'Angry' MSP calls for compromise with SFA and SPFL over 'skulduggery'

However, Whittle, who was a member of the Public Petitions Committee at the Scottish parliament when the governing bodies were urged to scrap regulations which had been branded 'exploitative' back in 2020, expressed his frustration at youth football campaigners turning to legal representatives in an attempt to achieve their objectives during heated exchanges.
He called for compromise from both sides so that a long-running dispute which has now raged for 15 years can be settled and change achieved which enables promising players to flourish at elite professional clubs and kids who fail to make it in the paid ranks to remain involved in the sport.
The Scottish Conservatives politician was speaking following a meeting of the Health, Social Care and Sport committee at Holyrood which heard evidence from Nick Hobbs of the Children and Young People's Commissioner Scotland, Scott Robertson of RealGrassroots and Mahesh Madlani and Alex Waksman of Gunnercooke.
RealGrassroots and the Children and Young People's Commissioner Scotland made complaints to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) back in December about four SFA and SPFL statutes which they alleged violated UK competition law and potentially constituted the economic exploitation of children.
Read more:
The CMA wrote to the SFA and SPFL in March reminding them of their obligations to comply with competition law and recommending they assess their practices.
Whittle, while expressing his concern about the disputed 'no poach', 'no approach', 'unilateral extension' and 'development contribution' rules, admitted that he would now like to see the two factions reach agreement which benefitted the Scottish game.
Hobbs, the head of investigations with the Children and Young People's Commissioner Scotland, alleged the Wellbeing Panel which was set up to determine if players in the CAS set-up could be released from a controversial two year registration which they sign when they turn 15 acted in the interest of the clubs not children.
'The Wellbeing Panel is a really good example of the kind of attitude that underpins all of this,' he told the committee. 'On the surface, it looks and sounds like a very positive mechanism for facilitating that movement between the clubs where necessary.
'But when we met with the SFA we asked, 'In what circumstances would you envisage a wellbeing panel would refuse permission for a child to move from one club to another'. They weren't able to tell us. That strongly suggests to me that the wellbeing panel exists not as a mechanism to facilitate that movement, but as an obstacle to prevent it from happening.
'Children will tend not to raise complaints when there are significant administrative processes that they have to go through and barriers that they have to jump over. I think The Wellbeing Panel is designed to restrict movement between clubs rather than facilitate it.
'The underlying issue here, and it always has been, is that the clubs principally view these children as economic assets and have rules and processes in place which allow them to be monetised. That SFA has made rules which are in the interests of clubs and not of the children.'
(Image: SNS Group) Whittle, who won European Championship and Commonwealth Games medals and competed in the Olympics during his running career, expressed hope that Ian Maxwell, SFA chief executive, and Neil Doncaster, his SPFL counterpart, would address the accusations in person when they are called in front of the committee following the Scottish parliament's summer recess.
However, he revealed that he has two grandchildren who are members of the CAS system and stressed that their experiences did not tally with the evidence which had been given.
He said, 'The changes which have been made to the unilateral extension rule are an adequate compromise if they're actually applied properly. The devil's in the detail here. The reality is that some do it properly, some don't. So I would like to see the application of the rule tightened up rather than the rule changed. The rule is not a problem. The application of the rule is where we need to start looking.
'There are some significant issues which need to be tackled. I have spoken to Mr Maxwell about this in a meeting we had at the SFA offices about six weeks ago. I was equally upset in that meeting as I was today. The 'no approach' rule, for example, doesn't make sense to me whatsoever. What nonsense is that? That's restrictive to everybody.
'But that's not getting to the nub of what the problem is. That's why I was getting so frustrated, because this is not getting us to where we need to be. We need to start with a blank bit of paper and say, 'What do we want?' We want a system here where we bring kids in at one level and they have the ability to route map all the way through to international level.
'But along the way there are other stations where their talent can be utilised, even if that's just playing five-a-side football with their pals. That's not happening at the moment. There's lots of things we could be doing and should be doing that would make it much better.'
Read more:
He added, 'I'm not optimistic the change that is needed can be achieved. If you get two sides so entrenched, it's very difficult to find compromise. My problem is this is a real grassroots issue, but all we heard from were lawyers. You're never going to get a compromise out of that.
'The SFA and SPFL will always be on the defensive if lawyers are involved. If it's a legal problem, deal with it in the courts. They kept saying, 'They're breaching this, they're breaching that'. But they've proved nothing.
'Some of the things they were saying in there did not reflect my experiences. I've got a couple of grandkids who are in the Club Academy Scotland system. One moved from a smaller club to a bigger club as well. I never saw any problems. Don't get me wrong, there are problems. If you've got 2,700 kids and you've got all these clubs, you know there is some skulduggery going on.
'But as it's not just in Scottish football where there are problems. In my sport, in track and field, if you move to a club without it being okayed you get a nine month ban. You need to have extenuating circumstances. The clubs have to agree or Scottish Athletics have to say, 'You're allowed'.'
Whittle continued, 'I am quite frustrated. I think the SFA and the SPFL have got questions to answer here. But I heard a lot of conflated evidence here today which I was actually quite angry about.
'We need to get the two sides in the room with the same objective. We all have the same objective. We want to get all the kids to play football. We want all levels of football to be at their best. We want Scotland to win the World Cup. That's not going to happen obviously, but that's what we want. At the moment, the system is not allowing that to happen.'
The SFA and SPFL were both approached for comment.
Back in March, an SFA spokesperson said, 'We have been in dialogue with the CMA and will continue to monitor our policies and procedures in line with FIFA regulations.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Record

an hour ago

• Daily Record

MPs back assisted dying for England and Wales in crunch Westminster vote

MPs voted by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23 - in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. MPs have voted for assisted dying to become legal in England and Wales. After a highly charged debate, MPs voted by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23 - in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. ‌ Terminally ill adults in England and Wales with less than six months to live will soon be able to apply for an assisted death. This would need to be approved by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. ‌ The bill does not apply in Scotland as separate legislation is going through Holyrood at the moment. It has now passed in the House of Commons and will move onto the House of Lords. The Scottish legislation has passed its first vote but will have to go through another stage to become law. It is led by Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur. This is a breaking news story - we'll bring you updates, pictures and video as it happens. ‌ Follow us on Twitter @Record_Politics and get updates from the team: @paulhutcheon, @andrewJQuinn97 and @dennynews. We're also on Facebook - your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Daily Record, Sunday Mail and Record Online. Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. We also have a weekly politics podcast, Planet Holyrood, which you can listen to Spotify or Apple music, or watch it on the Daily Record youtube channel. Don't forget to follow us on instagram and Tiktok for the best bits of the podcast.

STV News

an hour ago

• STV News

'Ludicrous' policies kicked SNP independence dream into long grass, says Ewing

Veteran MSP Fergus Ewing says 'ludicrous' policies linked to the SNP's coalition with the Greens set back the party's long-term dream of achieving independence. Speaking to STV News after announcing he will stand as an independent at next year's Holyrood elections, Ewing said it 'wasn't an easy decision' but he felt the party had 'deserted many of the people whose causes we used to champion'. Ewing, 67, has represented Inverness and Nairn for the SNP since 1999, but party rules state that membership ceases when a member plans to stand against the party. He said: 'Just for the avoidance of doubt, I haven't left the SNP. It's up to them to decide whether or not they want to do anything about [my membership].' Ewing said he has 'wrestled with his conscious' for a long time out of loyalty to the party and the First Minister. Ultimately, he said he couldn't reconcile his values with the party's current direction. Ewing said he began to have doubts about the direction of the SNP in the latter years of Nicola Sturgeon's government when he said he had to 'bite his tongue quite seriously'. He claims people feel 'scunnered' with the government, and 'let down by the Scottish Parliament that they still very much support'. Ewing added the SNP has 'ceased to be champions for the people of Scotland'. Describing the Greens as a 'fringe' party with 'really extreme socialist policies', Ewing said: 'It was really the fatal deal with the Greens, which unravelled fairly quickly, that really caused me to have serious doubts. Perhaps I've wrestled with them for too long.' He added: 'Why we have focused away into side issues like who should use which toilet just completely baffles me, as I believe it baffles the majority of people in Inverness, Nairn, and Scotland as a whole.' As a result, Ewing believes that trust in the party has been eroded, which the SNP needs to rebuild. 'Independence is in my DNA and I believe that's the ultimate aim for Scotland,' Ewing said. 'You do not want a divided country, and I'm afraid what we have at the moment is a divided country, and the economy is a matter of managed decline,' Ewing said. Ewing said there needs to be a 'relentless focus' on the economy, public service reform, and a focus on righting the NHS over the next ten years to 'win back that trust and confidence'. He added: 'That creates circumstances where people are ready to move to a new chapter of independence,' Ewing said. 'We're nowhere near that now, and there's no point in me trying to deny it.' 'But I'm afraid that's the SNP over the last few years – trying to deny the fact that we've eroded that trust by supporting a whole series of unaffordable, undeliverable, impracticable, and frankly at times ludicrous policies mostly imported from the Green party. 'And we still haven't got rid of that Green legacy. It's still there hanging over us.' Ewing may have blamed Sturgeon's deal with the Scottish Greens for 'most of the problems that we've seen for the SNP over the last four years', but he insisted his decision is not personal. Despite his issues with the direction of the SNP, Ewing said he would not be drawn into fighting against 'any particular individual politician or party'. 'I'm fighting for a better Parliament, and to stand up for the people in Inverness and Nairn who have stood by me, as I hope I have stood by them for 26 years,' he said. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

The National

2 hours ago

• The National

Scottish Government launches Disability Equality Plan

The Disability Equality Report, published on Friday, sets out a series of actions to improve access to services and disabled representation within government. Backed by £2.5 million in funding, the plan looks to improve access to mental health, advice and support services, as well as funding training for policymakers and leaders to build understanding of the issues facing disabled people. READ MORE: Scottish Government removes WhatsApp from all official devices It also sets out plans to have an annual "Cabinet Takeover", where disabled people will be given a "direct platform" to speak to ministers. The plan – which has been in the making since 2016 – was developed alongside several Disabled People's Organisations (DPOs), including Disability Equality Scotland, Inclusion Scotland and Glasgow Disability Alliance. Speaking at an event to launch the report in Glasgow on Friday, Equalities Minister Kaukab Stewart said the plan marked a "significant milestone" and was "shaped by the lived experiences of disabled people". (Image: NQ) "Scotland should be a place where every single disabled person can live a life of their choice with the support that they need to do that," she said. "It should be a place where everyone can participate fully in society, access their rights, seize opportunities and thrive in their communities. "Our investment is rooted in dignity, fairness and the belief that disabled people should be supported as citizens whose rights and contributions matter." Kaukab added: "This plan is not the end – it's the beginning. A progress report in 2026 will inform the next phase of our long term strategy. READ MORE: Experts warn Labour set to hike taxes as borrowing hits record figure "It's a clear signal of intent, a commitment to listen, to act, to pursue that lasting change in partnership with disabled people." Heather Fisken, CEO of Inclusion Scotland, said: 'This plan and related actions are a welcome step forward, but these will only be successful if it is properly resourced and if it there is accountability of delivery. "We want this accountability to be led by disabled peoples' organisations and disabled people themselves – genuine partnership between our organisations and the Scottish Government requires honesty and scrutiny, and that will be our focus going forward.' Lyn Pornaro, CEO of Disability Equality Scotland, said: 'This shows the power of disabled peoples' campaigning, and is a step in the right direction, but our campaigning work to deliver justice for disabled people will continue. "This includes making sure that both the Scottish Government and the UK Government deliver dignity, security, and human rights for disabled people – that requires investing in our communities and including services – not cutting the support we rely on.' Tressa Burke, CEO of Glasgow Disability Alliance, said: 'This funding from the Scottish Government is a win for the collective action of disabled people and our allies. We are grateful to everyone who took part in our campaign Disabled People Demand Justice and commend the Scottish Government for responding positively. "But it is a small step, when we need big leaps; poverty and inequality experienced by disabled people remain at unacceptable levels, and we need both the Scottish Government and the UK Government to urgently invest in disabled peoples' lives to deliver dignity and justice."