Latest news with #CTBTO
India Today
2 days ago
- Politics
- India Today
Twin quakes shake Iran amid Israel conflict. Is there link to nuclear activities?
Iran has been hit by two back-to-back earthquakes even as tension between the Islamic nation and Israel remains at its peak. An earthquake of 5.1 magnitude struck northern Iran on Friday at 9.19 pm local time. This happened only five days after a 2.5 magnitude quake was reported near Fordo after Israeli quake happened approximately 36 km southwest of Semnan at a depth of 10 km, with tremors felt in Tehran and other nearby regions. The timing of these quakes and recent satellite imagery showing damage at Iran's nuclear sites in Natanz and Fordo amid Israel's fierce attacks, have fuelled speculation regarding a potential AND ITS SEISMOLOGIC HISTORYIran is highly active seismically due to its position on the Alpine-Himalayan seismic belt, and thus, experiences frequent earthquakes, with over 2,000 annually, including 15 to 16 of magnitude 5.0 or higher. A long-term analysis of a decade between 2006 and 2015, showed 96,000 earthquakes were recorded in the country during the period. The ongoing conflict with Israel, which started on June 13, involves Israeli airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure, including sites such as Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordo, alongside Tehran's missile retaliations. The quake's shallow depth of 10 km and proximity to Semnan's space and missile complex sparked speculation, but seismic data suggests it was a natural ON NATURAL, NUCLEAR-INDUCTED QUAKES Nuclear activities, particularly underground nuclear explosions, can induce earthquakes by releasing tectonic stress near the blast. According to the US Geological Survey (USGS), such explosions can trigger seismic events, but these are typically much smaller in magnitude than the explosion itself and are limited to a range of a few tens of kilometres from the blast site. The quakes are generally less intense and have fewer aftershocks than natural can distinguish these events by analysing wave patterns, with nuclear explosions producing mainly P-waves. Natural earthquakes generate both P and S-waves. Also, the seismic waves generated by nuclear explosions differ from those of natural Berkeley Seismology Lab explains that nuclear test seismograms are dominated by compressional P-waves, while natural earthquakes generate strong shear S-waves as well. This distinction allows seismologists to differentiate between the two, using methods such as moment tensor solutions, as described by the National Geographic, which trace waves back to their origin to identify the mechanism of the earthquakes with a 2.5-magnitude event near Fordo on June 15, coincided with military actions, but expert analysis, including those from the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), confirmed they align with natural QUAKE THEORY IN INDO-PAK CONFLICTDuring India-Pakistan's four-day conflict in May, similar tremors were felt in Pakistan. Even then, a theory of atomic activity surfaced but was debunked by India Today after analysing the facts logically based on seismographic evidence and these scientific explanations in mind, it can be conclusively said that while nuclear activities, especially explosions, can cause small, localised earthquakes, the latest seismic events in Iran near nuclear facilities are consistent with natural tectonic activity, given the region's high seismic analysis, including from CTBTO, USGS, and independent seismologists, supports this conclusion, dismissing speculation about nuclear tests or military-induced quakes. The evidence leans toward natural causes, but ongoing monitoring and further research are essential, especially in conflict zones where speculation runs faster than the earthquake InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Israel#Iran
Yahoo
13-05-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
Sensors designed to detect nuclear detonations can help track space debris falling to Earth
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists are studying how sensors designed to detect nuclear tests could help track space junk and meteorites crashing down in the world's most remote regions. Across the world, dozens of supersensitive detectors have been installed since the beginning of the Cold War era to detect infrasound waves created by nuclear tests thousands of miles away. Infrasound refers to sound waves far below the range of human hearing, similar to how the infrared range of light is far below the threshold of human eyesight. These detectors, part of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) detection network, also pick up the rumble of a thunder or the ultrasonic booms generated by large pieces of space rocks or space debris disintegrating in Earth's atmosphere. Researchers are now studying how these sensors could help reconstruct trajectories of re-entering space debris, especially those that crash down in remote areas where the more commonly used optical cameras and telescopes are not available. According to one leading scientist in this field of study, these sensors can offer unique advantages over other methods of tracking objects falling from space. "The advantage of using the regional and global infrasound sensor network for studying trajectories of bolides and space debris is that it provides truly worldwide coverage operating continuously day and night and in all weather conditions," Elizabeth Silber, a scientist at Sandia National Laboratories in the U.S., told "Unlike optical observations, which require clear skies and darkness, or radar systems, which have limited range and are geographically constrained, infrasound waves can propagate thousands of kilometers with minimal loss of signal," said Silber, who is the lead author of a new study exploring the advantages and limitations of this detection method. These infrasound sensors can help determine falling space objects' trajectory using a method known as triangulation that compares signals received by two or more sensors to establish the location of the source. The researchers wanted to know how accurate such calculations can be depending on the angle at which the object enters the atmosphere. They found that while trajectories of space rocks and junk that fall into the atmosphere at steep angles of 60 degrees or more are easy to reconstruct from infrasound measurements, the same doesn't apply to objects flying through the atmosphere at shallower angles. "Steep-angle events deposit their energy along a relatively short, vertical segment of the atmosphere, making them behave almost like a point-source explosion," Silber said. "This compact geometry means the sound waves emitted travel along nearly identical paths, resulting in consistent arrival directions at distant infrasound sensors." On the other hand, pieces of space junk and meteorites that enter at shallow angles generate confusing data when measured by the infrasound sensors as they produce audible signals along a path of hundreds, even thousands of kilometers. "At distant observing stations, signals from different segments of that long trajectory can dominate, causing significant variability and uncertainty in the measured arrival directions," Silber explained. Images from cameras and telescopes, on the contrary, tend to do a good job reconstructing the trajectories of objects entering at shallow angles that streak across the sky like stunning shooting stars. Such instruments, however, are not available to monitor the skies above the remote regions of the world's oceans where most space junk and meteorites crash to Earth or burn up in the atmosphere. That's why scientists are trying to figure out whether combinations of different types of measurements could provide more accurate data. The limitations of infrasound measurements, for example, restrict the usability of such data in most cases of satellite re-entries, which are usually guided into the atmosphere gradually at shallow angles, Silber admitted. "Objects re-entering from low Earth orbit (LEO) generally do so at extremely shallow angles," Silber said. "This is because their orbits decay gradually due to atmospheric drag, causing them to spiral inward over time rather than plunging steeply." RELATED STORIES: — How much do SpaceX's reentering Starlink satellites pollute Earth's atmosphere? — Watch fiery SpaceX Starship Flight 8 debris rain down over The Bahamas (video) — SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket debris creates dramatic fireball over Europe, crashes in Poland (video) Most meteorites, too, enter at angles smaller than 60 degrees, with 45 degrees being the most common angle at which space rocks hit the atmosphere, Silber admitted. The researchers are trying to understand to what extent the infrasound sensors can help understand the trajectories of such objects and how the results could be improved. Although the sensors cannot provide advanced warnings about incoming pieces of space rock or junk, scientists are keen to use the data to learn more about these potentially dangerous events. "Although infrasound detection cannot deliver real-time warnings, it does play an essential role in characterizing events, assessing potential impacts and guiding response and recovery efforts," said Silber. The study was presented at the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union in April.
