Andhra Pradesh raises maximum working hours from 9 to 10 to boost investment
The Andhra Pradesh government, led by the TDP-NDA alliance, has increased daily working hours from nine to ten to attract investors and ease business regulations. Amendments to labor laws include extending overtime limits and relaxing night shift rules for women with added safety measures.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The TDP-led NDA government in Andhra Pradesh has decided to raise the maximum working hours from nine to 10 per day as part of ease of doing business and attracting investors.The Information and Public Relations (I&PR) Minister K Parthasarathy said that it has been decided to amend labour laws to make them 'favourable' to workers and investors.CPI state secretary K Ramakrishna criticised the move and said NDA governments at the Centre and state are pursuing 'anti worker' policies."Relevant sections of laws which allow maximum nine hours of work a day has now been raised to 10 hours per day. Under Section 55 there used to be one hour rest for five hours (work) now that has been changed to six hours," said Parthasarathy recently, elaborating on the decisions made by the cabinet to amend labour laws.Earlier, Parthasarathy noted that overtime was allowed only up to 75 hours which now has been extended up to 144 hours per quarter."Because of this (amendments to labour laws), investors in factories will (come to our state). These labour rules will be favourable for labourers and they will come to invest more. Globalisation is happening in every state. These amendments were brought to implement global rules," said Parthasarathy.Further, the minister observed that the cabinet has also relaxed night shift rules to enable more women to work in the night shifts.According to the I&PR Minister, women were not allowed to work in the night shifts earlier but now they can work with safeguards such as consent, transport facility, security and surveillance.He said the workplace of women during night shifts should be fully illuminated."When you work extra, income will increase. By these rules women can work in the formal sector. They empower women economically and promote gender inclusion and industrial growth. Also contribute to women's empowerment," he said.Meanwhile, K Ramakrishna, State Secretary of CPI, opposed the NDA alliance government's stand on labour laws amendments. He alleged that the Central and state governments are working against the interests of workers."For the past 11 years, the Modi government has repeatedly taken measures that infringe upon workers' rights in India," Ramakrishan told PTI on Saturday.To oppose these rules, he said trade unions have decided to protest on July 9 all over India, adding that all sections will participate in this protest actively.Further, he observed that the NDA governments both at the Centre and in the state are pursuing 'anti-worker policies'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk faces pushback as Texas lawmakers urge delay of Tesla robotaxi launch
Elon Musk 's ambitious plans to launch Tesla 's robotaxi service in Austin this month have hit political resistance. A group of Democratic lawmakers from the Austin area has formally requested the company to delay the rollout until September, when new autonomous vehicle regulations are set to take effect in Texas. The lawmakers argue that waiting for the legislation to kick in would better serve public safety and help build trust in Tesla's self-driving technology . While Musk hinted at a tentative launch this Sunday, the lack of details has raised concerns about oversight and preparedness. Lawmakers cite safety and public trust concerns In a letter sent to Tesla on Wednesday, the group of Austin-based Democratic lawmakers urged the company to hold off until the new autonomous vehicle law comes into effect. They warned that an early launch could undermine public trust and compromise safety, especially without clear protocols in place. They asked Tesla to provide a detailed explanation of how it intends to comply with the upcoming legislation if it proceeds with the rollout as planned. What the new Texas law entails Currently, Texas allows autonomous vehicles to operate statewide, provided they meet basic registration and insurance requirements. The new law passed by the legislature which is expected to take effect in September, will require companies like Tesla to seek formal authorisation before launching driverless services . The law also grants state authorities the power to revoke permits if the vehicles are deemed a public danger, and mandates companies to provide emergency guidance for police and first responders. Tesla's quiet approach about the launch Tesla and Musk have so far offered limited details about the Austin robotaxi launch. Musk said it would begin with 10 to 20 Model Y vehicles operating in 'the safest' parts of the city, but has not revealed who the initial riders would be, how the service would be priced, or how remote monitoring would be handled. This opacity has added to the lawmakers' concerns and fuelled debate over whether the rollout is premature. High stakes for Tesla's future Musk has placed the future of Tesla heavily on its autonomous driving technologies, shifting focus from traditional EV sales to robotaxis and humanoid robots. Investors and analysts view the upcoming robotaxi rollout in Austin as a crucial step. The pushback from lawmakers, however, highlights the regulatory hurdles that could slow Tesla's momentum in a space already fraught with scrutiny. Will Tesla comply or proceed? It remains uncertain how Tesla will respond. While the lawmakers' letter carries political weight in Austin, Texas is a Republican-led state, and the new law has yet to be signed by the governor. Whether Tesla proceeds with the launch or chooses to delay voluntarily could shape both its public image and regulatory relationships moving forward.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US Supreme Court races to wrap up 10 key cases, including birthright citizenship
The Supreme Court is in the homestretch of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump administration's emergency appeals of lower court orders seeking to slow President Donald Trump 's efforts to remake the federal government. But the justices also have 10 cases to resolve that were argued between December and mid-May. One of the argued cases was an emergency appeal, the administration's bid to be allowed to enforce Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to US-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The court typically aims to finish its work by the end of June. On Wednesday it decided one of its most closely watched cases, handing down an opinion that upheld a Tennessee ban on some healthcare for transgender minors. Here are some of the biggest remaining cases: (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Trump's birthright citizenship order has been blocked by lower courts The court rarely hears arguments over emergency appeals, but it took up the administration's plea to narrow orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the US. Live Events The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. ALSO READ: Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students At arguments last month, the court seemed intent on keeping a block on the citizenship restrictions while still looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. It was not clear what such a decision might look like, but a majority of the court expressed concerns about what would happen if the administration were allowed, even temporarily, to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally. Democratic-led states, immigrants and rights groups who sued over Trump's executive order argued that it would upset the settled understanding of birthright citizenship that has existed for more than 125 years. The court seems likely to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. ALSO READ: DHS sets strict limits on lawmaker visits to immigration detention centers The school district introduced the storybooks in 2022, with such titles as "Prince and Knight" and "Uncle Bobby's Wedding." The case is one of several religious rights cases at the court this term. The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries. A three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana is making its second trip to the Supreme Court Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are weighing whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. A three-judge court found that the state relied too heavily on race in drawing the district, rejecting Louisiana's arguments that politics predominated, specifically the preservation of the seats of influential members of Congress, including Speaker Mike Johnson. The Supreme Court ordered the challenged map to be used last year while the case went on. Lawmakers only drew that map after civil rights advocates won a court ruling that a map with one Black majority district likely violated the landmark voting rights law. The justices are weighing a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. The justices appeared open to upholding the law, though they also could return it to a lower court for additional work. Some justices worried the lower court hadn't applied a strict enough legal standard in determining whether the Texas law and others like that could run afoul of the First Amendment.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Haryana BJP govt faces firestorm as it scraps hiring of 8,600 jobs, Cong cries ‘voter betrayal'
Unemployment has continued to be a key issue in Haryana politics. In August 2024, two months before the Haryana Assembly polls, the BJP-led government announced direct recruitment for 5,666 posts in police force, one of the most sought-after government jobs in the state. At the same time, 3,053 Group C posts were also advertised, even as the recruitment process for 25,000 contractual posts across departments was also started. In October 2024, the BJP created history in Haryana by winning 48 of the 90 Assembly seats and forming the government for the third consecutive time. Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini, fulfilling a pre-poll promise, took oath after the 25,000 selected candidates for contractual posts were issued appointment letters. Last week, however, about 10 months after the BJP's return to power, the Saini government cancelled the recruitment for 5,666 regular posts in the police and 3,053 Group C posts. While the government has defended this move, saying that the cancellations were done for 'bringing in more transparency and ensuring systematic recruitment', the Opposition is now up in arms against the BJP, accusing it of 'misleading and cheating the youth in the name of votes'. The Haryana Staff Selection Commission (HSSC), which oversees recruitments in the state, cancelled it for both the police and Group C posts. The HSSC says all these posts will be announced after the Common Eligibility Test (CET), which is expected to be held in July. The candidates who successfully clear this test and figure in the merit list are considered eligible for Group C and Group D posts in government departments. The Saini government's flip-flop on the recruitment issue has given ammunition to the Opposition parties to attack the BJP, with the principal Opposition Congress calling it a 'betrayal of voters'. Senior Congress leader and ex-CM Bhupinder Singh Hooda said, 'It was as such a poll gimmick played by the BJP before October 2024 Assembly elections. A few days before the Election Commission issued the notification, the BJP announced these government jobs to get more votes. They got it and won. Since then, they did not fill these posts and have now cancelled the same. The youth of Haryana have understood the BJP's strategies and will give them a befitting reply.' Hooda also alleged that 'Not even a single promise that the BJP made in its manifesto has been fulfilled so far. What's happening in Hisar? Youth are being lathi-charged for raising the legitimate demand not to slash their scholarships. It is a completely non-performing government.' He was referring to an agitation by the students of Chaudhary Charan Singh Agricultural University in Hisar on June 10. The All India Congress Committee (AICC)'s general secretary and MP Randeep Surjewala said, 'There's a saying that all the people cannot be fooled all the time. But, it seems that Nayab Singh Saini had made this saying seem untrue. Over 8,500 posts that were advertised before the October 2024 Assembly polls have now been cancelled. The Saini government is misleading the youth.' Referring to the Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision to quash a 2019 state government notification that gave 10 additional marks on the basis of socio-economic criteria for Group B and C posts, Surjewala said, 'Over 13.5 lakh youth have enrolled for the CET. In the last five years, only one CET exam was conducted. The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed the result for that examination due to discrepancies. They fooled the youth that the socio-economic criteria's additional marks shall be given… The CM now says he will challenge it in a higher court.' He also said, 'About 50,000 contractual employees were recruited before 2024 Assembly polls through the Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam. Of these, now 4,000 have been thrown out. The fate of the remaining is also uncertain.' Surjewala added, 'Why is the government cancelling these recruitments? If the government was not serious in making these recruitments, why did they announce it in the first place? These BJP ministers and MLAs need to be asked these questions. Otherwise, the BJP will again advertise posts ahead of the next elections and then cancel it after the polls.' HSSC chairman Himmat Singh, however, in an X post, said that the date for the CET shall be announced soon and applicants should continue their preparations for it. He added that with 13.48 lakh youth enrolled for the CET, all the recruitments for Group C and D posts will now be held after the CET's results.
