logo
#

Latest news with #CLAT-UG2025

CLAT UG 2025 Revised Results OUT At consortiumofnlus.ac.in- Check Details About Counselling Process Here
CLAT UG 2025 Revised Results OUT At consortiumofnlus.ac.in- Check Details About Counselling Process Here

India.com

time18-05-2025

  • General
  • India.com

CLAT UG 2025 Revised Results OUT At consortiumofnlus.ac.in- Check Details About Counselling Process Here

CLAT UG Revised Result 2025: The consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has officially released the revised results of the CLAT-UG 2025 yesterday, i.e. 18th May, 2025, Saturday. All the candidates who have appeared for the Common Law Admission Test 2025- Undergraduate can now check their results from the official website i.e. The board has also released the final answer key along with the counselling schedule. The result for PG (Postgraduate) has not been declared official notice said, 'Pursuant to the decision and directive of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and with the approval of the Governing Body of the Consortium of National Law Universities (CNLU), the results and counselling schedule for CLAT 2025 (Undergraduate) are hereby published. The results for CLAT 2025 (Postgraduate) will be announced following the resolution of matters currently pending before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court,".c CLAT Result 2025: Steps to Download the Result Step 1- Go to the official CLAT exam- Step 2- You will see the link of CLAT 2025 Result on the homepage, click on it. Step 3- A new page will be opened to login, Step 4- Enter the required details of yours correctly and submit it. Step 5- After submission, CLAT UG Revised Result will appear on your screen. Step 6- Check your scores correctly and download the page. Step 7- Print out your result for future reference. CLAT Result 2025; Instruction PDF of Counselling Process CLAT Result 2025: Counselling Process NLU has also opened the registration window for the admission counselling from 17th May, 2025 at 4 PM. And the last date to register for the counseling process is 21st May, 205 till 5 PM. Candidates will have to provide at least 15 preferences while choice-filling their courses and colleges. There will be five rounds for the counselling. And the counselling fee for the general category candidates is Rs. 30,000 and for ST/SC/OBC/BC/EWS/PwD category candidates is Rs. 20,000. All the students are advised to keep checking the official website for all the important updates.

CLAT UG 2025 Revised Results, Final Answer Key Out; Counselling Schedule Released
CLAT UG 2025 Revised Results, Final Answer Key Out; Counselling Schedule Released

News18

time17-05-2025

  • Business
  • News18

CLAT UG 2025 Revised Results, Final Answer Key Out; Counselling Schedule Released

Last Updated: CLAT 2025 results out: The CNLUs has also issued the final answer key along with the counselling schedule. The PG results are yet to be declared. The Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has released the revised results of the CLAT-UG 2025 today, May 17. It has also issued the final answer key along with the counselling schedule. The PG results are yet to be declared. 'Pursuant to the decision and directive of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and with the approval of the Governing Body of the Consortium of National Law Universities (CNLU), the results and counselling schedule for CLAT 2025 (Undergraduate) are hereby published. The results for CLAT 2025 (Postgraduate) will be announced following the resolution of matters currently pending before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court," reads the official notice. Step 1 Go to the official website of the CLAT exam, Step 2 – Look for the link mentioning 'CLAT 2025 Result'. Step 3 – Enter your login credentials. Step 4 – Your CLAT Result 2025 will appear on the screen. Step 5 – Check CLAT Result 2025 and take a print out for future reference. CLAT Result 2025: Counselling Process Begins According to the official notice, candidates must provide a minimum of 15 preferences during the choice-filling process. The CLAT 2025 counselling will take place in five rounds. The registration process has commence today, May 17 and will continue till May 21. The counselling fee for general category candidates is Rs 30,000. For ST/ SC/ OBC/ BC/ EWS/ PWD categories, it is Rs 20,000. CLAT 2025 was conducted in a single shift from 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM on December 1, 2024. As per the marking scheme, for every correct answer, candidates will earn one mark, while 0.25 marks will be deducted for each incorrect response. The Delhi High Court had earlier directed the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to revise the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) results after a student challenged the final answer key and sought a revision of his result. The high court identified two errors in Set A of the question paper, specifically in questions 14 and 100. The Delhi HC also noted that question 100 contained errors and is therefore invalid. First Published: May 17, 2025, 17:45 IST

CLAT 2025 Revised Results By Today Evening, Consortium Of NLUs Tell Supreme Court
CLAT 2025 Revised Results By Today Evening, Consortium Of NLUs Tell Supreme Court

News18

time16-05-2025

  • Politics
  • News18

CLAT 2025 Revised Results By Today Evening, Consortium Of NLUs Tell Supreme Court

Last Updated: The Delhi High Court had earlier directed the Consortium of NLUs to revise the CLAT results after a student challenged the final answer key and sought a revision of his result. The Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has informed the Supreme Court on Friday that they are prepared to publish the revised results of the CLAT-UG 2025 by today evening. They further informed that the NLUs are currently waiting for the final order from the top court to upload the results, reported Live Law. The Consortium's lawyer, Advocate Arun Sri Kumar, responded that the results could be published within two hours once the order is uploaded. 'We are just waiting for the final order; then we will publish the results within 2 hours. We have informed the vendor based on the oral instructions. Once the order is in, we will release the results," Kumar said, the report added. To which the CJI said that the order will be out by today following which Kumar replied that the results will be published today evening. The Delhi High Court had earlier directed the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to revise the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) results after a student challenged the final answer key and sought a revision of his result. The high court identified two errors in Set A of the question paper, specifically in questions 14 and 100. Justice Jyoti Singh upheld the petitioner's claim and agreed with the Expert Committee's assessment that option 'C' was the correct answer to question. Singh added that all candidates who selected option 'C' should be awarded full marks. The Delhi HC also noted that question 100 contained errors and is therefore invalid. After the revised results are out, the CLAT 2025 counselling schedule will be announced by the Consortium. There will be five rounds of admissions counselling. If a candidate is not allotted a seat in a given round, they will be required to wait for the next round of counselling as this is a sequential process. First Published: May 16, 2025, 17:30 IST

SC pulls up NLU consortium over errors in CLAT 2025; seeks government's response
SC pulls up NLU consortium over errors in CLAT 2025; seeks government's response

Hindustan Times

time07-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Hindustan Times

SC pulls up NLU consortium over errors in CLAT 2025; seeks government's response

The Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) for setting up questions for the national Common Law Admission Test-Undergraduate (CLAT-UG) 2025 in the most 'casual' manner as it directed changes in the marking pattern of six questions. The bench noted that in some questions, the answer key issued by the consortium was contrary to past SC judgments. (File photo) The court also sought the Centre's response to have a permanent mechanism for conducting the examination similar to NEET and other combined entrance tests in the interest of students. The bench headed by justice Bhushan R Gavai and comprising of justice Augustine George Masih, said, 'At the outset, we must express our anguish at the casual manner in which the consortium has been framing the questions for CLAT exam which involves careers and aspirations of lakhs of students in the country.' The bench noted that in some questions, the answer key issued by the consortium was contrary to past Supreme Court judgments and in one question, the answer required students to make calculations, that could not be expected in an objective test on legal reasoning. The court was hearing two petitions filed by candidates who appeared in the CLAT-UG 2025 expressing disappointment on the April 23 decision of the Delhi high court which had scrutinised 17 questions and recommended changes in marks for four of those. The changes included grace marks being awarded to all candidates who attempted three out of the four sets of questions, excluding Set A. Going by the questions framed and the answers to six questions called in question, the bench remarked, 'This sort of consortium you have vice chancellors calling themselves academicians of high vice chancellor has framed these questions.' Senior advocates KK Venugopal and Gopal Sankaranarayanan appearing for the petitioners pointed out that errors in CLAT are not new and on two occasions in the past – in 2013 and 2018, orders were passed by the top court expressing concern on the conduct of CLAT and sought responses from the Union government and Bar Council of India (BCI), directing them to take steps to ensure there is no loss caused to students. The bench mooted for a permanent mechanism for conduct of CLAT and said, 'Why should not there be a permanent mechanism to avoid these errors. What is the Union government doing about it. They can have a mechanism similar to what they have for conducting NEET, JEE, etc.' The court noted that a petition in this regard is already pending since 2015 filed by law professor Shamnad Bashir. As the petitioner is no more, Sankaranarayanan urged the court to direct listing of this matter suo motu instead of keeping the petition of students pending as they are likely to get admission in NLUs. Also Read:Supreme Court stays Delhi HC order to revise undergraduate CLAT 2025 results Accepting the suggestion, the court said, 'In academic matters, court is generally slow in interfering as we do not possess the expertise. But when academicians themselves act in such a manner, which affects lakhs of students, the court is left with no option but to interfere.' As the petitions before the top court raised doubts about the answers to six questions decided by the high court, the bench examined each of them in detail. In one question related to environment issues, the bench noted that the answer selected by the consortium said that the fundamental duty to preserve environment is that of the state, even as there was an option given for the same question that the responsibility lies with both state and citizens. The court said, 'In many judgments, this court has ruled that both state and citizens have the duty to preserve and protect natural resources... We are amazed at such stand taken by the consortium having experts in the legal field. We cannot accept the answer given in the answer key for Q 56 and direct the consortium to give positive marking to all students who answered options (c) and (d) -- relating to citizens and states, and those who ticked option (a) and (b) be given negative marking.' In two other questions (Q 115 and Q 116) in one of the sets of CLAT-UG, the court found that the students were required to do mathematical calculations. Senior advocate Rajshekhar Rao, appearing for the consortium, submitted that this was elementary mathematics of Class 8 level which students are expected to know to which the court said, 'The question is so complicated. Do you expect boys and girls aged 16-17 years to go there with a calculator and answer this. For answering the question, one has to undergo detailed mathematical analysis which cannot be expected in an objective test.' Sankaranarayanan said that each year, a different NLU is allowed to set the questions. He requested the court to revisit the scheme which allows NLUs to conduct the examination. The bench agreed to consider this issue. As regards the present CLAT-UG 2025, the direction issued on Wednesday has given finality to the examination held on December 1 last year. The results were declared on December 7 following which petitions were filed across the country and the Supreme Court in February directed all matters to be heard by the Delhi high court. Initially, a single judge bench had considered the matter and recommended changes in marking pattern that was later appealed before the division bench leading to the April 23 decision.

Supreme Court stays Delhi High Court direction to revise CLAT-UG 2025 merit list
Supreme Court stays Delhi High Court direction to revise CLAT-UG 2025 merit list

Indian Express

time30-04-2025

  • Politics
  • Indian Express

Supreme Court stays Delhi High Court direction to revise CLAT-UG 2025 merit list

The Supreme Court Wednesday stayed the Delhi High Court order asking the Consortium of National Law Universities to revise the marksheets, and republish the final list of selected candidates of CLAT-UG 2025 within four weeks. A bench of Justice B R Gavai and Justice A G Masih passed the interim order while issuing notice on a Special Leave Petition challenging the April 23 High Court order. The HC Division Bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and T R Gedela, had concluded that there were errors in B, C, and D set of question papers. It said, 'Since the error has occurred on the part of the respondent/Consortium itself, while publishing Sets 'B', 'C' & 'D' of question papers, no fault can be found with the candidates for giving or not giving correct or incorrect answers.'. 'In view of the fair admission by the learned senior counsel on behalf of the respondent/Consortium, we direct that all the candidates who participated in CLAT UG 2025 with respect to the Sets 'B', 'C' & 'D' of question papers shall, as a consequence, be granted the marks indicated against the said question. Since Set 'A' did not have this error, we do not deem it fit to interfere with the marks obtained by all those candidates who answered correctly,' added the High Court bench. A candidate who secured All India Rank 22 challenged this before the Supreme Court, saying that the High Court decision put the candidates who received the A Set Question Paper at a disadvantage when compared to the students who received the B, C and D sets, thereby robbing her of a level playing field.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store