US presses Iran nuclear threat narrative despite IAEA's denial
US ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea stated at a UN Security Council meeting on Friday that Iran must be stopped from developing a nuclear bomb, despite IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi recently saying the agency found no evidence that Tehran is pursuing such a weapon. Analysts say Washington's narrative resembles past efforts to justify regime change in the Middle East.
Last week, Israel launched airstrikes on Iran, citing an imminent threat that Tehran would make a nuclear weapon. Iran, insisting its nuclear program is peaceful, retaliated with strikes on Israeli targets. The Israeli assault came days after the IAEA reported that Iran had enriched uranium to 60% – which is short of the 90% required for weapons.
However, since the strikes started, Grossi has claimed that his agency had no proof that Iran was actually trying to build a nuclear weapon, stressing that enriched uranium alone does not constitute a bomb. US intelligence agencies also maintain there is no evidence Iran is pursuing nuclear arms. Nevertheless, President Donald Trump has claimed Iran was 'very close' to acquiring a bomb and warned the US could intervene if it doesn't agree to scrap its nuclear program.
Amb. Dorothy Camille Shea, interim U.S. representative to the United Nations: "We can no longer ignore that Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon." pic.twitter.com/TeUP30avf5
Shea declared the US 'continues to stand with Israel' and backs its campaign against 'Iran's nuclear ambitions.' She insisted that the US 'can no longer ignore that Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' lacking only a decision from its supreme leader.
Some analysts say US rhetoric on Iran echoes President George W. Bush's 2002 claims about Iraqi WMDs, which led to a US invasion despite no stockpiles being found. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon told journalist Tucker Carlson this week that the entire operation against Iran 'that came out of nowhere' is in fact an attempt by the US 'deep state' to orchestrate regime change in Iran.
'We have a system that has its own national security policy… that is the fight we have to take on today,' Bannon stated, suggesting that Trump should not succumb to pressure from US war hawks and involve American military in the conflict. Tucker Carlson also said that while he supports Trump, he fears the consequences if he yields to pressure and joins the Israeli strikes. 'I think we're gonna see the end of the American empire,' he warned, criticizing Washington hawks for dragging the country into another war.
Journalist Steve Coll told NPR this week that using US intelligence to justify strikes mirrors the Iraq war narrative. He noted that while Israel calls its attacks preemptive, the objective remains vague.
'[Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu has spoken of regime change and urged Iranians to rise up – just like George H.W. Bush did in 1991 with Iraq,' Coll said. 'There's no sign of a planned invasion, yet talk of toppling Iran's government persists.'
Other observers, including former US President Bill Clinton, suggested Israel's 'undeclared war' on Iran may also be driven by another goal – Netanyahu's desire to stay in power. Shea made a notable slip during her UN remarks, initially blaming Israel for 'chaos and terror' in the Middle East before correcting herself to attribute it to Iran. RT's Rick Sanchez and journalist Chay Bowes called her words a 'Freudian slip' while discussing the situation in an episode of Sanchez Effect on Friday, with Sanchez adding, 'She accidentally said the truth out loud.'
US representative to the UN Dorothy Shea:"Israel's government has also spread chaos, terror and suffering throughout the region..."Awkward pause."Iran's government has also spread chaos, terror and suffering throughout the region..."It's always foreign policy that brings… pic.twitter.com/W5UMV52rVn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump believes only negotiated agreement can resolve Russia-Ukraine conflict
US President Donald Trump believes a negotiated agreement between Russia and Ukraine is the only viable path to ending the conflict between the two countries, according to State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce. Trump's efforts to mediate a truce between Russia and Ukraine contributed to the countries restarting direct negotiations in Türkiye last month – talks that Kiev abandoned in 2022 to focus on its military efforts. Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that while Moscow is not seeking an unconditional surrender, Kiev must acknowledge the 'realities on the ground,' and that its negotiating position worsens with each passing day. In a press briefing on Friday, Bruce was asked whether those remarks mean that Moscow is not serious about the talks, and how Washington would respond. 'As I've mentioned before, during negotiations, things sometimes progress, things change. That's the whole point of negotiations and conversations: You signal how long you're generally willing to wait, but you also know if someone is serious,' she said, noting, 'At the same time, we've heard some very blunt comments by President Trump about President Putin.' That's where we've landed at this point in comments from both the president and secretary of state – that the only way this is going to end is for the two parties to meet and come to a conclusion and a decision, and some kind of an agreement. She added that while the US remains Ukraine's 'biggest supporter,' the process of peace negotiations is complex and constantly evolving. 'We are clearly making our presence and our care about the situation known... but this is not about reacting to a single quote or online statement,' she said. Asked about Putin's assertion that Russia now holds a 'strategic advantage' in the conflict, Bruce declined to comment on potential punitive measures or sanctions, reiterating: 'We're not going to listen to what [Russia] says – we're going to watch what they do.' 'Only the president can make the decision about how to proceed. Only he knows all the elements about what's important and how we're going to make a difference,' she said. 'As I term it… there is one guiding hand to the choices that we make. And that would include Russia, Ukraine, and every conflict he's trying to stop.' The spokeswoman added that direct engagement between Moscow and Washington continues behind the scenes, involving 'months now of dealing with the parties directly,' and argued that Trump, as 'the most powerful leader in the world right now,' is better positioned than the public or press to assess the situation.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Pakistan recommends Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
The Pakistani government has formally recommended US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his mediation efforts in ending the recent military conflict between Islamabad and New Delhi. India, however, insists Trump played no role in de-escalating the tensions. Relations between the two nuclear-armed neighbors escalated in late April after a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam in Indian‑administered Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on Pakistan‑backed militants. In a statement on Friday, the Pakistani government announced it 'decided to formally recommend' Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis.' According to Islamabad, the American leader helped de-escalate a 'rapidly deteriorating situation' that could have triggered 'catastrophic consequences for millions in the region and beyond.' It also expressed gratitude to Trump for offering to help resolve the longstanding Kashmir dispute between Pakistan and India. The US president has repeatedly claimed credit for the ceasefire on May 10 that halted the hostilities between the two neighboring states. However, the Indian government has denied that the US president played a decisive role. Speaking at a press briefing on Wednesday, Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri revealed that during a phone conversation with Trump the previous day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed that 'India has never accepted mediation [to resolve its dispute with Islamabad over Jammu and Kashmir], does not accept and will never accept it.' Also on Wednesday, the US president invited Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir to a private lunch meeting, after the field marshal similarly called for Trump's Nobel nomination, Reuters reported, citing White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly. On Saturday, in a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump stated that he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio had arranged a 'wonderful treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda in their war.' 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for keeping Peace between Egypt and Ethiopia… and I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the Abraham Accords in the Middle East,' Trump lamented. Speaking to reporters the previous day, the Republican made similar claims about his role in resolving those conflicts. 'I should have gotten [the Nobel Peace Prize] four or five times,' he insisted, claiming that this will not happen 'because they only give it to liberals.'
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
US presses Iran nuclear threat narrative despite IAEA's denial
US ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea stated at a UN Security Council meeting on Friday that Iran must be stopped from developing a nuclear bomb, despite IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi recently saying the agency found no evidence that Tehran is pursuing such a weapon. Analysts say Washington's narrative resembles past efforts to justify regime change in the Middle East. Last week, Israel launched airstrikes on Iran, citing an imminent threat that Tehran would make a nuclear weapon. Iran, insisting its nuclear program is peaceful, retaliated with strikes on Israeli targets. The Israeli assault came days after the IAEA reported that Iran had enriched uranium to 60% – which is short of the 90% required for weapons. However, since the strikes started, Grossi has claimed that his agency had no proof that Iran was actually trying to build a nuclear weapon, stressing that enriched uranium alone does not constitute a bomb. US intelligence agencies also maintain there is no evidence Iran is pursuing nuclear arms. Nevertheless, President Donald Trump has claimed Iran was 'very close' to acquiring a bomb and warned the US could intervene if it doesn't agree to scrap its nuclear program. Amb. Dorothy Camille Shea, interim U.S. representative to the United Nations: "We can no longer ignore that Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon." Shea declared the US 'continues to stand with Israel' and backs its campaign against 'Iran's nuclear ambitions.' She insisted that the US 'can no longer ignore that Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' lacking only a decision from its supreme leader. Some analysts say US rhetoric on Iran echoes President George W. Bush's 2002 claims about Iraqi WMDs, which led to a US invasion despite no stockpiles being found. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon told journalist Tucker Carlson this week that the entire operation against Iran 'that came out of nowhere' is in fact an attempt by the US 'deep state' to orchestrate regime change in Iran. 'We have a system that has its own national security policy… that is the fight we have to take on today,' Bannon stated, suggesting that Trump should not succumb to pressure from US war hawks and involve American military in the conflict. Tucker Carlson also said that while he supports Trump, he fears the consequences if he yields to pressure and joins the Israeli strikes. 'I think we're gonna see the end of the American empire,' he warned, criticizing Washington hawks for dragging the country into another war. Journalist Steve Coll told NPR this week that using US intelligence to justify strikes mirrors the Iraq war narrative. He noted that while Israel calls its attacks preemptive, the objective remains vague. '[Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu has spoken of regime change and urged Iranians to rise up – just like George H.W. Bush did in 1991 with Iraq,' Coll said. 'There's no sign of a planned invasion, yet talk of toppling Iran's government persists.' Other observers, including former US President Bill Clinton, suggested Israel's 'undeclared war' on Iran may also be driven by another goal – Netanyahu's desire to stay in power. Shea made a notable slip during her UN remarks, initially blaming Israel for 'chaos and terror' in the Middle East before correcting herself to attribute it to Iran. RT's Rick Sanchez and journalist Chay Bowes called her words a 'Freudian slip' while discussing the situation in an episode of Sanchez Effect on Friday, with Sanchez adding, 'She accidentally said the truth out loud.' US representative to the UN Dorothy Shea:"Israel's government has also spread chaos, terror and suffering throughout the region..."Awkward pause."Iran's government has also spread chaos, terror and suffering throughout the region..."It's always foreign policy that brings…
