Latest news with #125thUSOpen
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
NCAA settles: Big payday for college athletes
From Warner Bros. Discovery's (WBD) corporate shake-up to the high-stakes US Open Golf Championship and even actor Ryan Reynolds' continued big bets on global sports, the financial plays shaping the sports business are ones to watch. This week on Yahoo Finance Sports Report, host Joe Pompliano takes a look at some of this week's biggest headlines in the sports business world that you and your portfolio need to know. Plus, Sportico Legal Analyst and Senior Sports Legal Reporter Michael McCann stops by the show to break down everything you need to know about the House vs. NCAA settlement. Yahoo Finance Sports Report with Joe Pompliano, a vodcast brought to you by Yahoo Finance and Yahoo Sports, looks beyond the latest sports business headlines and analyzes all the need-to-know news—the teams, trades, and billion-dollar deals—so you and your portfolio will win BIG. Yahoo Finance Sports Report is developed and produced by Lauren Pokedoff. Welcome to Yahoo Finance Sports Report, a unique look at the business of sports brought to you by Yahoo Finance and Yahoo Sports. I'm your host, Joe Pompeiano, and I'm here to coach you through the financial game. Today, we've got Sportico legal analyst and senior sports legal reporter Michael McCann joining us to break down the House NCAA settlement and so much more. Let's huddle up and get right into are kicking off this week with Pop's Playbook. Why take a look at some of the biggest headlines in sports that you and your portfolio need to know. First up, Warner Brothers Discovery announced earlier this week that it will split into two separate public companies by 2026. 1 company will be a streaming and studios business that will house WBD's film and TV properties and its streaming service HBO Max, and the other be a global networks brand that will include TNT Sports, Bleacher Report, and multiple other networks. Now, this book will impact the distribution of WBD sports rights in the US as TNT Sports major events are often available to stream on HBO Max. In a call with Wall Street analysts on Monday, WBD CFO said, quote, The US sports rights will reside at global networks, and itManagement team will determine the streaming and digital rights over time, end quote. But WWE's statement still leaves a few questions. Will TNT sports events continue streaming on HBO Max once WBD splits, or will the new global networks company look to sell the streaming rights for TNT sports events to a different partner? We'll see how the details shake out when WBD completes its split next up, the 125th US Open takes place this weekend at Oakmont Country Club outside of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and will have significant economic implications. Founded in 1903, Oakmont Country Club is one of the most historic venues in golf and will host the US Open for a record weekend. However, Oakmont is also one of the most exclusive clubs in the country, with a reported $200,000 initiation fee and $10,000 annual dues for its members. Big money will also be on the line for the 156 golfers competing at this year's US Open. The prize pool for the 2024 US Open at Pinehurst number 2 was worth $21.5 million with champion Bryson DeShambe earning $4.3 million for his second major the event will be a major economic driver for the Pittsburgh area. 200,000 people are expected to attend the US Open at Oakmont, and the United States Golf Association estimates that the event will have a $200 million economic impact on the local economy through direct and indirect spending. To finish out, Wrexham AFC, the Welsh soccer club owned by actors Rob McElaney and Ryan Reynolds, is looking to sell a minority stake in the team at a $475 according to Bloomberg. Wrexham, which was recently promoted to the EFL championship, is reportedly seeking to raise funds so it can upgrade its roster and be a real competitor in its new league, which sits just one tier below the top flight English Premier League. Bloomberg also noted that Wrexham seeks additional capital to fund the construction of a new 7000 seat stand, which will increase the capacity of its home stadium to over 18,000 talks to sell a minority stake in the club are reportedly still in the early stages, and Wrexham hasn't yet found a new investor. But if the club can sell a stake at a $475 million valuation, the sale would represent a 19,000% increase in value from the $2.5 million that McElaney and Reynolds paid for Wrexham in 2021. I'll also have an update on another sports investment from Ryan Reynolds here in a few week for the deeper dive, where I give you a play by play analysis of news in the sports world and its significance to your bottom line, we're talking about the rise of Sail GP. Now, last weekend I was in New York City watching 12 50-foot catamarans race each other in front of the Statue of Liberty for Sail GP, the fastest growing sports league you've never heard of. Sail GP was founded by billionaire Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, and America' legend Sir Russell Coots in 2018 to bring sailing out of the yacht club and into the mainstream. And even though the league is in just its fifth season, Sail GP has already built a thriving business model. Now think of Sail GP as the Formula One of sailing. There are 12 nation-based teams that compete in 13 Grand Prix events around the world, featuring several 15 minute sprint style races each weekend. TheseTeams compete for millions of dollars in prize money, with the season-long champion taking home a $2 million prize alone. However, unlike Formula One, where teams with the most resources regularly win races by building the fastest courses, every sail GB team uses the same 50-foot catamaran. These sailboats reach top speeds of 60 MPH and are powered by 78-foot wing sails, turning each race into an even GP is also one of the most innovative TV products in sports, with augmented reality overlays that track the speed and distance of each boat, and drones and chase boats supplying incredible footage with 4K stabilized cameras. The league is broadcast in over 200 countries and territories worldwide, has a broadcast agreement with CBS Sports in the US, and drew 1.78 million viewers for last year's race in Spain on CBS. Now, while Sal GP's TV and in-person products are outstanding, its is even more fascinating. In just 7 years, CellGB has expanded from 6 teams completely owned by the league to 12 teams and has gone from 5 races to 13 races today. 10 of the league's 12 teams are now privately owned, with teams selling for $50 million or more to investor groups that include celebrity owners like soccer superstar Kean Mbappe, actress Anne Hathaway, and entrepreneur Gary Vaynerchuk. And just last week, actors Hugh Jackman and Ryan Reynolds became co-owners of the Australian LGB Sale GP is expected to generate more than $100 million in revenue for 2025 through a diverse set of revenue streams. The league commands six-figure host fees from cities to host Sale GP events, with Auckland, New Zealand paying over $1 million to host the Grand Prix in January of this past year. And Sale millions each year from sponsors, including high-end luxury brands like Rolex, Emirates, and Accora Hotels. Now, Sale GP still has a long way to go if it wants to match Formula One's global appeal and commercial success, but don't count them out and keep an eye on their growth in the coming years because this once niche sport might just be the next big made it to the one on one, a conversation where I get to break down news and sports with the key player in the industry. This week, we're talking to Sportico's senior sports legal reporter, Michael McCann, about the recent NCAA versus House settlement, which will pave the way for universities and colleges to directly pay their student athletes starting this year. Michael, thank you so much for joining the show today. I want to start right there. I mean, there's plenty that we could talk about with the settlement, but if you could just do a quick explainer for people who may not know exactly what happened. Yeah, so last Friday, Judge Wilkin, the judge in the case, approved the settlement. The settlement is a game changer. It will have a couple big pieces to it. One is that athletes who played over the last eight years, Division One athletes will be paid over 10 years, about $2.8 billion. Now, most of that money is gonna go to football, it's not equally distributed, but it basically compensates athletes for NIL deals they could have gotten money for broadcast, video games that were never there's a remedy portion to the settlement in terms of damages. That's not as controversial as the other piece. The other piece that's really gonna change college sports noticeably will be the injunctive relief, and specifically,Colleges going forward can opt into a system where they can share revenue with athletes. This is totally new, right? All the years of amateurism, that's gone. Colleges and those in the power conferences will do it, others probably will not, but they can pay players a share of revenue up to what amounts to $20.5 million total. Now, schools that give most of that money to men could run afoul of Title IX, wouldn't surprise me to IX litigation. The other piece to this is that there are no more limits on scholarships, so every athlete could conceivably get a full ride, which is great for the athletes, and there are now a roster limits, so the roster sizes in some cases will be a little bit smaller. College football teams are traditionally about 120, now they're going to be 105, so some walk on athletes are gonna lose the spot that they would have other piece is NIL review. So deals that are in excess of $600 will be subject to neutral review. NILO will be a new service that will basically try to figure out if the deals are in fact reflecting fair market value. If not, the athlete can dispute that in there's a lot going on. If you're a college athlete, here's the thing, you now can get NIL deals plus a full ride plus a share of revenue. So, so for this is why we're seeing athletes now sue to stay in school, right? Traditionally people want to leave school and go to turn pro. Now people want to stick around. Yeah, so Michael, my first question off of that, and I have plenty, is how do collectives fit into this, right? Because I think people over the last number of years have heard a lot about collectives, and the traditional college football fan especially probably views collectives as this organization that is essentially funneling money from boosters to athletes their school. Now some of these collectives are a little bit more legitimate where they're actually sourcing and sort of acting as an agency, but now that the school can pay you directly and those collective kind of like boosters deals are taken out of it because they have to be legitimate NIL deals, where does that leave the collective industry today? Yeah, you hit it, Joe. So the work that collectives were doing is now essentially shifting to the schools and athletic departments. Some of these collectives will be folded into athletic departments. Some of the people might be brought into the athletic departments, we'll we'll have to see on that. So the collectives now, as you say, could still do NIL deals, but they'll be subject to this review process. They can't be paid for play, so that's now what they could do is marketing, they could do, uh, perhaps brand development. I mean, there are a lot of folks with in collectives that are really talented at business dealings, they may be able to provide some assistance, but their role will probably shrink being honest about it. Now, there may be some collectives that still do what you said, that they still try to funnel money in, and, you know, this will, this will be a good test of how the enforcement process we could certainly see a scenario where NIL collectors, even if they're not operating as a collective, they're just operating more in the traditional what we grew up with sort of money going to athletes uh under the table. I, I don't know if that's gonna happen, but we'll have to see. So how are schools actually gonna be paying this money, right? Where is it gonna be coming from? Because if you think about the big conferences, the SEC, Big 10, whatever, ACC, those schools can afford it based on the money that they're getting from the conferences every year from media rights, but there's a bunch of smaller conferences sort of on the longer tail, that maybe can't afford $20.5 million especially just for a football team. How are schools thinking about funding this and how many schools do you think will actually reach that limit? Yeah, I, I think many will opt in but not go to 20.5 million, and Joe, you're hitting at a real set of problems for colleges right now, cause it's not just this, it's not just coming up with 20.5 million or whatever fraction of that. It's also the fact thatThe population pool is going down for colleges over the next several years, there's the enrollment cliff hitting universities where there will be fewer US aged kids that will be applying to college, so there's going to be more competition for students, meaning more uh scholarships and other ways of trying to entice students to go. And then there's the fact that grants are being cut off, right? We know the federal government uh disposition is now to be more scrutinizing of grants or just cutting them also, if it's a more difficult entry point for international students who tend to be full tuition payers, they're having more difficulty now under the current administration. So there's a lot of pressure points hitting schools. What are they gonna do to come up with this money? They're gonna, I, I, you know, we'll see what it would be raising student activity fees. I know that's unpopular, but colleges sometimes do that as a way of making money. They may have to, what does that exactly mean? What, what, what do you mean by student activity fee? It means if you and I are classmates at a college and we're paying $38,000 now we get a fee tacked on that used to be $600 and is now $1200 and our parents complained to us saying, why are we spending all this money, you better be studying, right? So it's that fee, it's that, it's that fee that goes on the student, that's one possibility and restructuring.I mean, this is gonna happen regardless of 20.5 million. We're gonna see with lower enrollment, colleges, I think, go into serious restructuring where they need to maybe cut some departments, maybe even cut schools. I, we don't want to see that happen, but there there are certain realities kicking in. Yeah, it's sort of a difficult situation because if you look at the schools that are successful, like really successful in football, even schools that just have a lot of attention around them, like in Colorado or in Alabama, of course, or schools like that, the football program, uh, drives a lot of money for the school from enrollment and all that kind of thing, especially with out of state students that are charged more money. All right, everyone, we've got to take a quick break, but we'll be back with more of my conversation with Michael McCann after back to Yahoo Finance Sports Report. I'm your host Joe Pompriano. I'm here with Sportico legal analysts and senior sports legal reporter, Michael McCann. I'm curious how you think about new revenue opportunities, right? Like, uh, I think it was last year, or maybe even 2 years ago at this point, we saw Tennessee implement the, uh, the tax on tickets, basically saying that this money was going to be used to fund NIL a lot of the fans actually seemed quite OK with it, right? Like if you're paying a tax, at least you know what it's going for. A lot of them are probably donating to NIL collectives anyways, at least in a smaller amount. So a 5% tax or whatever it ends up being on the ticket, uh, wasn't a deal breaker for them. But I'm curious if you think we'll see either more schools implement that or any other ideas that you've heard that they might be be implementing as well. Yeah, I mean, you're right, the tax was surprisingly not, I didn't receive a hostile reaction, at least from what we could tell. I, I do worry that that that model may be unpopular, or if we see it play out at other schools, the idea of paying a tax, I could see some objections to now, maybe it doesn't matter, maybe the sports are so popular thatThey can just raise fees. Uh, you know, other ideas, I think better media rights deals is part of it, right? How, how is college sports being monetized in terms of not just TV but streaming? Are there avenues left unturned? Are there opportunities for really better negotiations and, you know, we're seeing now general managers hired by schools. Part of that, part of their job is gonna be coming up with ways of expanding the revenue we're gonna see some business folks brought in, uh, as you know, athletic departments have traditionally been run by, uh, you know, people like me, lawyers or compliance folks, and now I think we're seeing some more business people brought in that may have creative ideas, particularly with licensing, particularly with with monetizing intellectual property rights, there's all sorts of ways, stones that maybe there's low hanging fruit as well, but there are certainly stones that haven't been all turned. Yeah, we may be getting the NFL model where there's select games on Netflix and Peacock for the SEC and other conferences like that. Um, but Michael, I would love to hear just your thoughts on how sustainable the $20.5 million dollar number is, right? Like, are we gonna go substantially higher than that, or do you think it'll stay sort of there for a while? It's projected to grow gradually about 10 to $12 million over the next 10 years, and it's based on a formula. It's based on a formula that the settlement has. So, I mean it could grow, right? It could grow if revenues go way up. And if, and if it turns out that college sports is worth a lot more than it's generating, which some people believe, some people believe that that college sports should know, if, if they had the, the insights of the NFL, they would be able to generate more revenue. Maybe that's true. But I think the expectation is that it will be a fairly slow growth of that figure, which is also interesting because think about it, that's 20.5 million for everyone in the athletic department, right? I mean, there are a lot of, a lot of athletes in that department. Does the quarterback say, I, I want 5 million andYou know, or does a school say, let's put all of our eggs in the best running back. Let's go all out for a running game. Or maybe a school says, we want, we want basketball to be our focus. We think we can put together a great team, forget the football team. We know we're not great at that. We're gonna put together the best basketball team, and we're gonna use that 20.5 million on that. There are all these really interesting permutations that it that it seems like pro sports, right? This sort of sounds like uh pro sports. Yeah, it's sort of an interesting look at it because it's almost like Moneyball, right, where you're trying to find where you get the best return on your investment, whether that's specific players or whether that to your point with the basketball, uh, analogy there, whether that's an entirely different team where you're competing kind of as a bigger fish and smaller pond. It'll be really interesting to see and, and again, to your point, uh, it's part of the a lot of these schools are hiring GMs and capologists and different things like that. But I, I would love to just double click on one thing you mentioned earlier in this conversation, which was some of the, uh, alternative sports teams, some of the Olympic sports, some of the non-revenue generating sports, and just get your feedback and insight on on how those uh teams might be uh impacted by the settlement. Yeah, I mean may expect that they will be adversely impacted by the settlement, that the settlement will funnel more money towards the revenue generating sports. Now, let's remember, most colleges are not going to opt into the system. So in a lot of schools, the world's not changing. The Ivy League is not changing. They're keeping the same model. They're not paying players. So, you know, in a way at the top schools, it's possible that some sports, particularly the Olympic sports, particularly the sports that are played by Title 9 remains, remains an important law that will ensure that there are equal opportunities for women athletes. Uh, that, that may make it harder to say cut a women's team than, uh, depending upon which men's team we're talking about to bring a number of roster spots. So yeah, I mean, I, I, I think the expectation is that the money will, I mean, it's already mostly for certain sports, but I think that effect will be amplified. Yeah, it's sort of an unfortunate situation because if you're looking at a team that, you know, spends $2 million a year on salaries and expenses and other things like that, that's $2 million that could go towards this for the football team that's bringing in a lot of academics and things like that from a monetary standpoint, it certainly makes sense. Um, the, the last thing I want to touch on there is just the NIL go portion, right? You mentioned earlier that deals that are legitimate NIL deals, the Doctor Peppers of the world and other businesses like have to go through and get approved by NILO. Where do you think the line is drawn on this? So like, first off, who's actually enforcing this? And then second off, like, where is that line gonna be drawn between what's legitimate and what isn't? Because as we know in college sports, there's, you know, car dealerships in the hometown that uh are sort of legitimate, but also sort of not legitimate. Yeah, so Deloitte is the key player in this arrangement. They're gonna be running NILO with the College Sports Commission. They're gonna have authority. So what is, what is fair market value? Some would say fair market value is whatever the market will pay you, right? So if that car dealer wants to offer you, Joe, $2 million you're worth 2 million. I mean that that that's a not illegitimate that, that argument though is not one the NCAA would embrace. The NCAA would say, well, that money is really going to Joe because we want Joe to come to our school. He, his actual value in terms of his image, his likeness, uh, that's not nearly worth that much. What we're really paying him is because Joe's this great football player that we want in our school. So this new entity will look at data points. They'll look at, for instance, what other athletes in the same get an endorsement deal, and that car dealership, well, what have they paid in the past for endorsement deals? If they pay 10,000 bucks and they're on local TV and then suddenly they're offering you $2 million that that's gonna raise some questions about the legitimacy of that transaction. And the smart thing that they did with this settlement is they have that is, that cannot be stressed more. Yeah, it sounds like we're gonna have a lot less legitimate NIL deals whether people aren't just gonna want to file them in time or whether they're gonna get denied, it could be either, but uh certainly seems like there will be less. But thank you so much for joining us today, Michael. I learned a lot and I'm sure everyone else did too. Thanks, Gerald. Appreciate it. The clock is winding down here, but we have just enough time for some final buzz. So let's talk about the trading card market for Oklahoma City Thunder superstar Shai Gillis NBA finals are in full swing, with Game 4 between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers taking place tomorrow night at Game Bridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. And while there has been plenty of action to discuss on the court, one player in the finals is dominating the collectibles market off the court. According to data shared at Yahoo by professional sports authenticator, Oklahoma City Thunder superstar Shai Gillis Alexander is the in this year's NBA Finals. Now, it's not necessarily a surprise that the 26-year-old guard is popular among collectors. The Thunder have a chance to win their first ever NBA championship after a historic 68 win season. And SGA won his first NBA MVP award last month with 71 out of 101st place votes. But SGA isn't just PSA's most collected NBA Finals He's the most collected player by a wide margin. PSA's top three most collected 2025 NBA Finals players include SGA at #1, his Thunder teammate Chet Holmgren at #2, and Pacers superstar guard Tyrese Halliburton at #3. However, PSA's data says that SGA has nearly doubled the cards graded than any other 2025 NBA Finals player this what's even crazier is that SGA alone has 2 times the number of cards greater than the entire Indiana Pacers roster combined. Now, this NBA final series is far from over. If Tyrese Halbburn keeps making buzzer beaters and the Pacers pull off a championship upset, Halliburton could skyrocket his value among card collectors. But as of right now, there's a huge gap between SGA and every other NBA Finals player, and that gap could become even bigger if he adds an NBA championship to his resume this all out of time, so it's officially game over for this week. Thank you so much to Michael and for all of you for joining us. Please make sure to scan the QR code below to follow Yahoo Finance podcast for more videos and expert insights and catch us every Thursday wherever you get your podcasts. I'm your host, Joe Pompeliano. See you next time. This content was not intended to be financial advice and should not be used as a substitute for professional financial services.
Scotsman
6 days ago
- Sport
- Scotsman
'I just want to win majors now': Bob MacIntyre opens up on close call in US Open
Scot says reaction to J.J. Spaun holing huge winning putt at Oakmont was his way of saying 'fair play' Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Bob MacIntyre believes there is 'no reason' why he can't become a major champion after being on the verge of winning the 125th US Open until J.J. Spaun produced a brilliant birdie-birdie finish at Oakmont Country Club in Pennsylvania. In an interview with The Scotsman after a dramatic conclusion to the season's third major, the Oban man also opened up on his classy act of sportsmanship as he applauded Spaun's title-winning putt across the final green and spoke as well about how he is determined to play in 'every Ryder Cup from now until I retire'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After a sensational weekend performance, posting rounds of 69 and 68 on a brutal course on the outskirts of Pittsburgh, MacIntyre posted the clubhouse target as he finished with a one-over-par total and, as Sam Burns, Adam Scott, Viktor Hovland and Tyrrell Hatton all faltered down the stretch, it looked as though that might have been good enough to get his hands on the trophy. It took something special from Spaun to deny the 28-year-old as the American set up a birdie at the par-4 17th by driving the green then finished with a birdie as well when a three-putt could easily have been on the cards from around 65 feet and resulted in a two-hole play-off. Bob MacIntyre reacts to holing a birdie putt on the 15th hole in the final round the 125th US Open at Oakmont Country Club |'Aye, it does,' replied MacIntyre, who picked up a whopping cheque for $2.3 million and also climbed to a career-best 12th in the Official World Golf Ranking, in reply to being asked if this excellent effort had given him the belief that he can go on and win a major. 'That's the toughest test I've ever encountered on a golf course. That's as hard as it gets. Obviously finishing sixth in The Open at Royal Portrush (in 2019) was my best finish, but it was a back-door effort, so to speak, due to the weather and stuff. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'But this was different. There's no reason why I can't win a major championship in my career and that's my goal now. I said I wanted to win the Scottish Open and I got that. I thought I had this one, to be honest with you, but, yeah, I just want to win majors now.' Spaun's big breakthrough came after he feared his career was heading nowhere this time last year before showing what he was capable of when almost winning The Players Championship at TPC Sawgrass in March, losing out in a play-off to Rory McIlroy. MacIntyre watched on television in the recorder's area as Spaun emerged as the winner on this occasion and his reaction to the 34-year-old Californian sealing the victory in style - he applauded vigorously and shouted 'wow' - has been widely praised. American J.J. Spaun shows off the trophy after landing his maiden major win in dramatic style in Pennsylvania |'Aye, it was just one of those ones where you want to see someone winning it (in style),' he admitted. 'I mean, I got to win the Scottish Open last year the way I did with the big celebration. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Look, if I'd won this one it was going to be unbelievable - it would have been something special. But to see a guy hole a putt like that to win after his heartbreak in The Players, I take my hat off to him - fair play!' MacIntyre, who will defend his Genesis Scottish Open title at The Renaissance Club next month, is now looking forward even more to heading back to Royal Portrush for the season's final major after making his mark on his debut in the game's marquee events at the County Antrim venue six years ago. 'It is satisfying to think about that,' he said of what he's achieved in the game since then, including a double triumph on the PGA Tour last year and playing on a winning Ryder Cup team in Rome in 2023, 'and I can't wait to go back to somewhere I love and enjoy playing as much as I do when it comes to Portrush. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'So much has happened for me in the last year and I keep saying that I don't know when I am going to be able to sit down and actually think about what we have achieved in the last year. Bob MacIntyre reacts with caddie Mike Burrow at the end of the final round at Oakmont Country Club |'It keeps coming and keeps coming and keeps coming. But it's not from the lack of effort. Look, I've put a lot of work into this. It's not just happening through luck. I've built a team around me that I think are the best I can get and they can support me. People that are known and people that are still unknown. I trust every one of them pretty much with my life. 'I mean, this is my job and this is my life, but it's all about trust. I trust them and they obviously trust me to go out there and try to deliver, as I almost did on this occasion.' Since suffering a disappointing early exit in The Masters in April, the left-hander has made eight cuts in a row, including a confidence-boosting top-ten finish in the Charles Schwab Challenge after adding that to his schedule instead of taking a week off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On the back of getting himself in the major mix, he has climbed to fourth behind McIlroy, Hatton and Shane Lowry on Europe's Ryder Cup points list and now looks in a great position to secure either an automatic spot or a captain's pick. 'I was going to take a week off and not play Colonial (venue for the Charles Schwab Challenge),' he reflected, 'but my game has been feeling good and I believed that a result was coming so we decided to play Colonial, which was good. I had Mikey Thomson on the bag for that and we got a top ten there. 'I am starting to see things happening with my game - driver, putter, everything. I feel things coming and just have to keep going and keep going until I get that result. 'This is my sixth week in a row. If you are planning a schedule, you probably wouldn't do six weeks, never mind going to a seventh this week (in the Travelers Championship in Connecticut). But I make big calls and I trust what I do. I just felt that was the right thing and we've built some good momentum and then a result like this comes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After making his Ryder Cup debut in 2023 in Rome, Bob MacIntyre is now in a strong position to be involved again for Europe at Bethpage Black in September | Getty Images 'As far as the Ryder Cup is concerned, that's where I want to be. I want to play every Ryder Cup from now until the day I retire and this is a massive step for that to happen this year.' After finding it difficult to adjust to life on the PGA Tour in his rookie season last year, MacIntyre has learned to cope with it a bit better so far this season, though he is ready to get back to Oban for a bit once he's done and dusted at the Travelers Championship.
Scotsman
7 days ago
- Sport
- Scotsman
Bob MacIntyre's $2.3m US Open pay day plus huge Ryder Cup boost
Scot's second-place finish at Oakmont takes PGA Tour career earnings to close to $13m Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Bob MacIntyre had lots of reasons to be pleased with himself at the end of the 125th US Open despite being pipped for the second time in his career by a brilliant birdie-birdie finish. As had been the case when he was denied by Rory McIlroy in the 2023 Genesis Scottish Open at The Renaissance Club, the Oban man had to settle for second place at Oakmont Country Club in Pennsylvania after American J.J. Spaun came up with something special at the last two holes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It was a classy reaction from MacIntyre, who was watching on TV to see if he'd done enough to perhaps get into a play-off, as he applauded after Spaun had clinched victory by holing a monster birdie putt on the 72nd green. Bob MacIntyre and his caddie Mike Burrow react at the end of the fina round in the 125th US Open at Oakmont Country Club |Though it wasn't to be for the Scot on this occasion, he headed away from the season's third major with a huge spring in his step for a variety of reasons. For starters, he picked up a cheque for a whopping $2.322 million - the biggest prize of his career - to take his season's earnings alone on the PGA Tour to just under $5 million. In just 70 events on the US circuit, he's now won $12.865 million. In addition, his performance in Pittsburgh lifted him from 46th to 17th in the FedEx Cup Standings, meaning he's on course for the season-ending Tour Championship for the second year in a row. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He's also up to a career-best 12th, having climbed eight spots in the Official World Golf Ranking, and another strong performance in this week's Travelers Championship in Connecticut could see him defend his Genesis Scottish Open title next month as a top-ten player for the first time. On top of all that, MacIntyre has also handed himself a massive boost in his bid to be on Luke Donald's side for Europe's Ryder Cup defence at Bethpage Black in New York in September. On the back of a good run of form in recent weeks, he'd climbed into the top 12 in the points table and now's he up to fourth behind Rory McIlroy, Tyrrell Hatton and Shane Lowry. Scot now in automatic Ryder Cup spot for Bethpage Black The top six will secure automatic spots and that will be his target again after making the team for the 2023 match in Rome, though the left-hander has a much better chance this time around of earning a captain's pick if that was required. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sepp Straka and Rasmus Hojgaard are the other players currently in the automatic berths, with Tommy Fleetwood and Ludvig Aberg next on the list.
The Sun
7 days ago
- Climate
- The Sun
US Open resumes with Burns leading at rain-soaked Oakmont
AMERICAN Sam Burns clung to a one-stroke lead over Australia's Adam Scott as Sunday's final round of the 125th US Open resumed following a storm delay at Oakmont. Burns, seeking his first major title, was on two-under par and Scott, the 2013 Masters winner, was on one-under par for the tournament through seven holes when play was halted for dangerous weather. Play was stopped at 4:01 p.m. (2001 GMT) and resumed at 5:37 p.m. after a delay of 96 minutes. Course workers used squeegees to brush standing water off greens and fairways in a bid to keep the course playable as well as stop water from trickling into bunkers. Burns and Scott were each two-over on their round at the eighth tee when play was stopped. England's Tyrrell Hatton and Norway's Viktor Hovland shared third on one-over with Mexico's Carlos Ortiz and American J.J. Spaun sharing fifth on two-over. With 11 holes remaining for the leaders in the final pairing, they were racing sunset to try and decide a winner without going to a Monday finish. In US Open history, there have been two Monday finishes caused by storms and not a playoff -- 2009 at Bethpage Black when Lucas Glover won and 1983 when Larry Nelson won at Oakmont.
Straits Times
7 days ago
- Sport
- Straits Times
J.J. Spaun wins rainy US Open for first major title
J.J. Spaun reacts after making a birdie putt on the 18th hole to win the US Open. PHOTO: EPA-EFE J.J. Spaun celebrates with his family and the championship trophy after winning the 125th US Open. PHOTO: IMAGN IMAGES OAKMONT, Pennsylvania - During a less-than-fruitful 2024 season, J.J. Spaun wondered if he should call it a career if he failed to keep his PGA Tour card. He could have called it a week on June 15 when he bogeyed five of his first six holes at the US Open, dropping behind several more accomplished golfers on the leaderboard before a 96-minute weather delay. In both cases, Spaun rejected the idea of quitting. Then, amid a Pittsburgh summer storm, came the lightning strike. Spaun sank an improbable 64 1/2-foot birdie putt at the 18th hole to cap his stunning first major victory, emerging from the pack in the wild, waterlogged final round of the US Open on Sunday at Oakmont Country Club. He finished the round birdie-birdie to card a 2-over 72 and finish the week one-under-par 279, two shots better than Scotland's Robert MacIntyre (final-round 68). Spaun said: 'I just felt like you keep putting yourself in these positions, like eventually you're going to tick one off... But all the close calls that I've had on the PGA Tour this year has just been really good experience to just never, never give up.' Spaun, 34, had just one prior victory on the PGA Tour and never finished inside the top 20 at a major. His closest brush with glory came when he lost a playoff to Rory McIlroy at The Players Championship this past March. Spaun shot 66 Thursday to take the early lead, hung around through Friday and Saturday and then won a war of attrition in horrid weather conditions. At one point down the final stretch, five players were tied for the lead at 1 over, and that group didn't even include eventual runner-up MacIntyre. At the 314-yard, par-four 17th hole, Spaun pumped a drive uphill that settled on the well-guarded green. He two-putted for birdie to take the outright lead. Needing par at No. 18 to beat MacIntyre, Spaun landed his second shot on the far side of the green and got a read from playing partner Viktor Hovland of Norway, who putted first. Spaun drained the birdie and let the waterworks flow as the heavens poured on him. 'We kind of got a good line, a good read on the speed' from Hovland, Spaun said. 'I was more focused on how hard he was hitting it. I kind of knew the line already, but it looked like he gave it a pretty good whack because it started raining there for the last 10, 15 minutes. ... 'About eight feet out, I kind of went up to the high side to see if it had a chance of going in, and it was like going right in. I was just in shock, disbelief that it went in and it was over.' Hovland (73) placed third at two over. Cameron Young (70), England's Tyrrell Hatton (72) and Mexico's Carlos Ortiz (73) tied for fourth at 3 over. Sam Burns led Spaun and Australia's Adam Scott by one stroke after 54 holes, but Burns and Scott came undone in the rain. Burns shot 40 on the back nine of an eight-over 78 to drop to four over, tied with Scottie Scheffler (70) and Spain's Jon Rahm (67); Scott (79) posted six over. Even before the adverse conditions set in Sunday afternoon, there was carnage throughout the final few pairings. The worst seemed to be reserved for Spaun, who bogeyed five of his first six holes and got an especially bad break at No. 2. Spaun's wedge shot into the green took one hop and bounced off the flagstick. The backspin kicked in and the ball rolled 40 yards down the front of the green as Spaun stared, bewildered. 'All I heard (from the crowd) is like a really loud like, 'Oh!' It wasn't, like, a good one,' Spaun said. 'During the delay I went and watched (the replay) and it was just really unlucky. It was pretty much a two-shot swing. I was thinking that would have been pretty close, maybe inside of five feet, if it didn't hit the flag.' The rain gear had come out well before play was postponed at 4:01 p.m. And while Oakmont was devilishly difficult throughout the week, heavy rain made the back nine borderline unfair. The sloped fairway at No. 11 repelled most drives, and the rough, already 5 inches long, was even harder to escape. Those elements combined to stymie Burns and Scott when they arrived at the 11th in first and second place, respectively. Scott needed two hacks to get out of the greenside rough, while it took four strokes for Burns to get his ball to stay on the green. Scott chased in a long bogey putt with a triumphant fist pump before Burns tapped in for double. Then Burns' par putt at No. 12 lipped out, creating a five-way tie at 1 over: Burns, Scott, Spaun, Ortiz and Hatton. One by one, their names dropped down the board. Scott went bogey-bogey-double at Nos. 14-16, Ortiz doubled No. 15 and Burns had another implosion at the same hole. Burns argued unsuccessfully for a free drop out of a water-filled divot in the fairway, hit a poor second shot from there into the rough and wound up making double bogey. 'When I walked into it, clearly you could see water coming up,' Burns said. 'Took practice swings and it's just water splashing every single time. Called a rules official over, they disagreed. I looked at it again. I thought maybe I should get a second opinion. That rules official also disagreed. At the end of the day, it's not up to me, it's up to the rules official.' MacIntyre, meanwhile, got an 8-foot putt to fall at No. 14 to creep up to two over and then chipped his second shot at No. 17 to four feet for his final birdie. He two-putted for par at the last to get in the clubhouse at one-over 281. 'My previous rain delay comebacks haven't been strong. Today was a day that I said to myself, 'Why not? Why not it be me today?'' MacIntyre said before heading off to watch the conclusion of the round. NBC's cameras caught MacIntyre in the clubhouse watching Spaun's final putt on TV and applauding his competitor. Hovland, the 2023 FedEx Cup champion, fell off the pace with four front-nine bogeys but managed to play the back nine even par. He finished top-five at a major for the fourth year in a row, but he still seeks his first victory. 'After (Spaun's) start, it just looked like he was out of it immediately,' Hovland said. 'Everyone came back to the pack. I wasn't expecting that, really. I thought I had to shoot maybe 3 under par today to have a good chance, but obviously the conditions got really, really tough, and this golf course is just a beast.' Hovland added that Spaun's putt at No. 18 was 'just absolutely filthy.' Spaun had to agree. 'You watch other people do it,' Spaun said. 'You see the Tiger chip, you see Nick Taylor's putt (at the 2023 Canadian Open), you see crazy moments. To have my own moment like that at this championship, I'll never forget this moment for the rest of my life.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
