logo
#

Latest news with #Immokalee

‘Tasteless, Hideous and Repulsive': Trump Wants You to Eat Inferior Tomatoes
‘Tasteless, Hideous and Repulsive': Trump Wants You to Eat Inferior Tomatoes

New York Times

timea day ago

  • Politics
  • New York Times

‘Tasteless, Hideous and Repulsive': Trump Wants You to Eat Inferior Tomatoes

The food critic Craig Claiborne once labeled them 'tasteless, hideous and repulsive.' James Beard called them 'an almost total gastronomic loss.' The New Yorker writer Thomas Whiteside found in 1977 that one survived a six-foot fall onto the floor intact, thus easily exceeding the federal standard for automobile bumpers. The subject of their scorn? The Florida field tomato — which the Trump administration wants us to eat more of by imposing a 21 percent tariff on most Mexican tomatoes starting July 14. The tariff represents a double insult to consumers, assaulting both our taste buds and our pocketbooks. President Trump has told us to make do with fewer (and more expensive) imported pencils and dolls for the greater good of bringing manufacturing back to America. Fine. But tomatoes? The last thing American consumers need is a revitalization of Florida's withering tomato industry. Even some industry leaders admit the mediocrity of Florida field-grown tomatoes. In 2020, when I visited Lipman Family Farms, one of the largest growers of field tomatoes in the United States, its chief executive at the time, Kent Shoemaker, warned me not to expect anything like the fully red vine-ripened tomatoes our grandparents grew. 'We have to get the tomato from Immokalee, Fla., to St. Louis, Mo., in February, and your grandma's tomato wouldn't make it,' he explained, adding, 'You have to make choices.' Those choices include breeding tomatoes not for flavor, but to survive disease, insects, shipping and Florida weather from blistering heat to tropical downpours. Some Florida tomato varieties are bred to fit perfectly on a fast-food burger patty. Or, if they are destined for Subway, to look fresh in a display case hours after being sliced. Because high sugar levels in tomatoes attract bacteria and fungi while also reducing size and yield, Florida growers have to deliberately minimize sweetness. Finally, to survive the journey to St. Louis or anywhere else, the fruits are picked while still bright green and rock hard; they turn pink by spending several days or more in a room filled with ethylene gas. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Committee backs ag worker minimum wage bill that mirrors Mills' proposal last year
Committee backs ag worker minimum wage bill that mirrors Mills' proposal last year

Yahoo

time06-05-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Committee backs ag worker minimum wage bill that mirrors Mills' proposal last year

Workers pick tomatoes at a farm owned and operated by Pacific Tomato Growers on February 19, 2021 in Immokalee, Florida. (Photo by) Lawmakers have endorsed a bill this session that would grant farmworkers in Maine the right to minimum wage and has the potential to finally make it off the governor's desk. The Legislature's Labor Committee voted 6-1 with multiple members absent to endorse LD 589, which would give agricultural workers the right to state minimum wage and mirrors the proposal Gov. Janet Mills put forward last session. Before committee members broke to caucus ahead of the vote, Senate co-chair Mike Tipping (D-Penobscot) said, 'This is the closest we have come and I hope we're in a good place here to finally pass a basic minimum wage for agricultural workers.' There were two bills before the committee this session seeking to guarantee farmworkers the right to state minimum wage, since they are currently excluded from the section of law that provides a wage floor and overtime protections. Legally, they are only entitled to the $7.25 federal minimum wage; however, many farm owners say they pay workers even more than Maine's minimum wage of $14.65 an hour. Earlier this session, the Labor Committee also supported a bill that would allow agricultural employees to talk about wages, working conditions and other employment matters with other employees or the employer. That bill has received initial approval from the Senate, but was tabled in the House of Representatives Tuesday, pending a vote. Farmworker rights have been an ongoing discussion in the state as Mills has vetoed multiple pieces of legislation over her tenure seeking to secure labor protections, including her own bill last session. She said she could no longer support that proposal after the committee reworked the bill to allow farmworkers to bring their own private action against employers for violations. House co-chair Rep. Amy Roeder (D-Bangor) said Tuesday that as a self-described 'idealist,' the legislation doesn't go as far as she would have liked, though ultimately supported the bill. 'I realize in legislation that we have to crawl before we can walk sometimes, but we've been crawling for an awful long time,' Roeder said. When introducing LD 357 this session, Sen. Rick Bennett (R-Oxford) said he was appalled by the governor's actions last year. His bill was identical to the one the Labor Committee supported last year, but this time bolstered with a Republican as the lead sponsor. Though the committee voted unanimously not to support Bennett's bill, Tipping thanked him for following the committee's work last session by introducing this measure. Sen. Rachel Talbot Ross (D-Cumberland) originally took a different approach from Bennett with LD 589, which initially removed language that exempted farmworkers from current statute, rather than create a new section of law. However, this was a sticking point for the agricultural industry who worried that any future changes to that section of law could overlook the unique qualities of farming. After amending LD 589 to address those concerns, the proposals had just two key differences. The legislation from Talbot Ross does not include a private right of action, leaving it up to the Department of Labor and the Office of the Maine Attorney General to handle any wage violations. Additionally, the amended version of LD 589 includes language clarifying that the changes that would result from this legislation could not be construed to mean that agricultural workers were losing any existing rights. Tipping highlighted this language before casting his vote in support of the bill, saying that he interprets it to mean that farmworkers won't lose their right to bring private action against an employer for other violations, such as not being paid any wages. Labor Commissioner Laura Fortman said that based on conversations she has had with the governor, Mills seems to be on board with the amended version of LD 589. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store