Latest news with #DBSBank
Time of India
3 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
Can crude oil prices really double? Let's look at the worst-case scenario
As the Middle East slides into its most dangerous flashpoint in years, doomsayers warn that Brent prices could surge past $150 per barrel in a worst-case scenario, a geopolitical shock big enough to sever key oil routes and ignite panic across global markets. While such an outcome is far from consensus, traders are beginning to price in the tail risks as Israel–Iran tensions simmer. Brent crude held near $73 a barrel on Tuesday, up from sub-$67 levels last week, after Israeli strikes hit Iranian energy and military infrastructure. Tehran has vowed retaliation, and though ship-tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains intact, there's growing anxiety that the conflict could spill into the waterway that carries a fifth of the world's oil. The geopolitical premium in crude has unmistakably returned. 'Crude oil prices resumed gains on Tuesday as escalating conflict between Israel and Iran reignited supply concerns,' said Rahul Kalantri, Vice President of Commodities at Mehta Equities. 'While Iran has signaled willingness to de-escalate and resume nuclear talks, uncertainty over further retaliation kept traders cautious.' While the market reaction reflects real unease, forecasts are split on how high oil could go if events spiral further. Singapore-based DBS Bank has floated $150 as the upper bound for Brent in a doomsday scenario that assumes Iranian exports are fully knocked out and regional producers fail to plug the gap. The Strait of Hormuz is open — for now Crucially, there's been no disruption to oil flows. Vessels are still passing through the Strait of Hormuz, and ports like Kharg Island remain untouched. Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil at Kpler, told the Financial Times that the current Israeli strategy appears aimed at crippling Iran's internal energy logistics, not its export infrastructure. That may explain the relatively measured response from global markets. J.P. Morgan, one of the largest oil market participants on Wall Street, said prices currently reflect only a '7% probability' of a nightmare scenario, one in which regional tensions curtail not just Iranian exports but also threaten Gulf shipping lanes. A wider conflict that closes Hormuz, the bank said, is still unlikely. 'Iran would be damaging its own position, both economically and politically, by irritating its main customer,' JP Morgan said, referencing China's growing dependence on Iranian crude. Even as geopolitical temperature rises, J.P. Morgan is sticking with a base case oil forecast of $60–$65 for 2025. The U.S. investment bank also flagged potential ripple effects on inflation and monetary policy. 'An attack on Iran could spike oil prices to $120, driving U.S. CPI to 5%,' it said, warning of a reversal in disinflation and an abrupt rethink of the Federal Reserve's rate-cut trajectory. Markets are nervous, not panicked Still, recent price action shows nervousness is creeping in. Brent rallied nearly 9% last week after the Israeli strikes, while gold surged and equities fell. U.S. inflation expectations also nudged higher. Analysts warn that a spike in crude could push American CPI back toward 5%, complicating central bank rate-cut plans globally. India, which imports nearly 40% of its crude via the Strait of Hormuz, is watching closely. 'Almost 50% of our LNG imports also flow through this route,' said Probal Sen, Senior Research Analyst at ICICI Securities, in an interview with ET Now. 'Sustained oil above $75 would hurt marketing margins for refiners and pressure the rupee.' Public-sector oil firms such as Hindustan Petroleum and Bharat Petroleum could see earnings volatility, Sen said, though valuations may remain attractive on longer horizons. Meanwhile, energy analysts say Gulf producers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have every reason to keep the situation from spiraling. Both are in the middle of multiyear economic overhauls that depend on regional stability, not a war that shocks oil markets and freezes capital flows. For now, oil traders are pricing fear, not fallout. But with every new headline from Tehran or Tel Aviv, the $150 scenario inches a little closer from the outer rim of possibility into something more plausible. It's still a hedge. But it's no longer a fantasy. Also read | Crude oil prices could spike to $120, warns J.P. Morgan. Explained in 6 key points ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
Economic Times
3 days ago
- Business
- Economic Times
Long India narrative continues but global investors turning impatient: Taimur Baig, DBS Bank
Taimur Baig, MD & Chief Economist, DBS Bank, says despite tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, the global oil market possesses significant shock absorption capacity due to ample supply outside the region and muted demand from major consumers like the US, Europe, and China. Current oil prices, even with potential increases, remain well below historical highs in both nominal and real terms, mitigating the impact of Middle East developments. Baig further says, global investors are largely optimistic about India's growth narrative, though some desire stronger economic performance beyond the current 6% range. While Indian financial markets have been rewarding, expectations are high for accelerated company earnings and sales, especially with anticipated rate cuts and increased liquidity from the RBI potentially fueling loan demand and consumption. Of late, the world has been dealing with the uncertainty around the US tariff and the implications on economies and businesses, but with the rise of new geopolitical tensions, especially what has really been happening in the Middle East, how do you see the situation escalating and what implications can it have on the world economy, especially crude oil prices? Taimur Baig: With respect to crude oil prices, there is substantial shock absorption capacity in the world. There is ample supply in the area outside of the one that is under the gun right now, which is the countries in the Strait of Hormuz. Vulnerabilities are substantial. A lot of oil and gas from that region flow into Asia. Asia's dependence on that part is substantial. But if you think about Europe or the US, there are plenty of other sources of supply and which is why a lot of the western oil market futures and spot trading action has been fairly muted. So far, the kind of rally that we have seen in oil since Israel started attacking Iran is nothing compared to the historically sharp reaction that the market has had in the past. There are two major reasons for that. One ample supply, even beyond the area in the Middle East and secondly, very muted demand. We have not seen major spike in demand for gas or oil out of the US, Europe, or China, three big sources of demand in the world and as a result, even if supply were to be somewhat questionable in the near term around some escalation around Strait of Hormuz, that would not cause a major spike in oil. And the final point on oil is that at $75 oil is basically 50% below all-time highs in nominal terms. In real terms, it is like 60% below all-time highs. So, even if oil were to go to $100, $125, we have been there, seen that many times in the past and that is my key point on the Middle East developments and its implication on oil, the shock absorption capacity of the world with respect to somewhat higher oil price is substantial. While it all sounds reassuring, at least on the oil front, given that we are adequately supplied, what are you making of Trump's fresh comments coming in overnight where he is saying that Iran will still not be allowed a nuclear weapon? They should have taken that deal and he has also called for an immediate evacuation of everybody in Tehran, and not only US citizens. Do you think this is another major escalation in the making? Taimur Baig: There are a lot of things in the fog of war where signals can be misconstrued and lead to disproportionate response from either side. In this particular case, let us hope that that was somewhat of an exaggeration. We are talking about a city of 15 million people. It is just simply not possible to evacuate a city of that size. More importantly, if the Iranian regime feels existential threat, the set of reaction functions that they would entertain would be fundamentally far more adverse for global markets and economies than a tit for tat situation which is grave but not existential. It will honour the status quo as far as who rules Iran. If we go past that scenario and head into a far more adverse scenario about the Iranian regime's outright existence, of course, far worse eventualities would have to be entertained. Now, in the context of far worse eventualities, Iraq-Iran fought against each other for eight years in the 1980s. Iraq, when it was withdrawing from Kuwait, set oil field after oil field on fire in the early 1990s and after Operation Desert Storm, neither case led to a major oil shock akin to the kinds of shocks we saw in the 1970s. This is a critical thing to understand that a single case of supply related disruption cannot cause sustainable pressure on global commodities. It can cause spikes. It can be terrible for sentiments, but overall, the world can handle it. But in the short run, there could be major spikes and uncertainty, no question about that. I am wondering what the central bank stance is going to be and especially as we have the Fed meeting later. The Fed and the Bank of Japan are the only two central banks out of pretty much every in the world that have been holding fire and have not moved on rates. With so much turmoil in the world, I am wondering whether there will be a change of stance anytime soon? Taimur Baig: For the Fed to turn very hawkish at a time like this is unlikely. But at the same time, I do not think today's meeting would lead to some sort of a clear forward guidance about when rate cuts are coming either. The Fed has many uncertainties. What would be the duration of some of these tariffs? Nobody knows. If you do not know, how do you model the direction of goods prices going forward?We have seen expectations worsen substantially, meaning consumers are expecting prices to go higher, but we have not seen that materialise in wage bargaining, in wage demands, or for that matter on companies deciding to pass on substantial prices because people expect high prices anyway. None of those things have happened and we have some data for May and, of course, the full set of data for April already to get a sense of the early impact on tariff, pretty muted. But at the same time, the Fed has to be forward-looking. Just because we have not seen a manifestation of higher prices does not mean we would not. And if indeed on the margin, oil goes up as opposed to down, that adds to Fed's concern about price stability. So, the Fed is in a very tricky position. It would have to be very clear to the market that the uncertainties around right now make it stay on that wait and see mode. If in the next couple of months the economy shows some additional signs of weakness, prices do not jump the way we had feared a few months ago, trade related deals or postponements happen, then the Fed can start getting in the business of cutting rates at least twice this year, that is our forecast. The market, having been very dovish, has more or less worked around that forecast as well. Let us see. I am still holding on to that forecast. What is your view on India's macro positioning versus the other emerging markets because for India, we are in the rate cut cycle, the inflation seems to be cooling off and the other lead indicators are holding up well as well. Does it still hold the long India narrative globally? Taimur Baig: It seems very clear that the long India narrative is there. There is some degree of impatience from global investors. They probably want even stronger growth-related outturns in India. Financial markets have been very rewarding nonetheless. But at some point, you want that 7-8% growth trajectory to materialise not the sixes and at the same time even beyond the topline growth numbers, company related earnings, company margins, overall data on sales, all those things are expected to accelerate going forward, especially if the rate cuts that everybody is expecting materialise and the RBI in addition to cutting rates adds lots of liquidity to the system creates a loan cycle and around that, we can see a virtuous set of loan demand, consumption, sales, and farm level of that together lifts growth past the 6% range. India remains very much favourably seen by global investors, no question about it. Asset allocators look at India before just about anything else when they think of Asia. But valuation wise there are, of course, question marks. It is a very frothy market. If you look at valuations elsewhere in Asia and particularly in China, there are, of course, just from a valuation perspective better buys to be had. What are you making of the trade deals that we are hearing getting signed at the G7? We understand that the US and UK have signed a trade deal although we do not know the details of that. The US also claims that they have reached a truce with China as well. What do you make of these trade deals? How is it going to impact global trade volumes and where does India stand amid all of this? Taimur Baig: I will parse semantics a bit which is deal versus an agreement. When we talk about the free trade agreement between say India and the UK or the things that my country Singapore has signed with many countries in the world over the years, we are talking about hundreds of pages worth of a technical document, product by product discussion, very detailed commerce department official versus commerce department official sort of agreement. We are not talking about any of that stuff when we talk about trade deals between the US and UK or whatever is happening between the US and Japan. These are very high level discussions. Many details will remain unworked even if these deals are announced. My view is that beyond high level discussions on one promising to buy so much from the other, and promising to invest so much in the other, we would not really see too much teeth in that. The US simply does not have the bandwidth to go ahead and start signing detailed trade agreements with country after country in the world. If you look at the history of trade agreements, those things take years. Even the implementation takes multiple years. Donald Trump does not have the time or bandwidth for any of that. He wants some headline pleasing developments where it shows that the US is forcing countries to buy more from the US and perhaps sell less to the US and invest more in the US. He will get some of those things, but I do not think that will fundamentally change the US' issue, which is it runs a very large savings investment imbalance and for that, it needs to import a lot of stuff. It needs the rest of the world's financing, that is not changing.
Time of India
3 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
Long India narrative continues but global investors turning impatient: Taimur Baig, DBS Bank
Taimur Baig , MD & Chief Economist, DBS Bank , says despite tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, the global oil market possesses significant shock absorption capacity due to ample supply outside the region and muted demand from major consumers like the US, Europe, and China. Current oil prices, even with potential increases, remain well below historical highs in both nominal and real terms, mitigating the impact of Middle East developments. Baig further says, global investors are largely optimistic about India's growth narrative, though some desire stronger economic performance beyond the current 6% range. While Indian financial markets have been rewarding, expectations are high for accelerated company earnings and sales, especially with anticipated rate cuts and increased liquidity from the RBI potentially fueling loan demand and consumption. Of late, the world has been dealing with the uncertainty around the US tariff and the implications on economies and businesses, but with the rise of new geopolitical tensions, especially what has really been happening in the Middle East, how do you see the situation escalating and what implications can it have on the world economy, especially crude oil prices? Taimur Baig : With respect to crude oil prices, there is substantial shock absorption capacity in the world. There is ample supply in the area outside of the one that is under the gun right now, which is the countries in the Strait of Hormuz. Vulnerabilities are substantial. A lot of oil and gas from that region flow into Asia. Asia's dependence on that part is substantial. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Investigadora argentina revela hallazgos sobre el magnesio Salud Esencial Leer más Undo But if you think about Europe or the US, there are plenty of other sources of supply and which is why a lot of the western oil market futures and spot trading action has been fairly muted. So far, the kind of rally that we have seen in oil since Israel started attacking Iran is nothing compared to the historically sharp reaction that the market has had in the past. There are two major reasons for that. One ample supply, even beyond the area in the Middle East and secondly, very muted demand. We have not seen major spike in demand for gas or oil out of the US, Europe, or China, three big sources of demand in the world and as a result, even if supply were to be somewhat questionable in the near term around some escalation around Strait of Hormuz, that would not cause a major spike in oil. And the final point on oil is that at $75 oil is basically 50% below all-time highs in nominal terms. In real terms, it is like 60% below all-time highs. So, even if oil were to go to $100, $125, we have been there, seen that many times in the past and that is my key point on the Middle East developments and its implication on oil, the shock absorption capacity of the world with respect to somewhat higher oil price is substantial. While it all sounds reassuring, at least on the oil front, given that we are adequately supplied, what are you making of Trump's fresh comments coming in overnight where he is saying that Iran will still not be allowed a nuclear weapon? They should have taken that deal and he has also called for an immediate evacuation of everybody in Tehran, and not only US citizens. Do you think this is another major escalation in the making? Live Events You Might Also Like: Good news getting priced in faster, narrow range consolidation likely in medium term: Siddharth Vora Taimur Baig: There are a lot of things in the fog of war where signals can be misconstrued and lead to disproportionate response from either side. In this particular case, let us hope that that was somewhat of an exaggeration. We are talking about a city of 15 million people. It is just simply not possible to evacuate a city of that size. More importantly, if the Iranian regime feels existential threat, the set of reaction functions that they would entertain would be fundamentally far more adverse for global markets and economies than a tit for tat situation which is grave but not existential. It will honour the status quo as far as who rules Iran. If we go past that scenario and head into a far more adverse scenario about the Iranian regime's outright existence, of course, far worse eventualities would have to be entertained. Now, in the context of far worse eventualities, Iraq-Iran fought against each other for eight years in the 1980s. Iraq, when it was withdrawing from Kuwait, set oil field after oil field on fire in the early 1990s and after Operation Desert Storm, neither case led to a major oil shock akin to the kinds of shocks we saw in the 1970s. This is a critical thing to understand that a single case of supply related disruption cannot cause sustainable pressure on global commodities. It can cause spikes. It can be terrible for sentiments, but overall, the world can handle it. But in the short run, there could be major spikes and uncertainty, no question about that. I am wondering what the central bank stance is going to be and especially as we have the Fed meeting later. The Fed and the Bank of Japan are the only two central banks out of pretty much every in the world that have been holding fire and have not moved on rates. With so much turmoil in the world, I am wondering whether there will be a change of stance anytime soon? Taimur Baig : For the Fed to turn very hawkish at a time like this is unlikely. But at the same time, I do not think today's meeting would lead to some sort of a clear forward guidance about when rate cuts are coming either. The Fed has many uncertainties. What would be the duration of some of these tariffs? Nobody knows. If you do not know, how do you model the direction of goods prices going forward? You Might Also Like: Is the Indian bond market overreacting to Monetary Policy changes? B Prasanna answers We have seen expectations worsen substantially, meaning consumers are expecting prices to go higher, but we have not seen that materialise in wage bargaining, in wage demands, or for that matter on companies deciding to pass on substantial prices because people expect high prices anyway. None of those things have happened and we have some data for May and, of course, the full set of data for April already to get a sense of the early impact on tariff, pretty muted. But at the same time, the Fed has to be forward-looking. Just because we have not seen a manifestation of higher prices does not mean we would not. And if indeed on the margin, oil goes up as opposed to down, that adds to Fed's concern about price stability. So, the Fed is in a very tricky position. It would have to be very clear to the market that the uncertainties around right now make it stay on that wait and see mode. If in the next couple of months the economy shows some additional signs of weakness, prices do not jump the way we had feared a few months ago, trade related deals or postponements happen, then the Fed can start getting in the business of cutting rates at least twice this year, that is our forecast. The market, having been very dovish, has more or less worked around that forecast as well. Let us see. I am still holding on to that forecast. What is your view on India's macro positioning versus the other emerging markets because for India, we are in the rate cut cycle, the inflation seems to be cooling off and the other lead indicators are holding up well as well. Does it still hold the long India narrative globally? Taimur Baig: It seems very clear that the long India narrative is there. There is some degree of impatience from global investors. They probably want even stronger growth-related outturns in India. Financial markets have been very rewarding nonetheless. You Might Also Like: F&O Talk | Indian markets slip but show resilience even as global geopolitical risks mount: Rahul Ghose But at some point, you want that 7-8% growth trajectory to materialise not the sixes and at the same time even beyond the topline growth numbers, company related earnings, company margins, overall data on sales, all those things are expected to accelerate going forward, especially if the rate cuts that everybody is expecting materialise and the RBI in addition to cutting rates adds lots of liquidity to the system creates a loan cycle and around that, we can see a virtuous set of loan demand, consumption, sales, and farm level profitability. All of that together lifts growth past the 6% range. India remains very much favourably seen by global investors, no question about it. Asset allocators look at India before just about anything else when they think of Asia. But valuation wise there are, of course, question marks. It is a very frothy market. If you look at valuations elsewhere in Asia and particularly in China, there are, of course, just from a valuation perspective better buys to be had. What are you making of the trade deals that we are hearing getting signed at the G7? We understand that the US and UK have signed a trade deal although we do not know the details of that. The US also claims that they have reached a truce with China as well. What do you make of these trade deals? How is it going to impact global trade volumes and where does India stand amid all of this? Taimur Baig : I will parse semantics a bit which is deal versus an agreement. When we talk about the free trade agreement between say India and the UK or the things that my country Singapore has signed with many countries in the world over the years, we are talking about hundreds of pages worth of a technical document, product by product discussion, very detailed commerce department official versus commerce department official sort of agreement. We are not talking about any of that stuff when we talk about trade deals between the US and UK or whatever is happening between the US and Japan. These are very high level discussions. Many details will remain unworked even if these deals are announced. My view is that beyond high level discussions on one promising to buy so much from the other, and promising to invest so much in the other, we would not really see too much teeth in that. The US simply does not have the bandwidth to go ahead and start signing detailed trade agreements with country after country in the world. If you look at the history of trade agreements, those things take years. Even the implementation takes multiple years. Donald Trump does not have the time or bandwidth for any of that. He wants some headline pleasing developments where it shows that the US is forcing countries to buy more from the US and perhaps sell less to the US and invest more in the US. He will get some of those things, but I do not think that will fundamentally change the US' issue, which is it runs a very large savings investment imbalance and for that, it needs to import a lot of stuff. It needs the rest of the world's financing, that is not changing.
Straits Times
5 days ago
- Business
- Straits Times
Forum: Take the queueing pain out of SRS withdrawals
Forum: Take the queueing pain out of SRS withdrawals I have consistently contributed to my Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS) account over the years, diligently setting aside funds in preparation for retirement. Making contributions was always a straightforward process – essentially a regular bank transfer from my DBS Bank account to the SRS account. However, now that I am retired and wish to begin withdrawing these funds, I have encountered a surprisingly outdated and frustrating system. Unlike contributions, withdrawals cannot be made online. I was astonished to learn that I must physically visit a bank branch to carry out this simple transaction. Despite going on a weekday afternoon and trying two different branches, I ran into long lines extending outside. It is baffling that while SRS contributions can be done digitally in an instant, withdrawals require physical waiting, potentially for hours. Why the discrepancy? Even Central Provident Fund withdrawals can be securely processed online. This system seems misaligned with Singapore's push for digitalisation. A simple online process – secured via Singpass, secure messaging or even video calls – should suffice to safeguard against fraud. As our population ages, more retirees will seek access to their SRS funds. Requiring them to queue for hours to manage their retirement savings is inefficient, inconvenient and, frankly, unnecessary. I hope the banks or the relevant authorities can review this issue. Empowering retirees with secure digital access to their own savings is not just a convenience, it's a necessity. Francis Yeoh More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
09-06-2025
- Business
- Straits Times
Singapore stocks edge up higher ahead of US-China talks
SINGAPORE - Local stocks rose on June 9, in line with gains in Asian markets on hopes that a fresh round of US-China trade talks will ease tensions. Investors also digested the latest Chinese inflation and trade data. Trade tensions between the world's two largest economies may be moderating after China said on June 7 that it approved some applications for rare-earth exports, without specifying the countries or industries involved. This comes as China continues to grapple with weak domestic growth. Its consumer price index fell 0.1 per cent year on year in May, smaller than the 0.2 per cent drop forecast, while the producer price index declined by 3.3 per cent, compared with the 3.2 per cent decrease that analysts expected. The Asian giant's export growth also missed expectations in May , driven by a sharp decline in shipments to the US. In Singapore, the benchmark Straits Times Index (STI) rose 0.1 per cent or 2.03 points to end at 3,936.32. In the broader market, gainers beat losers 291 to 218, as 807.27 million securities worth nearly $994 million changed hands. DFI Retail led the gains on the STI, rising 5.3 per cent, or 14 US cents, to close at US$2.80. The Singapore Exchange was the biggest decliner, shedding nearly 2 per cent, or 28 cents, to $14.06. The trio of local banks ended up. DBS Bank gained 0.8 per cent, or 37 cents, to close at $45.49; OCBC Bank advanced 0.6 per cent, or 9 cents, to $16.37; and UOB rose 0.2 per cent, or 7 cents, to $35.32. In the broader Asian region, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index led advances, closing 1.63 per cent higher. South Korea's Kospi was next, with a 1.55 per cent gain. Japan's Nikkei 225 rose 0.9 per cent, and Taiwan's Taiex ended 0.6 per cent higher. THE BUSINESS TIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
