Latest news with #Howden
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- General
- Daily Mail
Council bans lollipop man from high-fiving children as they cross the road because of health and safety concerns and claims it 'slows down traffic'
A much-loved lollipop man has been banned from high-fiving schoolchildren as they cross the road – because council officials claim it causes traffic delays and poses a health and safety risk. Neil Cotton, 57, has spent the last two years brightening up the school run in the East Yorkshire town of Howden with his cheerful attitude and signature high fives. But the school crossing patrol officer has now been told by East Riding of Yorkshire Council to stop the friendly gesture at once – because it's seen as a 'distraction' and could make children forget how to cross the road safely. The stunned lollipop man took to social media to share the bizarre order, telling parents and supporters: 'I have been instructed that I can no longer high-five children any more whilst crossing the road. 'This is because it upsets some drivers having to wait another 10 seconds.' The junction, locally known as Cross Keys Corner, sees children from infant, junior and secondary schools cross the road daily and for many, Neil's high fives have become a happy part of the morning routine. But now council killjoys have stepped in, saying children should be focused 'without any distractions'. The post, which has since been removed, sparked outrage from local parents with many branding the decision 'absurd' and 'ridiculous'. Mother-of-one Kirsty Wilcox told BBC Look North: 'I think it's wrong. Why shouldn't he, what's wrong with it? 'It puts a smile on the kids' faces. My son does it all the time. But now he gets upset because he's not allowed to do it.' Fellow parent Theresa Holt said: 'It's silly. It takes literally seconds and it gives that child that little bit of happiness. He's great with my little boy and he sees him as a friendly face.' Even drivers weighed in on the row – with many defending Mr Cotton and blasting the council's 'over-the-top' approach. Tony Brooke said: 'It's absurd. Just to high five to them, I don't see there's a problem with that. 'He's going to hold the traffic up to let the kids across so I wouldn't have thought it would add any more time to people's journeys at all. It's crazy.' Another motorist, Michael Dalton, added: 'I think it's a bit OTT to be honest. It's a bit PC [political correctness] going crazy again. As a driver, we need to be a bit more courteous, certainly at school times.' In a statement, East Riding of Yorkshire Council said: 'It is vitally important that children learn to cross the road safely, concentrating without any distractions, walking carefully and being vigilant of the traffic. 'In this particular case, one of our officers spoke with this crossing patrol and simply reminded them of the need not to have distractions while children are crossing. 'However, we are confident they will continue doing a fantastic job and they are much appreciated.' Mr Cotton also revealed he has been told not to help guide larger vehicles around the junction because of fears the council could face legal action if there was an accident.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- General
- Telegraph
Council bans lollipop man from high-fiving children as they cross road
A lollipop man has been ordered to stop giving high fives to school children because of health and safety concerns. For the past two years, Neil Cotton, 57, has sought to brighten the children's day with a high five as they crossed the road in Howden, East Yorkshire. But the school crossing patrol officer has now been told by the council that the gesture is a 'distraction' to children learning to cross the road safely. Mr Cotton said the high fives were also deemed to be upsetting some drivers by slowing down traffic at the junction known as Cross Keys Corner. In a social media post, he said: 'I have been instructed that I can no longer high-five children any more whilst crossing the road. This is because it upsets some drivers having to wait another 10 seconds.' East Riding of Yorkshire Council said one of its officers had spoken to the crossing patrol to say it was 'vitally important' that children learned to cross the road safely without any distractions. Mr Cotton also claimed he had been 'instructed to no longer guide the larger vehicles round Cross Keys Corner to eliminate the chances of legal action if there were to be an accident'. 'Absolutely ridiculous' The council clampdown drew ire on social media from parents who rely on the crossing patrol to keep their children safe. Niccie Downes responded to Mr Cotton's now deleted social media post by thanking him for doing 'an amazing job', calling the decision 'absolutely ridiculous'. She added: 'Finn thinks it's great when you high-five him in passing, which I'm sure all the others do, and as for guiding the lorries you're doing that for safety purposes as that corner is dangerous'. Another parent, Kirsty Wilcox, told BBC Look North: 'I think it's wrong. Why shouldn't he, what's wrong with it? It puts a smile on the kids' faces. My son does it all the time. But now he gets upset because he's not allowed to do it.' Theresa Holt said Mr Cotton's greeting gave children like hers a 'little bit of happiness'. She added: 'He's great with my little boy and he sees him as a friendly face.' A spokesman for East Riding of Yorkshire Council said: 'We value all our school crossing patrols, they are pillars of the community, and do a very important job – meeting and greeting children, parents and pedestrians and helping to keep them safe while crossing the road. 'It is vitally important that children learn to cross the road safely, concentrating without any distractions, walking carefully and being vigilant of the traffic. 'In this particular case, one of our officers spoke with this crossing patrol and simply reminded them of the need not to have distractions while children are crossing. However, we are confident they will continue doing a fantastic job and they are much appreciated.'
The Independent
2 days ago
- General
- The Independent
Lollipop man told to stop giving children high fives by council
A lollipop man has been told by a council he can no longer high five children in case they are distracted while crossing the road. Neil Cotton, 57, had been working as a school crossing patrol officer in Howden, East Yorkshire, for two years, when he shared on social media that he had been 'instructed that I can NO LONGER high five the children anymore whilst crossing the road' and 'NO LONGER guide the larger vehicles across Cross Keys Corner to eliminate the chances of legal action if there were to be an accident.' Mr Cotton helps children from pre-school, primary and secondary schools cross the junction known as Cross Keys Corner, of which he warned drivers to 'be careful at the junction as there will be large vehicles in the middle of the road AND some larger vehicles will have no option but to mount the pavements.' The local community shared their dismay over the decision, with Kirsty Wilcox telling BBC Look North that her son was upset that he was no longer allowed to high five the school crossing patrol officer. 'I think it's wrong. Why shouldn't he, what's wrong with it?' She added: 'It puts a smile on the kids' faces.' Another parent, Theresa Holt, said: 'It's silly. It takes literally seconds and it gives that child that little bit of happiness. He's great with my little boy and he sees him as a friendly face.' Drivers have also protested against the move, with Michael Dalton calling the move 'a bit OTT.' 'As a driver, we need to be a bit more courteous, certainly at school times' he added. Driver Tony Brooke described the move as 'absurd', adding he saw no problem with Mr Cotton high fiving the children. 'He's going to hold the traffic up to let the kids across so I wouldn't have thought it would add any more time to people's journeys at all. It's crazy.' A spokesperson from East Riding of Yorkshire Council said: 'We value all our school crossing patrols, they are pillars of the community, and do a very important job – meeting and greeting children, parents and pedestrians and helping to keep them safe while crossing the road. 'It is vitally important that children learn to cross the road safely, concentrating without any distractions, walking carefully and being vigilant of the traffic. 'In this particular case, one of our officers spoke with this crossing patrol and simply reminded them of the need not to have distractions while children are crossing. 'However, we are confident they will continue doing a fantastic job and they are much appreciated."
BBC News
3 days ago
- General
- BBC News
Howden lollipop man told to stop giving kids high-fives
A lollipop man said he had been told he could no longer high-five children while they are crossing the road because it slows down traffic. Neil Cotton, 57, has been working as a school crossing patrol officer in Howden, East Yorkshire for about two years. In a social media post, he said he could not high-five the children anymore, because "it upsets some drivers having to wait another 10 seconds". East Riding of Yorkshire Council said it was vitally important children learned to cross the road safely, without any distractions. Mr Cotton helps children from the infant, junior and secondary schools in Howden to cross the junction known locally as Cross Keys Corner. His social media post received more than 100 comments before it was taken down. On the school run, Kirsty Wilcox, told BBC Look North: "I think it's wrong. Why shouldn't he, what's wrong with it? "It puts a smile on the kids' faces. My son does it all the time. But now he gets upset because he's not allowed to do it." Another parent, Theresa Holt, said: "It's silly. It takes literally seconds and it gives that child that little bit of happiness. He's great with my little boy and he sees him as a friendly face." 'It's absurd' Driver Tony Brooke described the move as "rules gone mad". "It's absurd. Just to high five to them, I don't see there's a problem with that," he said. "He's going to hold the traffic up to let the kids across so I wouldn't have thought it would add any more time to people's journeys at all. It's crazy."Another driver, Michael Dalton, added: "I think it's a bit OTT to be honest. It's a bit PC [political correctness] going crazy again. As a driver, we need to be a bit more courteous, certainly at school times."East Riding of Yorkshire Council said: "It is vitally important that children learn to cross the road safely, concentrating without any distractions, walking carefully and being vigilant of the traffic."In this particular case, one of our officers spoke with this crossing patrol and simply reminded them of the need not to have distractions while children are crossing."However, we are confident they will continue doing a fantastic job and they are much appreciated."Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
News18
13-06-2025
- Business
- News18
Air India Crash: Insurance Claims May Reach Up To Rs 1,000 Crore, Is This India's Costliest Airline Tragedy Yet?
While the aircraft damage will be covered in $280-million insurance coverage, the biggest cost will come from the 'liability insurance'. Insurance claims may reach Rs 1,000 crore. In India's one of the deadliest airline tragedies, a London-bound Air India Flight 171 crashed on June 12 claiming a total of 241 lives on board. Few also died in the doctors' hostel where the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft fell near the Ahmedabad airport. Air India has announced a compensation of Rs 1 crore each to the families of those lost their lives. However, the flight crash will also trigger insurance claims, which, as per estimates, might go as high as Rs 1,000 crore. Airline liabilities in the event of death or injury are governed by international conventions such as the Montreal Convention, 1999, to which India is a signatory, according to experts. They said that under the Convention, airlines are liable to pay: Up to 128,821 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) (about $1.33 per SDR), as of October 2024, per passenger in case of death or bodily injury, irrespective of fault. Compensation beyond that limit is also possible if the airline is proven negligent. While interim compensation may be announced by the airline, final compensation for passengers will be determined under the Montreal Convention of 1999, to which India became a signatory in 2009, brokerage firm Howden (India) MD and CEO Amit Agarwal told news agency PTI. 'Compensation is calculated using Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), which stood at 128,821 SDRs (approximately $1.33 per SDR) as of October 2024. The actual payout will depend on the coverage purchased by Air India," Agarwal said. On Thursday, June 12, a London-bound Air India plane carrying 242 passengers and crew crashed moments after taking off from Ahmedabad International Airport. Of these, 169 are Indian nationals, 53 are British nationals, 1 Canadian national and 7 Portuguese nationals. Air India has insured its entire fleet under a $20-billion global aviation insurance programme. This insurance is divided into two parts — one for damage to the aircraft itself (called 'hull insurance') and the other for legal and passenger claims (called 'liability insurance"). As far as aircraft damage is concerned, Agarwal said, it would be covered under the aviation hull all-risk section, which insures the current valuation of the aircraft, including spares and equipment. For a Dreamliner, this value can range between $211 million and $280 million, depending on its configuration, age, and other factors, he added. 'The aircraft involved (VT-ABN) was a 2013 model and, based on available information, was insured for approximately $115 million in 2021. Whether the damage is partial or total, the loss would be covered based on the value declared by the airline," he said. Narendra Bharindwal, president of the Insurance Brokers Association of India (IBAI), told PTI that aviation insurance programmes for major airlines such as Air India are arranged on a fleet basis and reinsured across international markets like London and New York. 'No single insurer bears the entire risk — coverage is widely distributed among global reinsurers, with shares as small as 1.5 per cent to 2 per cent and a lead reinsurer typically taking 10-15 per cent. The financial impact of such incidents is shared globally across this network," Bharindwal said. It is too early to ascertain the overall liability (passengers and third party) on the operator because of this crash. Overall Insurance Claims While the aircraft damage will be covered in the $211 million-$280 million insurance coverage, the biggest cost will come from the 'liability insurance'. Experts also said the actual amount the passenger receives will depend on a number of factors. Typically, the claimant (family of the deceased passenger or the injured) has to prove the extent of the actual damage suffered. Factors such as age of the deceased passenger, educational status, employment, last salary drawn, marital status, general economic status, the number of dependants the extent of dependency are, typically, considered to assess the damage. According to 'The (overall) claim could go as high as Rs 1,000 crore and could have a ripple effect on the aviation insurance industry." It is being considered to be one of the deadliest and costliest airline crashes in the Indian aviation history. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates—only on News18. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Air India crash Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 13, 2025, 10:57 IST News business Air India Crash: Insurance Claims May Reach Up To Rs 1,000 Crore, Is This India's Costliest Airline Tragedy Yet?
