4 days ago
Supreme Court rejects Texas's bid to axe nuclear waste storage site
The Big Story
The Supreme Court rejected Texas's bid to axe federal approval of a nuclear waste storage facility, arguing the state did not have the right to bring its challenge in the first place.
© AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File
In a 6-3 decision, the court in effect upheld the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's decision to issue a license to a company that wanted to store nuclear waste off site from a power plant.
The opinion, authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said that Texas, as well as private company Fasken Land and Minerals, did not have the right to sue over the license.
'Under the Hobbs Act, only an aggrieved 'party' may obtain judicial review of a Commission licensing decision,' Kavanaugh wrote. 'Texas and Fasken are not license applicants, and they did not successfully intervene in the licensing proceeding. So neither was a party eligible to obtain judicial review.'
The opinion did not address the question in the underlying case, which was about whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission should be allowed to license private off-site nuclear waste storage sites.
Kavanaugh was joined by justices John Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Justices Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
The dissent, authored by Gorsuch, argued that Texas and Fasken should be allowed to sue.
'Radioactive waste poses risks to the State, its citizens, its lands, air, and waters, and it poses dangers as well to a neighbor and its employees,' he wrote.
'Both Texas and Fasken participated actively in other aspects of the NRC's licensing proceeding,' he added. 'Both are entitled to their day in court — and both are entitled to prevail.'
Read more at
Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains.
Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here.
Essential Reads
How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future:
Court blocks EPA from axing environmental justice grants
A federal judge this week barred the Trump administration from axing grants that were part of a $600 million program that aimed to tackle pollution in underserved communities.
Wildfires may be accelerating the spread of infectious disease by keeping US West residents indoors: Study
As climate-driven weather extremes fuel fires across the U.S. West, the tendency of residents to spend more time indoors may be accelerating the spread of infectious diseases, a new study has found.
Trump cuts to NOAA, NASA 'blinding' farmers to risks, scientists warn
The Trump administration's cuts to climate research and federal weather forecasting agencies are 'blinding' the U.S. to oncoming threats to its food supply — and kneecapping efforts to protect it.
What We're Reading
News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics:
'Abolishing FEMA' Memo Outlines Ways for Trump to Scrap Agency (Bloomberg)
What Others are Reading
Two key stories on The Hill right now:
Senate GOP leader faces pushback after members blindsided by Trump bill
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is facing strong pushback from members of the GOP conference over the Finance Committee's piece of President Trump's tax and spending bill, which largely ignores GOP senators' concerns about Medicaid cuts and the quick phaseout of clean-energy tax credits. Read more
5 takeaways from Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz
Pundit Tucker Carlson published a nearly two-hour interview with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday, during which the two conservative firebrands debated President Trump's foreign policy, the future of the Middle East and America's place in the world. Read more
You're all caught up. See you tomorrow!
