Fire officials, cops among 10 eyewitnesses who saw cash at Justice Varma's house
A Supreme Court-appointed inquiry panel has, for the first time, named the 10 eyewitnesses who saw large quantities of cash inside the store room of Justice Yashwant Varma's official residence in Delhi. The list includes fire officials, police officers, and personnel from the child rights body: Ankit Sehwag, Pradeep Kumar, Manoj Mehlawat, Bhanwar Singh, Pravindra Malik, and Suman Kumar — all officers from the Delhi Fire Service (DFS); Rajesh Kumar and Umesh Malik from Tughlaq Road police station; Roop Chand, a head constable; and Sunil Kumar, an officer from the Indian Commission for Protection of Child Rights (ICPCR).advertisementThe panel found that these eyewitnesses saw stacks of currency notes — reportedly piled 1.5 feet high — in the aftermath of a fire at the judge's residence in March. One witness described being "shocked and surprised" by the sheer volume of cash, saying it was unlike anything he had ever seen.
Despite the discovery, Justice Varma made no effort to report the matter to police or judicial authorities, the panel noted. "No plausible explanation has been given. The judge's claim of lack of knowledge is unbelievable," it said.The panel also flagged what it called "unnatural conduct" by the judge, highlighting how the store room — access to which was exclusively controlled by Justice Varma and his family — was later cleaned out and the cash disappeared. Visual evidence reportedly showed some notes were half-burnt.advertisementRejecting Justice Varma's defence that the entire episode was a conspiracy to malign him, the inquiry committee stated: 'Currency notes were seen by multiple people and recorded in real time. It is implausible they were planted to frame him.'The committee concluded there was "sufficient substance" in the allegations against the Allahabad High Court judge and has recommended his removal.Justice Varma, who was transferred back to the Allahabad High Court following the incident, has not been allotted any judicial work since. He has neither resigned nor taken voluntary retirement and continues to claim the process against him is 'fundamentally unjust.'Must Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Cops Can't Barge Into History Sheeters' Homes For 'Surveillance': Court
Kochi: The Kerala High Court has held that the police have no right to knock on the doors of suspected persons or history sheeters or "barge" into their homes at night under the guise of surveillance. The ruling by Justice V G Arun came on a plea by a man accused of threatening police officers from discharging their duties when they asked him to come out of his home late at night as part of night check on rowdy history sheeters. Allowing the plea, the court quashed the FIR against the man and all further proceedings in connection with it, saying that "under the guise of surveillance, the police cannot knock on the doors or barge into the houses of history sheeters". The court said that police officers should understand that the concept of home "transcends its physical manifestation as a dwelling and encompasses a rich tapestry of existential, emotional and social dimensions". "In other words, every man's house is his castle or temple, the sanctity of which cannot be vilified by knocking on the door at odd hours. A person's right to life encompasses the right to live with dignity and dignity is non-negotiable," it said. The court further said that under the Kerala Police Manual only 'informal watching' of history sheeters and 'close watch' over those leading criminal existence were permitted. "Undoubtedly, neither of those expressions permit domicile visits at night," it added. It also pointed out that under section 39 of the Kerala Police Act all persons are bound to comply with the 'lawful directions' of a police officer for discharge of his functions. "Knocking on the doors of a history sheeter at midnight and demanding him to come out of the house cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed as a lawful direction," the court said. Consequently, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the offence of threatening a police officer to obstruct him from discharging his duties under the Kerala Police Act for refusing to abide by the direction to come out of the house at night, the court added. "If, as alleged, the petitioner had used derogatory language or threatened the police during the course of such refusal, his action may invite some other offence, but definitely not the offence he is presently charged with," it said. The petitioner had claimed that he was implicated in the case to divert the enquiry ordered by the High Court into his complaint alleging police harassment. The police had claimed that as part of their night check duty on rowdy history sheeters, officers had gone to ascertain if the petitioner was at home. However, when he was asked to open the door of his home, he refused to do so and also abused and intimidated the officer, it had alleged.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Kerala High Court bars police from barging into history sheeters' home under guise of surveillance
The Kerala High Court has held that the police have no right to knock on the doors of suspected persons or history sheeters or "barge" into their homes at night under the guise of surveillance. The ruling by Justice V G Arun came on a plea by a man accused of threatening police officers from discharging their duties when they asked him to come out of his home late at night as part of night check on rowdy history sheeters. Allowing the plea, the court quashed the FIR against the man and all further proceedings in connection with it, saying that "under the guise of surveillance, the police cannot knock on the doors or barge into the houses of history sheeters". The court said that police officers should understand that the concept of home "transcends its physical manifestation as a dwelling and encompasses a rich tapestry of existential, emotional and social dimensions". "In other words, every man's house is his castle or temple, the sanctity of which cannot be vilified by knocking on the door at odd hours. A person's right to life encompasses the right to live with dignity and dignity is non-negotiable," it said. The court further said that under the Kerala Police Manual only 'informal watching' of history sheeters and 'close watch' over those leading criminal existence were permitted. "Undoubtedly, neither of those expressions permit domicile visits at night," it added. It also pointed out that under section 39 of the Kerala Police Act all persons are bound to comply with the 'lawful directions' of a police officer for discharge of his functions. "Knocking on the doors of a history sheeter at midnight and demanding him to come out of the house cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed as a lawful direction," the court said. Consequently, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the offence of threatening a police officer to obstruct him from discharging his duties under the Kerala Police Act for refusing to abide by the direction to come out of the house at night, the court added. "If, as alleged, the petitioner had used derogatory language or threatened the police during the course of such refusal, his action may invite some other offence, but definitely not the offence he is presently charged with," it said. The petitioner had claimed that he was implicated in the case to divert the enquiry ordered by the High Court into his complaint alleging police harassment. The police had claimed that as part of their night check duty on rowdy history sheeters, officers had gone to ascertain if the petitioner was at home. However, when he was asked to open the door of his home, he refused to do so and also abused and intimidated the officer, it had alleged.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Allahabad HC stays arrest of Karni Sena member Rana in Agra MP house attack case
The Allahabad High Court has stayed the arrest of Karni Sena member Okendra Singh Rana in two separate FIRs lodged against him in connection with the attack on the Agra residence of Samajwadi Party MP Ram Ji Lal Suman in March allegedly by the right-wing group. The incident had taken place following a remark Suman made in Parliament on 16th century Rajput king Rana Sanga. While directing to list the case after six weeks, a division bench of Justices Siddharth and Harvir Singh made it clear that an interim order will be subject to the co-operation by petitioner Rana in the ongoing investigation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 이 게임은 쉽고 무료로 플레이할 수 있지만 잊기 어렵습니다 레이드 섀도우 레전드 Undo Passing this direction, the court also made it clear that if some credible material is brought on record during investigation against Rana, the investigation officer of the case, after recording its reason, may affect the arrest of the petitioner while strictly adhering to the guidelines issued by the apex court in the Arnesh Kumar case. The court in its order dated June 19 also issued notice to the first informant - former MLA and Suman's son Randhir Suman, who had lodged FIR against members of Karni Sena at Hariparwat police station in Agra district immediately after the attack on March 27. Live Events Another FIR was lodged by a sub-inspector, who was posted in the security of MP Suman on June 1, on the same issue at Hariparwat against members of Karni Sena. Petitioner Rana had challenged both the FIRs and had sought stay on his arrest in the cases. Rana's counsel argued that he has not been named in the FIR and during investigation, he was falsely implicated in the matter by the police. The controversy began when Ramji Lal Suman made a statement in Parliament on March 21 suggesting that Rana Sanga had invited Mughal emperor Babur to India to defeat Ibrahim Lodi. These remarks, which questioned the Rajput legacy, provoked an immediate backlash from Rajput organisations, including the Akhil Bharatiya Kshatriya Mahasabha and the Karni Sena. Subsequently, members of Karni Sena allegedly attacked and vandalised the residence of Suman in Agra.
