logo
#

Latest news with #NationalVitalStatisticsSystem

First-time moms in the US are getting older as new average age is revealed
First-time moms in the US are getting older as new average age is revealed

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Health
  • Yahoo

First-time moms in the US are getting older as new average age is revealed

The average age of new mothers in the U.S. is increasing, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A report from the agency revealed an uptick of nearly a year, rising from 26.6 in 2016 to 27.5 in 2023. 'All racial and ethnic groups saw an increase in mean age at first birth of 0.4 to 1.4 years,' the National Vital Statistics System authors wrote. The system provides the most complete data on births and deaths in the U.S. The results indicate a continual trend over the past several decades, they noted, with the average age jumping or remaining stable every year since 1970. The spike reflects changes in social, political, education and economic factors. More women are working now than ever before and there have been fewer teenaged pregnancies. It's also more expensive than ever to have children. In fact, many people are choosing not to have kids because of that cost and fears over climate change. While the report did not get into regional break downs, it looked at changes by urbanicity. In 2016 to 2023, the same 0.9-year increase was found across large central, large fringe, and medium metropolitan areas. For small metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, the change was just 0.7 years. 'Mothers living in large fringe or large central metropolitan areas had the highest mean age at first birth (27.6 in 2016 and 28.5 in 2023),' they found. Whereas, those in noncore areas had the lowest average age at first birth, until 25 years old. The report also analyzed the breakdown by race, finding that Asian American mothers had the largest increase in average age, at 1.4 years. They also had the highest average age at first birth in 2016 and 2023, at 30.1 and 31.5 years, respectively. Conversely, American Indian and Alaska Native mothers had the lowest mean age at first birth in 2016 and 2023, at 23.2 and 24.2 years old. 'The increase in the mean age of mothers from 2016 to 2023 is the result of declines in first births to mothers younger than 25 and increases in first births to mothers age 30 and older,' the authors noted. 'The ongoing rise in the age of mothers at first birth reflects changes in childbearing for U.S. families,' the report said.

First-time moms in the US are getting older as new average age is revealed
First-time moms in the US are getting older as new average age is revealed

The Independent

time6 days ago

  • Health
  • The Independent

First-time moms in the US are getting older as new average age is revealed

The average age of new mothers in the U.S. is increasing, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A report from the agency revealed an uptick of nearly a year, rising from 26.6 in 2016 to 27.5 in 2023. 'All racial and ethnic groups saw an increase in mean age at first birth of 0.4 to 1.4 years,' the National Vital Statistics System authors wrote. The system provides the most complete data on births and deaths in the U.S. The results indicate a continual trend over the past several decades, they noted, with the average age jumping or remaining stable every year since 1970. The spike reflects changes in social, political, education, and economic factors. More women are working now than ever before and there have been fewer teenaged pregnancies. It's also more expensive than ever to have children. In fact, many people are choosing not to have kids because of that cost and fears over climate change. While the report did not get into regional break downs, it looked at changes by urbanicity. In 2016 to 2023, the same 0.9-year increase was found across large central, large fringe, and medium metropolitan areas. For small metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, the change was just 0.7 years. 'Mothers living in large fringe or large central metropolitan areas had the highest mean age at first birth (27.6 in 2016 and 28.5 in 2023),' they found. Whereas, those in noncore areas had the lowest average age at first birth, until 25 years old. The report also analyzed the breakdown by race, finding that Asian American mothers had the largest increase in average age, at 1.4 years. They also had the highest average age at first birth in 2016 and 2023, at 30.1 and 31.5 years, respectively. Conversely, American Indian and Alaska Native mothers had the lowest mean age at first birth in 2016 and 2023, at 23.2 and 24.2 years old. 'The increase in the mean age of mothers from 2016 to 2023 is the result of declines in first births to mothers younger than 25 and increases in first births to mothers age 30 and older,' the authors noted. 'The ongoing rise in the age of mothers at first birth reflects changes in childbearing for U.S. families,' the report said.

The average age of U.S. moms is nearing 30, new CDC data shows
The average age of U.S. moms is nearing 30, new CDC data shows

Fast Company

time13-06-2025

  • Business
  • Fast Company

The average age of U.S. moms is nearing 30, new CDC data shows

Women are waiting longer to have babies. For the first time, the average age of giving birth has risen to nearly 30 years of age, according to a new report. The data, which comes from the National Vital Statistics System, was published on Friday in the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics report. Per the report, the average age for giving birth rose by nearly a year from 2016 to 2023. It went from 28.7 years of age to 29.6. Likewise, age for first-time mothers increased similarly over the same time period, rising from 26.6 to 27.5. Interestingly, teen pregnancies fell, too. In 2016, they accounted for 11.8% of all births. In 2023, they made up only 8.7%. The latest findings are in line with the fact that many people are delaying marriage until later in life, too. According to a 2021 Pew Research report, the average age for tying the knot has risen dramatically since the 1980s. The number of U.S. adults who were married by 21 dropped from about one-third in 1980 to 6% in 2021. And marrying by age 25 plunged, too, from nearly two-thirds to 22%. However, according to the same report, people aren't just delaying marriage until their late 20s or even 30s. 25% — a record number — were still unmarried at 40. Of course, the fact that it's become massively more expensive to have a family likely plays a role in women delaying having children, or not having any at all. A recent LendingTree analysis found that since 2023, the annual cost of raising a young child has jumped by nearly 36%. In 2025, the tab is around $30,000 per year. Over 18 years, raising a child costs $300,000 (though in several states, it's even higher). However, women are also one group who are becoming increasingly financially independent, while perhaps decentering the goal of marriage and motherhood at the same time. In 2024, 20% of home buyers were single women. Only 8% of single men bought their own homes last year. And a 2019 Morgan Stanley report projected that by 2030, 45% of women between 25 and 44 will be single and childfree. U.S. women are not the only ones delaying motherhood. According to recent government data, per The Guardian, Japanese women are doing the same. In 2024, the number of births in Japan dropped by 5.7% from the previous year to 686,061. The number marks the lowest birth rate since the records in 1899. The latest data comes as the Trump administration has recently floated the idea of incentivising having babies by giving families a $5,000 'baby bonus' to help offset the costs. Given the hospital bills alone for giving birth in the U.S. can average around $3,000 (for a vaginal delivery with insurance), it's unlikely the plan will persuade too many American women to have babies before they're financially ready and able (or even at all).

'Why Should I Invest If I'm Just Gonna Die?' — Dave Ramsey Viewer Insists He's Giving Bad Advice But Cites Bogus Stats That Men Don't Live Past 72
'Why Should I Invest If I'm Just Gonna Die?' — Dave Ramsey Viewer Insists He's Giving Bad Advice But Cites Bogus Stats That Men Don't Live Past 72

Yahoo

time08-06-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

'Why Should I Invest If I'm Just Gonna Die?' — Dave Ramsey Viewer Insists He's Giving Bad Advice But Cites Bogus Stats That Men Don't Live Past 72

Saving for retirement is a long game — and for decades, Dave Ramsey has told his audience that building wealth doesn't require massive income, just consistent effort. But when one caller threw that entire mindset into question, Ramsey didn't just correct the math — he unleashed a full-on lecture. In a video clip titled "Why Should I Invest If I'm Just Going To Die?" posted to his official YouTube channel, a listener named Isaiah challenged Ramsey's popular claim that $100 invested monthly could grow into millions over time. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . "You keep saying to invest $100 a month beginning at age 30 and you'll be worth $5 million at 70 years old," Isaiah said. "That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, because the life expectancy of a white male is 72 and for a Black male it's 68." Ramsey fired back: "We have never said $100 a month from 30 to 70 is $5 million. It's $1,176,000. All of your numbers are wrong." He cited data from the National Vital Statistics System showing that as of 2023, the average life expectancy for men in the U.S. was nearly 76. But more importantly, he pointed out that once someone reaches age 65, the average life span stretches another 18 years. "That's into your 80s," he said. "So no, you don't just die before you enjoy your money." But it wasn't just the math that set Ramsey off — it was the mindset. "At the core of your belligerency," Ramsey said, "is the idea that somehow you're supposed to get rich in 10 minutes, or that you're entitled to something." Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. He pushed back hard on Isaiah's claim that his background or race had anything to do with financial limits. "Color of skin hasn't got anything to do with your ability to build wealth," Ramsey said. "You're not a victim of anything but your bad thinking." Then came the now-infamous rant: "Roll up your sleeves, live on less than you make, get out of debt, deny yourself a little bit of pleasure... and quit smoking so much pot. Seriously." Ramsey called the caller's view "hopelessness," and accused him of spreading discouragement to others who could be working toward financial independence. "You're a hope stealer," he said. "And that pisses me off. Because I spend my life giving people hope." By the end of the clip, Ramsey reminded listeners that 89% of America's millionaires are first-generation wealthy. "If you plant $100, you'll get this. If you plant $1,000, you'll get 10 times as much," he said. "Most of you waste $100 driving past Starbucks."Ramsey's closing argument? "This is the best economy in the history of mankind for the little man to get ahead. If you don't do it, that's not on life. That's on you." Not everyone may agree with Ramsey's delivery, or his assumptions about longevity, race, or motivation. And sure — life doesn't come with guarantees. You might not live to 88, and a $100 monthly investment won't magically turn you into a millionaire overnight. But the bigger question is: What's the alternative? If you don't save out of fear you'll never make it to retirement, what happens if you do? Ramsey's point may be harsh, but it's hard to argue with the logic: hoping you'll be dead before you need your money isn't a financial plan. And if you're wrong — that could cost you a lot more than $100 a month. Read Next: Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? . Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'Why Should I Invest If I'm Just Gonna Die?' — Dave Ramsey Viewer Insists He's Giving Bad Advice But Cites Bogus Stats That Men Don't Live Past 72 originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

This U.S. State Was Just Named the Happiest for Retirees
This U.S. State Was Just Named the Happiest for Retirees

Yahoo

time03-06-2025

  • Health
  • Yahoo

This U.S. State Was Just Named the Happiest for Retirees

According to a new study, there's one state in particular that has nailed the recipe for happiness. And it's the perfect place for seniors looking to live out their golden years. In late May, released its Senior Happiness Index to determine which places around the U.S. offer the highest chances of finding happiness for older people. To determine the ranking, the team analyzed a number of factors, including the number of senior centers in each state using and normalized the data per 100,000 people. It then determined the percentage of seniors (65 years and older) living alone, which was collected via the U.S. Census American Community Survey (2023), along with an overall senior health ranking taken from America's Health Rankings 2024 Senior Report. Next, it calculated the cost of living index by state using data from the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, along with the average annual life expectancy at birth from the National Vital Statistics System. Then, it gathered data on the happiest states in the U.S. using a 2024 study by WalletHub and finally assigned each state a score from zero to 10. After looking at all that information, the team named Utah the happiest state of all for seniors. "Utah tops the list with the most content seniors, scoring 7.69 out of 10 thanks to its supportive environment for senior living," the findings noted." Utah was also named the healthiest state for older people in 2024, and it ranks as the third-lowest percentage of those aged 65 and over living alone (21.48 percent), reducing the risk of social isolation." The findings also noted that Utah is among the top five happiest states in general and is a spot where more than two-fifths (44 percent) actively volunteer, which is the highest rate in the nation. "This not only means Utah's aging population is staying connected and involved with their community, but volunteering also contributes significantly to Utah seniors' well-being and happiness," the findings added. Idaho came in a close second with a score of 7.38, thanks to most of its seniors living with others, ensuring fewer people are experiencing loneliness. And as the findings stated, it's a fantastic spot for seniors looking to live an active lifestyle with "30 state parks to explore and proximity to national treasures like Yellowstone." Rounding out the top three is Connecticut, with a score of 7.01, thanks to its strong statistics, including the third-highest average life expectancy, access to health care, and its ranking among the top 10 happiest states overall on WalletHub's rankings. Ready to find more happiness? See the full report and where your state ranks on Read the original article on Travel & Leisure

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store