Latest news with #AuthorisedProfessionalPractice
Evening Standard
3 days ago
- Evening Standard
Police officer who followed BMW before fatal crash denies he was pursuing car
According to Authorised Professional Practice guidance for police forces, the definition of a pursuit is when a car or motorcycle, by their actions or their continuance of their manner of driving, refuses to stop and that the police driver believes the subject vehicle driver is aware of a requirement to stop and the police driver continues to drive behind the vehicle to report its progress or to stop it.
ITV News
6 days ago
- ITV News
Officer involved in strip search of Child Q says search 'should have never happened'
One of the police officers involved in the in the strip search of a child while on her period, has told a misconduct hearing that search "should have never happened" and that she is "very sorry for the distressed caused." Speaking at the hearing on Monday 16 June, PC Wray, was questioned about the training she had received in regards to police searches. She told the panel that she had received training on police stop and search. Though this included how to conduct a strip search, this itself was not practical. During this line of questioning it was revealed that PC Wray had never completed her Search Powers and Procedures Course, which covers the legal framework for police searches. When asked why this course hadn't been completed, PC Wray told the panel: 'I was never made aware that I missed that course'. She went on to tell the panel that she'd never received any training on what to do if someone you are searching is menstruating - as was the case for Child Q. PC Wray also told the panel that there was no training on how to minimise the embarrassment nor was she provided any training on how to search children. Concluding her response to training, PC Wray told the panel that prior to searching Child Q, she had not familiarised herself on how stop and search policies had changed; nor had she read the full guidance laid out in the Authorised Professional Practice - which is the official professional practice for policing. The hearing heard that on the day of Child Q's search, PC Wray was on shift at a response officer when she received a radio call for a 'female officer to assist with a search'. PC Wray told the hearing that she understood that to mean a strip search was going to be taking place. Prior to this, she had never attended a school but had carried out two strip searches - both of which were in a custody cell, none of which involved a child. She arrived at Child Q's school at around 11am and was taken to the room where the child was. PC Wray told the panel that she believed this to be a 'very serious incident' and that she had smelt cannabis when she entered the school's medical room. One of the requirements for a strip search is authorisation from a officer with the rank of sergeant or higher. However, the hearing today heard no such authorisation was given for the search of Child Q. PC Wray accepted that she should've checked if the search was authorised and believed that it had been authorised prior to her arrival. When asked about Child Q's behaviour prior to the removal of her clothes, she said the student appeared 'completely calm' and 'answered all the questions directed at her.' Rules also require an appropriate adult to be present during this kind of search - this was not the case for Child Q's Wray said that she assumed Child Q's PE teacher was the designated appropriate adult - even though she was not in the room while the search was taking place. PC Wray's evidence was followed by a series of apologies. She told the panel that the strip search of Child Q "should have never happened" and that "she should have spoken to a sergeant", and "phoned Child Q's mother". She said she never intended the for the search to be "degrading" or "humiliating". With tears in her eyes she said unconscious bias played no part in her decision to proceed with the search of Child Q. When asked why no notes or records were made about her involvement in the search, she told the panel that she 'didn't know' she had to make a record of it in her pocket book - despite Metropolitan Police policy requiring a contemporaneous record being made in the event of a strip search. PC Wray marks the last witness in this case. The panel will now decide whether she and her other colleagues involved in the search - detective constable Kristina Linge, PC Victoria Wray and PC Rafal Szmydynski - committed gross misconduct and whether they should remain officers in the Metropolitan Police Service.
