US aerial tankers headed to Middle East
The US has reportedly deployed more than 30 aerial refueling tankers across the Atlantic toward the Middle East, Military Watch Magazine reported on Monday. The outlet has described the buildup as 'unprecedented,' claiming it could suggest broader US involvement in the ongoing Israeli-Iranian war.
West Jerusalem and Tehran have entered the fourth day of open hostilities. Last Thursday, Israeli forces launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets, killing senior military officials and scientists and prompting retaliatory missile barrages on Israeli cities such as Tel Aviv and Haifa.
The US has expressed support for the Israeli strikes, with President Donald Trump calling them 'excellent.' He has also warned that Washington could become directly involved in the conflict if American interests are threatened but has yet to announce any plans to involve US forces.
However, according to flight tracking data, the US has already started deploying KC-135 and KC-46 aerial refueling tankers to the Middle East. Military Watch Magazine has suggested that the aircraft may be intended to support Israeli Air Force operations or refuel US fighters and bombers if Washington expands its role in the conflict.
The report also claims that tankers from other Western countries have participated in Israeli aerial refueling efforts, while the US is believed to have provided intelligence, satellite targeting data, and missile defense support.
On Sunday, Axios reported that Israeli officials had asked the US to directly take part in the military operation, specifically requesting assistance in striking Iran's Fordow enrichment facility. However, US officials cited by the outlet said the request was declined, with one stating that the Trump administration is not considering any such involvement.
Nevertheless, Tehran has claimed that Washington's support for West Jerusalem has made the US complicit in Israel's aggression against Iran. Sources within the Iranian military have also reportedly indicated that Tehran's response to Israeli strikes would 'spread to all areas occupied by this [Israeli] regime and related US bases in the region in the coming days.'
In response, Trump has warned that any Iranian attack on US forces would trigger a military response, writing on his Truth Social platform that 'if we are attacked in any way, shape, or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' He also insisted that the US 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' and called on Tehran to return to negotiations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
UN watchdog report ‘hardly' justification for attack on Iran
Israel's attack on Iran is not justified by the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) latest report, which states there is no evidence that Tehran is developing a nuclear bomb, according to the agency's chief, Rafael Grossi. Israel launched airstrikes against Iran last week, claiming it was on the brink of developing a nuclear bomb. Tehran denied the accusation and responded with retaliatory strikes. Israel's attack came several days after the IAEA Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its nonproliferation obligations. The resolution cited Grossi's recent report that Iran had enriched uranium to 60% purity, albeit short of the 90% required for weapons-grade material, and was not cooperating with inspectors. Speaking to CNN's Anderson Cooper on Thursday, Grossi stressed that the IAEA's report 'could hardly be a basis for military action.' 'Military action, whomever it comes [from], is a political decision that has nothing to do with what we are saying,' he said. Grossi acknowledged that Iran had failed to provide adequate answers to the agency's inquiries, but emphasized that the IAEA 'do not have any indication that there is a systematic program in Iran to manufacture, to produce a nuclear weapon.' He also noted that enriched uranium alone does not equal a bomb. 'We do not have any evidence that this is ongoing in Iran,' he said. Tehran had previously accused the IAEA chief of betrayal, saying his 'biased report' was used to 'craft' the resolution used by Israel to justify its 'unlawful attack.' US intelligence agencies have also maintained there is no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Nevertheless, US President Donald Trump has dismissed those findings, insisting Iran was 'very close' to getting a bomb when Israel attacked. He has called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and warned of possible US involvement if American targets are attacked. Since launching its assault, Israel has hit several Iranian nuclear sites, including in Natanz, Isfahan, and near Tehran. However, the Israeli military reportedly lacks the capability to breach Iran's fortified Fordow facility – built deep within a mountain – and has allegedly asked the US to use its GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs, according to Axios. The White House has insisted that Trump had ruled out direct US participation in the strikes. The Wall Street Journal, however, recently claimed the president has already approved a US attack plan but is yet to give the order. Israel's campaign has drawn widespread condemnation. Moscow has accused West Jerusalem of violating international law and warned that US intervention would escalate the crisis.
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
NATO split over 5% spending commitment
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has rejected NATO's proposal for member states to increase military spending to 5% of their GDP, calling the idea 'not only unreasonable but also counterproductive.' Following US President Donald Trump's demands for a 5% target, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has called for every bloc member to raise military spending to 3.5% of GDP and commit a further 1.5% to wider security spending. 'Spain will continue to fulfill its duty in the years and decades ahead and will continue to actively contribute to the European security architecture. However, Spain cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP at this summit,' Sanchez wrote in a letter to Rutte that emerged on Thursday in the media. 'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices. As a sovereign ally, we choose not to.' Spain currently falls well behind other Western nations, allocating only about 1.3% of its GDP to military spending – significantly below NATO's 2% target. Rutte previously called for cuts to social programs across the EU in order to fund the increased military outlays. Since assuming office in January, Trump has intensified demands that the bloc's European members spend more on defense and has repeatedly accused them of failing to shoulder the burden equitably. Earlier this month, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer unveiled his cabinet's plan to significantly increase military spending. The move was backed by Rutte, who claimed that Russia could be ready to target NATO countries within the next five years. Leaders of the bloc are expected to agree to increase defense spending to contain the alleged threat. Russian President Vladimir Putin dismissed the rhetoric about the threat posed by Russia to NATO as an 'inconceivable lie' used by Western governments to justify tax increases and the diversion of public funds to the military-industrial complex. Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on Thursday, Putin warned that this kind of military posturing only escalates global tensions while diverting resources from social and economic development. The Times reported on Wednesday that the upcoming NATO summit, scheduled for 24-25 June in The Hague, is expected to be unusually brief with just one working meeting lasting two and a half hours. The outlet reported that the format of the summit was altered in light of Trump's dislike of lengthy diplomatic meetings.
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Hungary offers to host Ukraine peace talks
Hungary's offer to host peace talks aimed at ending the Ukraine conflict remains valid, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said on Thursday. Hungary has maintained a dissenting position within the EU since the conflict escalated in February 2022, advocating for dialogue while most other member states have pledged only to continue military support to Kiev. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), Szijjarto reaffirmed Budapest's commitment to a peaceful resolution and said Hungary is prepared to host negotiations. He said he communicated the proposal to senior Russian and Ukrainian officials days after the outbreak of the hostilities, adding, 'This offer is there, is valid, we have not withdrawn that.' Hungary would be willing to organize a summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump if such a meeting were requested, Szijjarto claimed. He praised the recent improvement in relations between Moscow and Washington, following the change in the US administration. 'Our clear historic experience is that whenever the US and Russia are able to maintain a civilized relationship, it's always better for Central Europe,' he said. Trump has declined to continue US military aid to Ukraine and has suggested that both Washington and Moscow could benefit from restoring bilateral ties. His efforts to mediate a truce between Russia and Ukraine contributed to the countries restarting direct negotiations in Türkiye, talks that Kiev abandoned in 2022 to focus on its military campaign. Szijjarto noted that European nations that once called for Ukraine's victory are now urging an unconditional ceasefire. He said that many of those countries previously criticized Budapest for promoting diplomacy, arguing that the shift highlights their loss of credibility. At a recent round of talks in Istanbul, Russia proposed two options for a conditional ceasefire, asserting that either would prevent Ukraine from regrouping and resuming hostilities, unlike an unconditional truce. The proposals involved either a Ukrainian withdrawal from territories claimed by Russia or a halt to military mobilization and Western arms deliveries. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has rejected both and demanded direct talks with Putin. The Russian president said this week that he is open to such a meeting to finalize a peace agreement, but cautioned that Zelensky is not legally authorized to sign any treaty. Zelensky's presidential term expired last year and no successor has been elected, raising Moscow's concerns about any agreement the Ukrainian politician might sign.
