Latest news with #CompetitionAppealTribunal
North Wales Chronicle
3 days ago
- Business
- North Wales Chronicle
Compensation delayed for millions of Brits in Mastercard
This follows the Competition Appeal Tribunal's approval on how the settlement should be distributed last month, following the class action against Mastercard, which dates back to 2016. Walter Merricks, the former financial ombudsman, launched his claim after the European Commission ruled in 2007 that Mastercard's 'multilateral interchange fees' charged to businesses had since 1992 infringed competition law. He alleged that 46 million shoppers in Britain were ripped off after fees were wrongly levied on transactions made over a 15-year period between 1992 and 2008. The fees were paid by retailers accepting Mastercard payments, rather than by consumers themselves. But Mr Merricks claimed shoppers had lost out as retailers passed on these fees in the form of higher prices. It followed the arrival of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which allowed for US-style class actions in UK competition claims. A statement from Mr Merricks said millions of UK consumers who are part of the class action could now come forward and claim their share of the £200 million, with individuals potentially getting between £45 and £70 each. Recommended reading Mr Merricks said UK consumers would shortly be able to register to receive a payment by completing a simple online form, regardless of whether they ever held a Mastercard card - bit that now seems to be delayed. Commenting on the outcome, Mr Merricks said: 'I started this case because I believed that Mastercard's fees paid by retailers for processing card transactions had been unlawfully high and virtually all UK consumers had lost out for long periods by paying higher prices than they should have done as retailers passed on those costs. 'As the evidence came to be known through the litigation process, this was the position only in a relatively small proportion of transactions and the settlement reflects that.'
South Wales Guardian
4 days ago
- Business
- South Wales Guardian
Compensation delayed for millions of Brits in Mastercard
This follows the Competition Appeal Tribunal's approval on how the settlement should be distributed last month, following the class action against Mastercard, which dates back to 2016. Walter Merricks, the former financial ombudsman, launched his claim after the European Commission ruled in 2007 that Mastercard's 'multilateral interchange fees' charged to businesses had since 1992 infringed competition law. He alleged that 46 million shoppers in Britain were ripped off after fees were wrongly levied on transactions made over a 15-year period between 1992 and 2008. The fees were paid by retailers accepting Mastercard payments, rather than by consumers themselves. But Mr Merricks claimed shoppers had lost out as retailers passed on these fees in the form of higher prices. It followed the arrival of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which allowed for US-style class actions in UK competition claims. A statement from Mr Merricks said millions of UK consumers who are part of the class action could now come forward and claim their share of the £200 million, with individuals potentially getting between £45 and £70 each. Recommended reading Mr Merricks said UK consumers would shortly be able to register to receive a payment by completing a simple online form, regardless of whether they ever held a Mastercard card - bit that now seems to be delayed. Commenting on the outcome, Mr Merricks said: 'I started this case because I believed that Mastercard's fees paid by retailers for processing card transactions had been unlawfully high and virtually all UK consumers had lost out for long periods by paying higher prices than they should have done as retailers passed on those costs. 'As the evidence came to be known through the litigation process, this was the position only in a relatively small proportion of transactions and the settlement reflects that.'
Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Business
- Daily Mirror
Mastercard compensation payments delayed as new legal challenge launched
The payment card provider has agreed to pay £200million to settle a case against it - with millions of people due up to £70 each Millions of Brits could be forced to wait months for compensation from Mastercard due to a new legal challenge. The payment card provider has agreed to pay £200million to settle a case against it - with millions of people due up to £70 each. Walter Merricks, the former financial ombudsman, argued that 46 million shoppers were ripped off after fees were wrongly levied on transactions between 1992 and 2008. The fees were paid by retailers accepting Mastercard payments, rather than by customers themselves - meaning you don't necessarily need to have owned a Mastercard to be eligible for compensation. The Competition Appeal Tribunal gave its final approval last month - but now, it has been revealed that the online claims portal is being delayed following a legal challenge from a company called Innsworth. Innsworth helped fund the case but is now trying to challenge how these funds will be split. reports that this could see payments delayed by months. You may be eligible for payments if you lived in England, Wales or Northern Ireland for at least three months between June 1997 and June 2008, and you bought goods or services from UK businesses that accepted Mastercard credit cards. If you live in Scotland, the starting point is May 1992. The judgment has ringfences £100million for consumers, and if the expected 5% of claimants – 2.5 million people – come forward, then they will receive £45 each. If fewer claimants come forward, then payments will be capped at £70 per claimant. Once the legal challenge is resolved, an online claims portal will be launched at Commenting on the original outcome of the case, Mr Merricks said: 'I started this case because I believed that Mastercard's fees paid by retailers for processing card transactions had been unlawfully high and virtually all UK consumers had lost out for long periods by paying higher prices than they should have done as retailers passed on those costs. 'As the evidence came to be known through the litigation process, this was the position only in a relatively small proportion of transactions and the settlement reflects that. 'The settlement that has today been finally approved represents a fair and just outcome for UK consumers. On any view, recovering £200 million by way of a settlement for UK consumers is a huge sum, and that will translate into a meaningful impact in the pockets of UK consumers.'
Glasgow Times
4 days ago
- Business
- Glasgow Times
Compensation delayed for millions of Brits in Mastercard
This follows the Competition Appeal Tribunal's approval on how the settlement should be distributed last month, following the class action against Mastercard, which dates back to 2016. Walter Merricks, the former financial ombudsman, launched his claim after the European Commission ruled in 2007 that Mastercard's 'multilateral interchange fees' charged to businesses had since 1992 infringed competition law. He alleged that 46 million shoppers in Britain were ripped off after fees were wrongly levied on transactions made over a 15-year period between 1992 and 2008. Why the payments could be open to all UK shoppers? The fees were paid by retailers accepting Mastercard payments, rather than by consumers themselves. But Mr Merricks claimed shoppers had lost out as retailers passed on these fees in the form of higher prices. It followed the arrival of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which allowed for US-style class actions in UK competition claims. A statement from Mr Merricks said millions of UK consumers who are part of the class action could now come forward and claim their share of the £200 million, with individuals potentially getting between £45 and £70 each. Recommended reading How can people register for a share of the compensation? Mr Merricks said UK consumers would shortly be able to register to receive a payment by completing a simple online form, regardless of whether they ever held a Mastercard card - bit that now seems to be delayed. Commenting on the outcome, Mr Merricks said: 'I started this case because I believed that Mastercard's fees paid by retailers for processing card transactions had been unlawfully high and virtually all UK consumers had lost out for long periods by paying higher prices than they should have done as retailers passed on those costs. 'As the evidence came to be known through the litigation process, this was the position only in a relatively small proportion of transactions and the settlement reflects that.'
Western Telegraph
04-06-2025
- Business
- Western Telegraph
Martin Lewis on the 'staggering' £70 Mastercard payout
Millions are set to receive up to £70 each following the Competition Appeal Tribunal final approval, following a landmark class action against Mastercard, which dates back to 2016. Taking to X, the Money Saving Expert founder said: "The staggering thing about this Mastercard compensation case is the 'even if you never had one' - the net is spread very far and wide." He added: "Check now if you're due up to £70 from Mastercard - even if you've NEVER had one. Millions are in line for compensation after the card firm settled a landmark legal case against it out of court..." The staggering thing about this Mastercard compensation case is the 'even if you never had one' - the net is spread very far and wide. — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) June 2, 2025 What is the Mastercard compensation case, and why are people getting £70? Walter Merricks, the former financial ombudsman, launched his claim after the European Commission ruled in 2007 that Mastercard's 'multilateral interchange fees' charged to businesses had since 1992 infringed competition law. He alleged that 46 million shoppers in Britain were ripped off after fees were wrongly levied on transactions made over a 15-year period between 1992 and 2008. Why don't I need to be a customer? The fees were paid by retailers accepting Mastercard payments, rather than by consumers themselves. But Mr Merricks claimed shoppers had lost out as retailers passed on these fees in the form of higher prices. It followed the arrival of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which allowed for US-style class actions in UK competition claims. A statement from Mr Merricks said millions of UK consumers who are part of the class action could now come forward and claim their share of the £200 million, with individuals potentially getting between £45 and £70 each. How can people register for a share of the compensation? Mr Merricks said UK consumers would shortly be able to register to receive a payment by completing a simple online form, regardless of whether they ever held a Mastercard card. It was expected that payments would be made to consumers who register before the end of the year, he added. Recommended reading: Commenting on the outcome, Mr Merricks said: 'I started this case because I believed that Mastercard's fees paid by retailers for processing card transactions had been unlawfully high and virtually all UK consumers had lost out for long periods by paying higher prices than they should have done as retailers passed on those costs. 'As the evidence came to be known through the litigation process, this was the position only in a relatively small proportion of transactions and the settlement reflects that. 'The settlement that has today been finally approved represents a fair and just outcome for UK consumers. 'On any view, recovering £200 million by way of a settlement for UK consumers is a huge sum, and that will translate into a meaningful impact in the pockets of UK consumers.'
