Latest news with #TonyEvers
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Governor Tony Evers grants $1.8 million to Green Bay to cover public safety costs from NFL Draft
MADISON, Wis. (WFRV) – After a successful NFL Draft in Green Bay, Governor Tony Evers announced on Wednesday that his administration is providing nearly $2 million in grants to cover some of the costs. The $1.8 million grant was funded through the Opportunity Attraction and Promotion Fund. According to the release from Gov. Evers, the money will help Green Bay, Ashwaubenon, and Brown County cover the security and public safety expenses associated with the Draft. Incoming Packers president Ed Policy discusses goals, legacy, and leadership transition Gov. Evers cited the event's huge success in Green Bay as a reason for the grant, while complimenting the Packers and community on their handling of the week. 'It was critically important to me that Green Bay and our local partners received the support they needed to cover public safety costs, and I'm glad we were able to get this done,' Gov. Evers said in the release. 'For three days, Wisconsin had the national spotlight, showcasing all we have to offer.' The Opportunity Attraction and Promotion Fund was a proposal in the 2023-25 Biennial Budget, which Gov. Evers finalized with a $10 million investment to be distributed by the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC). Mayor Genrich expressed his gratitude through the release to Gov. Evers and the WEDC for their support, while citing the impact the NFL Draft provided the community and state. 'This was a historic event that brought enormous economic benefits to our community and the entire state of Wisconsin,' Mayor Genrich said in the release. 'The allocation of this funding recognizes that positive statewide economic effect and protects our local taxpayers from bearing the costs—a win-win for residents.' WEDC Secretary and CEO Missy Hughes concurred, highlighting how Green Bay showed the potential that Wisconsin as a whole has to show up on a national stage for major events. Green Bay Packers hosting third annual 'Girls Flag Open' event 'We have the facilities to host major events, the people needed to prepare for and staff the event, and the community to rally behind such a large undertaking,' Hughes said. 'Green Bay rose to the occasion and did a phenomenal job.' Early estimates projected a $94 million impact on statewide economic activity, according to the release, with about $20 million to the Green Bay area alone. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
CBS News
3 days ago
- Politics
- CBS News
Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down GOP law weakening attorney general's power
A unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the Democratic state attorney general Tuesday in a long-running battle over a law passed by Republicans who wanted to weaken the office in a lame duck legislative session more than six years ago. The court ruled 7-0 that requiring the attorney general to get permission from a Republican-controlled legislative committee to settle certain lawsuits was unconstitutional. The law is a separation of powers violation, the court said. The Republican-controlled Legislature convened a session in December 2018 after Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul defeated Republican incumbents. The laws signed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker on his way out the door weakened powers of both offices. At issue in the case decided Tuesday was the attorney general's power to settle lawsuits involving environmental and consumer protection cases as well as cases involving the governor's office and executive branch. The new law required the Legislature's budget committee, which is controlled by Republicans, to sign off on those settlements. The Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020, when controlled by conservatives, upheld all of the lame duck laws and ruled they did not violate the separation of powers principle. But the ruling left the door open to future challenges on how the laws are applied. Kaul sued that year, arguing that having to seek approval for those lawsuit settlements violates the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The Legislature argued that lawmakers have an interest in overseeing the settlement of lawsuits and that the court's earlier ruling saying there was no separation of powers violation should stand. Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford, who won election to the state Supreme Court in April and will be joining the court in August, ruled in favor of Kaul in 2022 saying the law was unconstitutional. A state appeals court overturned her ruling December, saying there was no separation of powers violation because both the executive and legislative branches of government share the powers in question. The Supreme Court on Tuesday said the Legislature cannot "assume for itself the power to execute a law it wrote." There is no constitutional justification for requiring the Legislature's budget committee to sign off on court settlements at issue in the case, Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote for the court. Kaul praised the ruling, saying in a statement that the decision "finally puts an end to the legislature's unconstitutional involvement in the resolution of key categories of cases." Republican legislative leaders who defended the law had no immediate comment Tuesday. The win for Kaul comes as Evers has been unsuccessful in overturning numerous law changes affecting the power of the governor. He's proposed undoing the laws in all four state budgets he's proposed and courts have upheld the laws when challenged.
CBS News
3 days ago
- Politics
- CBS News
Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down Republican law weakening attorney general's power
A unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the Democratic state attorney general Tuesday in a long-running battle over a law passed by Republicans who wanted to weaken the office in a lame duck legislative session more than six years ago. The court ruled 7-0 that requiring the attorney general to get permission from a Republican-controlled legislative committee to settle certain lawsuits was unconstitutional. The law is a separation of powers violation, the court said. The Republican-controlled Legislature convened a session in December 2018 after Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul defeated Republican incumbents. The laws signed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker on his way out the door weakened powers of both offices. At issue in the case decided Tuesday was the attorney general's power to settle lawsuits involving environmental and consumer protection cases as well as cases involving the governor's office and executive branch. The new law required the Legislature's budget committee, which is controlled by Republicans, to sign off on those settlements. The Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020, when controlled by conservatives, upheld all of the lame duck laws and ruled they did not violate the separation of powers principle. But the ruling left the door open to future challenges on how the laws are applied. Kaul sued that year, arguing that having to seek approval for those lawsuit settlements violates the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The Legislature argued that lawmakers have an interest in overseeing the settlement of lawsuits and that the court's earlier ruling saying there was no separation of powers violation should stand. Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford, who won election to the state Supreme Court in April and will be joining the court in August, ruled in favor of Kaul in 2022 saying the law was unconstitutional. A state appeals court overturned her ruling December, saying there was no separation of powers violation because both the executive and legislative branches of government share the powers in question. The Supreme Court on Tuesday said the Legislature cannot "assume for itself the power to execute a law it wrote." There is no constitutional justification for requiring the Legislature's budget committee to sign off on court settlements at issue in the case, Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote for the court. Kaul praised the ruling, saying in a statement that the decision "finally puts an end to the legislature's unconstitutional involvement in the resolution of key categories of cases." Republican legislative leaders who defended the law had no immediate comment Tuesday. The win for Kaul comes as Evers has been unsuccessful in overturning numerous law changes affecting the power of the governor. He's proposed undoing the laws in all four state budgets he's proposed and courts have upheld the laws when challenged.
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Politics
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down GOP law weakening attorney general's power
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A unanimous Wisconsin's Supreme Court sided with the Democratic state attorney general Tuesday in a long-running battle over a law passed by Republicans who wanted to weaken the office in a lame duck legislative session more than six years ago. The court ruled 7-0 that requiring the attorney general to get permission from a Republican-controlled legislative committee to settle certain civil lawsuits was unconstitutional. The law is a separation of powers violation, the court said. The Republican-controlled Legislature convened a session in December 2018 after Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul defeated Republican incumbents. The laws signed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker on his way out the door weakened powers of both offices. At issue in the case decided Tuesday was the attorney general's power to settle civil lawsuits involving environmental and consumer protection cases as well as cases involving the governor's office and executive branch. The new law required the Legislature's budget committee, which is controlled by Republicans, to sign off on those settlements. The Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020, when controlled by conservatives, upheld all of the lame duck laws and ruled they did not violate the separation of powers principle. But the ruling left the door open to future challenges on how the laws are applied. Kaul sued that year, arguing that having to seek approval for those lawsuit settlements violates the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The Legislature argued that lawmakers have an interest in overseeing the settlement of lawsuits and that the court's earlier ruling saying there was no separation of powers violation should stand. Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford, who won election to the state Supreme Court in April and will be joining the court in August, ruled in favor of Kaul in 2022 saying the law was unconstitutional. A state appeals court overturned her ruling December, saying there was no separation of powers violation because both the executive and legislative branches of government share the powers in question. The Supreme Court on Tuesday said the Legislature can not 'assume for itself the power to execute a law it wrote.' There is no constitutional justification for requiring the Legislature's budget committee to sign off on court settlements at issue in the case, Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote for the court. Kaul and Republican legislative leaders who defended the law had no immediate comment Tuesday on the ruling. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down GOP law weakening attorney general's power
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A unanimous Wisconsin's Supreme Court sided with the Democratic state attorney general Tuesday in a long-running battle over a law passed by Republicans who wanted to weaken the office in a lame duck legislative session more than six years ago. The court ruled 7-0 that requiring the attorney general to get permission from a Republican-controlled legislative committee to settle certain civil lawsuits was unconstitutional. The law is a separation of powers violation, the court said. The Republican-controlled Legislature convened a session in December 2018 after Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul defeated Republican incumbents. The laws signed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker on his way out the door weakened powers of both offices. At issue in the case decided Tuesday was the attorney general's power to settle civil lawsuits involving environmental and consumer protection cases as well as cases involving the governor's office and executive branch. The new law required the Legislature's budget committee, which is controlled by Republicans, to sign off on those settlements. The Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020, when controlled by conservatives, upheld all of the lame duck laws and ruled they did not violate the separation of powers principle. But the ruling left the door open to future challenges on how the laws are applied. Kaul sued that year, arguing that having to seek approval for those lawsuit settlements violates the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The Legislature argued that lawmakers have an interest in overseeing the settlement of lawsuits and that the court's earlier ruling saying there was no separation of powers violation should stand. Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford, who won election to the state Supreme Court in April and will be joining the court in August, ruled in favor of Kaul in 2022 saying the law was unconstitutional. A state appeals court overturned her ruling December, saying there was no separation of powers violation because both the executive and legislative branches of government share the powers in question. The Supreme Court on Tuesday said the Legislature can not 'assume for itself the power to execute a law it wrote.' There is no constitutional justification for requiring the Legislature's budget committee to sign off on court settlements at issue in the case, Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote for the court. Kaul and Republican legislative leaders who defended the law had no immediate comment Tuesday on the ruling.
