Latest news with #Tehran-backed
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Politics
- Straits Times
Thousands protest in Tehran and the region against Israel, US
Protesters in Beirut gathering for a rally in solidarity with Iran on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS Thousands protest in Tehran and the region against Israel, US TEHRAN – Thousands of people rallied in Tehran, Baghdad and Beirut on June 20 after weekly prayers to protest against Israel's strikes on Iran, chanting slogans against Israel and its main backer, the United States. Images on Iran's state television showed protesters in Tehran holding up photographs of commanders killed since the start of the war, while others waved the flags of Iran and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. 'This is the Friday of the Iranian nation's solidarity and resistance across the country,' the news anchor said. 'I will sacrifice my life for my leader,' read a protester's banner, referring to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. According to state television, protests took place in other cities around the country, including in Tabriz in north-western Iran and Shiraz in the south. Israel launched a blistering attack on Iran on June 13, prompting Tehran to retaliate with barrages of missiles aimed at Israel. Imam Mohammad Javad Haj Ali Akbari, who led Tehran's prayers, told worshippers that Israel had attacked Iran out of 'despair', the official Irna news agency reported. He accused Israel of launching a 'psychological war' to 'pit the people of the country against the government'. 'Their plans were precise, but their calculations were laughable,' he said. With warnings of all-out regional war intensifying, fears are growing over an intervention by Iran-backed Iraqi factions, who have threatened Washington's interests in the region if it were to join Israel in its war against Iran. 'No right' In Iraq, thousands of supporters of powerful cleric Moqtada Sadr rallied on June 20 after prayers in Baghdad and other cities. Mr Sadr, who has previously criticised Tehran-backed Iraqi armed factions, retains a devoted following of millions among Iraq's majority community of Shi'ite Muslims. 'No to Israel! No to America!' chanted demonstrators gathered in the Sadr City district of Baghdad, the cleric's stronghold in the capital. 'It is an unjust war… Israel has no right' to hit Iran, said protester Abu Hussein. 'Israel is not in it for the (Iranian) nuclear (programme). What Israel and the Americans want is to dominate the Middle East,' added the 54-year-old taxi driver. In the city of Kufa, protesters set fire to Israeli and American flags. Iraq is both a significant ally of Iran and a strategic partner of the United States. In Lebanon, hundreds of Hezbollah supporters took to the streets in the group's stronghold in Beirut's southern suburbs. Men, women and children waved the flags of Iran, Hezbollah and Lebanon, with some holding pictures of Ayatollah Khamenei. 'It is my duty to stand with (Iran) against the Zionist Israeli enemy,' said Mr Adnan Zaytoun, 60. Hezbollah, which suffered heavy blows in its latest confrontation with Israel in 2024, has not expressed any intention to intervene militarily on Iran's side. To supporters like Mr Zaytoun, 'if anyone attacks us, we will defend ourselves, but we do not support war'. Mr Fadel Saad, an 18-year-old student, said: 'We are here to show the American and Israeli enemies that we are resilient and will not be defeated… even if they destroy our homes over our heads.' In Yemen's capital Sanaa and other areas, tens of thousands of people gathered for protests organised by the Iran-backed Huthis, according to their official media outlets. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNBC
4 hours ago
- Politics
- CNBC
Europe and Iran to hold talks as Trump sets two-week deadline for U.S. strikes decision
Top U.K., France and Germany diplomats are pushing for eleventh-hour diplomacy with Iran in Geneva on Friday, as Washington weighs the possibility of joining Israel's military campaign against Tehran over the next two weeks. Iran and Israel have been trading fire for the past week, in the latest climax of tensions that have been simmering since the Tehran-backed Hamas' terrorist attack against the Jewish state in October 2023. Israel has since been fighting a war on multiple battles against the Palestinian militant group and other Iranian proxies, such as Lebanon's Hezbollah and Yemen's Houthi — which Tehran says are acting independently. The conflict has risked further escalation since the start of the week, amid signals that the U.S. — historically a close ally and weapons supplier of Israel — could intervene militarily against Tehran. "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," U.S. President Donald Trump said, according to a statement read out on Thursday by White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt. Following a Thursday meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff, U.K. Foreign Minister David Lammy said the three "discussed how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict" and that "a window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution." "There is no room for negotiations with the U.S. until Israeli aggression stops," Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who is expected to attend talks in Geneva, was quoted as saying on Iranian state TV on Friday, according to Reuters. Trump's aversion to Iran's nuclear program has been a central point of his statesmanship across both mandates. The White House leader pulled the U.S. out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) during his first presidency, tightening the noose on Iran's coffers through a string of stringent financial and oil-linked sanctions. Self-proclaimed 'peacemaker' Trump has so far fruitlessly pursued a second nuclear program deal since the start of his second term, initially expressing a preference for a diplomatic breakthrough — the likes of which European officials are now hoping to strike. "In the United States, [there are] many political officials who are convinced that we must not once more make the errors of the past. What we saw in Libya, what we saw in Afghanistan, what we saw in Iraq, we do not want to see reproduced," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said in a TV interview with French media, according to a CNBC translation. Notably, the U.K., France and Germany — alongside Iran's allies Russia and China — were previously involved in the JCPOA with Washington and Tehran. Markets have been rattled by the possibility of the conflict destabilizing the wider oil-rich Middle East and potentially drawing in the world's largest economy, spurring investors on a flight to safe-haven assets and broader focus on defense companies and initiatives.
UPI
12 hours ago
- Politics
- UPI
Rubio, Britain's Lammy meet on Iranian nuclear capabilities
June 19 (UPI) -- Secretary of State Marco Rubio and British Foreign Secretary David Lammy on Thursday discussed the conflict between Israel and Iran and agreed that Iran should never possess a nuclear weapon, the State Department said. The meeting in Washington, D.C., comes amid speculation that President Donald Trump will join Israel in its ongoing strikes against Iran. "I may do it. I may not do it," Trump told a group of reporters after returning to the White House following a G7 summit in Canada. "I mean nobody knows what I'm going to do." Israel and Iran have been in a proxy war for years, though it exploded into the open following Tehran-backed Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel. Last week, the fighting intensified with Israel launching a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, crippling the infrastructure and killing several top Iran military personnel and nuclear scientists. Iran -- which does not have a nuclear weapon and states its nuclear program is peaceful -- has responded with strikes of its on. Washington-based Human Rights Activists has said that at least 639 people have died in the Israeli strikes on Iran, 263 of them civilians. Israel warned Thursday that it was targeting the area near the Arak heavy water reactor, about 155 miles west of Tehran. Israeli officials warned people on X to evacuate the area. Rubio and Lammy also discussed other issues, including ways to cooperate on ending the current three-year war between Ukraine and Russia. The pair also talked about an upcoming NATO summit and reaffirmed the importance of increased defense spending to secure peace and stability.
France 24
a day ago
- Politics
- France 24
Israel-Iran conflict ‘drives final nail in the coffin' of postwar world order
On October 12, 2023, as Israel and its allies reeled from the carnage wrought just days earlier by Hamas militants in southern Israel, the then Pentagon chief was asked whether Washington would place any conditions on its hugely expanded security assistance to its Middle East ally. Lloyd Austin's answer to reporters was a straightforward 'no', based on the assumption that Israel's military would 'do the right things' in its war against the Tehran-backed militia. Twenty months on, Israel has flattened Gaza, bombed swathes of Lebanon, seized further territory in Syria, and now launched a direct attack on Iran as it pursues what it describes as an 'existential' fight against the Islamic Republic and its allies in the region. Throughout the fighting, its ultra-nationalist leaders have dismissed the mounting evidence of war crimes committed in Gaza, which led the International Criminal Court to issue an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in November 2024. Senior cabinet members have openly advocated the forced removal of Gaza's population, which would amount to a genocidal crime, and the dismemberment of Syria. Netanyahu himself has discussed the possibility of assassinating Iran's head of state and precipitating 'regime change' in the Islamic Republic in interviews with US media. Ironically, such rhetoric brings Israel closer in line with the inflammatory bluster typical of its arch-foe Iran – with the important difference that Israel does possess nuclear weapons and a military capable of backing up its increasingly provocative statements. The extraordinary escalation is a 'natural consequence of the impunity that has prevailed in the region over the past two years", says H. A. Hellyer, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) in London. 'The fact that Israel has faced no consequence for repeatedly infringing international law sends a very clear signal: that if it chooses to do more, it can,' he explains. 'And it can count on the most powerful actors in the international community simply not doing very much or actually empowering and emboldening it.' The most immediate consequence of Israeli impunity in the Middle East is the immense suffering inflicted on civilian populations, nowhere more so than in Gaza, where Israel's ongoing military campaign has killed more 55,000 people, according to local health officials, and rendered the narrow strip of land largely uninhabitable. Another consequence, with more far-reaching implications, is the further erosion of the rules-based order in place since World War II, says Karim Emile Bitar, a Middle East expert at Beirut's Saint-Joseph University and visiting professor at Sciences-Po Paris. 'Recent events have driven the final nail into the coffin of international law and of what has been referred to as the liberal international order,' he says. 'The message to the world is that if might is on your side, you can break all the rules, trample on international law and all the standards that have been in place since 1945, and there will be absolutely no accountability.' 'A new Middle East' Netanyahu has described Israel's actions as ushering in a 'new Middle East', a phrase that has haunted the region at least since the 2003 Iraq War, when the US and its allies sought to remodel the region – with catastrophic consequences. 'There has been a lot of jubilation (among critics of Iran), imagining that these are the 'birth pangs' of some sort of new Middle East. On the contrary, this is a spiral of violence, fostered by an environment of impunity that allows for vigilante action to take place without repercussions,' says Hellyer. 'Nobody needs to be a fan of the Iranian regime, or Hezbollah or Hamas, to see that this activity is incredibly destabilising for regional order and security,' he adds. 'It also has massive repercussions for international order and international security, because it means that there isn't a rules-based order at all. It becomes the law of the jungle. And that should be quite concerning to all of us.' 12:50 Bitar notes that few people in the Sunni Arab world will be 'shedding a tear' for the Iranian regime – 'and for good reason, given the disruption and suffering caused by Tehran's regional proxies". However, he adds, 'they are also alarmed by an increasingly unbridled Israel, which – unlike Iran – has the means to wipe out entire cities, and whose senior ministers now openly advocate ethnic cleansing in Gaza". An immediate consequence is likely to be a regional arms race to try to narrow the gap with Israel. In Iran's case, analysts point to the likelihood of a fresh push to go nuclear, thereby achieving the exact opposite of the stated goal of Israel's military operation. 'Israel's attack is making Iran feel very vulnerable. Their conventional deterrence has failed, and I think we're going to see more and more calls from within the country to pursue nuclear weapons,' says Daryl Kimball of the US-based Arms Control Association, noting that contrary to Israeli claims, Western intelligence assessments have so far concluded that Tehran is not currently pushing to militarise its nuclear programme. Kimball says there are already voices in Iran calling for the country to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which prohibits states that don't have nuclear weapons from pursuing them. 'Bombing (Iran) simply makes sure they will try a hundred times more because they will assess there is no rules-based order, there is simply the threat of force and mutually assured destruction,' adds Hellyer. 'Anticipatory' self-defence The phrase 'birth pangs of a new Middle East' was famously used by former US secretary of state Condoleeza Rice to refer to the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah war, one of many conflicts with roots in the regional upheaval caused by the US invasion of Iraq. 'Back then, there was at least a stated aim to promote democracy and human rights in the region, even if it was largely a smokescreen,' says Bitar. 'Now there is no such pretence. We're back to Bismarckian power politics, in which might precedes right, and a world governed by nationalist authoritarian leaders in the mould of Putin and Trump.' In the present climate, he adds, 'the dwindling number of people who talk about respect for international law are regarded as hopeless idealists disconnected from reality". While Israel's attack on Iran has drawn condemnation around the world, the messaging from Western leaders has been far more mixed, with talk of Israel's 'right to defend itself' often taking precedence over references to international law. Hours after Israel launched the first wave of attacks, French President Emmanuel Macron, whose planned summit on a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was scuttled by the outbreak of war, put the blame squarely on Iran and said France stood ready to defend Israel if necessary. Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz went a step further, arguing that Israel was 'doing the dirty job for all of us' by taking on in the Iranian regime – prompting outcry in a country where the emphasis is normally on de-escalation. In an op-ed published by the Guardian, Sydney-based international law professor Ben Saul argued that support for Israel's 'right to self-defence" had no legal grounding in the present conflict and set a dangerous precedent. He described Israel's attack on Iran as 'part of a pattern of unlawful 'anticipatory' violence against other countries', along with its recent destruction of Syrian military bases and equipment, despite 'the absence of any attack by the new Syrian authorities on Israel'. 'The risk of abuse of 'anticipatory' self-defence is simply too great, and too dangerous, for the world to tolerate,' Saul wrote, noting that Russia claimed to invade Ukraine 'in part because it speculatively feared NATO expansion'. He added: 'Many countries have hostile relations with other countries. Allowing each country to unilaterally decide when they wish to degrade another country's military, even when they have not been attacked, is a recipe for global chaos – and for the unjustified deaths of many innocent people.' 'One pillar of the post-war order is attacking another' In an interview with Middle East Eye, Sir Richard Dalton, a former British ambassador to Tehran, noted that past US administrations had refused to countenance a large-scale Israeli attack on Iran, but that Netanyahu 'has obtained more leverage over the US (since Donald Trump's return to power) and Israel is more of a law unto itself'. Dalton said other Western countries had been 'incredibly limp in not holding Israel to account' for its conduct over the past 20 months, a stance he attributed in part to their growing disregard for international law. 'They don't look at the legal issue. They won't look at the circumstances in international law when a pre-emptive strike against a potential enemy is lawful and when it is not,' he said. 'Israel's strike was an illegal aggression. But we're prepared to talk frankly in those terms about Russia but not about Israel.' 11:50 While Western powers have failed to rein in the violence, the institutions they helped found decades ago to uphold the rules-based order have not sat idle. Since the start of the Gaza war, both the ICC and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have moved with urgency, the latter issuing successive rulings last year to warn of the risk of genocide in Gaza and order an end to Israel's military operations in the south of the enclave. Neither court, however, has the capacity to enforce international law if world powers refuse to comply. When the ICC issued its arrest warrant for Netanyahu, former US president Joe Biden described the move as 'outrageous'. His successor at the White House has gone a step further, issuing an executive order in January to authorise sanctions on the court over its 'illegitimate' actions against the US and its 'close ally Israel'. The Trump administration has also withdrawn the US from several UN bodies and slashed the organisation's funding, creating a situation in which 'one pillar of the post-war order is attacking another', according to Brian Brivati, visiting professor of contemporary history and human rights at Kingston University. 'The leading founder of the UN is now undermining the institution from within, wielding its security council veto to block action while simultaneously starving the organisation of resources,' Brivati wrote on The Conversation earlier this week. 'The combination of a powerful state acting with impunity and a superpower disabling the mechanisms of accountability marks a global inflection point,' he added. 'Other global powers, including Russia and China, are taking this opportunity to move beyond the Western rules-based system.' The breakdown of the system could have catastrophic consequences for global stability, warns RUSI's Hellyer, pointing to the need for international rules and co-operation to tackle a host of global challenges. 'There will always be new crises and conflicts, not least of which dealing with the climate emergency,' he says. 'And we need international law and the rules-based order to at least mitigate their consequences.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
'Very bad decision' if Hezbollah joins Iran-Israel war, says US official
BEIRUT (Reuters) -A top U.S. official visiting the Lebanese capital on Thursday discouraged Tehran-backed armed group Hezbollah from intervening in the war between Iran and Israel, saying it would be a "very bad decision". U.S. special envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack, who also serves as ambassador to Turkey, met Lebanese officials in Beirut as Iran and Israel traded more strikes in their days-long war and as the U.S. continues to press Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah. After meeting Lebanon's Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, a close ally of Hezbollah, Barrack was asked what may happen if Hezbollah joined in the regional conflict. "I can say on behalf of President (Donald) Trump, which he has been very clear in expressing as has Special Envoy (Steve) Witkoff: that would be a very, very, very bad decision," Barrack told reporters. Hezbollah has condemned Israel's strikes on Iran and expressed full solidarity with its leadership. On Thursday, it said threats against Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would have "dire consequences". But the group has stopped short of making explicit threats to intervene. After Israel began strikes on Iran last week, a Hezbollah official told Reuters the group would not launch its own attack on Israel in response. Hezbollah was left badly weakened from last year's war with Israel, in which the group's leadership was gutted, thousands of fighters were killed and strongholds in southern Lebanon and near Beirut were severely damaged. A U.S.-brokered ceasefire deal which ended that war stipulates that the Lebanese government must ensure there are no arms outside state control. Barrack also met Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Thursday and discussed the state's monopoly on all arms. Barrack is a private equity executive who has long advised Trump and chaired his inaugural presidential committee in 2016. He was appointed to his role in Turkey and, in late May, also assumed the position of special envoy to Syria.
