Latest news with #PeterSullivan
Times
3 days ago
- Times
Forensic science cuts will mean ‘more miscarriages of justice'
Miscarriages of justice will increase without urgent action to avert the 'long-running crisis' in the forensic science service, which experts warn is in a 'graveyard spiral'. Forensic science is praised for enabling miscarriages of justice to be overturned, including the convictions of Andrew Malkinson, who served 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, and Peter Sullivan, released 38 years after being wrongly convicted of murder. But scientific evidence 'can be highly persuasive, even when wrong' and 'mistakes, omissions, unreliable science or misinterpretations of forensic evidence can cause catastrophic wrongful convictions', a recent report argues. The report from the Westminster Commission on Forensic Science warns that 'reckless policy decisions' compounded by spending cuts have diminished the capacity to overturn miscarriages of justice as well as preventing them by reliably assisting with crime detection and prosecution.
Yahoo
09-06-2025
- Yahoo
Peter Sullivan has murder conviction quashed after 38 years in jail
A 68-year-old man who has spent 38 years in jail has had his murder conviction quashed at the court of appeal in what is thought to be the longest-running miscarriage of justice in British history. Peter Sullivan was wrongly convicted in 1987 for the frenzied murder of a florist and part-time pub worker, Diane Sindall, 21, who was killed as she left work in Bebington, Merseyside. It was alleged that in August 1986, Sullivan had spent the day drinking heavily after losing a darts match and went out armed with a crowbar before a chance encounter with Sindall. Her florist van had broken down on her way home from a pub shift and she was walking towards a petrol station when she was beaten to death and sexually assaulted. Her body was left partly clothed and mutilated. Sullivan has always protested his innocence and lawyers have tried twice before to get his conviction overturned. In a statement read by his lawyer Sarah Myatt outside the court on his behalf, Sullivan said too many horrors had been inflicted on him to detail. 'As God is my witness, it is said the truth shall take you free,' he said. 'It is unfortunate that it does not give a timescale as we advance towards resolving the wrongs done to me, I am not angry, I am not bitter. I am simply anxious to return to my loved ones and family as I've got to make the most of what is left of the existence I am granted in this world.' New tests ordered by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) revealed that Sullivan's DNA was not present on samples preserved at the time. Duncan Atkinson KC, for the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court of appeal that analysis of the DNA showed it came from someone known as 'unknown male one', and that it was 'one billion times more likely that the sample originated from unknown male one, rather than someone else, and it did not match the appellant'. He said: 'Had this DNA evidence been available at the time a decision was taken to prosecute, it is difficult to see how a decision to prosecute could have been made.' Quashing the conviction, Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Goss and Mr Justice Bryan, said: 'In the light of that evidence, it is impossible to regard the appellant's conviction as safe.' Sullivan, who attended the hearing via video link from HMP Wakefield, listened to the ruling with his head down and arms folded, and appeared to weep and put his hand to his mouth as his conviction was quashed. As the judgment was read out, his sister Kim Smith tearfully declared: 'We've done it.' Outside court, she said: 'We lost Peter for 39 years and at the end of the day it's not just us, Peter hasn't won and neither has the Sindall family. They've lost their daughter, they are not going to get her back.' Merseyside police said the crucial DNA evidence was not available during the original investigation and officers were now 'committed to doing everything' to find the person whose DNA was left at the scene where Diane Sindall died. Det Ch Supt Karen Jaundrill said that more than 260 men had been screened and eliminated from the investigation since it was reopened in 2023. She said: 'Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Diane Sindall who continue to mourn her loss and will have to endure the implications of this new development so many years after her murder. We are committed to doing everything within our power to find whom the DNA, which was left at the scene, belongs to. 'Unfortunately, there is no match for the DNA identified on the national DNA database.' But she said that, with the help of the National Crime Agency (NCA), officers were 'proactively trying to identify the person the DNA profile belongs to'. Holroyde said a decision by the CCRC in 2008 that scientific techniques at the time would not yield a DNA profile was 'plainly correct'. He said: 'The brutal attack which ended Miss Sindall's young life also blighted the lives of her fiance, her family and all those who loved her. We offer our condolences to the bereaved.' James Burley, who led the investigation by the charity Appeal into the case of Andrew Malkinson, said: 'Peter Sullivan's exoneration today after nearly four decades of wrongful imprisonment provides further evidence that our current appeals system cannot be trusted to swiftly identify and rectify miscarriages of justice. 'Between them, Peter Sullivan, Andrew Malkinson and Victor Nealon spent over 70 years wrongly imprisoned before finally being exonerated by compelling DNA evidence. Each had their cases previously rejected by both the court of appeal and the CCRC – the institutions which are meant to act as our justice system's safety net. The case for an urgent overhaul of the appeals system is now overwhelming.' His comments were echoed by Prof Rebecca Helm, who runs the miscarriages of justice registry at the University of Exeter law school. 'The case underscores the importance of having a mechanism through which convictions based on evidence that is known to be misleading (including weak or incorrectly described forensic science) can be scrutinised even in the absence of 'new' evidence in order to protect others who have been wrongfully convicted, and to ensure that true perpetrators are brought to justice,' she said. The prime minister's spokesperson called it a 'grave miscarriage of justice' and said: 'We must carefully consider this judgment and look at how this could have happened, to get both him [Sullivan] and Diane's family the answers they deserve.'
The Sun
01-06-2025
- Health
- The Sun
Why Lucy Letby's lawyers are ramping up killer's freedom bid after bombshell twist in ANOTHER infamous murder case
TWO dramatic court cases saw her convicted of the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of seven more - leaving Lucy Letby facing the rest of her life behind bars. But supporters of the 35-year-old nurse, who believe she is the victim of a miscarriage of justice, are now clinging to fresh hope after a seismic twist in another infamous criminal case - and are calling on MPs to step in. 9 9 The growing band of Letby champions, including MP David Davis, have been buoyed by the recent release of Peter Sullivan, 68, who was freed after 38 years when his murder conviction was overturned. The Court of Appeal quashed his conviction for the murder and sexual assault of 21-year-old florist Diane Sindall, who was battered to death in 1986, when a DNA testing breakthrough proved he was not a match for a semen sample found on her body. On a Facebook group set up for Letby's followers, one supporter said: 'There's another victim, Peter Sullivan, of a miscarriage of justice freed after 38 years of wrongful incarceration for a crime he did not commit. 'We need to put more pressure on our local MPs to speed up Lucy's appeal.' But far from offering a glimmer of hope to the 'Letby is innocent' brigade, the handling of Sullivan's case and that of Andrew Malkinson, wrongly convicted of rape, merely proves it could be years before the evidence is reviewed. The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which is currently considering an application for an appeal from Letby's lawyers, has been slammed by critics as 'not fit for purpose' after delays and blunders left the two innocent men floundering in jail years after new evidence that finally cleared them came to light. The legal team for Malkinson, who served 17 years before his rape conviction was quashed in 2023, spent more than a decade pleading with the CCRC to conduct DNA tests on samples taken from the victim, but was repeatedly refused. Those tests, it later emerged, would have seen him released at least a decade earlier. Similarly Sullivan, who was dubbed the 'Beast of Birkenhead', spent 38 years behind bars protesting his innocence despite his lawyers telling the CCRC in 2008 that DNA analysis of a semen sample found on the victim would clear him. And while the forensic test known as Y-STR, which eventually proved his innocence, became available in 2013, the CCRC waited until 2021 to order proper tests, and another four years before he was acquitted. I defend baby killers like Lucy Letby – bombshell new theory could FREE her but I know real truth… & it's NOT medical The Commission's chair, Helen Pitcher, who earned £95,000 a year for a two-day week, was forced to quit in April after Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she was 'unfit' for the role. Now there are calls for the resignation of chief executive Karen Kneller, a lawyer who received a £130,000 salary from taxpayers last year. A report into the Malkinson case, by KC Chris Henley, found Kneller was 'head of casework' at the time of the CCRC's "very poor" work and slammed staff for "muddled" thinking, "casual and dismissive" language and failing to read evidence. She was also in the role when Peter Sullivan's team made their first approach. 9 9 Swell of support Letby, originally from Hereford, is facing 15 whole life sentences for the murders and attempted murders at the Countess of Chester Hospital in Cheshire. Since her two trials, in August 2023 and October 2024, a swell of support has been building for the 35-year-old. Dr Shoo Lee, an eminent neonatal expert who claims his research was incorrectly interpreted by the prosecution to convict Letby, has said 'the medical evidence doesn't support murder [or attempted murder]' in any of the cases'. He is backed by a growing number of those who believe the case against her is flawed. In February, Letby's legal team submitted an application to the CCRC - set up in 1997 to review possible miscarriages of justice - with barrister Mark McDonald hand-delivering the full findings of a 14-strong international panel of experts. Her supporters argue that the babies could have died of natural causes, and Dr Lee claimed his findings on skin discolouration used to support the theory that the nurse killed some of the children by injecting them with air was "misrepresented" in court and that the evidence "wasn't quite right". He and the panel examined all 17 cases cited in the trial and concluded: 'Death or injury of all the affected infants were due either to natural causes or to errors in medical care.' Last month, an email emerged which appeared to contradict a consultant's testament he had caught Letby 'red-handed', standing over the cot of the victim known as Baby K as he was deteriorating without calling for help. In the bombshell missive sent to colleagues at the Countess of Chester Hospital on May 4, 2017, which was not read in court, Dr Ravi Jayaram wrote: 'At time of deterioration... Staff nurse Letby (was) at the incubator and called Dr Jayaram to inform of low saturations.' He added: 'Baby K subsequently deteriorated and eventually died, but events around this would fit with explainable events associated with extreme prematurity.' 'Not fit for purpose' 9 Following the release of Peter Sullivan, Letby has been flooded with a fresh wave of support, with her loyal band of followers drawing apparent inspiration from the latest acquittal. One man wrote: 'A new police investigation and new compensation claims. Those people in charge don't want that to happen anytime soon.' Another posted: 'Lucy and Peter Sullivan were found guilty of a crime by a jury and sentenced accordingly. 'I believe that only pressure from MPs and Lucy's legal team can speed up her case review. Unfortunately our legal system is not fit for purpose when it comes to addressing mistakes.' A link about how to raise the matter with your local MP has been posted to the site. A follower said: 'In Lucy's case there was NO crime so hopefully we can keep pushing that aspect and save the long wait for a retrial.' One woman referred to the CCRC as the 'Criminally Corrupt Reluctance Committee'. Referring to how Mr Sullivan must feel and drawing parallels between the two cases, another supporter said: 'It must be horribly frustrating for him… just as it is for Lucy.' The page, vowing that one day Letby will be freed, has seen an increase to over 3,400 followers. Internet sleuths still pore over the evidence from the trials and press coverage in online forums such as Reddit and Mumsnet. The pages have been flooded with discussions about supposed 'similarities' between the former nurse and Mr Sullivan, who they say were both wrongly jailed. One fan said: 'Worth noting that Mr Sullivan appears to have repeatedly made false statements to the police, a bit like what the Crown claimed Letby did.' Another posted: 'I was struck by the careful emphasis throughout that no one was being blamed for having got it wrong before. It makes me worried for Lucy Letby.' £1million payout 9 9 After the CCRC refused Sullivan's first attempt to challenge his conviction in 2008 he lost his appeal bid in 2019, before again asking the CCRC to refer his case in 2021, raising concerns over police interviews, bite mark evidence used during his trial and the murder weapon. Merseyside Police reopened the investigation in 2023 after the commission found that DNA samples taken from the scene did not match Mr Sullivan. He's now in line for a £1million payout, the maximum compensation claim for a wrongful conviction. Letby lost two bids last year to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal. Lawyer Katie Wheatley, partner at Bindmans and head of the Crime, Fraud and Regulatory team, said that while the two cases are 'very different in nature', the legal test for the CCRC remains the same. She said: 'Mr Sullivan was cleared by the Court of Appeal after new DNA tests obtained by the CCRC cast very significant doubt on the safety of his conviction. 'In Lucy Letby's case, her lawyer has said that the CCRC has been provided with new medical evidence from a panel of neonatologists and paediatric experts. 'It will be up to the CCRC to review this material and carry out any further investigations it considers appropriate. 'When considering whether to refer Lucy Letby's case to the Court of Appeal, the CCRC will apply the legal test for referral which is whether it considers there is a real possibility that the Court of Appeal will quash her convictions. 'Thus, while the cases are very different in nature, the legal test applied by the CCRC will be the same.' Timeline of horror - how Letby targeted babies LUCY Letby carried out her horrific crimes in a year-long period at Countess of Chester Hospital. She used insulin and air to inject newborns while working on the neo-natal ward. The collapses and deaths of the children were not 'naturally-occurring tragedies' and instead the gruesome work of 'poisoner' Letby. Her rampage was finally uncovered after staff grew suspicious of the "significant rise" in the number of babies dying or suffering "catastrophic" collapses. Letby was found to be the "common denominator" among the horrifying incidents. Officers then searched her three-bedroom home in Chester and discovered a chilling cache of evidence. The nurse had scribbled haunting notes in diaries and on Post-It notes, including one that read: "I am evil I did this." The note added: "I don't deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough to care for them. "I am a horrible person." A probe into whether Letby harmed any other babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital is ongoing. A corporate manslaughter investigation is also ongoing, as is now a gross negligence manslaughter one. The CCRC receives 1,500-1,600 cases each year, referring around 30 back to the Court of Appeal. The Law Commission is currently consulting on whether the 'real possibility' legal test that the CCRC currently applies should be changed to reflect the body's own view of whether a conviction might be unsafe, rather than having to predict what the Court of Appeal might think. Katie added: 'A change in the legal test might result in the CCRC broadening the focus of its investigations and being able to refer more cases to the Court of Appeal to review.' Even if the CCRC decides to refer Letby's case following the 14-strong panel's findings, the complexity of the case means it could take years, according to legal experts. Meanwhile, lawyers for the families of Letby's victims rubbished the report, claiming it's "full of analytical holes" and "a rehash" of the defence case heard at trial. Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes, of Cheshire Police, also hit back at 'ill-informed and insensitive' critics questioning her guilt. In a strongly worded statement, he insisted the former nurse's case had been 'rigorously and fairly tested' by two juries and two sets of appeal court judges after a painstaking six-year police investigation. Referring to the victims' families, he added: 'Their dignity and composure in the face of intense public discussions with little sensitivity or humanity is remarkable. 'Their words are incredibly honest and powerful and must not be lost in a sea of noise.' Undeterred 9 9 In November, Lady Justice Thirlwall is due to publish the findings from the public inquiry into how the former nurse was able to commit her crimes. Cheshire Constabulary is continuing a review of deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal units of the Countess of Chester Hospital and the Liverpool Women's Hospital during Letby's time as a nurse from 2012 to 2016. But Letby's supporters seem far from deterred and even threw a party to celebrate her 35th birthday at a pub in Clapham, south London. They filled the public gallery during her trial and protested outside Manchester crown court, wearing yellow butterfly badges to match one seen in a photo of Letby in scrubs. Every December since her conviction in 2023, they have sent her Christmas cards in prison. But, even if there are flaws in the prosecution, it will be a long time before they can celebrate a fresh appeal. The charges Letby was convicted on in full Child A, allegation of murder. The Crown said Letby injected air intravenously into the bloodstream of the baby boy. COUNT 1 GUILTY. Child B, allegation of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby attempted to murder the baby girl, the twin sister of Child A, by injecting air into her bloodstream. COUNT 2 GUILTY. Child C, allegation of murder. Prosecutors said Letby forced air down a feeding tube and into the stomach of the baby boy. COUNT 3 GUILTY. Child D, allegation of murder. The Crown said air was injected intravenously into the baby girl. COUNT 4 GUILTY. Child E, allegation of murder. The Crown said Letby murdered the twin baby boy with an injection of air into the bloodstream and also deliberately caused bleeding to the infant. COUNT 5 GUILTY. Child F, allegation of attempted murder. Letby was said by prosecutors to have poisoned the twin brother of Child E with insulin. COUNT 6 GUILTY. Child G, three allegations of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby targeted the baby girl by overfeeding her with milk and pushing air down her feeding tube. COUNT 7 GUILTY, COUNT 8 GUILTY, COUNT 9 NOT GUILTY. Child H, two allegations of attempted murder. Prosecutors said Letby sabotaged the care of the baby girl in some way which led to two profound oxygen desaturations. COUNT 10 NOT GUILTY, COUNT 11 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT. Child I, allegation of murder. The prosecution said Letby killed the baby girl at the fourth attempt and had given her air and overfed her with milk. COUNT 12 GUILTY. Child J, allegation of attempted murder. No specific form of harm was identified by the prosecution but they said Letby did something to cause the collapse of the baby girl. COUNT 13 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT. Child K, allegation of attempted murder. The prosecution said Letby compromised the baby girl as she deliberately dislodged a breathing tube. COUNT 14 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT. Child L, allegation of attempted murder. The Crown said the nurse poisoned the twin baby boy with insulin. COUNT 15 GUILTY. Child M, allegation of attempted murder. Prosecutors said Letby injected air into the bloodstream of Child L's twin brother. COUNT 16 GUILTY. Child N, three allegations of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby inflicted trauma in the baby boy's throat and also injected him with air in the bloodstream. COUNT 17 GUILTY, COUNT 18 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT, COUNT 19 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT. Child O, allegation of murder. Prosecutors say Letby attacked the triplet boy by injecting him with air, overfeeding him with milk and inflicting trauma to his liver with "severe force". COUNT 20 GUILTY. Child P, allegation of murder. Prosecutors said the nurse targeted the triplet brother of Child O by overfeeding him with milk, injecting air and dislodging his breathing tube. COUNT 21 GUILTY. Child Q, allegation of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby injected the baby boy with liquid, and possibly air, down his feeding tube. COUNT 22 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Times
22-05-2025
- Times
Sarah Myatt, who acted for Peter Sullivan to quash his murder conviction
Sarah Myatt, a solicitor-advocate at the law firm Switalskis, represented Peter Sullivan as the Court of Appeal quashed his conviction for murdering a woman in 1986. Sullivan, who is now 68, had spent 38 years in prison before being freed because of fresh DNA evidence in what is thought to be the UK's longest miscarriage of justice case. How long it has taken to clear Peter's name. While Peter remained positive, it has been a long battle despite clear concerns, which was frustrating. For me, moving from mental health law to criminal law has been fascinating and invaluable. It's shown me how fragile the human mind can be and deepened my commitment to fairness and justice — especially for those with mental health challenges or
The Independent
20-05-2025
- Politics
- The Independent
Ministers to prioritise compensation bid by man wrongly jailed for 38 years
The Government has pledged to prioritise any bid for compensation by a man who spent 38 years in prison after wrongly being convicted of murder. Speaking in Parliament, justice minister Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede said he would 'encourage' Peter Sullivan, 68, to seek a payout. The gross miscarriage of justice has again fuelled criticism of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which is already under fire over its handling of the case of Andrew Malkinson, who served 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit. Responding to warnings that the independent body which investigates potential miscarriages of justice was 'unravelling quickly', Lord Ponsonby said an interim chair had been identified with an announcement to be made 'imminently'. The previous chairwoman Helen Pitcher resigned in January over the controversy sparked by Mr Malkinson's case, claiming she had been scapegoated. Mr Sullivan, who to date has spent more of his life in prison than free, finally had his name cleared last week after decades protesting his innocence. Crucial DNA evidence was finally unearthed due to scientific advances last year, showing it was another unknown man who raped and murdered 21-year-old Diane Sindall in 1986. Victims of miscarriages of justice can apply to a government compensation scheme. Mr Malkinson was given a six-figure payment in February this year after delays left him struggling to survive financially and turning to food banks. Independent crossbencher Baroness Deech, a former chairwoman of the Bar Standards Board and a member of the Law Commission, said: 'Does it not add insult to injury that after a person has wasted the whole of their life in jail, that they don't get immediate compensation as soon as they are released?' Responding, Lord Ponsonby said: 'We would encourage Mr Sullivan to make an application to the miscarriages of justice application service, and we will prioritise his application because of the length of the prison sentence.' Tory peer Lord Garnier, who previously served as solicitor general, stressed the urgent need to appoint a chair of the CCRC 'not in the near future, but today'. He said: 'It's unravelling. It's unravelling quickly and there will be more Malkinsons, there will be more cases of that hideous nature, unless the Government really grabs hold of this thing and takes charge.' Lord Ponsonby said: 'The objective is to have an interim chair for 18 months to review the operations of the CCRC. 'What I can say is an individual has been identified and is going through the approvals process, so the announcement will be made imminently.'
