Minnesota House Democratic leader dead after targeted shooting; Democratic senator also shot
Speaker emeritus Rep. Melissa Hartman talks to colleagues during a special legislative session Monday, June 9, 2025 at the Minnesota State Capitol in St. Paul. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer)
House Democratic-Farmer-Labor caucus leader Melissa Hortman, who was among the most influential Minnesota elected officials of the past decade, died on Saturday morning after a man impersonating a police officer shot her in her Brooklyn Park home, Gov. Tim Walz said.
Hortman's husband was also shot and killed, the governor said.
Walz, appearing emotional at a press conference in the north metro, said they were killed in an apparent 'politically motivated assassination.'
'Our state lost a great leader, and I lost the dearest of friends,' Walz said. '(Hortman) was a formidable public servant, a fixture and a giant in Minnesota.'
Democratic Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were also shot multiple times earlier in the evening in their Champlin home. Walz said they were out of surgery, and that he's 'cautiously optimistic they will survive this assassination attempt.'
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Superintendent Drew Evans said Champlin law enforcement received a call at about 2 a.m. that a person shot Hoffman and his wife.
Brooklyn Park Police Department Chief Mark Bruley said his officers assisted with the Champlin shooting; a sergeant suggested checking in on Hortman's home. They live about five to eight miles away from each other. When Brooklyn Park police officers arrived at Hortman's home, they encountered a person who was dressed like a police officer who 'immediately fired at them,' Evans said. Police exchanged gunfire with the person, but they were able to escape.
The shooter is still at large, and Brooklyn Park is under a shelter-in-place order. Hundreds of police officers and SWAT teams are conducting a manhunt for the person, officials said.
Bruley said that when they arrived at Hortman's home, they saw a police SUV with its lights on and saw the suspect was impersonating a police officer.
In the SUV, police found a 'manifesto,' with a list of lawmakers and other officials on it. Hortman and Hoffman were on the list.
Hortman, who has two adult children, was first elected to the Legislature 2004 and served as House Speaker from 2019-2024. She lost two elections before winning, which she said gave her an understanding of what it takes to win swing seats and hold them.
Her speakership will be remembered as among the most consequential in recent Minnesota political history. With Walz and Senate GOP Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, she guided the state through the pandemic before helping Democrats achieve a trifecta in the 2022 election.
During the 2023 legislative session, she helped bridge the wide gulf between moderates and progressives in her caucus to achieve a historic legislative agenda. Democrats codified abortion rights in law; invested in education, including universal schools meals, as well as transportation and housing; created paid family leave; legalized cannabis; and passed gun control laws.
The encomiums poured in Saturday. 'There is no greater champion for Minnesota's working people than Melissa Hortman,' said Joel Smith, President and Business Manager of LIUNA Minnesota and North Dakota, the laborers union.
Hoffman was elected in 2012 and is known for his work on human services.
The Reformer sat down with Hortman at the Capitol on Thursday to discuss the 2025 session, which ended on Monday.
During his remarks Saturday, Walz denounced political violence and said the people involved in the shooting would be caught and held responsible.
'This was an act of targeted political violence. Peaceful discourse is the foundation of our democracy. We don't settle our differences with violence or at gunpoint,' Walz said.
House Speaker Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring, who worked closely with Hortman in the Legislature to negotiate a state budget this year, said she was horrified by Hortman's murder.
'I am horrified by the evil attack that took place overnight, and heartbroken beyond words by the loss of Speaker-Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark,' Demuth said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Attack on Iran need not lead to wider war, JD Vance says
Vice President JD Vance on Sunday said that President Donald Trump's move to strike nuclear facilities in Iran doesn't necessarily portend a greater conflict in the Middle East. In contrast, Vance told NBC's Kristen Welker on Sunday, the attack presents an opportunity to reset flagging negotiations on curtailing Iran's nuclear program. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance said on 'Meet the Press.' 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' Trump announced the strikes — on Iranian nuclear sites Fordo (also known as Fordow), Natanz and Esfahan — in a post on Truth Social on Saturday. The extent of the damage to the country's nuclear program isn't yet fully clear. But GOP skeptics of American military action against Tehran have largely come to heel. The vibe shift from Trump's No. 2 is notable, and it underscores the political currency that the president has built up within his own party. A longtime isolationist who served with the Marines in Iraq, Vance previously opposed any proactive military intervention against Iran in its own territory. But last week, he responded to debate around Trump's political authority and decision-making with an impassioned post on social media, arguing: 'The president has earned some trust on this issue.' 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' he told Welker on Sunday. 'I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then, we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives.' Vance said that the attack came in large part because Trump sensed Iran was 'tapping us along' in diplomatic talks. Even as recently as March, the White House 'had some optimism,' he said. 'How do we get from there to now? And the answer is, we felt very strongly that the Iranians were stonewalling us,' he said. 'They weren't taking this seriously. They were trying to draw this process out as long as possible so that they could rebuild their nuclear weapons program without the threat of American action.' As for what happens next? 'This is a reset,' Vance told Welker. 'This is an opportunity for the Iranians to take the smart path. We certainly hope that they will.'
an hour ago
Hegseth insists Iran strikes were 'intentionally limited' as US faces prospect of escalating war
After the U.S. hammered Iran with a series of "precision strikes" against three of its key nuclear facilities on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegesth insisted that the operation was "intentionally limited" as the prospect of wider war loomed. 'Well, anything can happen in conflict. We acknowledge that, but the scope of this was intentionally limited,' Hegseth said during a press conference Sunday with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine. Many lawmakers and even some of the president's allies were against striking Iran after President Trump's vow to keep the U.S. out of foreign conflicts and in the wake of decades of open-ended conflicts around the Middle East. Specifically, Hegseth said that the goal of the U.S. mission was not regime change, a prospect that has been left open by Israel. And he said both public and private channels were open with the Iranians in an attempt to bring them to the table for negotiations. 'They understand precisely what the American position is, precisely what steps they can take to allow for peace, and we hope they do so,' he said. Hegseth also pointed out that the strikes were targeted only at Iran's nuclear program, not its military members or civilian population. "The United States does not seek war," Hegseth said. "But let me be clear, we will act swiftly and decisively when our people, our partners, or our interests are threatened." Hegseth's remarks echoed those of Trump on Saturday night, when he said that peace was the goal of the mission and warned of Iran taking further steps against American interests. "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump said. "Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. "But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes." On ABC News' "This Week" Sunday, Vice President JD Vance tried to make clear"we're not at war with Iran, Jon. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program." After the strikes, Democrats and some Republicans criticized Trump's move, with some calling it "unconstitutional." "Donald Trump promised to bring peace to the Middle East. He has failed to deliver on that promise," said House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, of New York. "The risk of war has now dramatically increased, and I pray for the safety of our troops in the region who have been put in harm's way."
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Donald Trump's SNAP Benefit Cut Plans Suffer Blow
A plan by Republicans to shift a portion of federal food stamp costs to state governments suffered a major setback after the Senate parliamentarian found it would violate chamber rules. The blocked provision was an attempt to reduce federal spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), affecting more than 40 million low-income Americans who rely on food aid. The shift would have transferred major SNAP costs to the states, requiring them to pay at least 5 percent—and potentially more—of benefit costs, which analysts warned could result in significant cuts to nutrition support. The parliamentarian's decision places additional pressure on the bill's champions to find alternative means to fund tax cuts without imperiling food assistance, Medicaid, or other federal support programs. The provision, a cornerstone of Republican efforts to offset the costs of President Donald Trump's multitrillion-dollar tax and spending legislation, has been ruled inadmissible under Senate rules, sending GOP leaders scrambling to revise the mega bill. The ruling, issued by Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, came as the package prepared for a vote. While her opinions are advisory, they are rarely ignored in lawmaking practice. Republican lawmakers are now searching for new savings as they continue to advance Trump's legislative priorities despite the setback. MacDonough declared the SNAP cost-sharing plan noncompliant with the chamber's budget reconciliation rules, specifically the Byrd Rule, which bars certain policy measures from being attached to budget bills. The proposal would have shifted billions of dollars in SNAP costs from the federal government to the states, creating a new fiscal obligation for state governments and threatening coverage for millions. House Passes Bill with GOP SNAP Cuts The House passed the broader tax and spending package along party lines in May 2025, including a provision to require states to fund at least 5 percent of SNAP benefits and more for high error rates. The House-passed measure's SNAP provision was projected to save about $128 billion. Republican leaders had hoped these savings would help offset the bill's $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and new spending. Other Key Provisions Beyond SNAP, the package includes an extension and expansion of individual and business tax cuts, new work requirements for Medicaid recipients, cuts to federal health and nutrition programs, increased military and border security funding, and the elimination of taxes on tips for service workers. GOP Paths Forward Republican leaders, including Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman of Arkansas, said they were exploring options to keep the legislation on track while still delivering savings elsewhere. Options range from modifying the disputed SNAP provision to removing it entirely or risking a procedural vote requiring 60 votes—an unlikely scenario in the current Senate. Impact on SNAP Recipients The plan would have expanded work requirements to older adults (up to age 65), a component that remains in the bill for now. Democrats and anti-hunger advocates warned of significant harm to those in need, with more than 3 million individuals projected to lose food stamp access based on Congressional Budget Office estimates. Additional Rulings Expected The Senate parliamentarian is also expected to rule on other elements in the bill, including limits on immigrant eligibility for nutrition aid and changes to federal agencies, with further decisions likely to shape the final legislation. Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, said: "We will keep fighting to protect families in need," opposing shifts in SNAP costs to states, which she said would result in significant benefit cuts. Arkansas Senator John Boozman, chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said Republicans are "exploring options" to comply with Senate rules, while supporting those reliant on SNAP. Senate Republicans are expected to revise the bill to comply with the parliamentarian's rulings or drop the contested SNAP provisions. Further decisions from the adviser on other elements of the megabill are anticipated before any final Senate vote. This article contains reporting from The Associated Press. Related Articles When Are July 2025 SNAP Payments Coming?Republicans Out Of Step With Voters On Medicaid FundingNew York State Facing Lawsuit Over SNAP BenefitsSNAP Recipients Get Extra Money This Month in California 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
