Latest news with #Clifton
CBS News
10-06-2025
- CBS News
Largest U.S. private prison operator faces lawsuit after inmate was killed a day before his release
Matthew Vogel was finishing up a six-month stint at the South Central Correctional Facility in Clifton, Tennessee, for a parole violation when he was allegedly beaten to death by a cellmate who was serving three life sentences for murder. Vogel's cellmate is accused of bludgeoning him with a drainage cover before stabbing him with a shard of glass from a broken television, killing the 39-year-old one day before his scheduled release in August 2024. And according to a lawsuit filed earlier this year, Vogel's family claims cost-cutting and understaffing at the prison allowed it to happen. Vogel's family brought its case against CoreCivic, which operates the prison where Vogel died and is the largest private, for-profit prison firm in the nation. Vogel "had a big heart, very emotional," his mother, Maria Googe, said in an interview with CBS News. Nearly a year after his death, she still has questions: "Who dropped the ball? Did nobody hear it? Were there no guards that could have stopped it or intervened? There's just too many what ifs," she said. Matthew Vogel with his mother, Maria Googe. She is suing CoreCivic over his death in a Tennessee prison run by the company. Family photo The company has disputed the lawsuit's claims. CoreCivic adviser Steve Conry says, contrary to the claims in the lawsuit, its prisons are properly staffed. "Over the course of an inmate's residence at our facility, alterations are made to housing and program assignments when it is appropriate to do so based on any changes in the inmate's particular circumstances," Conry said. "For security and privacy reasons, we cannot address specific details of an inmate's housing or custody." When asked by CBS News whether the death of an inmate is considered a failure, Conry said: "One death is one death too many. We don't want any individual to die while they're in our care, but it does happen. We take it seriously." Private prisons reemerge under Trump administration The Vogel case comes at an inflection point for the federal use of private prisons. One of President Trump's first actions of his second term was to reestablish the use of private prison systems by federal agencies previously barred under the Biden administration. CoreCivic could be one of the biggest beneficiaries of new federal contracts under Mr. Trump. CoreCivic has lobbied hard to play an increasingly prominent role in assisting in the detention effort, along with its role supplementing state and local prison needs. The company has touted that among the valuable services it provides is the ability to build prisons faster and cheaper to relieve overcrowding. It says it also offers an array of vocational, education and substance-abuse recovery services as part of its privately-run facilities. "We have successfully partnered with federal, state and local government entities to creatively and efficiently meet their challenges in ways they could not do alone," CoreCivic told CBS News in a statement. "As a result, many systems are safer and better able to provide quality programming for the inmates in their care." Still, CoreCivic has been repeatedly found in Tennessee state audits to be deficient in staffing and turnover. In 2023 CoreCivic had 146% turnover rate for its prisons versus 37% percent for state-run prisons, as well as higher than average unfilled corrections officer positions. A survey of employees for that audit found that staffing issues left them feeling unsafe, and made the job more dangerous. CoreCivic, which operates four prisons in Tennessee, has disputed CBS News' analysis of that state data, which appears to show that inmates are twice as likely to be killed in CoreCivic prisons compared to government-run prisons. "Simply comparing aggregate numbers across a time frame does not account for a wide range of important factors and can result in apples-to-oranges comparisons and inaccurate conclusions," the company told CBS News in a statement. "For example, the likelihood of committing a homicide during incarceration can be influenced by numerous factors, such as security classifications, gang affiliations and crimes committed, among others." Tennessee seeks reforms State lawmakers in Tennessee have recently taken notice and passed legislation that mandates a 10% reduction in inmate populations at private prisons if their average death rate is double that of state-run facilities. CoreCivic, the sole private prison operator in the state, currently meets the threshold for reduction, according to state Sen. Mark Pody, who introduced the bill during legislative debate. One Tennessee CoreCivic prison in particular, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center., has come under scrutiny including by the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, which launched an investigation last year. "Publicly available information suggests that Trousdale Turner has been plagued by serious problems since it first opened its doors," said then-United States Attorney Henry C. Leventis. According to the Civil Rights Division's director at that time, Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, "Recent reported incidents of violence include stabbings of five people within a three week span in early 2024, at least 196 assaults, two murders and 15 deaths that the facility classified as accidental between July of 2022 and June of 2023, at least 90 incidents of sexual misconduct in that same timeframe, large amounts of contraband, including 97 knives found in June of 2023 alone." CoreCivic says it is cooperating with the investigation. "We take this matter seriously and are fully committed to working closely with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) officials to address any concerns," the company said. "Out of respect for their process, we defer to USDOJ and TDOC regarding any concerns or allegations related to the investigation." The company says the safety and dignity of inmates is a top priority for its leadership, and for staff at Trousdale Turner. "That's why we've worked closely with TDOC to identify and implement policies and processes that enhance safety and security while providing meaningful programs and services geared towards helping the individuals in our care prepare for successful reentry," the company said. "We take this matter very seriously and are committed to working closely with both TDOC and USDOJ officials to address areas of concern." There is evidence to suggest some violence continues. Over the past weekend, law enforcement responded to what the sheriff described as a riot late Sunday night at the Trousdale Turner facility involving as many as 200 incarcerated individuals. Original reports were that at least two corrections officers were held hostage, although CoreCivic now disputes that. All got out safely and with no major injuries. Emergency personnel were dispatched at least 47 times to Trousdale Turner in the first 6 months of 2025, according to publicly available records reviewed by CBS News. While a majority of those calls were for medical emergencies, they also included four suicide attempts, five suspected overdoses and 9 stabbings. Now with the increase in immigrant detentions, CoreCivic appears poised for major growth. "I've worked at CoreCivic for 32 years, and this is truly one of the most exciting periods in my career," CEO Damon Hininger told shareholders during a February 2025 earnings call, which coincided with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown and new federal contracts with private prison companies. CoreCivic donated $500,000 to Trump's inauguration. Only about 7% of prisoners in the U.S. are housed in private prisons, but nearly 90% of and Customs Enforcement detainees are held in privately run facilities. In March, the company received a contract worth up to $22.6 million to reopen an ICE facility in Leavenworth, Kansas, although a judge recently blocked that from moving forward after the city sued. A second $31.2 million contract was awarded in April for a detention center in California City, about 100 miles north of Los Angeles. A death in custody Attorney Ben Raybin, who is suing CoreCivic on behalf of the Vogel family, told CBS News he believes the challenges at the company's facilities come down, in part, to staffing. "This is a company that makes tens of millions of dollars every year and yet leaves its prisons understaffed," Raybin said in an interview with CBS News. Raybin argues that staffing concerns were behind the company's decision to give a lower risk rating to the man accused in Vogel's death, cellmate Travis Bess. Bess had been convicted in 2014 of killing a previous cellmate. The company reduced a risk rating for Bess from a four — the most dangerous — to a zero, Raybin said. A document obtained by Raybin and shared with CBS News shows a computer printout that calculated Bess' risk factors for recidivism. Raybin told CBS News that it appears someone overrode the computerized scoring. Tennessee Department of Corrections guidelines allow this in certain circumstances, but require an accompanying explanation. Raybin says no explanation for the reduction was provided. According to Department of Justice guidelines, individuals with higher risk scores receive stricter supervision or more intensive interventions, while those with lower scores face fewer restrictions or minimal intervention. Christopher Slobogin, director of Vanderbilt Law School's Criminal Justice Program, says that "people who are higher risk will probably need more risk management services, which will mean more staff and other resources." Although Tennessee does not release statistics for the cost per prisoner based on custody level, one state that does is North Carolina. According to that data, the daily cost of housing an individual prisoner in close custody is $174.22, versus $151.58 for medium. "One of the chief concerns is that private prison companies are beholden to the bottom line," said Eunice Cho, an attorney with the ACLU's National Prison Project. "Because they are ultimately accountable to their investors there will always be ways that private prison companies are looking to cut costs." As for Googe, she says she's still waiting for answers to what happened to her son. "It's something that nobody should ever have to deal with," she said. contributed to this report.
Daily Mail
09-06-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Church accountant sacked by Catholic diocese after 'witch hunt' for being an atheist wins £60k payout
A church accountant has successfully sued a Catholic diocese after she was discriminated against for being an atheist. Cambridge University-educated Janet Parker, 55, fell out with her boss after she asked for leave to care for her newly adopted daughter. When her request for flexible working was refused, she complained, adding that 'the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care'. 'I hoped that this kind of prejudice had been eradicated long ago,' she said. 'Maybe I am wrong.' Following this, Miss Parker was subjected to a 'witch hunt' investigation by managers at the Clifton Diocese for alleged professional negligence which led to her being sacked from her £60,000-a-year-role. She has now won claims against them after a tribunal ruled the church organisation had discriminated against her, harassed her and then unfairly sacked her because she was not religious. Miss Parker claimed the diocese's approach to her flexible working request was 'tainted by negative views of adoption, emanating from the religious beliefs of its staff'. Details of Miss Parker's tribunal claim emerged at a disciplinary hearing conducted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants (ICAEW) into abusive messages she sent to diocese Chief Operating Officer, Lyn Murray, after her dismissal. According to the full judgement - which has not been made public - the hearing in Bristol was told that she had worked at the Diocese - which covers the West of England and has assets exceeding £200 million - from February 2015 until her dismissal in October 2021. Miss Parker - described by the tribunal as a 'very intelligent, articulate, and able woman' - had been a chartered accountant since 1998 and had worked in London at Deloittes and Credit Suisse before moving to the charity sector in 2009. In 2019 her application to adopt a baby girl was approved and in January 2020 she informed Mrs Murray of her intention to take 52 weeks of adoption leave. The tribunal heard: 'Mrs Murray did not react well, arguing that she did not believe that [Miss Parker] could 'go on leave with no notice,' as she described it, and expressed dissatisfaction that [she] would 'do that to her', 'She asked why the child could not be placed into separate foster care before it was placed with [Miss Parker] so that [she] could conduct a handover. 'Additionally, Mrs Murray asked [her] whether it was really necessary for her to take her full entitlement of 52 weeks of adoption leave.' Miss Parker began her leave in September 2020. The tribunal heard that during her absence, her replacement flagged potential financial irregularities in the accounts she had been responsible for. In July 2021 Miss Parker had a conversation with Mrs Murray about reducing hours and working from home as she was struggling to find childcare for her daughter. However, her request was refused and the following month, the diocese launched disciplinary proceedings against her and put her on suspension. Miss Parker responded by issuing a grievance against Mrs Murray. 'This behaviour is not in accordance with the professed beliefs of the Catholic Church,' she said. 'I know that the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care, but I hoped that this kind of prejudice had been eradicated long ago. Maybe I am wrong.' During the investigation into her, senior church executive Carole Lawrence mocked Miss Parker - who suffers from anxiety and depression - saying she was glad she had not had a panic attack before a disciplinary hearing, the tribunal was told. The hearing was told the ICAEW was asked to investigate the allegations against her and eventually found there was insufficient evidence to support the complaints. However, at the conclusion of its investigation the diocese decided to dismiss her for gross misconduct. The tribunal heard this led to Miss Parker sending an email to Mrs Murray saying: 'There is one thing I always wanted to say to you. Now I can. F*** OFF YOU B****.' and 'Your god might forgive you but I never will. B****.' She then put out Facebook posts saying: 'You asked for it and I'm coming for you,' and 'Nolite te bastardes carborundorum, b****s,' - meaning 'don't let the b******* grind you down, b*****s' in Latin. Employment Judge Adam Midgley said that the way the diocese had handled the disciplinary process meant Miss Parker - as a non Catholic - had been religiously discriminated against. '[She] has argued that from the moment she challenged the [diocese], particularly from the point at which she referenced the Catholic Church's treatment of vulnerable children, her card was marked, and [it] closed ranks to protect itself and dismiss her.' He described the investigation that led to her dismissal as appearing like 'witch hunt' and said it was 'derisory in its depth, unbalanced and focused on establishing fault'. Miss Parker has yet to receive compensation following the judgement as the diocese is understood to have launched an appeal. The ICAEW issued her with a caution over the abusive messages and social media posts. In response, Miss Parker said: 'I wasn't happy with ICAEW outcome but I suppose it was the best outcome given the situation. 'I don't think what I did was wrong and I think I just did what probably millions of people around the country want to do when they leave their jobs. 'I have been through four years of hell with this and my parents, daughter and siblings have suffered too. 'I've gone self-employed as I don't think I could ever trust an employer again. 'I can honestly say I hate the Catholic Church and think they cannot be trusted.'
TimesLIVE
08-06-2025
- Health
- TimesLIVE
Crystal visions
If you thought South Africans were passionate only about soccer, braais and complaining about unscheduled load-shedding, think again. These days, an increasing number are embracing alternative therapy with all the fervour of a Jozi taxi driver chasing a missing fare. From cupping and crystal healing to sound baths and Cerebos salt caves, New Age techniques are no longer the preserve of Instagram yoga influencers or eccentric Clifton aunties. It's gone mainstream, popping up everywhere from Sandton boardrooms to Soweto's Credo Mutwa Cultural Village...
News.com.au
08-06-2025
- General
- News.com.au
NSW Land and Environment Court rules on Battiato v Clifton tree dispute
A long-running tussle between neighbours over a pine tree and a crumbling retaining wall has finally ended, with a court ordering both parties to share costs for the fix-up. The brouhaha between Vince and Natalie Battiato of 20 Kanangra Ave and Faye Clifton of 22 Kanangra Ave in the coastal NSW town of Corlette escalated into a legal stoush because of the dilapidated wall that splits the two properties. The wall needed to be fixed and the neighbours could not agree on who should pay. The Battiatos contended that the roots of an old pine tree, which has since been removed, on Ms Clifton's property was the main contributor to the damage to the wall. But Ms Clifton shot back and argued the age of the wall was the central factor underpinning its dilapidation. In their application to the NSW Land and Environment Court, the Battiatos said Ms Clifton should remove all remaining trees on her property to facilitate the reconstruction of the wall and then pay for the fix-up. They also wanted her to bear all court costs. In her submission, Ms Clifton pushed for a 'just and fair outcome to a lengthy ongoing dispute', court documents show. She asked for costs to be shared between the parties for the reconstruction job. Acting Commissioner Peter Nichols AC, settling the dispute, visited the site and concluded age was the primary cause of the wall's dilapidation. But he added the tree had also likely caused some damage. 'The tree has been shown to have exacerbated damage to the section of the retaining wall, thus engaging the court's jurisdiction, however orders made for any compensation are a matter of discretion,' he said. 'Given the nature of the retaining wall, it appears that, in the main, the dilapidation was a function of the age and inappropriate design and construction materials of the retaining wall.' In his decision, handed down this week, Dr Nichols upheld the application from the Battiatos but only 'in part'. He ordered Ms Clifton to remove seven trees from her property, including tree stumps, trunks and roots 'with a diameter of greater than 100mm located within 200mm of the shared property boundary between 20 and 22 Kanangra Ave'. The trees are camellia, lemon and pine trees. But he ordered for the wall reconstruction costs to be split '50-50'. 'Within 365 days of the date of these orders the applicants (Battiatos) and respondent (Ms Clifton) are to arrange and pay for the design and construction of the replacement retaining wall, including obtaining all necessary approvals from Port Stephens Council … sharing the costs 50-50,' he said. The neighbours were ordered to swap quotes beforehand to find the cheapest option from 'suitably qualified and experienced building contractors'. Further, Dr Nichols ordered the parties to construct a new boundary fence on the top of the new retaining wall on the shared property boundary, splitting the costs 50-50. Legislation within the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours Act) from 2006 and the Dividing Fences Act from 1991 covered the dispute. Port Stephens Council sits north of Newcastle in NSW's Hunter Valley region.
West Australian
08-06-2025
- General
- West Australian
NSW Land and Environment Court rules on Battiato v Clifton tree dispute
A long-running tussle between neighbours over a pine tree and a crumbling retaining wall has finally ended, with a court ordering both parties to share costs for the fix-up. The brouhaha between Vince and Natalie Battiato of 20 Kanangra Ave and Faye Clifton of 22 Kanangra Ave in the coastal NSW town of Corlette escalated into a legal stoush because of the dilapidated wall that splits the two properties. The wall needed to be fixed and the neighbours could not agree on who should pay. The Battiatos contended that the roots of an old pine tree, which has since been removed, on Ms Clifton's property was the main contributor to the damage to the wall. But Ms Clifton shot back and argued the age of the wall was the central factor underpinning its dilapidation. In their application to the NSW Land and Environment Court, the Battiatos said Ms Clifton should remove all remaining trees on her property to facilitate the reconstruction of the wall and then pay for the fix-up. They also wanted her to bear all court costs. In her submission, Ms Clifton pushed for a 'just and fair outcome to a lengthy ongoing dispute', court documents show. She asked for costs to be shared between the parties for the reconstruction job. Acting Commissioner Peter Nichols AC, settling the dispute, visited the site and concluded age was the primary cause of the wall's dilapidation. But he added the tree had also likely caused some damage. 'The tree has been shown to have exacerbated damage to the section of the retaining wall, thus engaging the court's jurisdiction, however orders made for any compensation are a matter of discretion,' he said. 'Given the nature of the retaining wall, it appears that, in the main, the dilapidation was a function of the age and inappropriate design and construction materials of the retaining wall.' In his decision, handed down this week, Dr Nichols upheld the application from the Battiatos but only 'in part'. He ordered Ms Clifton to remove seven trees from her property, including tree stumps, trunks and roots 'with a diameter of greater than 100mm located within 200mm of the shared property boundary between 20 and 22 Kanangra Ave'. The trees are camellia, lemon and pine trees. But he ordered for the wall reconstruction costs to be split '50-50'. 'Within 365 days of the date of these orders the applicants (Battiatos) and respondent (Ms Clifton) are to arrange and pay for the design and construction of the replacement retaining wall, including obtaining all necessary approvals from Port Stephens Council … sharing the costs 50-50,' he said. The neighbours were ordered to swap quotes beforehand to find the cheapest option from 'suitably qualified and experienced building contractors'. Further, Dr Nichols ordered the parties to construct a new boundary fence on the top of the new retaining wall on the shared property boundary, splitting the costs 50-50. Legislation within the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours Act) from 2006 and the Dividing Fences Act from 1991 covered the dispute. Port Stephens Council sits north of Newcastle in NSW's Hunter Valley region. Corlette lies next to famous Nelson Bay, a popular tourist destination in the region.
