Latest news with #Z2Go
Geeky Gadgets
04-06-2025
- Business
- Geeky Gadgets
Legion GO S vs Steam Deck OLED : Battle of the Handhelds
Is the handheld gaming market witnessing a new rivalry that could redefine portable play? With the rise of devices like the Lenovo Legion Go S and Valve's Steam Deck OLED, gamers are faced with a tantalizing choice between innovative performance and refined efficiency. The Legion Go S, Lenovo's bold entry into the scene, promises a powerhouse experience with customizable configurations and advanced display technology. Meanwhile, the Steam Deck OLED builds on its predecessor's legacy, offering a sleek, energy-efficient design paired with the vibrant visuals of an OLED screen. Both devices cater to distinct gaming priorities, but which one truly delivers the ultimate handheld experience? In this thorough comparison, ETA Prime explores the key differences that set these two contenders apart, from their performance benchmarks to battery life trade-offs and design philosophies. Whether you're drawn to the Legion Go S's premium features or intrigued by the Steam Deck OLED's balance of affordability and efficiency, this overview will help you uncover which device aligns with your gaming style. As we delve into their specs, pricing, and real-world performance, you might just find that the choice isn't as straightforward as it seems. Legion Go S vs Steam Deck Device Overview The Legion Go S represents Lenovo's ambitious entry into the handheld gaming sector. It offers two APU configurations: the AMD Z1 Extreme and the Z2 Go, providing flexibility for users seeking different levels of performance. Notably, it is the first third-party handheld device to ship with Steam OS, making sure seamless integration with Valve's gaming ecosystem. On the other hand, the Steam Deck OLED is an upgraded version of Valve's original Steam Deck. The inclusion of an OLED display enhances the visual experience while improving energy efficiency. This device builds on the success of its predecessor by offering a refined balance of performance and affordability, making it an appealing option for gamers seeking value. Specifications Comparison A detailed examination of the hardware reveals significant differences between the two devices, particularly in processing power, display technology, and refresh rates. Steam Deck OLED: Powered by an AMD Zen 2 APU with 4 cores and 8 threads clocked at 3.5 GHz, it features an RDNA 2 iGPU with 8 compute units running at 1600 MHz. The device includes 16 GB of LPDDR5 RAM (6400 MT/s) and a 7.4-inch OLED display with a 90 Hz refresh rate. Priced at $549 for the 512 GB model, it offers a compelling mix of performance and affordability. Powered by an AMD Zen 2 APU with 4 cores and 8 threads clocked at 3.5 GHz, it features an RDNA 2 iGPU with 8 compute units running at 1600 MHz. The device includes 16 GB of LPDDR5 RAM (6400 MT/s) and a 7.4-inch OLED display with a 90 Hz refresh rate. Priced at $549 for the 512 GB model, it offers a compelling mix of performance and affordability. Legion Go S (Z2 Go version): Equipped with an AMD Zen 3+ APU offering 4 cores and 8 threads at 4.3 GHz, it features an RDNA 2 iGPU with 12 compute units clocked at 2200 MHz. It also includes 16 GB of LPDDR5 RAM (6400 MT/s) and an 8-inch IPS display with a 120 Hz refresh rate and VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) support. The Z2 Go version is priced at $599 for the 512 GB model, reflecting its focus on premium performance. The Legion Go S stands out with its higher clock speeds and advanced display features, while the Steam Deck OLED prioritizes efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Which Handheld Console is Better? Watch this video on YouTube. Here are more guides from our previous articles and guides related to Lenovo Legion Go S that you may find helpful. Performance Performance is a critical factor for any gaming device, and the Legion Go S and Steam Deck OLED excel in different scenarios based on their TDP (Thermal Design Power) settings. Low TDP (15W): The Steam Deck OLED demonstrates superior efficiency in low-power scenarios. For example, in Forza Horizon 5 , it achieves 65 FPS, slightly outperforming the Legion Go S's 63 FPS. The Steam Deck OLED demonstrates superior efficiency in low-power scenarios. For example, in , it achieves 65 FPS, slightly outperforming the Legion Go S's 63 FPS. High TDP (20W): The Legion Go S takes the lead at higher power levels, delivering 72 FPS in Forza Horizon 5 and 56 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 , compared to the Steam Deck OLED's 47 FPS in the latter. These results highlight the Steam Deck OLED's strength in efficiency at lower power settings, while the Legion Go S excels in delivering higher performance when pushed to its limits. Battery Life Battery life is a crucial consideration for handheld gaming, and the two devices exhibit notable differences depending on their power consumption levels. Low TDP (6W): The Steam Deck OLED offers 5–7 hours of gameplay, compared to the Legion Go S's 4–6 hours. The Steam Deck OLED offers 5–7 hours of gameplay, compared to the Legion Go S's 4–6 hours. Moderate TDP (15W): Both devices achieve similar battery life, lasting approximately 2 hours and 15 minutes. Both devices achieve similar battery life, lasting approximately 2 hours and 15 minutes. High TDP (20W): The Legion Go S's battery life drops to around 1 hour and 20 minutes, while the Steam Deck OLED maintains a slight edge in efficiency. For gamers prioritizing extended playtime, the Steam Deck OLED's optimization for lower TDP settings makes it a more reliable choice. Design and Features Both devices incorporate thoughtful design elements to enhance the gaming experience, but their approaches reflect different priorities. Legion Go S: Features hall-based triggers and analog sticks for improved precision, along with a larger 55.5Wh battery. Its 8-inch IPS display with VRR ensures smooth visuals, particularly in fast-paced games. Features hall-based triggers and analog sticks for improved precision, along with a larger 55.5Wh battery. Its 8-inch IPS display with VRR ensures smooth visuals, particularly in fast-paced games. Steam Deck OLED: Offers a more compact design, an energy-efficient OLED display, and versatile storage options, including microSD and M.2 compatibility. The Legion Go S leans toward delivering a premium gaming experience with advanced features, while the Steam Deck OLED focuses on practicality and portability. Pricing and Value Pricing plays a significant role in the decision-making process. The Steam Deck OLED is priced at $549 for the 512 GB version, making it $50 cheaper than the Legion Go S (Z2 Go version) with the same storage capacity. For users seeking even higher performance, the Legion Go S's Z1 Extreme version is available, though it comes at a higher cost. Ultimately, the choice between these two devices depends on your gaming priorities. The Steam Deck OLED is ideal for those who value efficiency, affordability, and strong performance at lower TDP settings. Conversely, the Legion Go S appeals to gamers willing to trade battery life for higher performance and advanced features, particularly in its Z1 Extreme configuration. Both devices offer unique strengths, making sure a suitable option for every type of gamer. Media Credit: ETA PRIME Filed Under: Gaming News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Yahoo
07-03-2025
- Yahoo
How AMD's new FSR 4 tech could be the handheld gaming PC upgrade we've been waiting for
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Love it or hate it, frame generation software continues to be a major feature of gaming graphics updates. AMD's new FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) 4 frame-gen software offers massive updates for the Radeon 9070 and 9070 XT discrete GPUs, allowing AMD's new GPUs up to 3.7x better performance over the pure silicon power of the new RDNA 4 architecture. While we aren't likely to see AMD release mobile variants of the new Radeon GPUs, we might see some of the RDNA 4 tech make its way to AMD's integrated graphics tiles on the Ryzen Z2 generation and the Ryzen AI 300 series chipsets. While there are some divisive opinions around frame-gen software, it can be a game-changer for handheld gaming PCs. After all, AMD's AFMF 2 update did smooth out performance on the Asus ROG Ally X. So, can FSR 4 do the same? Based on AMD's benchmark data, FSR 4 upscaling alone offers significant improvements to the pure silicon performance of the RDNA 4 Radeon 9000 series GPUs across multiple games. The Radeon 9000 series silicon offers 4K gaming speeds of 39-97 frames-per-second (fps), depending on the title. With FSR 4 upscaling, that range moves to 78-134 fps. With FSR 4 upscaling and frame generation enabled, the Radeon 9000 series offers frame rates of 144 to 233 fps for up to 3.7x performance gains. Now, these benchmarks are provided by AMD, and are using the Radeon 9070 XT GPU with FSR 4 in "Performance" mode, in a test configuration with an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 32GB of DDR5 memory, and an MSI MEG x670E ACE motherboard. The games were run in 4K (3840 x 2160) at "Ultra," "Extreme," and "Maxed" presets. While we tend to prefer independently verified performance benchmarks, these GPUs were just announced, so we'll need to wait until the review embargo lifts to see how they held up in testing by media outlets and analysts. Based on these results, FSR 4 looks like a pretty solid update compared to previous versions of the software. It's also interesting to compare the FSR 4 gains to Nvidia's RTX 50-series, as Nvidia's flagship GPU also struggles to game in 4K at 60fps with more demanding titles, relying on Nvidia's DLSS 4 frame-gen software to fill the gaps. AMD announced the Ryzen Z2 series, a second-generation of gaming handheld chips, at CES earlier this year. We've only seen one system with a second-generation Ryzen Z2 chip so far, the Lenovo Legion Go S, which houses a Ryzen Z2 Go processor. If you take a look at the Ryzen Z2 generation, the Z2 Go is the most budget-friendly processor, as it uses old Zen 3 CPU architecture, RNDA 2 GPU architecture, and houses just 4 CPU cores. So, the Z2 Go is not exactly the most thrilling. The Ryzen Z2 and Z2 Extreme are far more impressive chipsets, though the Ryzen Z2 is very similar in terms of Zen 4 and RDNA 3 architecture compared to the Ryzen Z1 Extreme. However, software differences make a "night and day" difference between the Z2 and Z1 Extreme. While the Asus ROG Ally X will likely remain one of our favorite gaming handhelds, there's reason to look forward to a Ryzen Z2 series update. If AMD can bring the RDNA 4 updates to FSR to older architecture, or if FSR 4 tech can influence an update to AMD's Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF) tech, that could help AMD level the playing field with Intel's Core Ultra 200V Lunar Lake. While Lunar Lake isn't a handheld chip, Intel does have internal teams dedicated to helping the handheld market, and the raw power of Lunar Lake's Intel Arc iGPU outperforms the Z1 Extreme as we saw on the MSI Claw 8 AI+. While we don't benchmark with super sampling tech, we did witness Lunar Lake perform better than the RDNA 3.5 architecture of AMD's "Strix Point" Ryzen AI 300 series in a head-to-head demo of F1 24 at 1080p with medium settings. FSR 4 is currently a Radeon 9000 series exclusive, but that may change in a few months if AMD can bring FSR 4 to older architecture. We also could see FSR 4 become available on future AMD chips like the Ryzen AI 400 series and Ryzen Z3 generation if the software requires RDNA 4 architecture. Not that either chip has been announced or even hinted at by AMD, but the Ryzen AI 300 series will be a year old come Summer 2025, so we will likely see some AI PC chip updates from AMD later this year. Regardless of personal feelings, frame-gen software can have a major impact on gaming experiences. Whether you choose to enable frame-gen is up to you. I see a better case for FSR, DLSS, and XeSS when it comes to laptops and handhelds rather than desktops because of the hardware limitations of those form factors. But that's a matter of my personal opinion. Valve's Steam Deck reminded me of what's most important in gaming — and it's not graphics I tried gaming on the Lenovo Legion Go S and now I want to buy a Steam Deck instead This ROG Ally and Steam Deck mount looks ridiculous — and its creators know it
