Why Thailand's ruling political clan faces a new threat

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is facing street protests and growing calls to resign amid mounting anger over a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen. PHOTO: EPA-EFE
Thailand's most prominent political dynasty is on the brink of losing power once again.
Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is facing street protests and growing calls to resign amid mounting anger over a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, in which she criticised the Thai army for its role in a border dispute with the neighbouring country.
The controversy prompted the second-largest party in Thailand's already fragile coalition government to quit on June 18, saying Ms Paetongtarn had damaged the country's dignity.
If another key ally withdraws from the alliance, Ms Paetongtarn's coalition will be reduced to a minority in the lower house of parliament. She may be forced to step down or call an early election to avoid a prolonged crisis.
Elected via a parliamentary vote in August 2024 as the country's youngest ever leader, Ms Paetongtarn could become the third politician in the Shinawatra family to lose power before completing their term.
The turmoil will be a test of Thailand's democracy, which has previously been interrupted by a number of coups as royalist establishment engineered long stretches of military-backed rule.
What triggered the latest political crisis?
Tensions between Thailand and Cambodia escalated after a May border clash in the disputed Chong Bok area left a Cambodian soldier dead.
Both sides reinforced their troop deployments in the region and restricted border crossings, and Cambodia's government also imposed trade curbs. Diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute have so far failed.
In the audio recording leaked by Mr Hun Sen, Ms Paetongtarn blamed the simmering weeks-long border standoff on the Thai army.
She has apologised for the comments and said that her 'sympathetic remarks and softer tone' during the conversation were part of a negotiating strategy to ease border tensions.
Ms Paetongtarn has little political room to manouver.
The exit of the royalist, conservative Bhumjaithai Party from her ruling coalition reduced the government's position to 255 of the 495 seats in the House of Representatives, or just over a 51 per cent share.
If she loses the house majority and dissolves parliament, it would delay a new budget bill and disrupt fiscal policy while the country prepares for a new general election.
Alternatively, her resignation would trigger a new prime ministerial vote.
Either scenario could further unnerve foreign investors, who have been selling Thai stocks amid the threat of double-digit US tariffs on goods from South-east Asia's second-largest economy.
Who are the Shinawatras?
The Shinawatras are descendants of a Chinese immigrant who married a Thai woman in the late 19th century.
They have been the driving force behind parties that won most of Thailand's general elections since 2001, only to be booted out several times by the royalist establishment, which viewed them as a threat.
Three Shinawatras have occupied Thailand's top political office at different times over the last two decades.
Mr Thaksin Shinawatra, the billionaire father of Ms Paetongtarn, has been a polarising but enduring figure in politics since he first became prime minister in 2001.
He secured a second term in office with a landslide victory by his Thai Rak Thai Party in 2005, but this ended abruptly a year later in a military coup.
Mr Thaksin left Thailand in 2008 to avoid corruption charges that he said were politically motivated.
His sister, Ms Yingluck Shinawatra, faced a similar fate after her Pheu Thai party won the 2011 election and she became Thailand's first female prime minister.
Ms Yingluck was ousted by judicial order in 2014, and weeks later her government was toppled in yet another coup.
How did the Shinawatras return to high office?
In May 2023, after almost nine years of military-backed rule, elections were held in which Pheu Thai came second to Move Forward – a new party that found support among mostly young and urban voters with a campaign to change the 'lese majeste' law, which restricts what can be said about the nation's powerful monarchy.
In response, Pheu Thai and conservative, pro-establishment parties joined forces and agreed to make Mr Srettha Thavisin prime minister of a new coalition government, in a deal that was brokered by Mr Thaksin and allowed him to return from self-imposed exile.
Less than a year later, Mr Srettha was removed from office by a court order over an ethics violation case and parliament voted for him to be succeeded by Mr Thaksin's youngest daughter, Ms Paetongtarn.
How did the Shinawatras become popular?
In the wake of the 1997 Asian financial crisis, Mr Thaksin spent heavily on grassroots measures designed to stimulate domestic demand, such as debt moratorium plans for farmers, low-cost housing projects and loans for small- and medium-sized enterprises.
A universal healthcare initiative revolutionised access to medical care for poorer citizens and still benefits millions of Thais two decades later.
Its 'gold card' is held by 47 million people, or 70 per cent of the population.
After the coup that toppled Mr Thaksin's administration in 2006, his mostly rural supporters formed the pro-democracy 'Red Shirt' movement to protest his removal, and often clashed with a rival 'Yellow Shirt' group made up of urban middle-class Thais that sought to push the Shinawatras out of Thai politics.
Why is Thaksin's political influence controversial?
Stepping out of her father's shadow has been challenging for Ms Paetongtarn as Mr Thaksin is seen as the unofficial power behind Pheu Thai.
She is faced questions over whether Mr Thaksin wields significant influence over her administration – concerns that sparked dozens of complaints that sought to disqualify her from office and dissolve the Pheu Thai party.
Even if Ms Paetongtarn survives the current crisis, she could still face political blowback from her father's legal troubles.
Mr Thaksin has a royal insult trial hanging over him, in which he is accused of defaming the monarchy with remarks he made during an interview in 2015.
The hearing is scheduled for July 2025, the same month the Supreme Court will deliberate whether his time in a police hospital after returning from exile counts as having served his commuted prison sentence for corruption charges.
While the deal Mr Thaksin brokered in 2023 returned Pheu Thai to government, the alliance with the royalists damaged the party's popularity and could affect its performance in the next general election, which is scheduled to take place in 2027 if the government completes a full term.
After opposition party Move Forward was disbanded in 2024 – the Constitutional Court ruled it had violated election rules by promising to amend the lese majeste law – its leadership established the People's Party, which has similar ambitions for wholesale political change.
The movement's pledge to improve living standards with large-scale social welfare programs has challenged Pheu Thai's status as the party of the working class.
Many Thais are struggling with debt, inequality remains high, and a decline in poverty has slowed along with economic growth.
Why is there tension between the Shinawatras and the royalist establishment?
The Shinawatras' electoral and financial clout has made them an intimidating rival to an elite made up of army generals, judges and senior civil servants that has dominated Thailand's most powerful state institutions since the era of absolute monarchy ended in 1932.
Mr Thaksin's entrepreneurial success and personal ambition echoed the American Dream and resonated with many ordinary Thais who had become discontent with the paternalistic style of previous political leaders.
While many wealthier, well-educated and city-dwelling Thais accused Mr Thaksin of cronyism, populism and corruption, he enjoyed wide support among poorer and working-class voters in the country's north and northeast.
The latter groups make up the majority of the electorate and benefited from Thaksin's big-ticket economic programmes that came to be known as 'Thaksinomics'.
The groundswell of support for Mr Thaksin was seen by the establishment as a threat to the country's social hierarchy, in which the monarchy is perceived to sit at the top.
How did the Shinawatras make their fortune?
Mr Thaksin has portrayed himself as a self-made man from rural origins, but the family was relatively wealthy when he was growing up.
The root of their fortune was a silk business they established in the north of the country in the early 20th century.
During a 14-year career in the police force, Mr Thaksin dabbled in silk retail, cinemas, real estate and computer leasing – with little success – before striking it rich in the technology boom of the 1980s and 1990s.
His head start in the computer business and his political connections allowed him to snap up government concessions to operate paging and mobile phone services, cable television subscriptions, data networks and satellites.
At the height of his success, his Shin Corporation, now called Intouch Holdings, owned Thai mobile operator Advanced Info Service and satellite firm Shin Satellite, now known as Thaicom.
Shin Corp was sold to Singapore state investment firm Temasek Holdings in 2006.
Today, Shinawatra family members including Mr Thaksin's ex-wife, daughter Ms Paetongtarn, and her two older siblings – Mr Panthongtae and Ms Pintongta – control companies spanning real estate to health care and hospitality.
Some of those firms are listed on the Thai stock exchange, including property developer SC Asset, run by Thaksin's son-in-law Nuttaphong Kunakornwong.
Ms Paetongtarn stepped down from positions in the private sector to comply with share ownership laws for members of a cabinet.
Why did Thaksin go into exile?
Opponents accused Mr Thaksin of abusing his power to promote his family's business interests.
Sales of the Shinawatras' majority stakes in Shin Corp to a foreign company were seen as the final straw, and mass protests by the Yellow Shirts eventually led to his downfall.
Mr Thaksin claimed assassination attempts were made against him before and after the 2006 coup, making him fear for his safety.
His then-wife Pojamarn Damapong was sentenced to prison for tax evasion linked to a transfer of Shin Corp shares, and Mr Thaksin decided to flee the country in 2008 to avoid corruption charges.
He spent the intervening years shuttling between Hong Kong, Singapore, Dubai and London, and was found guilty in absentia in four graft cases.
Mr Thaksin was ordered to serve eight years in prison for corruption after he returned to Thailand in 2023.
He was moved to a police hospital within hours of entering a Bangkok jail and his sentence was later commuted to one year in a royal pardon. Mr Thaksin was released early on special parole in February 2024.
His sister Yingluck also fled Thailand in 2017 and a court later sentenced her to five years in prison for criminal negligence in a rice subsidy programme that cost the state billions of dollars.
She was ordered in May 2025 to pay a US$306 million (S$394 million) fine for losses incurred under the rice scheme.
Although she remains in self-imposed exile, Mr Thaksin has mentioned efforts to bring her home sometime in 2025. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Straits Times

4 hours ago

• Straits Times

Israel says its attacks have delayed Iran's presumed nuclear programme by 2-3 years

Smoke rises following an Israeli attack on the IRIB building, the country's state broadcaster, in Tehran, on June 16. PHOTO: REUTERS A view of the damaged building of Iranian state TV after an Israeli airstrike in Tehran on June 19. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Smoke rises during an Israeli air strike in Tehran, on June 18. PHOTO: ARASH KHAMOOSHI/NYTIMES Iran has not updated its tolls since June 15, when it said that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people. PHOTO: AFP Israel says its attacks have delayed Iran's presumed nuclear programme by 2-3 years JERUSALEM - Israel claimed on June 21 that it has already set back Iran's presumed nuclear programme by at least two years, a day after US President Donald Trump warned that Tehran has a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes. Mr Trump has been mulling whether to involve the United States in Israel's bombing campaign, indicating in his latest comments that he could take a decision before the two week deadline he set this week. Israel said on June 21 that its air force had launched fresh airstrikes against missile storage and launch sites in central Iran, as it kept up a wave of attacks it says are aimed at preventing their rival from developing nuclear weapons – an ambition Tehran has denied. 'According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb,' Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar said in an interview published on June 21 . Mr Saar said Israel's week-long onslaught will continue. 'We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat,' he told German newspaper Bild. Top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met their Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva on June 20 and urged him to resume talks with the United States that had been derailed by Israel's attacks. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said: 'We invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the United States, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for.' But Mr Araghchi told NBC News after the meeting that 'we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the United States) anymore, as long as the aggression continues'. Mr Trump was dismissive of European diplomacy efforts, telling reporters: 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this.' Mr Trump also said he is unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. 'If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do,' he said. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. On the streets of Tehran, many shops were closed and normally bustling markets largely abandoned on June 20 . 450 missiles A US-based NGO, the Human Rights Activists News Agency, said on June 20 that based on its sources and media reports that at least 657 people have been killed in Iran, including 263 civilians. Iran has not updated its tolls since June 15 , when it said that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. Since Israel launched its offensive on June 13, targeting nuclear and military sites but also hitting residential areas, Iran has responded with barrages which Israeli authorities say have killed at least 25 people. A hospital in the Israeli port of Haifa reported 19 wounded, including one person in a serious condition, after the latest Iranian salvo. Israel's National Public Diplomacy Directorate said more than 450 missiles have been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had targeted military sites and air force bases. Madness Western powers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the rapid expansion of Iran's nuclear programme, questioning in particular the country's accelerated uranium enrichment. The International Atomic Energy Agency said that Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons to enrich uranium to 60 per cent. However, it added that there was no evidence it had all the components to make a functioning nuclear warhead. The agency's chief Rafael Grossi told CNN it was 'pure speculation' to say how long it would take Iran to develop weapons. Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the conflict was at a 'perilous moment' and it was 'hugely important that we don't see regional escalation'. Arab League foreign ministers gathered in Istanbul late on June 20 to discuss the war, Turkish state news agency Anadolu said, on the eve of a weekend gathering of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Switzerland announced it was temporarily closing its embassy in Tehran, adding that it would continue to fulfil its role representing US interests in Iran. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

AsiaOne

4 hours ago

• AsiaOne

Thailand's economy teeters as political turmoil threatens recovery efforts, Asia News

BANGKOK - Thailand's economy is already on the ropes. Consumption has remained tepid despite a government stimulus programme, few of its economic engines are firing, and uncertainty wrought by US President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs means that the Thai economy could grow just over 1 per cent this year. Now, Southeast Asia's second-largest economy faces a fresh challenge: a new round of political chaos that can bring down Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra or her ruling Pheu Thai party. "We are currently in a period of economic downturn, with many issues affecting us," Visit Limlurcha, vice chairman of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, told Reuters. "This could make things even more complicated." The most significant short-term concern is the passage of a 3.78 trillion baht (S$148 billion)budget for the 2026 fiscal year, which starts on Oct 1, that must pass through parliament over the next few months. That process could get stalled if Paetongtarn, who is under siege for her handling of a festering border row with neighbouring Cambodia, dissolves parliament and triggers fresh elections. "If parliament is dissolved before the budget is passed, the process will be delayed significantly," said Prakit Siriwattanaket, managing director of Merchant Partners Asset Management. Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira told reporters on Friday that he was optimistic the budget would be approved by parliament by October. "I'm confident that those who are in charge of this matter know that the budget is very important for Thailand," he said. Thailand's economy has lagged regional peers as it struggles under high household debt and borrowing costs, and sluggish demand from China, which is also a key tourism market. It expanded 2.5 per cent last year, and growth could be further halved this year due to US tariffs, Pichai said last month. Thailand's stock market has been the worst performing bourse in Asia so far this year, down 23.4 per cent. Industrial sentiment also hit its lowest in eight months in May, even as consumer confidence dropped to a 27-month low. There is a clear need to press ahead with government spending, which has dropped by over 38 per cent annually during April-May 2025, OCBC economists Lavanya Venkateswaran and Jonathan Ng said in a report on Thursday, warning of a "double whammy" for the economy if both government expenditure and exports weaken. Protests and tariffs Amid the ongoing tumult, Paetongtarn may be able to hang on to her premiership and a coalition led by her Pheu Thai party could retain its majority, albeit in a weaker position compared to its previous grip on the parliament. [[nid:718615]] Such an arrangement will prolong political instability and raise the spectre of street protests, which have been part of previous crises and could hit one of Thailand's key remaining economic engines: tourism. "I'm worried. I don't want the situation to cause people to take to the streets," Thienprasit Chaiyapatranun, President of Thai Hotels Association, which represents around 1,000 hospitality establishments, told Reuters. "If they take to the streets, it will hit tourism." Activists - including those who have in the past agitated against Paetongtarn's father, the divisive former premier Thaksin Shinawatra - met on Friday to plan a major protest next week, and demanded the prime minister's resignation. A government lacking full authority may also struggle in ongoing trade negotiations with the United States, which has threatened to impose a 36 per cent tariff rate on imports from Thailand, said Natapon Khamthakrue, an analyst at Yuanta Securities. "The United States certainly would not want to talk to a government without full power or with few votes," he said. Trade negotiations with Washington will not be concluded in a short period, Finance Minister Pichai said. "Negotiations are never simple for any country, and countries that have begun talks still haven't reached a conclusion," he told reporters. Some business chambers and analysts are, nonetheless, holding out hope that a political resolution can be found quickly, minimising damage to the Thai economy, which has been rattled by multiple coups in the last eight decades, including two against governments led by the Shinawatra family. "Although the economy is no stranger to political uncertainty," OCBC's economists said, "the timing could not be more inconvenient considering external headwinds."

Business Times

4 hours ago

• Business Times

Trump pledge of quick China magnet flows has yet to materialise

[HONG KONG] Almost 10 days since US President Donald Trump declared a 'done' trade deal with Beijing, US companies remain largely in the dark on when they will receive crucial magnets from China, and whether Washington, in turn, will allow a host of other exports to resume. While there has been a trickle of required permits, many American firms that need Chinese minerals are still waiting on Beijing's approval for shipments, according to sources familiar with the process. China's system is improving but remains cumbersome, they said, contrary to Trump's assurances rare earths would flow 'up front' after a Jun 11 accord struck in London. The delays are holding an array of American industries hostage to the rocky US-China relationship, as some firms wait for magnets and others face restrictions son elling to China. That friction risks derailing a fragile tariff truce clinched by Washington and Beijing in Geneva last month, and triggering fresh rounds of retaliation. Interviews with multiple Western buyers, industry insiders and officials familiar with discussions revealed frustration over vague policies in both countries and lingering confusion about what level of magnet approvals from China would trigger Trump to abandon his tit-for-tat export curbs. 'Even if export approvals accelerate, there are so many unknowns about the licensing regime that it's impossible for companies to have a strong sense of certainty about future supply,' said Christopher Beddor, deputy China research director at Gavekal Research. 'At a minimum, they need to factor in a real possibility that talks could break down again, and exports will be halted.' In response to China's sluggishness on magnets, Trump last month restricted US firms from exporting chip software, jet engines and a key ingredient to make plastic to China until President Xi Jinping restores rare-earth exports. Companies subject to Washington's curbs have halted billions of US dollars in planned shipments as they wait for players in unrelated sectors to secure permits from Beijing, which could take weeks or even months to process, given the current pace. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Corporate chiefs affected by the export-control spat have sought clarity from the administration on its strategy, according to sources familiar with the matter. The Commerce Department, which administers the rules, has offered few details, they added. Oil industry executives have tried to convince Trump officials that blocking exports of ethane – a gas used to make plastics – is contrary to US national security interests, according to sources familiar with the deliberations. Business leaders have asked for export restrictions to be removed but that's been unsuccessful so far, the sources said. Energy and chemical giant INEOS Group Holdings has one tanker full of ethane waiting to go, while Enterprise Products Partners has three to four cargo ships stuck in limbo, according to a source familiar with the matter. That's particularly galling because China has adequate ethane supplies in reserve and can switch to using naphtha from the Middle East and other regions for much of their production, the sources said. Representatives from the companies did not respond to requests for comment. Industry figures have consistently told the Trump administration the ethane export restrictions are inflicting more pain on US interests than on China, according to the sources. China's Ministry of Commerce, which administers export licenses, has not responded to Bloomberg's questions on how many for rare earths have been granted since the London talks. At a regular briefing in Beijing on Thursday, spokesperson He Yadong said Beijing was 'accelerating' its process and had given the go-ahead to a 'certain number of compliant applications'. Access to rare earths is an issue 'that is going to continue to metastasise until there is resolution,' said Adam Johnson, chief executive officer of Principal Mineral, which invests in US mineral supply chains for industrial defence. 'This is just a spigot that can be turned on and off by China.' China only agreed to grant licenses, if at all, for six months, before companies need to reapply for approvals. Firms doing business in the US and China could see recurring interruptions, unless the Commerce Ministry significantly increases its pace of process applications. Adding an extra layer of jeopardy for US companies, Chinese suppliers to America's military-industrial base are unlikely to get any magnet permits. After Trump imposed sky-high tariffs in April, Beijing put samarium – a metal essential for weapons such as guided missiles, smart bombs and fighter jets – on a dual-use list that specifically prohibits its shipment for military use. Denying such permits could cause ties to further spiral if Trump believes those actions violate the agreement, the terms of which were never publicised in writing by either side. That sticking point went unresolved during roughly 20 hours of negotiations last week in the UK capital, sources familiar with the details said. Complicating the issue, companies often buy magnets from third-party suppliers, which serve both defence and auto firms, according to a person familiar with the matter. That creates a high burden to prove to Chinese authorities a shipment's final destination is a motor not a missile, the source added. Beijing still has not officially spelt out the deal's requirements, nor has Xi publicly signalled his endorsement of it – a step Trump said was necessary. 'The Geneva and London talks made solid progress towards negotiating an eventual comprehensive trade deal with China,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said. 'The administration continues to monitor China's compliance with the agreement reached at Geneva.' China's Commerce Ministry is working to facilitate more approvals even as it asks for reams of information on how the materials will be used, according to sources familiar with the process. In some cases, companies have been asked to supply data including detailed product designs, one of the sources said. Morris Hammer, who leads the US rare-earth magnet business for South Korean steelmaker Posco Holdings, said Chinese officials have expedited shipments for some major US and European automakers since Trump announced the agreement. China's Advanced Technology & Materials said on Wednesday it had obtained permits for some magnet orders, without specifying for which destinations. The company's customers include European aerospace giant Airbus SE, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Around half of US suppliers to Toyota Motor, for example, have had export licenses granted, the company said – but they're still waiting for those materials to actually be delivered. It's likely some of the delays are transport-related, one of the sources said. Even with permits coming online, rare-earth materials are still scarce because overseas shipments were halted for two months starting in April, depleting inventories. Trump's agreement 'will allow for rare earths to flow out of the country for a short period of time, but it's not helping the auto industry because they are still talking shutdowns', Hammer said. 'Nobody trusts that this thaw is going to last.' For many automakers, the situation remains unpredictable, forcing some to hunt for alternatives to Chinese supplies. Two days after Trump touted a finalised trade accord in London, Ford Motor chief executive officer Jim Farley described a 'day-to-day' dynamic around rare-earths licenses – which have already forced the company to temporarily shutter one plant. General Motors has emphasised it's on firmer footing in the longer term, because it invested in domestic magnet making back in 2021. The automaker has an exclusive deal to get the products from MP Materials in Texas, with production starting later in the year. It has another deal with eVAC of Germany to get magnets from a South Carolina plant starting in 2026. In the meantime, GM and its suppliers have applied for permits to get magnets from China, a source familiar with the matter said. Scott Keogh, the CEO of Scout Motors – the upstart EV brand of Volkswagen – told Bloomberg Television his company is re-engineering brakes and drive units to reduce the need for rare earths. Scout is building a plant in South Carolina to make fully electric and hybrid SUVs as well as trucks starting in 2027. Until the rare-earth supply line is reopened to Washington's satisfaction, Trump has indicated that the US is likely to keep in place its own export restrictions. Senior US officials have suggested the curbs are about building and using leverage, rather than their official justification: national security. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the measures were used to 'annoy' China into complying with a deal US negotiators thought they'd already reached. Restrictions on sales to China of electronic design automation (EDA) software for chipmaking are emblematic of the standoff. Those EDA tools are used to design everything, from the highest-end processors for the likes of Nvidia and Apple to simple parts, such as power-regulation components. Fully limiting China's access to the best software, made by a trio of Western firms, has been a longtime priority in some Washington national security circles – and would build on years of US measures targeting China's semiconductor prowess. While some senior Trump officials specifically indicated the administration would relax some semiconductor-related curbs if Beijing relents on rare earths, EDA companies still lack details on when, and whether, their China access will be restored, said industry officials who requested anonymity to speak candidly. Even if that happens, there's a worry that heightened geopolitical risks will push Chinese customers to hunt for other suppliers or further develop domestic capabilities. 'The risk is there for the London deal to fall apart,' said Alicia Garcia Herrero, chief economist for Asia-Pacific at Natixis. 'Because rare earths is a very granular issue and mistakes can be made.' BLOOMBERG