Latest news with #MadanMohanMalaviyaUniversityofTechnology
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
PRATIBHA Setu – Bridging merit and opportunity
Dr Onkar Singh has been the founder Vice Chancellor of the Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur (U.P.), the first non-affiliating technical University of the U.P. state. Currently, he is Vice Chancellor of Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)- INDIA. LESS ... MORE Kudos to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) for launching the aptly titled initiative 'PRATIBHA Setu'; i.e. Professional Resource And Talent Integration – Bridge for Hiring Aspirants, formerly known as Public Disclosure Scheme (PDS). As per the UPSC, this strategic initiative will enable verified employers—including ministries, PSUs, autonomous bodies, and private organisations—to access details of non-recommended willing candidates who cleared all stages of the eight prestigious direct recruitment UPSC examinations but were not included in the final merit list. This will bring together the prospective employers and the meritorious job seekers who have already proved their worth by succeeding in preliminary and main examinations and reached the interview stage but could not get into the final list just for lack of a few marks. Now it is up to the government departments and public/private sector organizations to offer employment to these industrious and assiduous young ones who have already developed a certain level of understanding as evinced by passing two stringent filters namely the preliminary and main examination stages of Civil Services Examination and other examinations for Indian Forest Service, Central Armed Police Forces, Engineering Service, Geo-Scientist, CDS, Indian Economic Service/Statistical Service, and Medical Services. This cohort widely takes care of candidates possessing almost all diverse educational backgrounds. This admirable initiative is at a time, when the selection cycles for jobs are not only too long but also uncertain due to various structural, procedural, and cultural issues leading to unforeseen circumstances like paper leakage, question paper defects, breach of examination at pre or post examination stages, etc. These factors eventually yield mental fatigue, career uncertainties, missing opportunities, financial burden, and on top of all the loss of trust in the system prevailing in the country. A look at the performance of the job recruitment agencies at the state and central level, the job recruitment processes carried out by UPSC are still considered to be sacrosanct barring a few aberrations which are attributed to the part of candidates. Undeniably, the Civil Services Examination (CSE) conducted by the Union Public Service Commission is one of the most prestigious and elaborate examinations in the country which is full of uncertainties for candidates due to three discrete stages collectively deciding the final outcome. Besides, the exam cycle of nearly one year leads to loss of year on year for any UPSC aspirant who is unable to succeed and thus the continued pursuit to try up to the last attempt is eventually a loss as the society is unable to reap the potential of such youth. To appreciate the relevance of PRATIBHA – SETU, let us delve into the detailed statistics of CSE – 2024 which shows that in this year 5,83,213 out of 9,92,599 enrolled candidates actually appeared in the Preliminary examination. Out of these total of 14,627 candidates qualified for appearance in the Written (Main) Examination, and from these, 2,845 candidates qualified for the Personality Test (PT) of the examination. Finally, 1009 candidates (725 men and 284 women) have been recommended by the Commission for appointment to various Services. Thus, out of all those who appeared in the interview, 1836 candidates who appeared in the interview have been left out, however, some of them have done fairly well in the Mains Examination and some have done well in the Personality Test. Indisputably, all these meritorious candidates who have reached the last stage will be either reappearing or quitting their aspiration to serve the country through Civil Services or similar other services. Undoubtedly, these are brilliant minds having a reasonably good understanding of the country and performed well in 9 distinct papers of the Mains Examination. It is worth mentioning that those whose names are in the list of 1009 and those whose names could not find a place in the final list do not have many variations. At times it is so painful that at the same cut-off marks, some are in and some are out. The cut- off for CSE 2024 was 947 and there are many candidates who have secured above 900 who are worthy in all respects, but it is the sheer chance that has played the role and they are out. If the country is unable to utilize its potential for the good of the other departments/organizations/ Public Service Undertakings of Govt of India /state, then it is a loss of opportunity to the nation. Also, the timing of using their capabilities at appropriate time is very critical and should be done at the earliest in the interest of the nation which has already invested so much in their upbringing and assessing their potential in different stages. Thus, the prudence lies in considering all interested candidates for direct recruitment to all government services and others, other than those covered under the Civil Services Examination and other 07 Examinations for which UPSC acts as a recruiter and all other public sector and private sector organizations. Thus, it is a welcoming move by the UPSC to maximize the yield of its efforts and expedite the process of recruitment for all the interested other government departments, organizations, Public Sector Undertakings, etc. who wish to quickly employ these readily available candidates who have marginally lost. With, the initiative of inviting prospective employers to select suitable human resources amongst those who have marginally lost, not only the candidates will get employed early but also the recruitment cycles of such employers will be shortened. This yields a happy situation of earliest engagement of youth use in the service of the nation and ensures that they do not waste their time merely preparing and trying their luck. Going by the expected outcome of PRATIBHA Setu, it appears that this practice of maximising the utility of the efforts put in any recruitment cycle should be adopted by all state public service commissions and agencies carrying out recruitments fairly and with integrity. This will not only eliminate the multiplicity of recruitment processes but also help in eliminating long recruitment cycles and quicker employment of youth and usher in the realm of one recruitment process for maximum jobs. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
22-05-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Admissions spur publicity competition
Dr Onkar Singh has been the founder Vice Chancellor of the Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur (U.P.), the first non-affiliating technical University of the U.P. state. Currently, he is Vice Chancellor of Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)- INDIA. LESS ... MORE Like every year, with the start of admission season, the print and electronic media, public places, roadsides, etc. are flooded with advertisements calling for admissions in educational institutions. This shift from issuing a precise admission notice to huge captivating advertisements in public spaces has become a common practice in educational institutions of all levels i.e. primary, secondary, and higher education institutions (HEIs). Nevertheless, the approach and methodology vary for different levels of educational institutions because of the differing expectations of the target audience. However, the core intent behind advertisements remains to attract students for admission. Perhaps, the upsurge in the number of self-financed private institutions and the inherent challenge of maximising admission revenue for their sustenance and growth are the obvious reasons along with other compelling circumstances that have seeded stiff competition amongst private educational institutions for admissions. With the admission advertising becoming a new norm, it becomes worthy of being looked into from various perspectives as the creative and impactful audio-video or written content in the publicity materials of HEIs— used across print, digital platforms, outdoor advertising, and more —reflect substantial intellectual and financial investments. Undoubtedly, such advertisements with catchy content attract attention and spark interest in students and society in general. But the degree of engagement, memory retention about the institution, emotional connect, recalling institution, etc. depend upon the mode whether print or electronic and also varies for Generation Z and Millennials. Delving into details of advertising by the HEIs, general showcasing is about their accomplishments like, student placements, placement salary packages, accreditations, rankings, IPRs, MoUs with eminent institutions within the country and abroad, industry linkages, infrastructure, facilities, institutional recognitions, programme specifics, and other things worth display to create impact. In many circumstances, the attributes showcased contrast from institution to institution and all attempts are made to tacitly establish a competitive edge over the others. Here are some of the examples highlighting the vulnerabilities associated with a few of the publicity attributes specially rankings, media reports, collaborations, and placements. Ranking: Looking at the institutional ranking it is evident that there is a large number of ranking frameworks available which offer inter-se ranks that are not coherent with the public perception of the respective HEI. Further, the credibility and acceptance of all ranking frameworks are not alike but the ranks projected in advertisements may create entirely different perspectives about the respective HEI and the deception could affect the stakeholders adversely. Media reports: The media reports of HEIs play a significant role in perception building. Therefore, sometimes the HEIs push certain content which gets published in the form of advertorials which look like news items. In a situation where the majority of the target audience may not be able to distinguish between the news items and advertorials, an opinion built on the advertorials could be misleading. Given that news items in print media enjoy greater credibility, any such initiative of paid advertorials or deceptive presentations may deprive the aspirants of getting exposed to the real standing of the particular HEI. Collaborations: The number of collaborations keeps on happening amongst HEIs or HEIs with industry within the country or across the countries as a part of the collective qualitative growth of the education ecosystem. These engagements with other HEIs or industries/organisations could be for running joint research, degree programmes, internships, projects, or short-term vocational training. In certain instances, the well-crafted taglines referring to these collaborations by the particular HEI create wrong perceptions. Quite likely, the way such capitalization of the collaboration is done by presenting it in a delusive manner in the public domain may not be in the knowledge of the respective collaborator and faintly impact them adversely due to others capitalizing on their brand value. Placements: In many situations, the HEIs also publish select placement statistics which could be comprised of the number of placements, type of placements, names of potential employers, salary package, etc. These statistics showing worthy packages largely affect the mood and plans of admission seekers. Nevertheless, the placement depends upon the potential of respective students and the timely facilitation of job opportunities by the respective HEI and cannot be deemed to be the privilege of every student. There have also been instances of flaunting a few placements with hefty packages which do not survive for long, yet misleading promotion continues to create the impression of outstanding placement. Thus, regardless of the admission aspirants of higher education being slightly mature as compared to those at primary and secondary levels, at times, the presentation made for one or more of the features listed in the advertisement does not allow them to get the correct picture of the respective HEIs. It goes without saying that the influence made upon innocent minds through camouflaged publicity materials and admission agents leads them to the portals of particular HEI and they are deprived of the possible opportunities of studying at the other institutions suiting them. The rigorous advertising campaign for reaching out to the maximum number of admission seekers has positively affected the admissions in various HEIs through brand building and it is compelling others to go for similar campaign. Alongside, the advertising campaign also involves huge expenditure and the money spent on publicity is a fraction of the total revenue from the higher education sector. This contribution to the economy is a function of the size of the higher education sector economy. A report by Statista shows that the size of the higher education market in India was around six billion US dollars in 2022 and the annual growth rate is expected to be nearly 10 per cent up to 2028. As per Statista, the US educational service industry had spent $1.5 billion on advertising in 2023 with Purdue University Global spending $83.48 million on advertisements in 2023. Thus, going by the global trend, there is a sizeable spending on publicity by the HEIs in the country as well. The moot point behind this expenditure is about the source from where this money comes, specially in a developing nation like ours, the fees are points of concern for the sizeable population. Obviously, in a self-financed setup, every expenditure is a part of the fee charged by the students, meaning thereby that any reduction in the spending on the publicity campaign will eventually ease out the students. Simultaneously, there is the engagement of admission counsellors or agents or managers on certain commissions for convincing students to seek admission in particular HEIs through special discounts, freebies etc. Needless to say, these admission influencers engaged by HEI resort to all possible ways to ensure admission of the student(s) by advocating the edge of the respective HEI over others in a rightful or deceitful manner. Typically, students come across the reality after taking admission but are helpless as it becomes too late by that time. The money spent as a commission to admission agents or freebies to aspirants also comes from the fees charged by the students in the HEIs. Way forward: Going by the fast growth of HEIs in the private sector, the stiff competition amongst them for admitting a maximum number of students is likely to continue as an annual affair. Also, given the self-financed nature of private sector institutions, it is quite difficult to restrict them from devising their mechanism to ensure admissions. However, a certain degree of regulations on delusive practices meant for only attracting students for admission is inevitable to ensure fair competition and prevent anti-competitive practices while aiming at reducing the cost of education for the overall good of the students. These regulations are also critically needed for protecting student interests and sustaining healthy competition amongst HEIs while ensuring that the underlying philosophy of maximising access to education to all is sustained with equity. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
17-05-2025
- Science
- Time of India
MMMUT set to have Indian Knowledge System dept
Gorakhpur : In a pioneering move to blend India's ancient intellectual legacy with contemporary education, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology ( MMMUT ) is set to launch a dedicated department of Indian Knowledge System , the first university in UP to do so. The decision was finalised in a recent review meeting chaired by Vice-Chancellor Prof J P Saini. Formal procedure, including appointment of department head, is expected to be completed shortly. The initiative aligns with the National Education Policy (2020), which highlights revival of India's traditional knowledge and its integration into modern academia. Following directives from UGC and AICTE, institutions nationwide have begun incorporating IKS-based curricula covering areas like Vedic literature, Indian philosophy, Ayurveda, yoga, ancient science and mathematics, and Indian art and architecture. At MMMUT, the new department will design course syllabi, appoint faculty, conduct classes, and oversee examinations. Courses likely to be introduced include Vedas: The Foundation of Indian Knowledge, Engineering Marvels of Ancient India, Vedic Mathematics, and Gita Today. Though IITs and a few universities already offer IKS courses, MMMUT will lead as the first institution in UP to establish a full-fledged IKS department. tnn
Time of India
21-04-2025
- General
- Time of India
Learning together or separately
Dr Onkar Singh has been the founder Vice Chancellor of the Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur (U.P.), the first non-affiliating technical University of the U.P. state. Currently, he is Vice Chancellor of Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)- INDIA. LESS ... MORE Quite often, the discussions trigger regarding the educational settings in the context of gender i.e. whether to have co-ed or single-gender institutions or convert existing single-gender institutions to co-educational institutions. A recent instance of an attempt to convert a famous all-boys prestigious boarding school to co-education received a lot of flak from its old students. Historically, in most cases, the attempts to transform any existing single-gender educational institution into a co-education type have seen much criticism. Delving deep into co-education or single-gender learning education environment shows that the socio-cultural conditions of India have been pushing for special efforts to educate everyone. As per the available statistics, achievement of a Gender parity index of more than 1 in education means that the special efforts for ensuring access to education for females have proved their worth. This has been possible with the constantly evolving education system consisting of diverse nature of institutions at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels. Kudos to the efforts of the state and philanthropists in setting up education centres of co-education type and single-gender i.e. boys or girls type. Undoubtedly, the number of educational institutions meant exclusively for boys or girls are small fraction of available institutions, but the presence of such exclusive single-gender institutions has its own relevance. The government's initiative of setting up of large number of residential Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalayas since 2004 has been a game changer in school education for girls and the reluctance of parents to send girls to schools is overcome to a great extent. Besides, special all-women higher education institutions in different disciplines have also been set up by the Government to facilitate female education seekers to fulfil their aspirations. Along with this, a good number of educational institutions have come up at all levels with the active participation of private education providers. With the increasing participation of females in almost all domains nearly at par with their male counterparts, sometimes a nuanced question as to whether girls want exclusive women's institutions or co-education institutions arises. Likewise, the existing institutions for only men are also targeted for conversion to both genders institutions. Thus, despite there being a maximum share of co-education institutions, these exclusive single-gender institutions are commonly catching the eye and necessitating contemplation about their continuance in existing form. An introspection into this issue from a women's institution perspective shows that these are individual preferences depending upon cultural backgrounds, educational goals, personal learning requirements, learning patterns, etc. Some of the obvious reasons for females preferring all-women educational institutions appear to be safety concerns, parents' willingness, better learning focus leading to better performance, freedom from gender-based discrimination/bullying/harassment, absence of stereotyping in context to subjects/choices, freedom of participation in activities, motivation from female role models, freedom from any social pressure as to what to do what not to do, lesser distractions, female-centric academic ambience, etc. There could also be certain cultural and religious factors dissuading females from participating in the mixed-gender educational environment. The varying education access in urban and rural areas, distances to education centres, and availability of opportunities also affect the decision-making by parents who want academic, emotional and social development of their children. The trend shows that those from the urban centres do not bother with co-education or single-gender institutions while those from rural or semi-urban areas prefer only women's institutions with little consideration for the education quality. These preferences are also dependent upon the age of children, as co-education is not a concern at the primary education level, it becomes an important attribute in selecting educational institutions at higher secondary and higher education levels. The frequently reported occurrences of gender-based discrimination and crime against women are unable to infuse confidence in parents/guardians about the safety and security of their wards, which corroborates the relevance of only women's education ambience for greater accomplishments without fear and hesitation. Nevertheless, these only-women education settings could lead to gaps with respect to congeniality to real-life mixed-gender work spaces, real-world diversities, availability of opportunities, communication with society, and social development. Thus, a trade-off is practised by those families that are willingly sending their children to single-gender institutions to pursue their education and any attempt to dismantle existing special purpose institutions will lead to disruptions in the education journey. A comprehensive look at the reasons for the selection of the single-gender or mixed-gender education setting points to the perception, opinions and choices of individuals/families being formed on various attributes. This makes it inevitable to continue with exclusive single-gender educational institutions, failing which a significant number of children may be deprived of education opportunities for reasons beyond their control. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
