SpaceX and Amazon Are Quietly Launching a New Space Race Right Now

If it seems like there's a lot of rocket launches lately, you're not wrong. While SpaceX just successfully launched a Falcon 9 rocket containing Starlink satellites on April 27, the aerospace company also launched a nearly identical rocket on April 28. And at nearly the exact same time, Amazon's Project Kuiper is also launching an Atlas V rocket containing Kuiper 1.
What do these dueling launches have in common? Well, like the Starlink network, Project Kuiper is also hoping to create communication coverage with a string of various satellites. Essentially, Project Kuiper represents the first round of Amazon satellites in direct competition with Starlink.
Although not the same company as Blue Origin, Project Kuiper is owned by Jeff Bezos. The first launch for the project is scheduled to blast off from Florida's Cape Canaveral Space Force Station on Monday, April 28, at 7:00 p.m. EDT.
You can watch the live stream on YouTube, which is embedded below.
The latest SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket successfully launched the latest round of Starlink satellites on Monday, April 28, at 4:42 p.m. EDT. This launch took place from Vandenberg, California. This was the second SpaceX Starlink launch in two days. You can watch the in-progress live stream on X and embedded below.
While it may sound a little melodramatic, the truth is, the competing technologies represent a battle for the future of orbital communication. Elon Musk has long promised that Starlink could provide low-cost internet to remote areas. So far, the results of this project have been somewhat mixed.
Meanwhile, Project Kuiper is also poised to create its own satellite broadband network in low-Earth orbit. If Amazon is successful, this will put it in direct competition with Starlink.
That said, in the U.S., there are two other satellite internet providers right now, including HughesNet and Viasat. If Amazon is successful, Project Kuiper will become the fourth in the U.S. market.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

3 hours ago

• Yahoo

SpaceX traces Starship test-stand explosion to failure of pressurized nitrogen tank

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. SpaceX thinks it knows why its newest Starship spacecraft went boom this week. The 171-foot-tall (52-meter-tall) vehicle exploded on a test stand at SpaceX's Starbase site late Wednesday night (June 18) as the company was preparing to ignite its six Raptor engines in a "static fire" trial. A day later, SpaceX narrowed in on a likely cause. "Initial analysis indicates the potential failure of a pressurized tank known as a COPV, or composite overwrapped pressure vessel, containing gaseous nitrogen in Starship's nosecone area, but the full data review is ongoing," the company wrote in an update on Thursday (June 19). "There is no commonality between the COPVs used on Starship and SpaceX's Falcon rockets," the company added. So, launches of the workhorse Falcon 9, which has already flown 75 times in 2025, should not be affected. The Starship explosion did not cause any reported injuries; all SpaceX personnel at Starbase are safe, according to the update. People living around the site, which is near the border city of Brownsville, shouldn't be worried about contamination from the incident, SpaceX said. "Previous independent tests conducted on materials inside Starship, including toxicity analyses, confirm they pose no chemical, biological, or toxicological risks," the company wrote. "SpaceX is coordinating with local, state, and federal agencies, as appropriate, on matters concerning environmental and safety impacts." That said, the explosion did damage the area around the test stand, which is at Starbase's Massey site (not the orbital launch mount area, from which Starship lifts off). "The explosion ignited several fires at the test site which remains clear of personnel and will be assessed once it has been determined to be safe to approach," SpaceX wrote in the update. "Individuals should not attempt to approach the area while safing operations continue." Related Stories: — SpaceX's Starship explodes in Texas during preparations for 10th test flight — SpaceX reached space with Starship Flight 9 launch, then lost control of its giant spaceship (video) — Starship and Super Heavy explained Wednesday night's explosion occurred during preparations for Starship's 10th flight test, which SpaceX had hoped to launch by the end of the month. (Static fires are common prelaunch tests, performed to ensure that engines are ready to fly.) That timeline will now shift to the right, though it's not clear at the moment by how much. The incident was the latest in a series of setbacks for Starship upper stages. SpaceX lost the vehicle — also known as Ship — on the last three Starship flight tests, which launched in January, March and May of this year. Starship's first stage, called Super Heavy, has a better track record of late. For example, on Flight 7 and Flight 8, the huge booster successfully returned to Starbase, where it was caught by the launch tower's "chopstick" arms as planned.

Business Insider

4 hours ago

• Business Insider

Elon Musk says xAI will retrain Grok: 'Far too much garbage'

When you're Elon Musk, you don't have to rely on centuries of prevailing human understanding — you can create your own. "We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors," Musk wrote on X on Friday night. Then, he said he would retrain Grok's latest model on that new base of knowledge to be free of proverbial waste. "Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data," he added. Musk has for years endeavored to create products, like the rebranded Twitter and Grok, that are free from what he views as harmful mainstream constraints. Business Insider previously reported that Grok's army of "AI tutors" was training the bot on a host of dicey topics to compete with OpenAI's more "woke" ChatGPT. Musk on Saturday asked X users to respond to his post with examples of "divisive facts" that can be used in Grok's retraining. Gary Marcus, an AI hype critic and professor emeritus at New York University, compared Musk's effort to an Orwellian dystopia, which isn't the first time he's made the comparison. "Straight out of 1984. You couldn't get Grok to align with your own personal beliefs, so you are going to rewrite history to make it conform to your views," he wrote on X in response to Musk. A revamped Grok could have real-world impacts. In May, just as Musk was stepping back from his work in Washington, DC to refocus on his various companies, Reuters reported that DOGE was planning to expand its use of Grok to analyze government data. "They ask questions, get it to prepare reports, give data analysis," a source told Reuters, referring to how the bot was being used. Two other sources told the outlet that officials in the Department of Homeland Security had been encouraged to use it despite the fact that it hadn't been approved. A representative for the department told the New Republic that "DOGE hasn't pushed any employees to use any particular tools or products." Grok has also had security issues. In May, after what the company said was an "unauthorized modification" to its backend, the bot started to frequently refer to "white genocide" in South Africa. The company quickly resolved the issue and said it had conducted a "thorough investigation" and was "implementing measures to enhance Grok's transparency and reliability."

Yahoo

6 hours ago

• Yahoo

Here's Why Jeff Bezos Only Paid Himself an $80,000 Salary From Amazon

The name Jeff Bezos is synonymous with Amazon and as a multi-billionaire. Although he's one of the richest people in the world, he's only paid himself a salary of $80,000 for around 20 years, according to the New York Times. Discover Next: Find Out: When asked why during an interview by the New York Times, Bezos said that he 'just didn't feel good about taking more' money when he 'already owned a significant amount of the company.' He said in the interview that he felt that he had 'plenty of incentive' since he owned more than 20% of Amazon and had gone down 10% since he started selling off his shares, and doesn't need any more wealth. Of course, as Amazon continues to remain profitable, his shares of Amazon keep increasing in value and are still making billions for him. Bezos isn't the only leader from a major corporation who has paid themselves a low salary. Here are a few. The Google co-founder reportedly pays himself a paltry $1 annual salary since 2004, when Google went public. He earns more from Google since Brin owns millions of Class A shares, which are used to have an ownership stake in the company. He also has thousands of Class B shares (which still have some voting rights) from the tech giant. The former CEO of Oracle has also paid himself a $1 annual salary, but owns around $90 million in stock options. Ellison also receives 'other compensation' equally, around $5 million. See Next: As the founder and former CEO of Whole Foods, he, too, earns $1 per year — it seems like a popular number. He has paid himself this amount since 2007. Due to his ownership in the grocery chain, he receives much higher compensation, not just through a salary. The co-founder and CEO of Facebook earns a higher salary than most on this list at $600,000. Yeah, that's a big number to most of us, but in comparison to other CEOs and what Facebook itself brings in, it seems small by comparison. In other words, some CEOs are getting paid multi-million-dollar salaries, while Zuckerberg is paid a fraction of that. Hayne is the president and CEO of Urban Outfitters, a fast fashion and lifestyle chain with locations all over the world. He, too, has opted for a $1 per year salary. However, he technically earns more than his base salary, as he gets a $5,000 bonus and $1 million from a non-equity incentive plan participation. What this means is that this compensation is based on Hayne's performance at his job and is not at all tied to his salary. Meaning, he could still earn a significant amount of money in his role at Urban Outfitters, but not a steady amount. More From GOBankingRates 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on Here's Why Jeff Bezos Only Paid Himself an $80,000 Salary From Amazon Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data