Teachers, Parents, Students Demand ‘Fully Funded Public Schools' at Indiana Statehouse Rally
This article was originally published in Indiana Capital Chronicle.
A sea of red descended upon the Indiana Statehouse Monday as hundreds of teachers, parents and students from across the state rallied to demand increased funding for public schools — and to protest pending policy proposals that could shift millions of local dollars to charters.
The rally — one of many hosted in recent years by the Indiana State Teachers Association, the state's largest teachers union — came just hours ahead of a possible final vote on a massive property tax plan. The latest provisions baked into the legislation could reduce public schools' tax dollars by as much as $744 million over the next three years.
ISTA President Keith Gambill said that blow comes in addition to education funding gaps in the newest draft of the state budget.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
'The overall funding increase of 2% per year — of $870 million — does not even meet inflation,' Gambill said. 'Our students deserve bold investment, not the bare minimum.'
He said teachers will be pressing lawmakers in the coming days and weeks 'to ensure that public dollars are staying with public schools.'
The legislative session must end by April 29 but could be finished as early as April 24. All bills — including the state budget — must be finalized by that time.
'Our schools deserve to be fully funded — and fully public — so all kids receive a quality education,' Gambill emphasized.
Teacher attendance at the rally forced at least three Hoosier school districts to move to an e-learning day, including Indianapolis Public Schools and nearby Pike Township, as well as Monroe County Community Schools in Bloomington.
The shift to e-learning appeared to prompt a legislative amendment published Monday morning by Indianapolis Republican Rep. Andrew Ireland.
Proposed language filed to Senate Bill 373, an unrelated education bill, sought to jeopardize funding for public school districts that convert scheduled in-person instructional days to virtual because of 'planned or coordinated absence of teachers or other personnel for the purpose of participating in a protest, demonstration, or political advocacy event.'
Districts would risk losing state tuition support for each day of a violation, according to Ireland's amendment.
Gambill read the amendment aloud during the rally, drawing shouting and boos from the crowd.
'We have got to talk to our legislators today, tomorrow and every day between now and the end of the session. We must be vigilant,' he said. 'We have to speak from the heart, and remind them that behind every policy is a classroom with a teacher and students.'
Ireland introduced the amendment Monday afternoon to make a statement, but withdrew it without discussion or a vote.
Chants echoed throughout the Statehouse halls for more than two hours Monday morning.
'Schools need funding!'
'Pay our teachers!'
'Defend public education!'
Rallygoers, many dressed in red t-shirts, had homemade signs in tow, too. Banners, poster boards, paper placards — and even painted messages on the backs of LaCroix boxes — were raised by attendees amid chanting, cheering and frustrated yells.
Everyone's goal was the same: demand 'fair' and 'adequate' funding for public schools.
Gambill said recent changes to both bills were improvements from their original versions. But he maintained that increases to base tuition support in the Senate GOP's state budget draft 'are not enough,' and held that amendments added to the property tax measure would divert 'critical' dollars from traditional publics to charters and could allow districts to 'side step' collective bargaining rights for teachers.
Monica Shellhamer, a vice president with the Indianapolis Education Association, said during her rally remarks that teachers continue to be left out of conversations around school funding.
'Indianapolis public schools has been a target of the legislature for many years and this year is no different,' Shellhamer said. 'Bill after bill continued to be submitted to shut down or defund Indianapolis public schools.'
Jenny Noble-Kuchera, president of the Monroe County Education Association, further pointed to pending education cuts at the federal level.
'The way it is currently, public education as we know it will begin to disappear, and our children are the victims,' she said Monday. 'We already have severe mismanagement at the federal level of Title I grants for our lower-income students, of critical programs supporting students with disabilities, and elimination of programs for our schools.'
'This is bad enough, and now Indiana politicians can't put their youngest constituents first, and support basics, like learning to read and write, and foundational math,' she continued. 'It's not OK.'
Indiana Capital Chronicle is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Indiana Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Niki Kelly for questions: info@indianacapitalchronicle.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Veterans in Congress Issue War Powers Warning to Trump After Iran Strike
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A dozen Democratic representatives in Congress, all military veterans, have sent a letter to the White House ordering that lawmakers will vote on any additional aggression against Iran so as not to repeat the "same mistakes" from wars that started two decades ago. Why It Matters Trump's green light to what he later described as a "very successful attack" against Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan has drawn renewed attention to Congress's role in approving military action as part of a potential broader war. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine's War Powers Resolution pending in the Senate has been mirrored in the U.S. House of Representatives, where Republican Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Ro Khanna of California introduced a resolution last Tuesday. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was enacted to limit the president's ability to commit U.S. armed forces to hostilities abroad without Congressional consent. What To Know A letter published on Monday was led by Representative Pat Ryan of New York, a U.S. Army veteran, and co-signed by 11 fellow House Democrats, who described themselves as "patriots who love our country." The other legislators are as follows: Rep. Salud Carbajal (CA) – Marine Corps Reserve Rep. Gil Cisneros (CA) – Navy Rep. Herb Conaway (NJ) – Air Force Rep. Chris Deluzio (PA) - Navy Rep. Maggie Goodlander (NH) – Navy Reserve Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (PA) – Air Force Rep. Ted Lieu (CA) – Air Force Rep. Jimmy Panetta (CA) – Navy Reserve Rep. Bobby Scott (VA) – Army Rep. Derek Tran (CA) – Army Rep. Eugene Vindman (VA) – Army Newsweek reached out to Ryan and others for comment. The lawmakers and veterans of multiple U.S. military branches are imploring the Trump administration not to jump into a conflict with Iran and other nations, saying that wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were fought by many of the signees, have led to no accountability, years after trillions of dollars and countless deaths. "Twenty years ago, in their rush to appear strong and tough, politicians—from both parties—failed to ask the hard questions before starting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan," the letter reads. "They failed us, our fellow veterans, and the American people. "Now, trillions of dollars and countless deaths later, we still haven't gotten accountability. We refuse to make those same mistakes." Rep. Pat Ryan speaks at the Concordia Annual Summit in New York City on September 18, 2023. Rep. Pat Ryan speaks at the Concordia Annual Summit in New York City on September 18, Concordia Summit The letter also says that the dozen lawmakers "are under no illusions about the nature of the Iranian regime and its proxies," referring to them as "evil" and intent to destroy both the U.S. and Israel. "Many of us lost friends to Iranian-backed terror," the letter continues. "We must continue to stand strongly with our Israeli allies, including active and robust support for the defense of the state of Israel and its people, as we have for decades. "But we must be very clear: American-led, offensive military operations against Iran—including Saturday night's preventive air strikes—are different." Representative Salud Carbajal told Newsweek on Monday: "As a Marine veteran, I served my country with pride but also understand the human cost of war. That cost is why our Founding Fathers gave Congress the power to declare war—to ensure that our nation has a transparent and honest conversation before we send Americans into harm's way. "That's why I joined my fellow House Democratic veterans in reaffirming this essential constitutional duty. We owe it to our servicemembers, their families, and the American people to prevent a rushed and reckless entry into war." A spokesperson for Goodlander shared the following statement with Newsweek: "Under the United States Constitution, Congress plays a critical role in questions of war and peace. I'll never stop working to ensure we execute our constitutional responsibility, protect the 40,000 U.S. forces serving in the Middle East today, and keep the American people safe." Patricia Crouse, a political scientist in residence at the University of New Haven, told Newsweek on Monday that she believes the current push to update the War Powers Act is a direct response to the situation in the Middle East. But it's a legislative effort that gained traction during the first and second Gulf Wars, she said. "As in the past, though, I don't believe it will gain much traction," Crouse said. "Other than Massie and MTG (Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene), Republicans in the House are fully behind Trump's actions and seem in no rush to limit his powers. The situation in the Senate is similar. "Without support from Republicans in both chambers, anything Democrats attempt to do is purely symbolic." Kaine told Punchbowl News on Monday that he is privy to Senate GOP support of his resolution, saying that lawmakers have expressed interest in signing off on whether Congress, not just the president, should have a say in attacking other nations. "I know I will have Republican support. How much is unclear," Kaine said. "The day-to-day events will affect is a very evolving situation." What People Are Saying Represenative Pat Ryan, in a statement on Monday: "I am supporting a War Powers Resolution because it is the clear and sacred Constitutional duty for Congress, not the President, to declare war. As our Founders intended, this will ensure we have a full and honest conversation with the American people about what American military action against Iran would mean. We stand ready and willing to execute our Constitutional responsibility, to protect our troops, and to keep the American people safe." Representative Ted Lieu, in a statement on Sunday: "There will be a bipartisan, classified briefing by the Administration this Tuesday. I urge the Administration to address what congressional authorization it relied on for the military strikes, if any. I also want the Administration to address many unanswered questions, such as if the strikes achieved their intended objectives, how the Administration intends to protect Americans and our service members from potential future attacks, and what the Administration's plan is going forward." What Happens Next Democratic Representatives Gregory Meeks of New York, Adam Smith of Washington, and Jim Himes of Connecticut—ranking members of the Foreign Affairs, Armed Services and Intelligence committees, respectively—are drafting their own War Powers resolution, according to Punchbowl News.
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Marjorie Taylor Greene Warns Trump Entering US Into 'Nuclear' World War III
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, warned on Monday that President Donald Trump is already "turning back on campaign promises" and that the U.S. is "entering" a nuclear war and "World War III" after the military carried out strikes on Iran over the weekend. "Six months in and here we are, turning back on campaign promises. And we bombed Iran on behalf of Israel. Yes, it was on behalf of Israel," Greene, a staunch Trump ally, told Steve Bannon on his War Room podcast. "We are entering a nuclear war—the World War, the World War III, because the entire world is going to erupt." This is a developing story and will be updated.
Axios
44 minutes ago
- Axios
FTC approves Omnicom, IPG merger but says they can't coordinate to bar ads based on politics
The Federal Trade Commission on Monday said it will approve Omnicom Group's $13.5 billion acquisition of rival The Interpublic Group, but only if the agencies agree they won't bar ads based on politics. Why it matters: A consent order that addresses the possibility of political collusion is rare, and speaks to the hyper-political climate facing the business community. The merger between Omnicom and IPG will create the largest global ad agency holding group by revenue. The deal is still pending approval from regulators in the U.K. Zoom in: The proposed consent order imposes restrictions "that prevent Omnicom from engaging in collusion or coordination to direct advertising away from media publishers based on the publishers' political or ideological viewpoints." It also prohibits agencies from accepting requests to direct advertising spend to a certain media publisher "based on political or ideological viewpoints or political content." Agencies are also prohibited from declining to do business with an advertiser based on their political or ideological viewpoints. Between the lines: Advertisers are still allowed to dictate where their ads appear. Agencies will need to act with caution to avoid accusations of collusion or bias when considering an advertiser's targeting requests. Of note: Earlier this year, the Trump administration fired the FTC's two Democratic commissioners. The remaining three commissioners are all Republican. The consent order passed by a 2-0-1 commission vote, with commissioners Andrew N. Ferguson and Melissa Holyoak voting in favor of the measure, while commissioner Mark R. Meador recused himself. It's unusual for orders to be passed by two votes within the FTC, but it's valid. Yes, but: The consent order also contains fairly standard provisions barring anticompetitive coordination over conditions such as pricing, ad placement, and sponsorships, as well as helping execute advertisers' ad campaigns. Axios previously reported that despite concerns around politics, most of the FTC's inquiries into the merger with ad professionals were apolitical. Reality check: Regulators rarely put in place merger provisions that specifically bar this type of coordination, but political pressure around allegations of ad groups penalizing conservatives has gained steam. Last year, House Judiciary Committee chair Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) sent letters to the CEOs of Omnicom and IPG as part of an antitrust investigation into whether ad agencies had colluded with the World Federation of Advertisers and the now defunct industry coalition Global Alliance for Responsible Media to boycott conservative media. Amid the chaos in Congress, the probe moved fully to the FTC, Axios reported last month. Jordan's investigation came months after he led a Congressional hearing about complaints that alleged GARM was colluding with ad-buying giant GroupM (now WPP Media) to discourage clients from buying ads in the Daily Wire because of its conservative politics. Last year, X sued the liberal watchdog group Media Matters for defamation, claiming one of its research reports contributed to an advertiser exodus. The FTC is now investigating the group over the same issue. What they're saying: "Websites and other publications that rely on advertising are critical to the flow of our nation's commerce and communication," Daniel Guarnera, director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, said in a statement. "Coordination among advertising agencies to suppress advertising spending on publications with disfavored political or ideological viewpoints threatens to distort not only competition between ad agencies, but also public discussion and debate."
