Latest news with #DefenseIntelligenceAgency
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Fox News Hosts Abruptly End Interview with Seemingly Inebriated Guest During Viral Military Parade Segment
Rebekah Koffler joined Fox News' special military parade broadcast on June 14 while seemingly inebriated, and the co-hosts abruptly cut her interview off after a minute and a half Koffler, a former defense intelligence agency officer, later claimed there were audio issues during the broadcast, which a Fox News source denies Ahead of the interview, Koffler posted about drinking champagne, which she later said was a "joke, intended to boost viewership"A Fox News segment is garnering attention online for its abrupt and awkward end after a guest appeared visibly inebriated during the live interview. On Saturday, June 14, President Donald Trump held his pricey birthday military parade in Washington, D.C., and during Fox News' live coverage, co-hosts Lawrence Jones and Emily Compagno invited Rebekah Koffler, a former Defense Intelligence Agency officer, to give her reaction. When Koffler joined the special broadcast just after 9:30 p.m. local time, Compagno asked her to comment on the 'symbolism' and 'messaging' of the parade, which also celebrated the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army. Koffler began by appearing to incorrectly identify host Jones as another member of Fox News' staff. 'I'm so excited, Emily and Lucas Tomlinson,' she began, her speech slurred. 'Everybody, like, this is incredible! Finally, the United States is back! I want to really thank all of our army, navy and air force officers who have been sacrificing their lives, literally.' Koffler, still slurring her speech, continued: 'Their families have been contributing to the mission, most of the time for the past quarter of a century because of the mismanagement of the, uh, the administrative state, they've been fighting these foreign wars, but with our new Commander in Chief, Donald J. Trump, they are prioritizing America first." "And I want to thank these officers for all of these sacrifices and all of the hardships that their families have endured," she went on. Both Jones and Compagno then made separate attempts to interject, seemingly trying to cut Koffler off. Instead, Koffler continued, this time correctly identifying Jones to tell him, 'Lawrence Jones, you are doing … you're rocking man!' She then attempted to say a few more words, but the co-hosts cut her off entirely. The duo both thanked Koffler for her time before concluding the interview, which ended up being around a minute and a half long. Neither Compagno nor Jones acknowledged the abrupt end or the guest's behavior. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The day after the incident, the former defense intelligence agency officer addressed the appearance, and online reactions tied to it after the segment went viral, in an X post. Claiming that "allegations against me related to my @FoxNews appearance #TrumpParade are FALSE," Koffler said the "TRUTH" is that "audio, video during #MilitaryParade were corrupted due to intermittent, slow internet connection." A Fox News source, however, denied this, telling PEOPLE there "was no connection or audio issues with her hit." In the same June 15 statement, Koffler also addressed a since-deleted X post she made before the broadcast — a photo of a bottle of wine, alongside which she included the caption, 'Refilling my #champagne glass." "Yes, I did post #champagne photo — this was a joke, intended to boost viewership," she wrote. Koffler is a freelance editorial writer, author and a strategic military intelligence analyst who formerly worked for the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, according to her Fox News bio. Read the original article on People
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Politics
- Daily Mail
Fox News guest is yanked off air as she slurs her words after drinking champagne during military parade
A former intelligence official was quickly taken off air after she appeared to slur her words during a Fox News interview on Donald Trump 's military parade. Rebekah Koffler, who previously worked as a Russian Doctrine and Strategy specialist in the US Defense Intelligence Agency, appeared as a guest during the network's marathon coverage of the event Saturday night. She joined the show shortly after 9:30 p.m. ET, but her interview appeared to be cut short leading to some internet speculation that she was intoxicated. She posted earlier in the day that she was slipping on champagne to celebrate. Fox hosts Lawrence Jones and Emily Compagno brought in Koffler after speaking with correspondent Lucas Tomlinson. 'I am so excited, Emily, and Lucas Tomlinson, everybody. Like, this is incredible. Finally the United States is, uh, is back,' Koffler said. 'I want really thank all of our Army, Navy, and Air Force officers who have been sacrificing their lives, literally. Their families have been contributing to the mission. Most of the time for the past quarter of a century because of the mismanagement of the, uh, the administrative state, they've been fighting these foreign wars. 'But with our new commander-in-chief, Donald J. Trump, they are prioritizing America first. And I wanna thank these officers for all of these sacrifices and all of the hardships that their families have endured. 'Lawrence Jones, you are doing– you're your [unintelligible], man! You guys and [unintelligible] Lucas! I wanna thank,' she said before getting cut off by Compagno. Koffler told the interview ended abruptly because of connection issues and producers told her they had lost the audio during the segment. She posted earlier in the evening promoting her interview saying, 'Go Army! Join me at 8:00 PM New York City time on @FoxNews for the special coverage of #Army250 #ArmyBirthday #GoArmy #MilitaryParade with @EmilyCompagno @LawrenceBJones3.' Koffler said her interview had been getting delayed since 7:45 p.m. and she unexpectedly had to do the hit remotely. However, a Fox News source told there was no connection issues during the segment. Clips of the interview went viral, with many commenters pointing to a since-deleted tweet Koffler posted showing she had been drinking before the segment. 'Well @POTUS is apparently encroaching on my airtime! My hit is moved to 8:20 - 8:30 pm depending on how long #Trump takes,' she said. 'I'm honored. Refilling my #champagne glass while waiting for my hit!' One person said, 'Sounds like she's been celebrating for 250 years. Who thought it would be OK to put her on tv?' 'That is hard to watch. You should put a sensitive warning on that video. It is the very definition of cringe,' said another. Others defended Koffler, noting that she was born in Russia and English may not be her first language. 'That is how Rebecca speaks... English is not her first language,' one person said. 'She took a little too much in celebratory mood - who are we to judge her? Focus on the success of the Military Parade. American Pride on display,' said a second.
Arab News
31-05-2025
- General
- Arab News
Global threat report reveals Trump's strategic priorities
The US Defense Intelligence Agency recently released its annual threat assessment report. While these official government documents are often bland and filled with bureaucratic language, this year's publication stands out — both for its substance and what it reveals about how the new administration views today's geopolitical challenges. This is the first threat assessment of President Donald Trump's second term, and it offers an early insight into the administration's strategic priorities. A few things jump out right away. This year's threat assessment is longer than last year's, and offers a more detailed and nuanced analysis across multiple sections. But two major changes in this year's report, when compared with the final assessment produced under the Biden administration, are particularly striking. The most notable difference is the inclusion of a dedicated section on US homeland defense and border security — placed not as an afterthought but as the first item in the report. This marks a sharp departure from last year's assessment, which focused almost exclusively on global threats and challenges. The placement and tone of the new homeland security section clearly bear Trump's personal stamp. One of his most effective political narratives has been that US policymakers focus too much on problems abroad, while neglecting the security of Americans at home. This report reflects that view. The homeland security section places particular emphasis on the national security implications of illegal immigration, transnational organized crime, and the influx of deadly narcotics by drug cartels into small American communities. These are not just political talking points; they represent real and growing threats to the safety and well-being of Americans. But the political savvy of the framing should not be overlooked. While the average American may not be deeply familiar with issues such as Taiwan's security or freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, they are certainly familiar with the devastating impact of fentanyl or cartel violence. Including homeland security at the top of the Defense Intelligence Agency's global threat assessment makes the report more relevant to the American public and highlights Trump's emphasis on border security as a matter of national defense. The second striking difference is the prominent section, entitled 'Growing Cooperation Among US Competitors and Adversaries,' which comes immediately after the homeland security section. For the first time, a US threat assessment explicitly links and highlights the emerging coordination among America's adversaries and competitors. The report states: 'Building on activities over the past two years, leaders in Beijing, Moscow, Tehran, and Pyongyang will strengthen their nations' ties in their drive to undermine the influence of the US and its allies.' This is an important — and overdue — acknowledgment of a multipolar and interconnected world. For years, much of the US foreign policy establishment has resisted the concept of multipolarity, preferring to see the world in unipolar or bipolar terms. This resistance is rooted in Cold War-era thinking, when power was viewed through a US-versus-Soviet lens. But a new generation of American strategists understands that multiple centers of power exist — and are increasingly coordinating with one another to challenge US interests around the globe. The coming months will be critical for the future of America's role in the world. Luke Coffey Recognizing the reality of this multipolar environment does not mean conceding that all powers are equal. It simply acknowledges the complexity of today's geopolitical landscape. The inclusion of this section in the threat assessment is a necessary step toward grappling with the way these regimes are learning from each other, cooperating diplomatically, militarily, and economically, and exploiting US vulnerabilities. To illustrate the shift, if you took a diplomat from 1980 and one from 1880 and brought them both to 2025, it might be the latter — accustomed to a world of competing empires and power centers — who would better recognize the dynamics at play today. Recognizing these trends is one thing, acting on them another. Within the new administration, there are competing schools of thought on how to respond. Some believe China is the primary threat and argue that all instruments of US power should be directed toward countering Beijing. Others, often aligned with more isolationist instincts, believe the US should focus exclusively on homeland security and reduce its global footprint. Then there are more traditional Republican voices who argue that the US must be able to address multiple threats simultaneously and maintain its global leadership role. Though the administration is still filling out its national security team, the contents of the Defense Intelligence Agency report suggest that the latter group is gaining the upper hand, at least for now. That could signal a more balanced approach in future, one that prioritizes US security at home, while maintaining engagement and vigilance abroad. In the coming months, the Department of Defense is expected to publish a new National Defense Strategy, which should provide additional clarity on how the US plans to counter the threats identified in the Defense Intelligence Agency assessment. Likewise, the National Security Council is likely to release a similar document outlining a more comprehensive, whole-of-government approach to these challenges. Importantly, all these strategies must be backed by resources. The White House will need to work with Congress to ensure that the budget aligns with these stated priorities. It is one thing to acknowledge that America's adversaries are coordinating their efforts, but quite another to craft a strategy — and appropriate the funds — to counter them effectively. Some in the Biden administration may have understood that this emerging coordination by America's competitors posed a threat, but were reluctant to spotlight it publicly for fear of being forced to act. The Trump administration, by contrast, has put these challenges front and center. But in doing so, it has also raised the stakes. Having declared that homeland defense is national security — and that America's adversaries are working together — the administration will now be judged on how it responds. The coming months will be critical, not only for America's national security and that of its allies, but also for the future of America's role in the world.
The Print
31-05-2025
- Business
- The Print
LAC tensions, China aiding Pakistan's WMD ambitions—what US flagged in annual worldwide threat report
The report says Pakistan perceives India as an 'existential threat' and will continue to pursue its military 'modernisation effort, including the development of battlefield nuclear weapons, to offset India's conventional military advantage'. The report, released earlier this month, also said sometimes these supplies are transshipped through Hong Kong, Singapore, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates. New Delhi: Pakistan almost 'certainly procures' foreign materials and technology for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) from foreign suppliers and intermediaries, 'very likely acquired primarily from suppliers in China', the United States' Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has said in its 2025 Worldwide Threat Assessment report. The report has further said the 'ongoing tensions along India and China's Line of Actual Control border demarcation are capable of escalating quickly'. Referring to the troop disengagement in Depsang and Demchok in Eastern Ladakh in October last year, it says 'the disengagement did not resolve the longstanding dispute about border demarcation but reduced some tension still lingering' since the 2020 Galwan clash, with India considering China its 'primary adversary' and viewing Pakistan as 'an ancillary security problem to be managed despite cross-border attacks in mid-May by both India's and Pakistan's militaries'. Notably, Pakistan deployed Chinese-supplied fighters such as JF-17 and J10C, PL-15E beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) against India during the military hostilities between 7 and 10 May. Besides, multiple reports indicate that Pakistan is expected to receive the fifth-generation J-35A fighter jet from China later this year. Subsequently, the assessment states that Pakistan 'primarily is a recipient' of Beijing's 'economic and military largesse' and its forces conduct multiple military exercises with Chinese forces every year. 'Foreign materials and technology supporting Pakistan's WMD programs are very likely acquired primarily from suppliers in China and sometimes are transshipped through Hong Kong, Singapore, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates,' the report said. India had launched Operation Sindoor in the early hours of 7 May, targeting nine terror training camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) associated with Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM). The strikes came in retaliation to the 22 April terror attack in Pahalgam, carried out by terrorists trained and backed by Pakistan, which claimed the lives of 26 tourists. Pakistan reached out to Indian Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) Lt Gen Rajiv Ghai 10 May to propose cessation of hostilities. The report released just the day after describes the escalation in detail, stating it included 'rounds of missile, drone and loitering munition attacks, and heavy artillery fire, by both militaries from 7 to 10 May'. Also Read:All about J-35A, the Chinese fifth-generation stealth fighter Pakistan plans to acquire On China A substantive portion of the DIA report focuses on China's rapid military and nuclear modernisation. The report estimates that China's operational nuclear warhead count has surpassed 600 and could exceed 1,000 by 2030. These warheads will 'be maintained at higher readiness levels to enable faster response times during conflicts,' it adds. On countering Beijing's expanding influence, it says that India is 'boosting its global leadership role' by advancing bilateral defence partnerships in the Indian Ocean region and increasing its participation in multilateral forums. These include the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) with the US, Australia and Japan; the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa); the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The paper also highlights India's strengthening of its nuclear triad and deterrence capabilities in 2024 by 'conducting the test of the nuclear-capable Agni-I Prime medium range ballistic missile (MRBM) and the Agni-V multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle while also commissioning its second nuclear-powered submarine'. India had commissioned its second nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), INS Arighaat, in August last year. The DIA further outlines India's focus on building indigenous defence capabilities through the 'Make in India' initiative, aimed at modernising the armed forces and mitigating supply chain risks. The assessment also says that, despite a reduction in arms procurement from Moscow, India will maintain its relationship with Russia 'since it views its ties to Russia as important for achieving its economic and defence objectives'. It adds that India continues to rely on 'Russian-origin spare parts to sustain a significant portion of its tank and fighter aircraft inventory', which has been described as 'the backbone of its military's ability to counter perceived threats from China and Pakistan'. (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari) Also Read: India used this battlefield hack to keep Soviet-era missile systems firing against Pakistan in Op Sindoor
Boston Globe
31-05-2025
- Politics
- Boston Globe
DOD employee tried to leak classified information, prosecutors say
'I do not agree or align with the values of this administration and intend to act to support the values that the United States at one time stood for,' Laatsch wrote in one message, according to an FBI affidavit. 'To this end, I am willing to share classified information that I have access to, which are completed intelligence products, some unprocessed intelligence, and other assorted classified documentation.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up U.S. officials were tipped off to Laatsch's outreach in March, and an FBI agent posing as a foreign official communicated with Laatsch over several weeks, arranging for him to drop off classified materials in a park in Arlington County, Virginia, just outside Washington, according to court records. Advertisement Sue J. Bai, the head of the Justice Department's National Security Division, called Laatsch's alleged offense 'a profound betrayal of the American people and a direct threat to our national security.' 'When someone entrusted with access to classified information attempts to provide it to a foreign government, it jeopardizes our intelligence capabilities, our military advantage and the safety of our nation,' Bai said in a statement Friday. Advertisement Dressed in a gray T-shirt and dark blue sweatpants, Laatsch made a brief initial appearance Friday afternoon in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon D. Kromberg said that the alleged offense is punishable by a maximum sentence of death or life in prison but that the Justice Department had not yet determined whether Laatsch met the criteria for the death penalty. Whitney Minter, a public defender for Laatsch, said he had no criminal record and indicated he would be seeking bail pending trial. A federal magistrate scheduled a hearing for Wednesday on whether to grant pretrial release. In the meantime, Laatsch is being held in jail. Laatsch, of Alexandria, joined the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2019 and had a top-secret security clearance. He worked with the agency's Insider Threat Division, helping officials monitor the computer activities of people under investigation, according to court records. He graduated in 2018 from Florida Polytechnic University with a degree in cybersecurity. Surveillance video of Laatsch's workstation at a Defense Intelligence Agency facility in the Washington area showed how the IT specialist accessed classified information on his screen, transcribed it onto a notepad, then placed the handwritten pages in his socks or lunchbox before leaving work for the day, according to the FBI affidavit. Prosecutors said that on May 1, after weeks of discussions, Laatsch dropped off a thumb drive at an Arlington County park with nine typed documents replicating the classified records he had accessed. The FBI retrieved the drive, and the agencies where those records originated said that eight of them were designated top secret, one of which 'reflected sensitive methods of intelligence collection, intelligence related to foreign military exercises, and analysis of the impact of those military exercises.' Advertisement When the undercover FBI agent asked what Laatsch wanted in exchange, he replied that he was seeking 'citizenship for your country,' the affidavit says. He did not rule out getting paid for the classified materials, prosecutors said. 'Although he said he was 'not opposed to other compensation,' he was not in a position where he needed to seek 'material compensation,'' according to a court filing. 'I've given a lot of thought to this before any outreach, and despite the risks, the calculus has not changed,' Laatsch wrote in a mid-April message quoted in the charging documents. 'I do not see the trajectory of things changing, and do not think it is appropriate or right to do nothing when I am in this position.' A second document drop was planned for Thursday, when Laatsch was arrested, court records state. 'It will not be easy for them, for example, to open a case on me without my knowledge since my permissions to see that would need to be changed and I'd notice,' he told the undercover FBI agent in one message quoted in the charging documents, boasting that he knew how to avoid the 'stupid mistakes' that had bedeviled other U.S. employees under investigation.
