fans expressed their shock at the announcement. 'What ?????? They were so good together. I used to watch their insta … family vlogs. What's happening these days . So many break ups," wrote a disheartened user. 'U looked so happy together in ur videos… All the best to you for ur future," posted another. Others wrote, 'After hearing this felt so bad, u both were idol couple for us, May god bless both, be happy always", 'Why ?????????", 'That's very sad I respect your decision. Me n my best wishes with you forever." When did Lataa Saberwal and Sanjeev Seth get married? Lataa Saberwal and Sanjeev Seth met on the sets of Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai and fell in love. They got married in 2010. She would often feature her husband, Sanjeev, on her YouTube videos where she enjoys a follower count of over 1 million. In her statement, the actor avoided sharing a reason behind their decision to separate. They had even participated together as a couple in Nach Baliye 6. Sanjeev was previously married to popular actor Resham Tipnis. What shows have Lataa Saberwal and Sanjeev Seth worked in? For the unversed, Sanjeev is a popular television actor himself. He has been a part of shows such as C.I.D., Zee Horror Show, Astitva…Ek Prem Kahani, Karishma Kaa Karishma, Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke and Junaid Khan's Maharaj. As for Lataa, she has worked in shows such as Kehta Hai Dil, Shaka Laka Boom Boom, Woh Rehne Waali Mehlon Ki, Main Teri Parchhain Hoon and Devi. She is also known for playing Hina Khan's mother, Rajshri Maheshwari, on Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, the same show her husband was a part of. In 2021, she announced her decision to quit daily soaps. She is now an active vlogger. First Published: