Movie review: the new ‘How to Train Your Dragon' is a rare remake that earns its wings

Beloved animated classic 'How to Train Your Dragon' returns with fresh wings and a grounded emotional core
What does it mean to remake a story that already works? In a film scene awash with cinematic recycling, the live-action adaptation of How to Train Your Dragon is both a burden and a blessing. Burden, because audiences know it by heart; blessing, because it was a story worth remembering in the first place. This new version rises not through spectacle alone or strict loyalty, but through its re-learning of the story's emotional grain: fear, kinship and the clumsy, courageous process of becoming.
DreamWorks has not historically been a purveyor of live-action nostalgia. That ground has long been trodden by Disney, whose recent photorealistic remakes ( The Lion King, Lilo & Stitch ) have sometimes mistaken sheen for soul. But here, with How to Train Your Dragon , the studio shows a rare thing in the world of legacy IP: restraint. And that's largely thanks to the return of Dean DeBlois, whose hand ensures the remake moves not by corporate momentum, but by a genuine return to form.
More from Tatler: 7 Filipino mythical creatures we want to see in DreamWorks' upcoming 'Forgotten Island'
Above Mason Thames as Hiccup and Gerard Butler as Stoick in 'How to Train Your Dragon' (2025) (Photo: DreamWorks)
We are, broadly, in familiar territory. Berk remains a fog-draped island of dragon-fearing Vikings; Hiccup is still the awkward heir with a misfit heart; and Toothless, the wounded Night Fury, is once again both terrifying and tender. But there is a difference in texture.
Mason Thames plays Hiccup with less ironic distance than Jay Baruchel's original voice turn, leaning instead into earnestness (sometimes wide-eyed, sometimes bone-tired). Gerard Butler, reprising his role as Stoick the Vast, gives a performance that is physically imposing as it is emotionally weathered, a father trying and often failing to understand a son he's afraid to lose.
Above Mason Thames as Hiccup with Toothless during their first flight (Photo: DreamWorks)
This remake is not interested in subverting its own legend. It recreates many of the original's most iconic scenes: the fish-sharing moment, the wordless bonding sequences, the soaring flight through the clouds—but filters them through a more human lens. Visually, it is sumptuous. Cinematographer Bill Pope captures Berk not as a cartoon world inflated to IMAX size, but as a harsh, wind-carved land dotted with firelight and fog. When Hiccup and Toothless finally take flight, the result is nothing but awe, a physical and emotional lightness that is earned.
Above Toothless in the 2025 live remake of 'How to Train Your Dragon' (Photo: DreamWorks)
Crucially, the dragons still feel like dragons. Unlike the CGI dead eyes of The Lion King , these creatures straddle the line between believability and myth. Toothless, in particular, retains just enough of his animated expressiveness to remain emotionally legible; a marvel, somewhere between a panther, a cat and a curious child.
Not everything translates cleanly. The slapstick humour that worked in the animated version sometimes lands with an awkward thud in live-action form. There's a stiffness to some of the early scenes, as if the film is still adjusting to its own new skin. And viewers who grew up with the 2010 version may find themselves caught in a kind of vertigo: this is both the film they know and not, and its closeness can be mildly disconcerting.
See more: From controller to screen: 5 TV shows adapted from video games to watch
Above Mason Thames as Hiccup and Nico Parker as Astrid in 'How to Train Your Dragon' (2025) (Photo: DreamWorks)
But as it settles in, the film begins to do something rather beautiful. Astrid, portrayed by Nico Parker, goes beyond being a romantic interest; this time, she is more natural, a co-conspirator. The dynamic between Hiccup and Stoick, always the emotional axis of the story, feels more bruised and lived-in now. There's real friction, and real grace, in their reconciliation.
And that's the win of this remake: it doesn't chase reinvention for its own sake. Instead, it treats the original story as a myth worth retelling. What the live-action of How to Train Your Dragon offers is novelty and clarity. It reminds us why we were drawn to this world in the first place.
Above Mason Thames as Hiccup with Toothless (Photo: DreamWorks)
Above Toothless in the 2025 live remake of 'How to Train Your Dragon' (Photo: DreamWorks)
By the final act, when dragons and Vikings fight not against each other but for each other, the film achieves that rare thing in blockbuster cinema: sincerity without sentimentality. It's no surprise a sequel is already in the works. If future instalments follow this same compass (careful craft, emotional precision and a bit of wind under the wings), they might just chart a new course through old skies.
NOW READ
Filipino-Americans Nicole Scherzinger, Darren Criss and Marco Paguia win big at the 2025 Tony Awards
'Ballerina' is a feisty and rough-edged extension of the beautifully brutal John Wick universe
What began as a disguise became Vice Ganda's most authentic self

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

13-06-2025

• Yahoo

Meet the 'Project Runway' season 21 designers and judges

Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Jesus Estrada; Yuchen Han; Joan Madison; Ethan Mundt a.k.a. Utica Queen on Project Runway season 21. Project Runway is back, back, back again — this time on a new network, a different lineup of main judges and mentors, and a sickening cast of designers sewing for their lives. The stakes have never been higher, and longtime fans of the show are excited to see how this turns out. Will Project Runway season 21 make it work? Here's everything you need to know about the new season. Project Runway season 21 will air on Freeform, the Disney-owned cable network formerly known as ABC Family. For longtime fans of the series, let's make this clear: Project Runway will not air on Bravo. Beyond Freeform, season 21 will also be available on Disney-owned streaming services such as Hulu and Disney+. Heidi Klum is back as the main host of Project Runway season 21. She'll be joined be a panel of judges that includes Nina Garcia and Law Roach. Otherwise, Project Runway winner and fashion superstar Christian Siriano will serve as a mentor for the designer contestants — a role assigned to Tim Gunn in past seasons. This new season of Project Runway on Freeform has a truly star-studded lineup of guest judges. Check out the full list below. Christian CowanHarris ReedJenna LyonsJoan SmallsMichael KorsMickey GuytonNikki GlaserSara FosterSofia VergaraTyra BanksZac Posen The Project Runway season 21 cast features 12 designers. Between contestants from past seasons returning for another chance, siblings competing against each other, and a fierce RuPaul's Drag Race alum, the girls, gays, and theys are gagging for this cast. Keep scrolling to learn more about the season 21 designers. Tune in to watch the new season when it premieres on Thursday, July 31 with a special two-episode premiere at 9 p.m. ET on — also available for streaming on and . Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Alex Foxworth Growing up in Greensboro, NC, sharp and opinionated designer, Alex Foxworth, is the juxtaposition of Southerner meets New Yorker. Inspired by her Japanese grandmother from Nagasaki, she incorporates traditional kimono techniques into timeless, mindful designs. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Angelo Rosa A proud single dad and passionate streetwear designer from Providence, RI, Angelo Rosa fuses his Dominican heritage with his New York grit. His designs blend luxury streetwear with bold, edgy details that reflect his creativity and resilience. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Antonio Estrada After designing alongside his twin, Jesus Estrada, Antonio Estrada is ready to own his voice as a designer and put the spotlight on his own intuitive couture. Born in Mexico and raised in California, Antonio is a self-taught designer known for his bold, versatile designs that blend glamour with a touch of playful rebellion. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Belania Daley Known for her fearless and feisty personality, Belania Daley, elevated streetwear designer, is ready to put her signature pattern-mixing and color-blocking designs into the spotlight. Growing up on Long Island, Belania learned how to sew at the age of 13 and has since honed impressive technical skills. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Caycee Black Project Runway season 19 alum and Houston, TX native Caycee Black, returns and is bringing her out-of-this-world designs back to the runway. Caycee is known for her hand-painted prints, gender fluid designs, and love for breaking traditions in the chicest way possible. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Ethan Mundt, a.k.a. Utica Queen Otherwise known as RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 star Utica Queen, Ethan Mundt is now bringing his fierce fusion of high fashion, avant-garde artistry, and theatrical storytelling to Project Runway. He aims to bring drama, sophistication, and a touch of surrealism to everything he creates. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Jesus Estrada Project Runway season 7 alum, Jesus Estrada, is back, alongside his twin brother Antonio, to reclaim his narrative and show the world the designer he's become. Born in Mexico and raised in California, Jesus Estrada is a charismatic designer known for vibrant queer designs that blend old Hollywood Glamour with a modern edge. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Joan Madison A vibrant and high-energy designer from Queens, NY, Joan Madison brings optimism, creativity and bling to everything she touches. Known for her big, dramatic designs and theatrical style, she's ready to make her dreams come true. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Joseph McRae Charlotte, NC native Joseph McRae is a self-taught designer and electrical engineer known for his southern charm and sass. After leaving his 13-year job, Joseph is now betting on himself and bringing his bold, boundary-breaking designs to the runway. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Madeline Malenfant Vintage and period-piece obsessed designer, Madeline Malenfant, grew up on Nantucket and always dreamt of being a fashion designer. Deeply inspired by the Renaissance period, her unique historical design style blends era-esque silhouettes with a modern twist. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Veejay Floresca A fearless designer and proud trans woman from the Philippines, Veejay Floresca is known for her fiercely competitive and unapologetic personality along with her aesthetic that combines modernity, wearability, and art. Courtesy of Disney/Heidi Gutman Yuchen Han Originally from Xining, China, Yuchen Han is an ambitious and authentic designer on a personal mission to empower others through his futuristic and enlightenment-focused designs. Often finding inspiration from sci-fi films, Yuchen is obsessed with Aliens and fiercely owns who he is. - YouTube

Forbes

13-06-2025

• Forbes

Marvel's ‘Thunderbolts*' Will Lose Millions At Box Office, Report Says

"Thunderbolts" partial movie poster. Disney Enterprises, Inc./Marvel Studios Marvel Thunderbolts* is reportedly going to end its theatrical run in the red, making the film the latest big financial disappointment for its studio, Disney. Thunderbolts* — aka The New Avengers — is the second of three Marvel Cinematic Universe releases for Disney this year. Captain America: Brave New World opened in theaters on Feb. 14, while The Fantastic Four: First Steps will open on the big screen on July 25. Starring Florence Pugh, David Harbor, Sebastian Stan, Hannah John-Kamen and Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Thunderbolts* — which follows a group of misfit antiheroes akin to DC's The Suicide Squad — snapped up $76 million in opening weekend May 2-4 to kick off the 2025 summer movie season. However, ticket sales waned from there. To date, Box Office Mojo reported, Thunderbolts* has earned $187.3 million domestically and nearly $190.6 million internationally for a worldwide tally of nearly $378 million. While a $378 million global gross would be welcome by most film releases, the amount falls in the lower tier of films released in the sprawling Marvel Cinematic Universe of movies, which kicked off in 2008 with Iron Man. Worse yet, the domestic gross of Thunderbolts* as of Thursday is in the bottom 25% of all 36 films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe at No. 29, per Box Office Mojo. Just ahead of Thunderbolts* and its $187.3 million domestic take on MCU list is Captain America: Brave New World, which earned $200.5 million during its North American theatrical run to currently hold the No. 28 spot. In a report published by Variety on Thursday, the industry trade publication broke down the financials for Thunderbolts*, noting that the film had a production budget of $180 million and a marketing budget of close to $100 million. Numbers-wise, a global gross of $378 million against a film that cost $280 million to make and market outwardly gives the appearance Thunderbolts* will be a profitable title. However, since half of any given film's ticket sales go to theater owners — plus, studios have other expenses including the payout of residuals — the financial picture for Thunderbolts* isn't so rosy. According to Variety, Thunderbolts* will have to make $425 million in theaters globally just to break even, which means the studio stands to lose millions of dollars once all of the numbers connected to the film's theatrical release are tallied. Sure, Disney still has time to make up a little more ground since Thunderbolts* is still in 1,955 theaters domestically as of Thursday, but not nearly enough to make the film whole considering the film finished at No. 10 at the June 6-8 box office with a domestic gross of $2.4 million. Even if Thunderbolts* manages to eke out $385 million to $390 million in global ticket sales before the final curtain closes, it stands to lose — using Variety's break-even estimate fo $425 million — anywhere from $35 million to $40 million. Lucky for the studio, Thunderbolts* will have access to more revenue streams once the film heads to the home entertainment through digital streaming purchases and rentals, streaming service and TV earnings, and physical media (4K Ultra HD and Blu-ray discs) sales. Only time will tell, however, if those earnings will help Thunderbolts* zap the negative figures from Disney's ledgers. If there's any saving grace, at least Thunderbolts* isn't near to being the box office disasater that was Disney's Snow White, which ended its run in theaters last week after opening on the big screen on March 21. Thunderbolts* is still playing in theaters.

Geek Tyrant

12-06-2025

• Geek Tyrant

THUNDERBOLTS* Fails to Break Even at the Box Office; Is Marvel Studios Recalibrating Its Playbook? — GeekTyrant

Well, the numbers are in for Marvel's Thunderbolts* , and they don't look great. Despite strong reviews and being framed by Disney CEO Bob Iger as the poster child of Marvel's "quality over quantity" comeback, the film is now officially set to not break even at the global box office. That's got to be a big sting for Marvel and Disney, and it also raises a bigger question… is Marvel Studios finally recalibrating its playbook? After Captain America: Brave New World stumbled earlier this year following a rocky post-production process, (and expensive reshoots), all eyes turned to Thunderbolts* to stabilize Marvel's current trajectory. Iger even called it the 'first and best' example of Marvel's refreshed focus, so the stakes were high. Six weeks in, though, the movie has only pulled in $371 million worldwide, and to break even, it needed to hit $425 million. To be fair, Marvel did scale things down here. According to Variety, the studio was cautious going in: the cast was largely composed of characters from Black Widow and The Falcon and the Winter Soldier , both of which were released in that weird pandemic-era blur of streaming and theatrical uncertainty. The production budget was trimmed to $180 million, and the marketing spend capped at $100 million, which was lower than Marvel's usual blockbuster budgets. Still, it wasn't enough. Exhibitor Relations analyst Jeff Bock points out the core issue: 'These lower-tier comic book movies aren't cinematic slam dunks anymore. Thunderbolts* wrapping up after just a month in theaters is also a concern. These films aren't legging out like previous iterations.' That might be the most telling sign of where superhero fatigue is landing hardest, on the characters who aren't household names. Marvel dominated the Infinity Saga era with 19 of its 22 films crossing the $500 million global mark. Now? Only 6 of the 13 Multiverse Saga entries have done the same. That's a major drop-off. So what's next? The article hints at a strategic pivot, and it looks like Marvel's done playing it safe with B-tier characters. The studio's upcoming slate is stacked with heavy hitters: The Fantastic Four: First Steps (July 2026) Avengers: Doomsday and Spider-Man 4 (2026) Avengers: Secret Wars (2027) A mystery film in July 2027 Plus, development continues on X-Men and Black Panther sequels Meanwhile, solo projects like Blade are still stuck in development purgatory. As Variety puts it: 'Marvel seems to be embracing a go-big-or-go-home mentality.' The global box office isn't what it used to be. Superhero saturation is real. And audiences are showing up for the icons, not the ensemble leftovers. I understand that, but at the same time, not ever Marvel movie needs to have a $100 million budget! They could be making great smaller scale film for far less that will pull in a profit. Regardless, Marvel has built a machine that doesn't rely on just box office numbers. Between Disney+, merchandise, and home release markets, the studio can weather a few misfires. But, unfortunatley, this may scare off Marvel from experimenting with mid-tier team-ups and deep-cut solo runs might be winding down. I just think that can and should still make those movie, but with lower budgets. Also, they don't have to connect with the larger universe. They can be one and done stories. The Multiverse Saga still has some big swings ahead, but I imagine things are going to change with the kinds of films they make and the characters they play with,, and I'm not excited about it. What are your thoughts?