Quanex Building Products (NX) Tops Q2 Earnings and Revenue Estimates
Quanex Building Products (NX) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.60 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.48 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.66 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of 25%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this housing materials maker would post a loss of $0.06 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.19, delivering a surprise of 416.67%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times.
Quanex , which belongs to the Zacks Building Products - Miscellaneous industry, posted revenues of $452.48 million for the quarter ended April 2025, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 2.77%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $266.2 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
Quanex shares have lost about 29.3% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 1.5%.
While Quanex has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Quanex: mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.85 on $490.8 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $2.55 on $1.84 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Building Products - Miscellaneous is currently in the top 36% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
One other stock from the broader Zacks Construction sector, Worthington Enterprises (WOR), is yet to report results for the quarter ended May 2025. The results are expected to be released on June 24.
This metal manufacturer is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.76 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +2.7%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
Worthington Enterprises' revenues are expected to be $306.7 million, down 3.8% from the year-ago quarter.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. (WOR) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Have Trump's strikes on Iran bolstered or eroded his credibility?
United States on Saturday conducted air strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites, entering Israel's war against Tehran. The timing was unexpected. On Thursday, U.S. President Donald Trump said he was still considering U.S. involvement and would arrive at a decision "within the next two weeks." Financial and political analysts had largely taken that phrase as code word for inaction. "There is also skepticism that the 'two-week' timetable is a too familiar saying used by the President to delay making any major decision," wrote Jay Woods, chief global strategist at Freedom Capital Markets. Indeed, Trump has commonly neglected to follow up after giving a "two week" timeframe on major actions, according to NBC News. And who can forget the TACO trade? It's an acronym that stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out" — which describes a pattern of the U.S. president threatening heavy tariffs, weighing down markets, but pausing or reducing their severity later on, helping stocks to rebound. "Trump has to bury the TACO before the TACO buries him ... he's been forced to stand down on many occasion, and that has cost him a lot of credibility," said David WOO, CEO of David Woo Unbound. And so Trump followed up on his threat, and ahead of the proposed two-week timeline. "There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump said on Saturday evening. But given Trump's criticism of U.S. getting involved in wars under other presidents, does America bombing Iran add to his credibility, or erode it further? The U.S. strikes Iran U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday said the United States had attacked Iranian nuclear sites, pushing America into Israel's war with its longtime rival. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Sunday that "Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated." The decision to attack Iran engages the American military in active warfare in the Middle East — something Trump had vowed to avoid. Iran calls attacks 'outrageous'Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday said Tehran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty and people after the "outrageous" U.S. attacks on three of its major nuclear enrichment facilities. Iranian state-owned media, meanwhile, reported that Iran's parliament backed closing the Strait of Hormuz, citing a senior lawmaker. The U.S. on Sunday called on China to prevent Iran from doing so. Stock futures in U.S. retreatU.S. futures slid Sunday evening stateside as investors reacted to Washington's strikes on Iran. On Friday, U.S. markets mostly fell. The S&P 500 lost 0.22%, its third consecutive losing session, while the Nasdaq Composite retreated 0.51%. But the Dow Jones Industrial Average eked out a 0.08% gain. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index ticked up 0.13%, but ended the week 1.5% lower. Oil jumps but bitcoin slumpsOil prices jumped Sunday evening in the U.S., its first trading session after Saturday's strikes. U.S. crude oil rose $1.76, or 2.38%, to $75.60 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent was up $1.80, or 2.34%, to $78.81 per barrel. Meanwhile, bitcoin prices briefly dipped below the $99,000 mark Sunday, its lowest level in more than a month, before paring losses. It's now trading around $100,940, down 1.5%. [PRO] Eyes on inflation reading Where markets go this week will depend on whether the conflict in the Middle East escalates after the U.S.' involvement. Investors should also keep an eye on economic data. May's personal consumptions expenditure price index, the Federal Reserve's preferred gauge of inflation, comes out Friday, and will tell if tariffs are starting to heat up inflation. How regime change in Iran could affect global oil prices Senior Israeli officials said this week that their military campaign against Iran could trigger the fall of the regime, an event that would have enormous implications for the global oil market. There are no signs that the regime in Iran is on the verge of collapse, said Scott Modell, CEO of the consulting firm Rapidan Energy Grop. But further political destabilization in Iran "could lead to significantly higher oil prices sustained over extended periods," said Natasha Kaneva, head of global commodities research at JPMorgan, in a note to clients this week. There have been eight cases of regime change in major oil-producing countries since 1979, according to JPMorgan. Oil prices spiked 76% on average at their peak in the wake of these changes, before pulling back to stabilize at a price about 30% higher compared to pre-crisis levels, according to the bank.
Miami Herald
22 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Oil up, but stocks look to slide after U.S. attacks on Iran
The U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday changes the focus of what's ahead for the U.S. economy in the last full week of June. Because everyone is waiting to see what Iran will do, other than fire missiles on Israel. That's what happened late Saturday. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The three biggest questions a day later: How will energy and stock markets react?Does Iran still have enough enriched uranium to make and deploy a small nuclear weapon?Will Iran move to block the ships from passing from the Persian Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz into global shipping lanes? Outside geopolitics, economic events coming up include Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's testimony before Congress on Tuesday and an important inflation report. Related: Netflix analysts turn heads with stock price target updates The nuclear question is on the table because U.S. officials weren't sure Sunday if the attacks on facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan actually destroyed nuclear materials. Vice President J.D. Vance, in fact, suggested that Iran's nuclear stock pile is still intact. If that's the case, it's possible Iran could assemble a first-generation weapon. That would be as powerful as the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, Robert Pape of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats told MSNBC's Alex Witt on Sunday. Not having this awful idea become reality depends on cooler heads prevailing. A key issue: If Iran is willing to discuss destroying or otherwise ceding control its nuclear development efforts. The Trump Administration is threatening more attacks if Iran rejects the demand. Blocking the Strait of Hormuz, through which 25% of the world's crude oil passes - headed mostly to China, India and Asia - will send global oil prices surging and, ultimately, will boost gasoline prices in the United States and elsewhere. Stocks and bonds also would slump. ChinaCrude oil futures in New York opened up nearly $3 a barrel, then fell back quickly. At 7:30 p.m. EDT, crude was was up $2.12 to $75.99. Brent crude, the global benchmark, jumped to as high as $81.40, then fell back to $79.20 per barrel, up $2.19 Crude oil settled at $73.84 a barrel on Friday, up 34 cents. or 1.2%, from Thursday and up 21.5% so far in June. AAA's daily report on gasoline prices put the U.S. average at $3.218 a gallon, down slightly from Saturday's $3.129. Stock index futures were lower in early trading Sunday with S&P 500 futures off 28 points to 5,990. Futures based on the Dow Jones Industrial Average were down just 184 points to 42,333. Nasdaq-100 futures had fallen 137 points to 21,710. Stocks overall were flat last week even as global tensions heated up. Some defense-oriented stocks slipped on Friday. Palantir Technologies (PLTR) was off 2% to $137.30. Lockheed Martin (LMT) , however, was up 0.4% to $470.56. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who is always verbally battered by President Trump, will testify before the Congress twice this week. The questions almost certainly focus on the Iran situation and its impact on the economy. He will also have to explain why the Fed is so stubborn about NOT cutting its key federal funds rate. The Fed decided last week to leave its federal funds rate at 4.25% to 4.5%. One Fed governor, Christopher Waller, who voted in support of holding rates steady, thinks a rate cut could come in July. Mary Daly, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, thinks the Fed will have better information by September. The federal funds rate mostly affects short-term rates. Bond yields influence rates on, say, home mortgages and auto loans. The 30-year mortgage rate was just under 7% on Friday. Powell's first appearance is before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday and the Senate Banking Committee on Wednesday. More Economic Analysis: Federal Reserve prepares strong message on long-term interest ratesMassive city workers union approves strikeAnalyst makes bold call on stocks, bonds, and gold The most important economic report this coming week is the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index (PCE), due Friday from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. This is the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation rate. The index for May is expected to show a 2.3% year-over-year index. The core index, stripping out food and energy, is expected to rise 2.6%, up slightly from April. The inflation rate is still the lowest since March 2021, Barrons says. Four reports come this week that will help clarify the condition of the housing market. Existing homes sales for May, due Monday from the National Association of Realtors. Most estimates are around 4.1 million units on a seasonally-adjusted annual basis, up From April's 4 million rate. S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index, due Tuesday from Standard & Poor' sales, due Wednesday from the Commerce Department. Pending home sales, due Thursday from the National Association of Home Builders. S&P Global reports its flash purchasing manager index reports for June. These measure what manufacturing and services companies are actually buying. The Conference Board comes out with its monthly Consumer Confidence Index report for June Tuesday morning It may show a slight gain because the data were collected as stocks were rallying after April's stock-market slump. The University of Michigan offers its revised Consumer Sentiment Index report on Friday. Its early version suggested consumers were a touch less worried and cited the market rally. Related: Veteran fund manager who predicted April rally updates S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
CNBC
32 minutes ago
- CNBC
What stocks to buy and when to buy in Monday's Iran-driven market
He bombed. Two words and the world went akilter. We get that. Visions blind us: a blocked Strait of Hormuz; $100 per barrel oil; a de-stabilized Iran and mullah revenge; our troops in harm's way; and no end to Israel-Iran missile volleys. Monday's reaction in the market? Always the same. Big institutions sell stocks, which are so-called risk assets, even as we know from the rise in the S & P 500 all of these last 40 years that stocks are hardly risky. No matter, the institutions want cash. They always want cash. They don't know any better. They want to sell the high price-to-earnings ratio stocks and look for safety. They are the drivers of the lower bond yields we will get, especially the 10-year Treasury. To which I say to these institutions, "Whoa there, cowboy." That's been the playbook for them ever since 1982. It's been wrong every time except 2007 when the Great Recession struck. Why did selling fail as a strategy every time but once? Because all of the major waves of selling in the wake of some incident of uncertainty were caused by momentary risk that did not ultimately threaten stocks, or the banking system — or, ultimately, the economy. This time is no different, unless the Strait of Hormuz is closed by Iran. Following Saturday's President Donald Trump -authorized strikes at three Iranian nuclear sites, Iran is said to be considering such a move. On Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio called for China to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, which is one of the most important trade routes for oil in the world. Crude prices rose in Sunday trading, and U.S. stock futures were lower. I think a conflict with a deeply hobbled non-nuclear, fourth-rate power, that is the current Iran does not create systemic risk even with higher oil. Let's take that off the table. This is not China. This is not on par with a seizure of strategically important Taiwan, which China has threatened to do, or a shutdown of all rare earth materials, which are dominated by China and needed for manufacturing in sectors including autos, semiconductors, and defense. Iran isn't a trading partner. It isn't even much of a trading partner with Russia or China. It lost its proxies through a stealth war against Israel that you could argue they have been winning for ages, simply because they are a terrorist condoning regime. They are no longer winning. They are losing big and seem hellbent on reducing their state to rubble. Given the apparent extent of the damage at the heavily deepened Fordo nuclear site, I also want to take existential risk off the table. Iran has not and will not be allowed to create a nuclear weapon. Israel seems to be able to anticipate everything they do, as Israel seems to have someone(s) infiltrated at a high level. I will not take the Strait of Hormuz off the table because it's the only gambit left of the terrorist regime. We will play that out momentarily — but, spoiler alert, it's not a meaningful plot. I don't detect a possibility of regime change in Iran, however, despite what some of the Western press says, because "the people" there are not going to rise up. And, the Western types are not going to push to overthrow. So, what works then for the CNBC Investing Club's portfolio? Monday's schematic The stock market is controlled, in moments like these, by the S & P futures markets, which overwhelm the opening bell in New York, as they have every time since the 1987 crash. It's axiomatic. It doesn't matter if it is mistaken, which it is. It's just what happens. The S & P futures sellers don't know a health care stock from a semi. They are using the futures as a hedge for their long-side portfolio. So are the hedge funds, except some will use the futures as a way to get short — bet against the market. The money goes into bonds, which due to their inverse relationship, means bond prices go up and bond yields go down. We know that tends to be positive for stocks. Some will choose to buy traditional safety stocks. Again, a mistake. There are now too many flaws. When a Procter & Gamble or a Johnson & Johnson doesn't offer protection — and, they most certainly do not, stay away. Think of how horrendous the food and drug stocks really have been. Most of these are nightmares. Our plan involves knowing and accepting the constraints forced upon us by the overwhelming negative power of the S & P futures out of Chicago. Selling doesn't let you get any palatable prices for your stocks. The good prices were Friday's close. You can sit on your hands and do nothing, which can work in times of uncertainty. Or you can buy, but you have to remember that there will be big institutions that will, all day long, be selling the stocks you want to buy. They will bury you. Here's why: Their sell orders will be huge. The prices they will get on the first parts of their orders will be ugly at the start of the day because of the negative power of the S & P futures sellers. Their sell orders are so large they will be "worked" all day. The traders handling these orders at the brokerage houses, like a Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan, are now you're enemy because they need to demonstrate their selling prowess. That means getting a price for their client that is, in aggregate, better than the closing price of the day. The best way for a trader to handle large sell orders on days like Monday is to skillfully sell when buy bids build and walk away for a bit to let bids build. That's careful selling. Cat and mouse. The worst way to do it is to sell all day at any price and then save a big chunk of the client's sell order for the closing bell, blowing the stock to smithereens. That causes a price that is the low of the day. Therefore, the trader will be giving the customer an average price that is better than the self-controlled, marked-down closing price. The client is oblivious and grateful for an average price that is better than the closing price, even as the execution was sub-optimal. All they know is they "did better" than the closing price. That's why it is so hard to buy on the first day of any sell-off. No matter what you do, whatever price you pay, you will most likely have a loss at the end of the day because of that process. Knowing this, you can't be heroic at the opening. Those who do will try to catch what they think will be the low of the day. When stocks start sinking again, as they almost always do, these opportunists will end up trying to scalp for pennies and will be gone by 10:30 a.m. ET. They will most likely be losers. Day trading stinks. Now, I am presuming if you are a Club member, you aren't on margin, or you wouldn't be reading this. Who wants to read an article by someone who has nothing but contempt for you? If you do have cash, and because the S & P Short Range Oscillator , a market momentum indicator that I have trusted for decades, is flat and will most likely be negative by the end of the day, I am going to err on the side of buying. After all, as long-term investors, one day of trading is not make or break for us. We're in the market for the long haul. If you don't have cash on hand, you sell some of your losers and use the day to reposition. What to buy It's very counterintuitive. The institutions sell the highest multiple stocks. They do so because they are up a lot. Those are the ones we want. These sell-offs give us a chance to get a better average cost basis. Our only obstacle here is that Micron Technology reports this week — and I fear, after this run, that it won't be good enough. Still, I will scan to see what we can buy that will matter. We can buy some industrials. They have been rock solid, and given that we don't see a recession on the horizon, that might be a great bet. I also think that the dollar store stocks will finally come in, and Club name TJX Companies will finally stop going down. Intriguing. Low multiple tech like Bullpen name Cisco Systems or the redoubtable IBM makes sense. I like the data center. I like Club name Amazon as well as Netflix and Tesla with a flat-fee robotaxi. The "normal" winners, the J & J and P & G's, just don't work anymore. After J.M. Smucker two weeks ago, forget food, especially General Mills , which reports this week. FedEx reports, too, making it tough to buy any transports. How about the oils. I would prefer to be a seller, not a buyer. We are pumping roughly 13.5 million barrels a day . We can up that by a million barrels on command from Trump. The Russians are pumping like mad. Who knows what Iran is doing, but it's probably trying to sell as much as it can to pay the bills. Do we really think the Saudis are against what Trump did Saturday? They are grateful and will sell whatever is necessary to keep oil down. Which is why I think that the Strait of Hormuz is not a sustainable worry. It's a big reason why I would be a buyer of the rest of the market. When to act Everyone I know is worried about a big down day. So, I am worried about a big up day. We will know what happens if the selling dries up at 2:45 p.m. ET. Why then? If nothing bad has happened by then, some sellers might walk away. The margined sellers are done. If the selling slows down, shorts will start covering, and some intrepid longs will wade in. There is time for a rally to build, and it won't be met by new sellers because there isn't enough time. If a rally starts earlier than 2:45 on Monday afternoon, it will be overwhelmed by sellers who are grateful for better prices. If it starts much later than 2:45, there won't be time to mount a rally before the 4:30 p.m. ET close. So, if you do wade in, think about waiting an hour after the 9:30 a.m. ET open and some by 3:30 p.m. ET — the latter being hard for us because of the constraints of the Club, which puts our trade alert deadline before 3:15 p.m. ET, because we always wait 45 minutes to execute our trades to give members a shot at the best prices. Be prepared for a long day. Be prepared for plenty of rumors. Be prepared for the Trump haters to say everything is going to be wrong. Be prepared to buy. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
