logo
#

Latest news with #Flight587

Do Most Plane Crashes Occur Right After Takeoff? Experts Weigh In
Do Most Plane Crashes Occur Right After Takeoff? Experts Weigh In

NDTV

time2 days ago

  • General
  • NDTV

Do Most Plane Crashes Occur Right After Takeoff? Experts Weigh In

After the Air India Flight 171 crash, involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner en route from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, investigators have been struggling to understand what went wrong in the critical first minute after departure. The aircraft, which went down shortly after takeoff, has once again brought global attention to the alarming pattern in aviation disasters. Investigations have repeatedly shown that several of the deadliest air crash disasters, especially in the West, have occurred within moments of takeoff. Experts said the first minute of the flight is extremely critical. At this moment, the aircraft is more vulnerable to technical failures, pilot error or external factors such as bird strikes, they explained. One such incident involved the Delta Air Lines Flight 1141, which crashed seconds after it took off from Dallas-Fort Worth Airport in 1988. The investigation found the flaps and slats were not extended. In addition to this, the flight crew claimed to have deployed the flaps on the CVR, but no lever sound was captured, suggesting they may not have done so. In 2001, American Airlines Flight 587 crashed minutes after takeoff, killing all 251 passengers and nine crew members onboard. The crash occured after the tail fin of the plane broke off while flying because the co-pilot kept pressing the foot pedals with full force, reports said. In another incident in 2008, the pilots of Spanair Flight 5022 forgot to extend the flaps and slats, causing the crash and death of 154 people on board. According to the International Air Transport Association (IATA), 8.5 per cent of plane accidents between 2005 and 2023 occurred during takeoff, while the initial one minute after departure accounted for 6.1 per cent of accidents. Research showed the initial three or last eight minutes of a flight are most crucial when the majority of aviation crashes occur. According to a Boeing study, even though the initial seconds after takeoff make up two per cent of the total flight time, they still caused 20 per cent of the fatal crashes and 20 per cent of fatalities between 2015 and 2024. Aviation experts said when the plane is close to the ground and is flying at a low speed, it is more vulnerable to a crash. At high altitudes, pilots have more time to react but during takeoff or landing, there's little room for error because the plane is low and slow. The risk is higher during the first few minutes of climbing, as the engines are working at full power to lift several hundred tonnes of plane, and if anything goes wrong, even a minor fault, could lead to a crash.

These are the deadliest plane crashes in the last 25 years
These are the deadliest plane crashes in the last 25 years

Yahoo

time12-06-2025

  • General
  • Yahoo

These are the deadliest plane crashes in the last 25 years

A London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed in India on Thursday with 242 people on board the Air India plane. Police said there are no known survivors and authorities said there are likely casualties on the ground in the city of Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad Police Commissioner G.S. Malik told The Associated Press that the "exact figures on casualties" were still being determined. Air India said 169 Indian nationals, 53 British nationals, one Canadian national and seven Portuguese nationals were on board. Here is a list of the deadliest plane disasters in the 21st century, excluding the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks: 2014: Flight MH17 shot down over Ukraine On July 17, 2014, Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was shot down over rebel-held eastern Ukraine en route to Kuala Lumpur from Amsterdam. All 298 people aboard the Boeing 777 were killed, including 193 Dutch nationals. In May this year the U.N. aviation agency blamed Russia for the downing of the jetliner, a ruling Moscow dismissed as "biased." 2003: Military plane crash in Iran On Feb. 19, 2003, a Russian-made Ilyushin Il-76 belonging to Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard Corps crashed near Kerman in the southeast of the country. All 275 people on board were killed. The aircraft disappeared from radars an hour after takeoff, after sending a request to airport control in Kerman to land due to bad weather. 2001: American Airlines Flight 587 On Nov. 12, 2001, an American Airlines Airbus A300 crashed in the New York borough of Queens shortly after taking off, killing all 260 on board and five people on the ground. Flight 587 was bound for Saint-Domingue, in the Dominican Republic, departing from New York's John F. Kennedy airport. 2018: Algerian military plane crash On April 11, 2018, an Ilyushin Il-76 heavy transport aircraft crashed shortly after taking off from a military base south of the capital Algiers, killing all 257 people on board. The passengers were mostly military personnel and members of their families. 2014: MH370 disappears On March 8, 2014, Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 disappeared on its way from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 people aboard. Despite an intense search in the southern Indian Ocean, the Boeing 777-200 was never found. Earlier this year, a new search for the plane was launched more than a decade after the plane went missing, Malaysian authorities said. 2009: Air France crash in the Atlantic On June 1, 2009, an Air France Airbus A330 disappeared over the Atlantic in a zone of turbulence after taking off from Rio de Janeiro on flight AF447 to Paris with 228 passengers and crew on board. It took two years to find the wreckage of the plane. 2002: China Airlines crashes into the sea On May 25, 2002, a China Airlines Boeing 747-200 smashed into the Taiwan Strait, killing all 225 people on board. The aircraft, headed for Hong Kong, disintegrated mid-flight some 20 minutes after taking off from Taipei. Air India plane crashes shortly after takeoff, carrying more than 240 people An accused woman skips her pedicure, kills her ex-husband Coons blasts Hegseth for request to eliminate funding for Ukraine's war against Russia

Kids of slain NYPD officer still fighting for death benefits 8 years later
Kids of slain NYPD officer still fighting for death benefits 8 years later

Yahoo

time30-04-2025

  • Yahoo

Kids of slain NYPD officer still fighting for death benefits 8 years later

THE BRONX (PIX11) — The city once vowed it would never forget the ultimate sacrifice of Miosotis Familia, but the slain NYPD officer's children say that promise has been broken. Eight years later, they're still fighting to receive their mother's death benefits. More Local News Genesis Villella has been walking past a portrait of her mother for the past eight years, and her murder still doesn't feel real. However, she vividly recalls a conversation they once had. 'She said, 'Genesis, if anything happens to me because of my job, I need you to take care of Peter and Delilah,'' Villella recalled. Three years later, in July 2017, NYPD Officer Miosotis Familia was executed in the line of duty. With Villella's father also deceased — tragically killed in the Flight 587 crash in Queens — she was left to raise her younger siblings. She adopted 12-year-old twins, Peter and Delilah. 'I was 21 years old, raising children on my own, and I was barely an adult,' she said. But after all these years, Villella is still fighting to obtain her mother's death benefits from her pension plan. 'It's an extremely complicated issue with a very simple solution,' she said. Street renamed for NYPD Detective Miosotis Familia, 1 year after line-of-duty death Villella aged out of the five-year window to receive her mother's pension. And as the legal guardian of the twins, they weren't eligible either. 'The people who were supposed to help me refused to help me,' she said. She has been urging the New York City Council to change a decades-old law that would help rectify her unique and painful situation. But she feels the city — including the police unions — has turned its back on her family. Recalling how, behind the scenes, they say, 'We're going to be there for you.' Now saying she's realized that promise was broken. In a statement, PBA President Pat Hendry told PIX11 News:'Elected leaders must work together to ensure they are caring for our fallen sister's children with the same commitment and compassion that she showed every day she wore the uniform.' Council Majority Leader Amanda Farías is standing in Villella's corner, working to do right by the children and potentially others in the future. 'We're trying to navigate at the state and city level to make sure we can legally pass something beneficial to her and her siblings,' Farías said. 'We're working on a time frame for age limits and what's allowable with the pension,' she added. More: Latest News from Around the Tri-State In a statement, Julia Agos, a spokesperson for Speaker Adrienne Adams, said:'The family of NYPD Detective Miosotis Familia should not have been forced to fight for the benefits they deserve from the sacrifice of her public service to the city. Speaker Adams and Council leaders are working collaboratively with state lawmakers and other stakeholders to advance a law in the coming weeks that resolves this issue for Detective Familia's family and prevents any other family from facing similar hardship.' If the City Council passes the bill, another hurdle remains: pension provisions are cemented at the state level. That's where Assemblyman Jeff Dinowitz comes in. 'We're trying to make a change to the pension law…It's my intention we do the right thing for this family,' Dinowitz said. The city council has until June, the end of the NY legislative session, to approve the city law in order to proceed at the state level. 'My mom was a cop for 12 years — does that mean nothing?' Villella asked. 'I can't let her memory fade,' she said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

From anguish to aggression: Trump goes on offense after midair collision
From anguish to aggression: Trump goes on offense after midair collision

Japan Times

time31-01-2025

  • Politics
  • Japan Times

From anguish to aggression: Trump goes on offense after midair collision

WASHINGTON – After TWA Flight 800 crashed in New York in 1996, U.S. President Bill Clinton asked "every American not to jump to conclusions' about what brought it down and declared it time "to pull together and work together.' Five years later, when American Airlines Flight 587 fell out of the sky, President George W. Bush predicted that the "resilient and strong and courageous people' of New York would get through the tragedy. In 2009, after a Colgan Air plane crashed near Buffalo, New York, President Barack Obama said that "tragic events such as these remind us of the fragility of life.' And then there was President Donald Trump. In the wake of this week's midair collision near Washington, Trump was more than happy to jump to conclusions and pull the country apart rather than together. After declaring it to be an "hour of anguish for our nation,' Trump just five minutes later let anguish give way to aggression as he blamed diversity policies promoted by Obama and former President Joe Biden for the crash, which killed 67 people.

From Anguish to Aggression: Trump Goes on Offense After Midair Collision
From Anguish to Aggression: Trump Goes on Offense After Midair Collision

New York Times

time31-01-2025

  • Politics
  • New York Times

From Anguish to Aggression: Trump Goes on Offense After Midair Collision

After TWA Flight 800 crashed in New York in 1996, President Bill Clinton asked 'every American not to jump to conclusions' about what brought it down and declared it time 'to pull together and work together.' Five years later, when American Airlines Flight 587 fell out of the sky, President George W. Bush predicted that the 'resilient and strong and courageous people' of New York would get through the tragedy. In 2009, after a Colgan Air plane crashed near Buffalo, President Barack Obama said that 'tragic events such as these remind us of the fragility of life.' And then there was President Trump. In the wake of this week's midair collision near Washington, Mr. Trump was more than happy to jump to conclusions and pull the country apart rather than together. After declaring it to be an 'hour of anguish for our nation,' Mr. Trump just five minutes later let anguish give way to aggression as he blamed diversity policies promoted by Mr. Obama and former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. for the crash, which killed 67 people. Mr. Trump has never been like other presidents. He does not follow many of the rituals and traditions of his office. He practices the politics of division rather than unity. Where past presidents have sought to project a comforting, paternal presence for a stricken nation in moments of crisis, Mr. Trump's instinct is to move quickly from grief to grievance. He has long demonstrated that he is more comfortable as the blamer in chief than consoler in chief. His decision to use the bully pulpit of the White House on Thursday to assign responsibility for the crash to his political rivals by name without offering a shred of evidence was, even for Mr. Trump, a striking performance. And it was no off-the-cuff comment. He followed up by signing an order directing a review of 'problematic and likely illegal decisions' by Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden. 'I put safety first,' Mr. Trump told reporters in his first visit to the briefing room of his second term. 'Obama, Biden and the Democrats put policy first. And they put politics at a level that nobody's ever seen because this was the lowest level. Their policy was horrible and their politics was even worse.' The Democratic presidents, he said, made 'a big push to put diversity into the F.A.A.'s program,' leading to Wednesday night's disaster over the Potomac River. Never mind that the 'problematic' hiring policy language he read had also been in place during his own administration and that he could not say whether it had any connection to the crash. It was not the first time Mr. Trump has exhibited what even his own former aides have called an 'empathy gap.' Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, with thousands of Americans dying every day at its peak, Mr. Trump rarely paused long enough to dwell on the human toll and never sponsored any memorial to the fallen. Instead, he focused his public messages on finding others to fault, whether it be China, Mr. Obama, Democratic governors, the World Health Organization, federal regulators or his own scientific advisers. He has responded similarly to natural disasters by going on the attack. Just this month, Mr. Trump reacted to the devastating wildfires in greater Los Angeles by blasting Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, calling him 'Newscum.' After Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico in 2017, he engaged in a war of words with San Juan's mayor and, when he finally visited the island, memorably tossed paper towels to people who had been left without food, water or power. Angry at criticism of his handling of the calamity, he later suggested to aides that the United States sell or trade away Puerto Rico. 'Trump doesn't lead with empathy,' said Olivia Troye, who served on the White House Covid task force staff before later publicly criticizing the president's management of the pandemic. 'He exploits tragedy for whatever political grievance he's peddling at the moment, never offering the comfort or stability a president should.' The exception has been if the victims of a tragedy buttress a political argument he has been making. At a ceremony this week to sign a bill cracking down on unauthorized immigrants charged with certain crimes, he expressed compassion for relatives of Laken Riley, a 22-year-old Georgia nursing student killed last year by a migrant from Venezuela who had crossed into the United States illegally. Mr. Trump often moves to place any crisis into his own political or ideological narrative, regardless of the facts. He tied the California fires to wrongheaded environmental and water policies, assertions that experts disputed. After the New Year's Day terrorist attack on Bourbon Street in New Orleans, Mr. Trump blamed immigration, even though the attacker was a U.S. citizen born in Texas. This week, after American Airlines Flight 5342 collided with an Army Black Hawk helicopter over Reagan National Airport, Mr. Trump went straight to diversity policies, with no evident basis. The problem, he said, was that candidates for air traffic controller jobs were rejected because the work force was 'too white' while people with serious mental or physical disabilities were hired. In addition to Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden, two of Mr. Trump's longtime favorite targets, the president singled out Pete Buttigieg, who served as Mr. Biden's transportation secretary, saying that 'he's a disaster.' Mr. Buttigieg, as it happens, is considered a possible Democratic candidate for president in 2028. Mr. Trump's instant focus on diversity programs generated outrage among Democrats. 'Listen, it's one thing for internet pundits to spew off conspiracies,' Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, said on the Senate floor not long afterward. 'It's another for the president of the United States to throw out idle speculation as bodies are still being recovered and families are still being notified. It just turns your stomach.' Mr. Buttigieg pushed back on social media. 'Despicable,' he wrote. 'As families grieve, Trump should be leading, not lying. We put safety first, drove down close calls, grew Air Traffic Control, and had zero commercial airline crash fatalities out of millions of flights on our watch.' Mr. Buttigieg and other Democrats pointed out that Mr. Trump had just fired the members of an aviation security advisory group, although there was no indication that the move had contributed to this week's crash. 'Time for the president to show actual leadership and explain what he will do to prevent this from happening again,' Mr. Buttigieg wrote. In this opening chapter of his return to power, Mr. Trump seems fixated on diversity programs more than ever. Other than immigration, he has made it perhaps the central villain of his second term. Among his first acts was to order the elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion programs throughout the federal government and a review of federal grants and loans to weed out any that promote diversity. Recognizing the writing on the wall, many states, localities, universities and private companies are now scrapping their diversity programs, either to curry favor with the new administration or to preserve their federal financing. Mr. Trump and his allies have successfully made the acronym D.E.I. politically radioactive. As with so much else in this Trump 2.0 era, the road to Mr. Trump's broadsides against the Federal Aviation Administration's leadership and policies may lead back to Elon Musk, the president's billionaire patron who has been given wide latitude to restructure government in the new administration. Mr. Musk has long quarreled with the F.A.A., which has hit his SpaceX rocket company with fines for safety lapses and sought to delay a launch. Last fall, he called for 'radical reform at the F.A.A.' and a week later he reposted a picture of Michael Whitaker, the agency administrator, with the caption, 'He needs to resign.' Mr. Whitaker did just that the day Mr. Trump took office last week, and the new president appointed an acting successor on Thursday. While Mr. Trump said there would be a 'systemic and comprehensive investigation' of this week's crash, he did not wait to offer the conclusions of his own rather less methodical inquiry. He went on at some length about F.A.A. diversity policies that encourage the hiring of people with severe disabilities, the same ones in place when he was in office last time. What he could not say was whether any people with severe disabilities were actually hired as air traffic controllers as opposed to for other jobs compatible with their abilities. Nor could he say whether anyone on duty on Wednesday night fit that category. Indeed, he acknowledged that there were many unanswered questions. 'We don't know that that would have been the difference,' he said of helicopter pilots not following instructions. He said he did not know whether another plane might have blocked the pilots' view. He said he did not know why adjustments were not made when the two aircraft hurtled toward each other. He said he did not know if the helicopter pilots were wearing night-vision goggles. 'We don't know that necessarily it's even the controller's fault,' he said at another point. But just because he did not know all those things did not mean he was not certain who was to blame. No need to wait for the investigation to reach that conclusion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store