logo
#

Latest news with #systematicreview

Cold weather and joint pain: What is the connection?
Cold weather and joint pain: What is the connection?

Medical News Today

time16 hours ago

  • Health
  • Medical News Today

Cold weather and joint pain: What is the connection?

Effects Who it affects Managing pain Contacting a doctor FAQ Summary Cold weather may worsen joint pain in some people, such as those with arthritis or orthopedic implants. Keeping warm by dressing appropriately for the weather and using draft excluders at home may help. Many people with health conditions such as arthritis report worsening joint pain when temperatures drop. Some research supports this, but more studies may be necessary for scientists to understand exactly why this happens and how common it is. Taking steps to stay warm may help reduce joint pain during cold weather. However, if someone experiences severe or persistent pain that interferes with their daily life, it is a good idea to speak with a healthcare professional. CatherineHistorically, most evidence of a link between cold weather and joint pain was anecdotal. However, in recent years, more researchers are investigating a cause-and-effect link. A 2025 review suggests that low temperatures may affect: compliance of the periarticular structures, which are tissues around a joint viscosity (resistance to flow) of synovial fluid, which is in joint cavities the ability of substances to pass through blood vessels, which may affect inflammation blood vessel constriction These effects may lead to increased joint pain and stiffness during cold weather. A 2023 systematic review of 14 studies suggests a correlation between increased osteoarthritis joint pain and lower temperatures, as well as increased atmospheric pressure and relative humidity. A potential cause for this is an overexpression of thermosensitive transient receptor potential channels (thermo-TRPs) in cold weather. Thermo-TRPs are a type of protein structure in cells involved in functions such as body temperature regulation and pain perception. However, the researchers conclude that more research is necessary to fully understand the links between osteoarthritis pain and weather conditions, including temperature. According to the 2025 review, cold weather may affect how people use care resources for health conditions such as arthritis. For example, lower temperatures may make people less likely to use physical therapy, which could contribute to increases in their symptoms. The Arthritis Foundation also suggests that cold weather may contribute to lower moods, which may cause people to focus more on their pain. More research is necessary to understand exactly how cold weather affects joint pain and other factors that may contribute. Not everyone will experience joint pain when it gets colder. However, certain health conditions may increase a person's chance. Pain is subjective and varies from person to person, even among people with the same health conditions. Mild pain for one person may feel severe for another. So, there is no guarantee everyone with arthritis will have painful joints when it gets colder. A 2020 study also suggests a link between cold weather and increased pain in people with orthopedic implants, such as joint replacements. If someone tends to experience worsening joint pain in colder temperatures, it can help to monitor weather forecasts to anticipate weather changes before they happen and take steps to prepare. Keeping warm may help reduce joint pain due to cold weather. People can try the following steps: wear warm clothes, such as gloves and multiple layers choose clothes made from insulating materials, such as wool use hot water bottles or portable hand warmers use heat pads or heated blankets at home place draft excluders or door sweeps on doors at home eat a hot meal or drink a warm drink move around to boost circulation If someone has a health condition that affects their joints, sticking to their treatment plan even during cold weather can help prevent worsening joint pain. A person's symptoms may differ depending on factors such as underlying health conditions, current treatments, and more. If someone does not have a diagnosed health condition but starts experiencing persistent or frequent joint pain, a doctor can diagnose the underlying cause. People with a health condition, such as arthritis, may benefit from speaking with a healthcare professional if they experience a severe flare-up or worsening symptoms. Their healthcare team may wish to change their current treatment plan to help them manage their symptoms. Although warmer temperatures may improve joint pain for some people, other weather factors, such as humidity and barometric pressure, can also affect joint pain. Treatment compliance and other factors may also contribute. The Arthritis Foundation suggests there is no guarantee a warmer climate will help. However, people can visit a new climate at different times throughout the year before committing to moving to see if their symptoms improve. No scientific studies support an 'ideal' temperature to reduce joint pain. The most comfortable temperature to relieve joint pain may vary from person to person. People can use a symptom journal to help work out what temperatures seem to relieve their joint pain and what temperatures worsen it. No scientific research supports using copper or magnetic bracelets to relieve joint pain during cold weather. However, the Arthritis Foundation suggests there is no harm in trying this remedy alongside a doctor-approved treatment plan. Some people may find that their symptoms improve due to the placebo effect. Cold weather may trigger or worsen joint pain in certain people, such as those with arthritis or joint replacements. Low temperatures may affect the fluid and tissues in and around joints, causing pain and stiffness. People may also focus on symptoms more and be less likely to follow treatment plans in cold weather. Taking steps to keep warm may help relieve joint pain that worsens in cold weather. This may include wearing multiple layers, using hand warmers or heat pads, and fitting draft excluders at home. Medical News Today has strict sourcing guidelines and relies on peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical journals and associations. We only use quality, credible sources to ensure content accuracy and integrity. You can learn more about how we ensure our content is accurate and current by reading our editorial policy.

Nonsurgical Options Show Modest Benefit in Chronic Back Pain
Nonsurgical Options Show Modest Benefit in Chronic Back Pain

Medscape

time11-06-2025

  • Health
  • Medscape

Nonsurgical Options Show Modest Benefit in Chronic Back Pain

In people with nonspecific chronic low back pain, nonsurgical interventions like cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness possibly showed small-to-moderate long-term benefits in reducing pain intensity and disability. However, the evidence was mostly of low-to-moderate certainty. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 randomized or cluster randomized controlled trials involving 15,395 participants aged 16 years or older (mean age, 45.7 years; median percentage of women, 61%) with chronic low back pain lasting at least 12 weeks. They assessed the effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions for chronic low back pain (including 91% trials on nonspecific chronic low back pain) with a focus on long-term (1-2 years) and very long-term (≥ 2 years) outcomes. Psychological, physical, and combination nonsurgical interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and multidisciplinary care, were assessed, with exercise being the most frequently assessed intervention. Interventions were compared with placebo or sham, adjuvant interventions, no intervention, or usual care. Pain intensity and disability were assessed using scales like the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index, respectively, along with other measures, and the certainty of evidence was assessed. TAKEAWAY: At long-term follow-up, small-to-moderate reductions in pain intensity and disability were possibly seen with cognitive-behavioral therapy (mean differences, -7.2 and -5.7, respectively) and mindfulness (mean differences, -10.0 and -9.3, respectively) in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain. The evidence was of moderate certainty. Goal setting and needling interventions probably resulted in small reductions in disability, with mean differences of -8.3 and -4.8, respectively. Multicomponent biopsychosocial care and behavioral therapy might have led to moderate and small reductions, respectively, in pain intensity in those with nonspecific chronic low back pain (mean differences, -10.2 and -7.4, respectively; low-certainty evidence). Multidisciplinary care could have led to small reductions in disability (mean difference, -8.3). At very long-term follow-up, multidisciplinary care may have led to a moderate reduction in pain intensity (mean difference, -10.1), whereas exercise may have resulted in a moderate decrease in disability (mean difference, -10.2) in those with nonspecific chronic low back pain. The evidence was mostly of low certainty. IN PRACTICE: 'Although we identified some interventions with long-term effects for people with chronic low back pain, the clinical importance of the effects is uncertain,' the study authors wrote. 'Greater attention is needed on developing and testing interventions with long-term effects for chronic low back pain.' SOURCE: The study was led by Hazel J. Jenkins, PhD, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. It was published online on May 28, 2025, in The Lancet Rheumatology . LIMITATIONS: The certainty of the evidence was reduced for most comparisons because of the quality of the studies and inconsistencies in the results. DISCLOSURES: The study reported receiving no specific funding. Some authors reported receiving grants, support for attending meetings, research fellowships, and serving as members of the executive board of the network and/or as members of associations outside the submitted work.

Continuing Metformin Reduces PCOS Pregnancy Risks
Continuing Metformin Reduces PCOS Pregnancy Risks

Medscape

time05-06-2025

  • Health
  • Medscape

Continuing Metformin Reduces PCOS Pregnancy Risks

Continuing metformin throughout the first trimester in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) showed the potential to reduce miscarriage risk (odds ratio [OR], 0.64) and increase clinical pregnancy rates (OR, 1.57) compared with placebo. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 1708 women suggested that stopping metformin at pregnancy confirmation might be less beneficial than continuation through the first trimester. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating metformin started preconception and continued at least until positive pregnancy test compared with placebo or no treatment in women with PCOS. The analysis included 12 trustworthy studies with 1708 participants, with trials conducted across 14 countries spanning five continents, all graded as low to moderate quality evidence. The primary outcome measure focused on miscarriage rate, defined as pregnancy loss prior to 20 completed weeks of gestation, while secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Investigators performed indirect comparisons between treatment groups using the Bucher technique to evaluate clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for metformin treatment continued throughout first trimester vs stopped at a positive pregnancy test. TAKEAWAY: Women receiving preconception metformin continued throughout the first trimester had higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11-2.23), potential reduction in miscarriage (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32-1.25), and possible increase in live birth (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.59-2.61) compared with placebo or no treatment. Participants who stopped metformin once pregnant showed an increased clinical pregnancy rate (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.80) but suggested higher miscarriage risk (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.73-2.90) compared with placebo or no treatment. Indirect comparisons consistently favored continuing metformin through first trimester vs stopping at pregnancy confirmation for clinical pregnancy (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.74-1.83), miscarriage (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.17-1.16), and live birth (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.41-3.13). IN PRACTICE: 'Women with PCOS have been shown to have a fivefold increased risk per year of developing insulin resistance and subsequent type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance has been shown to be independently associated with a higher risk of miscarriage. Metformin acts by decreasing gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis and enhancing glucose uptake, all of which in turn reduce insulin resistance,' wrote the authors of the study. SOURCE: The study was led by James Cheshire, PhD, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust in Birmingham, England. It was published online in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . LIMITATIONS: According to the authors, the main limitation was the inherent heterogeneous nature of the study population and the overall low quality of evidence. Women with PCOS have different phenotypes and varying degrees of hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance, which could not be accounted for in the analyses. Additionally, many studies did not subdivide pregnancy outcome data by body mass index (BMI), preventing meaningful analyses in BMI subgroups. The limited outcome data in spontaneously conceiving populations (only 30 women from two studies) make it difficult to extrapolate findings to this group. DISCLOSURES: The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. The study received no external funding.

DASH Diet Tied to Lower Risk for Colorectal Cancer
DASH Diet Tied to Lower Risk for Colorectal Cancer

Medscape

time19-05-2025

  • Health
  • Medscape

DASH Diet Tied to Lower Risk for Colorectal Cancer

Adherence to the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet — which emphasizes fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, whole grains, nuts, and low-fat dairy — was associated with a 19% reduced risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), with stronger protective effects observed in men than in women. METHODOLOGY: Conflicting evidence exists on the link between adherence to the DASH diet and CRC risk, highlighting the need for a comprehensive analysis. Researchers performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies analyzing the association between adherence to the DASH diet and CRC risk. Effect sizes were reported as hazard ratios, odds ratios, or relative risks (RRs) in the included studies, with most studies analyzing outcomes in both men and women. The methodological quality of the studies was independently assessed using relevant parameters. TAKEAWAY: Researchers included 14 studies: Eight cohort studies, four case-control studies, one cross-sectional study, and one comparative analysis; all studies had a low to moderate risk for bias and moderate to high quality. DASH adherence was associated with a significantly reduced risk for CRC (RR, 0.81), as analyzed in 13 effect sizes from nine articles. Risk reduction was greater in men (RR, 0.77) than in women (RR, 0.84). DASH adherence was associated with a 25% reduced risk for rectal cancer and a 17% reduced risk for colon cancer, according to an analysis of six and five effect sizes, respectively. Analysis of four effect sizes showed a substantially reduced risk for colorectal adenoma following adherence to the DASH diet (RR, 0.42). IN PRACTICE: 'The DASH diet can be a valuable component of a personalized plan for many in high-risk groups, but it shouldn't be presented as a one-size-fits-all solution,' the authors wrote. 'Registered dietitians and healthcare professionals play a crucial role in creating tailored dietary plans that are both effective and achievable for each individual,' they added. SOURCE: Mohammad Mehdi Abbasi of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Paria Babaahmadi of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Shiraz, and Fateme Nozari of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, all in Iran, led the study. It was published online in BMC Gastroenterology . LIMITATIONS: Included studies used different methods to assess DASH adherence, and its application varied across cultures and populations. Differences in various cooking styles, such as grilling, which might induce carcinogenesis, were not addressed. Colon and rectal adenomas were not specifically addressed in the included studies. DISCLOSURES: This study received no financial support. The authors declared having no competing interests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store