logo
ENع
#

Latest news with #environmentalist

Cycling charity misled public with ‘save the dormouse' campaign
Cycling charity misled public with ‘save the dormouse' campaign

Telegraph

time21 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Cycling charity misled public with ‘save the dormouse' campaign

Britain's biggest cycling charity misled the public by running an inaccurate fundraising campaign which claimed donations would save endangered wildlife, a regulator has found. Sustrans, which manages the vast National Cycle Network (NCN), launched a series of hugely successful Facebook adverts in 2022 pleading for money to help protect rare birds, bats, dormice and hedgehogs. The following year, the Fundraising Regulator received two complaints that the charity, which has received more than £100 million of taxpayers' cash to promote cycling and low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), was wrongly 'portraying' itself as a 'wildlife charity'. The watchdog launched an investigation and was sent examples of social media adverts in which Sustrans asked potential donors: 'Will you help save the dormouse?' Other adverts asked people to give money to tackle the 'environmental emergency' by preventing animals' homes from being 'razed to the ground' and paying for a nest box for a 'beautiful barn owl'. The Facebook adverts featured 'cute, fluffy' creatures, including a toad crossing a road, a Willow Tit and a young hedgehog snaffling for food. Now the regulator has ruled that Sustrans, twice breached the code of fundraising practice by giving the impression it was 'solely focused on wildlife protection activities'. The nature enthusiast who lodged the official complaint said Sustrans had to be 'dragged kicking and screaming' to the charity regulator before it eventually 'stopped misleading the public' and withdrew the adverts. The regulator's full ruling, seen by The Telegraph, will prove hugely embarrassing for the cycling charity, which after the pandemic benefited massively from controversial 'active travel' projects. 'The complainant is concerned that potential donors would not be aware their donations could fund work that has a potentially negative impact on wildlife,' the ruling says. 'We find that Sustrans positioning itself within this fundraising campaign as solely focused on wildlife protection activities on the NCN is likely to mislead potential donors.' It concludes that the 'fundraising campaign' was 'inaccurate' because 'a potential donor... could assume their donation will be used for wildlife protection' but could fund a 'different purpose'. Sustrans' 'wildlife protection work is predominantly a direct result of... increasing active travel and by expanding and developing the NCN', the ruling said. It added some sample ads were 'not clear about the charity's broad strategic aim', leaving some likely to 'conclude the charity's activities are mostly the promotion and protection of wildlife.' The complainant initially used the charity's internal complaints procedure, prompting Sustrans to pause and review the campaign, before making the adverts 'clearer'. But, the complainant, who is not named by the regulator and has maintained his right to anonymity, then contacted the regulator. The regulator found the charity 'acknowledges' its work expanding cycle networks 'could negatively impact protected wildlife species' and has a 'statutory obligation towards ecology work and biodiversity in relation to its charitable aim of expanding and improving the NCN' by installing bird, bat and dormouse boxes and managing hedgerows. Sustrans was found not to have breached the code that requires it to prove any 'direct or indirect claim' in its campaign. The dossier at the centre of the Fundraising Regulator's investigation, seen by the Telegraph, shows Sustrans' £140,000 a year chief executive, Xavier Brice, twice rejected the complainant's concerns saying: 'I have full confidence that our fundraising adverts are not misleading to the public in portraying us as a wildlife charity, only that we do spend time and money to support ecology and wildlife on the NCN.' The complainant said he was 'shocked' by the response after he raised concerns about 92 Facebook ads which he claimed attracted 'three million hits'. He said: 'It's brazenly unethical as they confirmed to me a lot of ecological work they do is to mitigate the negative effects of implementing cycling infrastructure. 'Sustrans' website only showed they sowed seeds and put up boxes for birds, bats and dormice. That's like a primary school eco-project. 'Sustrans had to be dragged kicking and screaming to stop misleading the public after two years. 'I believe it's unprecedented for the regulator to censure a charity this large which is mostly funded by the taxpayer.' The campaign was so successful that in its 2022/23 accounts, Sustrans boasted that tests of 'new digital engagement' fundraising campaigns found 'the best performing adverts' included 'cash gifts to support ecology work on the National Cycle Network'. A Sustrans spokesman said: 'All the work mentioned in our fundraising campaign appropriately reflects the work our in-house team of ecology experts and volunteers have done to improve biodiversity on the National Cycle Network. The regulator agreed we were able to show evidence that we had completed this work. 'Our ecology campaign was an unrestricted appeal, helping us to raise donations for our charitable objectives and we had a statement to that effect on every landing page. We accept the regulator's recommendation that we should have included more about our core mission, to make it easier for people to walk, wheel and cycle, throughout the adverts to ensure it was clear to potential supporters that our mission is not solely ecology on the National Cycle Network. 'The last thing we would want to do is mislead our supporters, who are vital to our mission. We have been grateful to collaborate closely with the regulator and we are implementing their recommendations.'

Dorothy Myers obituary
Dorothy Myers obituary

The Guardian

time12-06-2025

  • General
  • The Guardian

Dorothy Myers obituary

My friend and colleague Dorothy Myers, who has died aged 88, was a pioneering environmentalist. When she joined the Oxfam policy unit in Oxford in 1984, the organisation had just published David Bull's influential book Pesticides and the Third World Poor. Dorothy led Oxfam's input to teamwork with the global Pesticide Action Network (Pan) that challenged the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation to stop export of pesticides banned in industrialised countries to the developing world. While at Oxfam, she helped establish the Pesticides Trust (part of the global Pan, and now Pan UK), which promotes safe and sustainable alternatives to pesticides. Dorothy's research identified pesticides with deadly impacts in the global south and contributed to the Rotterdam Convention, an international treaty effective since 2004 that agrees responsibility for dangerous chemicals. Her last study at Oxfam, co-authored with Joan Davidson, on poverty and environmental degradation, was presented to the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. After leaving Oxfam, she joined Pan UK in 1994 to establish an organic cotton project with African partners. She helped the project identify methods of pest management that would safeguard health and reward farmers financially for growing organic cotton. Many thousands of farmers still benefit. Dr Abou Thiam, the former regional coordinator of Pan Africa, recalled how Dorothy was 'always available and always helpful' and'provided outstanding service to many peoples, farmers, communities and organisations in Africa'. Dorothy was thoughtful and strategic, with a great ability to turn abstract concepts into action. Friends around the world also remember her great sense of fun. Born in Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, she was the daughter of Amy (nee Hinton) and Frank Halliman, both teachers, and went to Middlesbrough high school for girls. She gained a degree in geography from LSE in 1959, then joined her parents, who were teaching in Kenya. Working in Nairobi's town planning department from 1960, she highlighted the need for essential services in rapidly growing shantytowns. Dorothy met the environmentalist Norman Myers in Kenya and they married in 1965. In the late 60s they built up a wildlife photographic business, which supported them through a spell in California while Norman studied for a PhD at the University of California, Berkeley. In 1972 they returned to Nairobi, where Dorothy became involved in local environmental action. In 1974, now with two young children, she helped establish the Environment Liaison Centre International, the local link to the Nairobi-based UN Environment Programme. The family returned to the UK in 1982 and settled in Oxford, where Dorothy began her work with Oxfam. Dorothy separated from Norman in 1992. Launching a new challenge, she ran an English language summer school for foreign students, remembered fondly by many who worked there, which she continued for many summers while at Pan UK. Always able to effortlessly fit more into life, Dorothy loved music, art and gardening, and being surrounded by nature. After retiring in 2001 she bought a house near Limoux, France, where friends and family valued entertaining discussions. Dorothy is survived by her daughters, Malindi and Mara, and grandchildren, Juliette and Alex.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store