Latest news with #Bulletinofthe
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 days ago
- Politics
- First Post
Why Iran's Fordow nuclear site that Israel wants to hit may be a big dilemma for Trump
As tensions rise between the US, Israel, and Iran, the GBU-57's real-world capability raises hard questions about whether Fordow is truly vulnerable read more Rescuers work at the site of a damaged building, in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Reuters While many people imagine a quick, clean military strike — like dropping one powerful bomb to destroy Iran's Fordow nuclear facility — the real situation is much more complicated. The idea of using the GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) to sounds like an easy fix, but in reality, it's full of risks, difficult decisions and serious political consequences. As Richard Nephew noted in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, even if a strike on Fordow worked, it would only be one part of the solution. It wouldn't be enough on its own to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Strategic significance of Fordow Fordow's relevance within Iran's nuclear architecture stems not just from its capability but from its resilience. Tucked beneath nearly 90 metres of mountainous rock near Qom, the facility houses thousands of centrifuges, including advanced IR-6s, capable of enriching uranium to weapons-grade purity within days. Its clandestine construction, revealed by US intelligence in 2009, and subsequent reactivation after the US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, demonstrates Iran's intent to maintain it as a strategic hedge. Nephew remarked that its very existence serves 'as a hedge and secure place' for clandestine weapons support. Fordow's protective depth and redundancy make it not merely a target but a symbol of Iran's nuclear endurance. The MOP: Tactical giant, strategic gamble The GBU-57A/B MOP represents the apex of US conventional bunker-busting capability. As described by the Air and Space Forces Magazine, it is a 30,000-pound bomb designed to burrow through over 60 metres of reinforced concrete or hard rock. This capability positions the MOP as a singular option for targeting hardened sites like Fordow. However, operational deployment remains limited; despite years of development since the early 2000s and several strategic deployments, no combat use of the MOP has ever been confirmed. The logistical requirements for deploying the MOP are severe. Only B-2 Spirit stealth bombers can carry it—each capable of delivering just two such munitions per sortie. These bombers must penetrate heavily defended Iranian airspace, likely relying on electronic warfare and support from refuelling and escort assets. Recent reports confirm the deployment of B-2s to Diego Garcia, with hints of operational readiness but no evidence of MOP usage in current or past campaigns in Yemen, Gaza or Syria. Operational uncertainties: A weapon without precedent Despite its engineering marvel, using the MOP against Fordow is an untested hypothesis. The exact depth and configuration of the facility remain classified, leaving open the possibility that even a successful detonation might not neutralise Iran's centrifuge operations. The use of a smart fuse with void-detection technology allows for timing detonation at optimal depth, yet as Nephew noted, damage assessment post-strike would be difficult—especially if Iran preemptively relocates sensitive equipment within the facility. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Fordow's compartmentalisation could mitigate the bomb's impact and any mission failing to destroy all centrifuge halls would leave Iran with a viable breakout capability. Moreover, the necessity of precise, real-time intelligence is paramount, given the potential for Iran to conceal, disperse or rapidly reinforce nuclear assets. Geopolitical risk: Striking Fordow is not just military The political ramifications of striking Fordow, particularly with the GBU-57, are manifold. A direct US military strike on Iranian soil would almost certainly provoke retaliatory actions—not only from Tehran but potentially from its network of regional proxies. Gulf states, Israel and US assets across West Asia could become targets in a broader escalation spiral. Internationally, such a move risks undermining fragile alliances and diplomacy. As the JCPOA showed, Iran's nuclear progress can be paused with negotiation. Yet, the Trump administration's prior exit from the deal—and subsequent hardline posture—illustrates a volatile political climate. Nephew warned that 'a diplomatic strategy…contained the threat in 2015.' With the current Israeli military actions and Washington's fluctuating commitment to diplomacy, a unilateral US strike may fracture NATO cohesion and alienate European allies advocating restraint. Political calculus: Trump, optics and the war decision The domestic political calculus in Washington—particularly under Trump's leadership—intertwines with strategic deliberations. Trump's abrupt exit from the June 2025 G7 summit, citing events 'bigger than a ceasefire,' has intensified speculation about impending military action. His rhetoric has leaned toward sabre-rattling with claims of control over Iranian airspace and veiled threats towards Iranian leadership. These remarks align with hawkish voices in his party, such as Senator Lindsey Graham, who advocate for the MOP's use as a means of crippling Iran's nuclear infrastructure. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, this approach risks alienating isolationist factions within his base and provoking bipartisan concern in Congress. Proposals to limit presidential authority in launching unapproved military campaigns reflect historical anxieties that strategic strikes may be misused for domestic political gain. Illusion of finality Even if the MOP were to destroy Fordow completely, the assumption that this would eliminate Iran's nuclear threat is overly optimistic. As Nephew emphasised, Fordow is not the only path to a bomb. Iran has dispersed its nuclear infrastructure, possibly building new, hidden sites and maintaining a reserve of centrifuges ready for rapid deployment. In fact, Tehran recently hinted at the unveiling of another 'invulnerable' enrichment facility, following the IAEA's findings of treaty noncompliance. Thus, the destruction of Fordow could represent a tactical victory but a strategic pause at best. Any delay could still allow Iran to resume its programme through alternate channels, particularly if the attack undermines future diplomacy or collapses monitoring agreements with the IAEA. Historical precedents and strategic lessons Past examples offer sobering lessons. In post-Gulf War Iraq, containment and inspections eventually faltered, despite extensive military pressure and diplomatic mechanisms. Similarly, Israel's past sabotage of Iran's Natanz plant—targeting its above-ground infrastructure—slowed progress temporarily but failed to halt the overall trajectory of the program. The potential use of the MOP, therefore, must be viewed through this historical lens. It is not merely an act of destruction, but a signal: one that could rally Iran's domestic support, justify nuclear acceleration and fracture international consensus. Strategy must precede firepower The notion that the GBU-57A/B MOP represents a silver bullet against Iran's nuclear ambitions is strategically seductive but fundamentally needs serious scrutiny. Fordow's destruction, while important, cannot guarantee the elimination of Iran's breakout capability. Worse still, such a strike risks severe geopolitical backlash, undermining the very stability it purports to protect. Nephew's analysis frames this reality succinctly. The destruction of Fordow is a 'necessary—but not sufficient' condition. Without a broader strategy — one that combines coercion with credible diplomacy — the use of the MOP may prove not only insufficient but counterproductive. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As tensions escalate, decision-makers must weigh the gravity of initiating a strike with such a singular and potent weapon — one that has never been used in combat — not as an act of cinematic heroism but of sober, calculated statecraft.
Yahoo
28-01-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Doomsday clock ticks one second, closest ever to midnight
The "doomsday clock" symbolizing how close humanity is to destruction ticked one second closer to midnight Tuesday as concerns on nuclear war, climate and public health were jolted by US President Donald Trump's return. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which set up the clock at the start of the Cold War, shifted the clock to 89 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been, a week after Trump's inauguration. The clock was last moved to 90 seconds to midnight over nuclear-armed Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It was originally placed at seven minutes to midnight in 1947. "At 89 seconds to midnight, the doomsday clock stands closer to catastrophe than at any moment in its history," said former Colombian president and Nobel Peace laureate Juan Manuel Santos, chair of The Elders, a group of major former leaders. "The clock speaks to the existential threats that confront us and the need for unity and bold leadership to turn back its hands," he told a news conference in Washington to present the findings from the board of experts. "This is a bleak picture. But it is not yet irreversible," he said. Just days into his second presidency, Trump has already shattered norms on international cooperation. Santos welcomed Trump's pledges for diplomacy with Russia and China. Trump has vowed to end the Ukraine war, which has raised fears of Russian use of nuclear weapons, by pressing both sides. But Santos said that the US withdrawal from the Paris climate accord and World Health Organization set back the planet on two top risks. The world just experienced another record-breaking year of high temperatures and major disasters. Other countries could soon say that if the United States, the world's largest economy, "is not going to make an effort to limit the carbon emissions, why should I?" Santos said. And with many people's memories fading of Covid-19, "we have to remind them what happened -- and what will happen will be worse, according to all the scientists," Santos said. - Threats, and benefits, from AI - Suzet McKinney, a public health expert on the board of Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, said the risks of infectious disease was confounded by advances in artificial intelligence, which increase the risks that rogue actors could unleash biological weapons. "As nation-states around the world and even our own government engage in practices that are sure to encourage rogue behavior and/or cripple our ability to curb the spread of infectious diseases, novel or otherwise, we cannot hide our heads in the sand," she told the news conference. But Robert Socolow, a physicist who also serves on the board, said that the unveiling of Chinese intelligence firm DeepSeek -- which has rattled the United States -- could ultimately also pay dividends by reducing energy demand from the fast-growing field of AI. The Chinese breakthrough may mirror "the kind of progress in semiconductor chips that reduce the energy demands of ordinary computing" in the analogue era. But the experts also warned that artificial intelligence risked worsening disinformation. "All of these dangers are greatly exacerbated by a potent threat multiplier -- the spread of misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theories that degrade the communication ecosystem and increasingly blur the line between truth and falsehood," said Daniel Holz, chair of the board. sct/st
Yahoo
28-01-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Doomsday clock ticks one second, closest ever to midnight
The "doomsday clock" symbolizing how close humanity is to destruction ticked one second closer to midnight Tuesday as concerns on nuclear war, climate and public health were jolted by US President Donald Trump's return. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which set up the clock at the start of the Cold War, shifted the clock to 89 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been, a week after Trump's inauguration. The clock was last moved to 90 seconds to midnight over nuclear-armed Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It was originally placed at seven minutes to midnight in 1947. "At 89 seconds to midnight, the doomsday clock stands closer to catastrophe than at any moment in its history," said former Colombian president and Nobel Peace laureate Juan Manuel Santos, chair of The Elders, a group of major former leaders. "The clock speaks to the existential threats that confront us and the need for unity and bold leadership to turn back its hands," he told a news conference in Washington to present the findings from the board of experts. "This is a bleak picture. But it is not yet irreversible," he said. Just days into his second presidency, Trump has already shattered norms on international cooperation. Santos welcomed Trump's pledges for diplomacy with Russia and China. Trump has vowed to end the Ukraine war, which has raised fears of Russian use of nuclear weapons, by pressing both sides. But Santos said that the US withdrawal from the Paris climate accord and World Health Organization set back the planet on two top risks. The world just experienced another record-breaking year of high temperatures and major disasters. Other countries could soon say that if the United States, the world's largest economy, "is not going to make an effort to limit the carbon emissions, why should I?" Santos said. And with many people's memories fading of Covid-19, "we have to remind them what happened -- and what will happen will be worse, according to all the scientists," Santos said. - Threats, and benefits, from AI - Suzet McKinney, a public health expert on the board of Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, said the risks of infectious disease was confounded by advances in artificial intelligence, which increase the risks that rogue actors could unleash biological weapons. "As nation-states around the world and even our own government engage in practices that are sure to encourage rogue behavior and/or cripple our ability to curb the spread of infectious diseases, novel or otherwise, we cannot hide our heads in the sand," she told the news conference. But Robert Socolow, a physicist who also serves on the board, said that the unveiling of Chinese intelligence firm DeepSeek -- which has rattled the United States -- could ultimately also pay dividends by reducing energy demand from the fast-growing field of AI. The Chinese breakthrough may mirror "the kind of progress in semiconductor chips that reduce the energy demands of ordinary computing" in the analogue era. But the experts also warned that artificial intelligence risked worsening disinformation. "All of these dangers are greatly exacerbated by a potent threat multiplier -- the spread of misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theories that degrade the communication ecosystem and increasingly blur the line between truth and falsehood," said Daniel Holz, chair of the board. sct/st
