Latest news with #PH20
Daily Record
12 hours ago
- Politics
- Daily Record
Perth and Kinross Council's SNP administration accused of "cutting short democracy"
Members of the public and several councillors are frustrated after Perth and Kinross councillors were asked to vote on the future of Perth and Kinross leisure facilities without debate. On Wednesday, June 18 councillors approved a £74 million proposal for Perth's new leisure centre PH20 to be built on Thimblerow car park as part of a £97m investment on leisure facilities across Perth and Kinross . But the crucial decision was pushed through at a meeting of Perth and Kinross Council on Wednesday, June 18 without open discussion. Around four and a half hours after the meeting started - and several lengthy recesses - council leader Grant Laing tabled a motion to "move straight to the vote with no further debate". He cited the council's standing order 17.1, a procedural motion which - amongst other things - can be used to propose "no further discussion or questioning take place". His motion was seconded by deputy leader Eric Drysdale and supported by the majority of councillors who voted by 23 votes to 15 to move straight to the vote on leisure facilities. Councillors had already had the chance to question several protestors - who made passionate deputations against the Thimblerow proposal and for Bell's Sports Centre to be reinstated as a heated multi-use sports venue - and council officers. But councillors had not yet had the chance to share their own views and/or comment on what they had heard. The Conservatives tabled an amendment, against the SNP leadership's motion, for there to be a debate - as is standard procedure. Labour councillor Alasdair Bailey, Liberal Democrat councillor Peter Barrett and Independent councillor Colin Stewart supported the Conservative group's amendment. Provost Xander McDade abstained. Following the meeting, Conservative councillor Chris Ahern accused the SNP of "cutting short democracy". The Perth City Centre councillor said: "I am extremely unhappy with the decision made today by the leader of the council and the administration in cutting short democracy and preventing debate. I can only assume they were scared to hear the truth and didn't want their excuses to be published for the public to see them for what they are." Blairgowrie and Glens Conservative councillor Caroline Shiers was "extremely disappointed" and added: "I don't recall many occasions when that standing order has been used before except when debates have been going on for some time and councillors are repeating the same arguments - not to stop all contributions before they even started." A PKC spokesperson said: "On the procedural point, Cllr Laing moved a motion under section 17 of standing orders, where under 17.1 it says that a procedural motion can be to propose that no further discussion or questioning takes place. 17.2 and 17.3 of standing orders sets out what happens when a procedural motion is made." Liberal Democrat councillor Peter Barrett took part in proceedings remotely. He supported the decision but described the way the meeting was conducted as a "shambles" and "an unedifying spectacle". Speaking immediately afterwards, the Perth City Centre councillor said: "The only good thing you can say about today's proceedings was that the right decision was made. The rest was a shambles. Anyone watching today's events of the PH2O and Bell's proposals in the council chamber unfold must have been left confused, disappointed and angry. "What an unedifying spectacle which dragged on for hours. Ages spent offline with the meeting in apparent suspension, the Provost announcing 'two minute recesses' which went on for more than 20, not a single word of debate exchanged, more points of order than a hedgehog has spines and almost as many totally opaque 'points of clarification'. "Chairing of the meeting is meant to facilitate the swift and efficient conduct of business, the standing orders of the council are meant to support that objective, you'd never in a million years guess either from the live-cast of today's council proceedings. Something has to change and change urgently." Gareth Thomas watched the entire day's proceedings from the public gallery and was "stunned" by what he felt was a lack of democracy. He said: "It's amazing to see democracy not at work. No data or evidence. I'm stunned." Ahead of the meeting, Perth and Kinross Community Sports Network drew up a business plan for how to run Bell's Sports Centre as a heated venue, with plans and revenue cost proposals. On Wednesday, councillors voted through a proposal for Bell's Sports Centre to be used as "an unheated, covered sports pitch/events space". Dr Thomas said: "I struggled to find any data for the proposed unheated G3 use for Bell's. "I fail to see how it can be sensible to commit to a multi-million pound integrated investment on what appear to be back of the envelope (mis)calculations about Bell's." Perth and Kinross Community Sports Network (PKCSN) chairman David Munro prepared a presentation, which he was unable to display during the meeting due to it being against council policy. The council protocol for deputations states: "Deputations are verbal only and any visual or written information should be circulated to members of the committee by obtaining their email address from the council website. It is not permissible for members of the public to display visual information on the day of the committee." His slides - which he later shared with the Local Democracy Reporting Service - compared the Bell's Sports Centre footprint with the Thimblerow site. It showed the six badminton courts - proposed for PH20 - dwarfed by the Bell's dome space in the main arena, which had 17 badminton courts. The PKCSN chair said they feel like the protests and deputations were "a worthless exercise" and the council's current system "lacks credibility and accountability". On Thursday, Cllr Laing said: "The provision under standing orders to move straight to a vote is rarely used, and indeed on the past two occasions I can recall them being used I voted against it because I felt there was still useful discussion to be had on those occasions. "However, yesterday's council meeting had already included several hours where elected members had been able to listen to information and ask questions of both deputees and officers to allow everyone in the chamber to form a decision on how they wanted to vote. It was clear to me from the framing of the questions that everyone in the room had already made up their minds and further discussion would only have taken up more time rather than usefully informing the final decision. "The people of Perth and Kinross have already waited long enough for a decision to be made. I stand by asking to move straight to that decision, and I am pleased that we can now get on with the job of developing the future of sport and leisure facilities in Perth and Kinross."
The Courier
07-05-2025
- Sport
- The Courier
New design shows how Bell's Sports Centre in Perth could look
A new design shows how Bell's Sports Centre in Perth could look if it is reopened as a fully-heated indoor sports facility. Campaigners believe the iconic North Inch complex should be reinstated to serve the sporting communities that used it before it was shut by flooding. However, the local authority has put forward plans to turn Bell's into an unheated event space with sports pitches. The Perth and Kinross Community Sports Network (PKCSN), which represents a dozen local sports clubs, is against the council's proposals. AJ Fitchet Architects have drawn up a design for Bell's Sports Centre. Image: ajfitchet architect This view has been backed by nine national sporting bodies and nearly 3,700 people who have signed a petition to save the facility. The campaigners enlisted the help of architect Alastair Fitchet, who has worked pro bono with them for the last six months to help design new drawings for the facility. Councils Bell's plans make no sense to architect Alistair, who owns Ajfitchet Architects in Dundee, told The Courier it is important Bell's and its B-listed dome structure are protected. He said: 'I feel it's incredibly important. 'To be taking the heart of out the building and seeing what Perth and Kinross Council are looking to put in doesn't make any sense to me.' How volleyball courts with stands could look at Bell's. Image: Ajfitchet Architect The architect called the structure 'iconic' and says his new redesign 'acknowledges' the listed status. 'The dome is the key part,' Alastair says. 'I don't see any way a building like this would get built today. 'We need to protect it.' He has also incorporated elements to make the building more green and energy efficient. The proposed badminton setup at the redesigned Bell's. Image: Ajfitchet Architect The architect acknowledges his designs are at early stage of the process but hopes it will help spark the imagination for what is possible at Bell's. PKCSN is currently hosting a GoFundMe to raise money for surveyors to cost the designs. 'The people of Perth are being deprived' The controversial plans for Bell's tie into the council's overall new leisure centre proposals which have been met with a huge backlash by residents as they don't feature a dedicated leisure pool. PKCSN also argues the indoor sports provision at the new facility is far less than they already had at Bell's. David Munro, chairperson of the campaign group, told The Courier: 'The people of Perth are being deprived. 'They're being deprived of local sport, they're being deprived of the chance to participate in and watch national and international level sports. Dave Munro and Bill Powrie on Crieff Road, Perth. Image: Steve MacDougall/DC Thomson 'The only people I've spoken to that are in favour of an unheated option are a few councillors.' The future of the facility is set to be discussed by the council next month, alongside plans for PH20. A local authority spokesperson said: 'Almost 2,000 people responded to the consultation on the future of Bell's Sports Centre. 'A summary of responses has been provided to councillors and will be used to inform our proposals for the sports centre when they are presented to council in June.'
