SpaceX rockets keep exploding. Is that normal?

With yet another failed Starship test this week, in which the ambitious heavy rocket exploded once again, you might reasonably suspect that luck has finally run out for SpaceX.
But this degree of failure during a development process isn't actually unusual, according to Wendy Whitman Cobb, a space policy expert with the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, especially when you're testing new space technology as complex as a large rocket. However, the Starship tests are meaningfully different from the slow, steady pace of development that we've come to expect from the space sector.
'The reason a lot of people perceive this to be unusual is that this is not the typical way that we have historically tested rockets,' Whitman Cobb says.
Historically speaking, space agencies like NASA or legacy aerospace companies like United Launch Alliance (ULA) have taken their time with rocket development and have not tested until they were confident in a successful outcome. That's still the case today with major NASA projects like the development of the Space Launch System (SLS), which has now dragged on for over a decade. 'They will take as long as they need to to make sure that the rocket is going to work and that a launch is going to be successful,' Whitman Cobb says.
'This is not the typical way that we have historically tested rockets.'
SpaceX has chosen a different path, in which it tests, fails, and iterates frequently. That process has been at the heart of its success, allowing the company to make developments like the reusable Falcon 9 rocket at a rapid pace. However, it also means frequent and very public failures, which have generated complaints about environmental damage in the local area around the launch site and have caused the company to butt heads with regulatory agencies. There are also significant concerns about the political ties of CEO Elon Musk to the Trump administration and his undemocratic influence over federal regulation of SpaceX's work.
Even within the context of SpaceX's move-fast-and-break-things approach, though, the development of the Starship has appeared chaotic. Compared to the development of the Falcon 9 rocket, which had plenty of failures but a generally clear forward path from failing often to failing less and less as time went on, Starship has a much more spotty record.
Previous development was more incremental, first demonstrating that the rocket was sound before moving onto more complex issues like reusability of the booster or first stage. The company didn't even attempt to save the booster of a Falcon 9 and reuse it until several years into testing.
Starship isn't like that. 'They are trying to do everything at once with Starship,' Whitman Cobb says, as the company is trying to debut an entirely new rocket with new engines and make it reusable all at once. 'It really is a very difficult engineering challenge.'
'They are trying to do everything at once with Starship.'
The Raptor engines that power the Starship are a particularly tough engineering nut to crack, as there are a lot of them — 33 per Starship, all clustered together — and they need to be able to perform the tricky feat of reigniting in space. The relighting of engines has been successful on some of the previous Starship test flights, but it has also been a point of failure.
Why, then, is SpaceX pushing for so much, so fast? It's because Musk is laser-focused on getting to Mars. And while it would theoretically be possible to send a mission to Mars using existing rockets like the Falcon 9, the sheer volume of equipment, supplies, and people needed for a Mars mission has a very large mass. To make Mars missions even remotely affordable, you need to be able to move a lot of mass in one launch — hence the need for a much larger rocket like the Starship or NASA's SLS.
NASA has previously been hedging its bets by developing its own heavy launch rocket as well as supporting the development of Starship. But with recent funding cuts, it's looking more and more likely that the SLS will get axed — leaving SpaceX as the only player in town to facilitate NASA's Mars plans.
But there's still an awful lot of work to do to get Starship to a place where serious plans for crewed missions can even be made.
'There's no way that they're putting people on that right now.'
Will a Starship test to Mars happen by 2026, with a crewed test to follow as soon as 2028, as Musk said this week he's aiming for? 'I think it's completely delusional,' Whitman Cobb says, pointing out that SpaceX has not appeared to be seriously considering issues like adding life support to the Starship or making concrete plans for Mars habitats, launch and landing pads, or infrastructure.
'I don't see SpaceX as putting its money where its mouth is,' Whitman Cobb says. 'If they do make the launch window next year, it's going to be uncrewed. There's no way that they're putting people on that right now. And I seriously doubt whether they will make it.'
That doesn't mean Starship will never make it to Mars, of course. 'I believe SpaceX will engineer their way out of it. I believe their engineering is good enough that they will make Starship work,' Whitman Cobb says. But getting an uncrewed rocket to Mars within the next decade is a lot more realistic than next year.
Putting people on the rocket, though, is another matter entirely. 'If they're looking to build a large-scale human settlement? That's decades,' Whitman Cobb says. 'I don't know that I will live to see that.'
Featured Videos From The Verge
Microsoft Build event in 15 minutes
Microsoft just wrapped its annual Build conference for 2025. The focus this year: AI agents. We got a look at the open agentic web, new CoPilot updates, Linux is now open-source, and the company also confirmed it's expanding its Azure AI Foundry models list to include Elon Musk's Grok 3 and Grok 3 mini from xAI. Plus, we hear from OpenAI's Sam Altman and Nvidia's Jensen Huang. Here's everything you missed

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Washington Post

10 minutes ago

• Washington Post

Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election, reviving longstanding grievance

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Friday called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden, repeating his baseless claim that the contest was marred by widespread fraud. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favorably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!'

Medscape

10 minutes ago

• Medscape

Key Abstracts in Early-Stage NSCLC From ASCO 2025

Dr Jonathan Goldman of the University of California, Los Angeles, highlights key abstracts in early-stage NSCLC from ASCO 2025. Dr Goldman begins with updated results from CheckMate 816, comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo + nivolumab. Median overall survival (OS) in the nivolumab arm remains unreached vs 73.7 months with chemo alone. Event-free survival (EFS) is durable at 59.6 vs 21.1 months, as evidenced by 5-year EFS of 49% in the combination arm. Next, he reviews the NeoADAURA trial evaluating neoadjuvant osimertinib ± chemo in resectable EGFR-mutated stage II-IIIB NSCLC. Major pathologic response was higher in osimertinib-containing arms (26% and 25%) vs 2% in the chemo arm, although long-term outcomes remain pending. Dr Goldman also discusses the SWOG/NRG S1914 trial of perioperative stereotactic body radiotherapy ± atezolizumab, which did not show improvements in OS or progression-free survival (PFS). He then highlights a prospective, low-dose CT screening study of the Mississippi Delta cohort, which showed a 4.7% lung cancer detection rate overall and 4.5% in patients with incidental pulmonary nodules — underscoring the utility of low-dose CT as a modality in early detection. In closing, he reports on two studies in small cell lung cancer. The IMforte study showed that lurbinectedin + atezolizumab in 1L maintenance improved PFS (HR, 0.54). In the DeLLphi-304 study, second-line tarlatamab improved OS compared to chemo (HR, 0.6), which is a potentially practice-changing update.

Digital Trends

11 minutes ago

• Digital Trends

LG 2025 TV buying guide: New lineup and models explained

LG has long been a trusted brand name for TVs and all kinds of appliances. Within that TV department, what it's done with its OLED models is remarkable, especially when it comes to variety, which we'll get to. More than ever this year, it's also giving some extra love to the rest of the lineup. This guide breaks down LG's 2025 TV lineup to help you in the decision-making process if you're in the market for a new TV. There are a number of different models offered at a variety of sizes with varying levels of performance, and it can be a little bit confusing. We'll get there in a minute though, because we're starting with LG's budget-friendly LED lineup with the models that are new for 2025. LED TVs These are models labeled UA75 and UA77. They're both 4K TVs that support HDR10 and 4K gaming with a 60 Hz refresh rate and VRR, but they're not necessarily much to write home about. Both models feature direct LED backlighting, which is a step down from full array local dimming found in the higher-end models. Direct-lit usually results in worse contrast and more halo effects around bright objects. What they are is budget-friendly. At the 43-inch size, some models start under $300. Even if you climb the ladder up to 86 inches, you'll pay a little more than $1,000. These would be ideal for a college dorm room if you're getting a smaller size TV or for a room that just needs a TV but won't be the centerpiece of a home theater. QNED LED and Mini-LED TVs Moving up, there's LG's QNED lineup. These combine quantum dot and NanoCell tech to deliver richer, more accurate colors with a wider color gamut. They're also better to view from wider angles, so you don't need to be directly in front of the TV to get a decent picture. LG QNED82A LED TV Starting with the QNED82A, this LED model offers a better picture in terms of color and clarity thanks to LG's 'dynamic QNED color' and a feature called Dimming Pro, which does a better job controlling light and showing better contrast. While it's a fine TV starting at $600 for a 55-inch model and $750 for 65 inches, there's more to be had in the QNED lineup a little bit higher up. LG QNED85A mini-LED TV The QNED85A is a little more expensive, starting at $850 for the 55-inch version, but the improvements are significant, especially for gamers. The upgraded Alpha 8 AI Processor Gen 2 provides an even better picture and sound quality experience. Still, like the 82A, this is an edge-lit LED TV and a step below the full array local dimming found further up the lineup. However, for gamers that need more from their TVs, this is the model where 120 Hz refresh rates start to appear. Also worth noting, if you have the internet speed and router to take advantage, the QNED85A and beyond are Wi-Fi 6E enabled compared to Wi-Fi 5 on the QNED82A. On paper, that means internet connectivity to the TV can be much faster, which could make for a better streaming experience with less buffering for 4K shows, movies, and cloud gaming. LG QNED92A mini-LED TV At the top of the QNED lineup is the QNED92A. To eliminate confusion, that's its model number in the United States. In the United Kingdom, it's QNED93. They're essentially the same TV, but depending on the region you're in, you'll see one of those two. Take everything from the previous model and turn it up a notch in the QNED92A, which is only available in 65, 75, and 85 inches and starts at $1,800 for the 65-inch size. As the flagship QNED TV, it's the only model to feature full array local dimming and Dolby Vision. With the best backlight technology in the 92A, you'll get darker blacks and brighter highlights than anything else previously listed. In terms of audio, it sets itself apart as the only QNED TV in the lineup that supports Dolby Atmos. That means if you're streaming Dolby Atmos-compatible content from the TV operating system, webOS, you'll get Atmos in your speaker setup as long as they support it. In the lower-tier QNED85A, you'll need an external device that supports Dolby Atmos since that model only supports Dolby Atmos pass-through to your audio system. LG QNED9M wireless mini-LED TV Also in this section is the QNED9M, which adds the wireless connect box. Previously, this was exclusive to the OLED M series that introduced this box a few years ago. Adding this to the QNED lineup really reiterates LG's commitment to bolstering its mini-LED TVs, especially as competitors like Sony, Samsung, Hisense, and TCL continue to make big improvements in that department every year. Essentially, the QNED9M packs many of the same features as the 92A, including local dimming, Dolby Vision, and Dolby Atmos support. The wireless connect box means the only cord running from the TV is for power. It's offered in similar sizes too, starting at 65 inches for $1,800. OLED TVs Moving on to the OLED TVs — a little bit simpler. There are the B, C, and G series OLED TVs, ascending in that order. There's also the M series, which features the wireless connect box. In general, these are some of the best-looking TVs on the market thanks to OLED's superior contrast levels. LG B5 OLED TV Starting with the LG B5, it's offered at 48, 55, 65, 77, and 83 inches, which is great for getting into extra-large OLED sizes without spending quite as much. It's still not as inexpensive as some of LG's mini-LED options, but for example, the 83-inch B5 comes in at $4,500, while the 77-inch follows at $3,000. Pricing for the 55 and 65-inch models hasn't been announced yet but will be updated once available. As far as features, even what's considered entry-level OLED still comes pretty stacked. The B5 supports Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos. With its quick response time, it's a great TV for gaming too, complete with variable refresh rate up to 120 Hz. Four HDMI 2.1 ports don't hurt either, especially for entry-level OLED. Sansui's OLED offerings add a little more competition for the B series TVs in the budget OLED tier, but for those who want to purchase from a more familiar brand, the B5 is tough to beat. Final pricing will confirm if that holds up. LG C5 OLED TV The C series takes a moderate but still significant step up, mainly improving brightness and picture processing. The LG C5 uses the Alpha 9 Gen 8 processor — a step up from the Alpha 8 in the B series — and its refresh rate tops out at 144 Hz compared to 120 on the B5. One of the biggest differences separating the C5 from the B5 is the EVO panel. When you see OLED Evo, that's the panel with brightness booster tech, giving the C5 panel more brightness and more vibrant color. Along with the more advanced processor, this makes the C5 the better choice if image quality is a priority. The C5 also comes in a 42-inch size, unlike the B5 and the next TV. It's a great option for a monitor or a smaller gaming setup on a desk. LG G5 OLED TV The G5 is truly special and stands out among the TVs listed here. The G4, last year's model, was already closing the gap with its MLA (Micro Lens Array) panel, drawing closer to QD-OLED rivals from Samsung and Sony. This year, LG has taken the flagship G5 to new heights. The new four-stack OLED panel further enhances brightness — LG claims up to 45% better than the G4, which is impressive if you saw that magnificent G4 screen. When talking about brightness, it's not just for the sake of being bright and blinding. Overall brightness helps with daytime viewing or rooms with lots of ambient light, but brightness mainly benefits HDR viewing and how much the brightest objects on screen stand out from darker areas. Think of the twinkle of stars in a night sky or bright fire or sun that's meant to pop in a movie scene. The G5 has all the bells and whistles mentioned with the previous OLED models but improves in the gaming category with variable refresh rate up to 165 Hz. It comes in sizes ranging from 55 to 97 inches, with the 55-inch model starting at $2,500 and the 97-inch model sitting at a whopping $25,000. Note that the four-stack OLED panel is not available in the 97-inch version. Also, the G5 comes with LG's 5-year warranty, adding peace of mind for such a big investment. LG M5 wireless OLED TV Finally, though pricing isn't available yet, the LG M5 OLED was announced via press release back at CES and is expected to feature the same four-stack OLED panel as the G5. What makes it special is the wireless connect box. This allows you to set the wireless box out of sight and get lossless audio and video quality sent to the TV. It's especially convenient when mounting or placing the TV where running cables is tricky or if you want extra tidy cable management. From previous testing with an M series OLED, the wireless connectivity worked well with only occasional performance dips depending on obstructions between the wireless box and TV. The M5 is currently listed for pre-order in 65, 77, 83, and 97-inch sizes.