logo
Coty considering two-part sale, according to industry sources

Coty considering two-part sale, according to industry sources

Fashion United4 days ago

US-based group Coty Inc., listed in New York and Paris, may be approaching a decisive turning point. According to several industry sources cited by WWD, the cosmetics specialist is considering a partial sale of its businesses, potentially paving the way for a profound restructuring of the company. Two-stage sale
According to information gathered by WWD, discussions are still at a preliminary stage. The scenario under consideration would involve a two-stage sale: firstly, the Luxury division, which includes the Gucci, Burberry, Jil Sander and Hugo Boss licences; and secondly, the Consumer Beauty division, with mass-market brands such as CoverGirl, Max Factor and Rimmel London.
When questioned by the media outlet, a Coty spokesperson declined to comment, stating that the company does not comment on "rumours or speculation". Coveted brands but complex transaction
According to WWD's information, Coty is currently in discussion with Interparfums for some of its Luxury assets, including the Burberry and Hugo Boss fragrances. "We are always inclined to study opportunities that arise," said a spokesperson for Interparfums SA on Monday. According to sources close to the matter, the group has already submitted an offer to recover the Burberry licence, which it held until 2013.
The Burberry Goddess brand, launched in 2023, is considered Coty's greatest commercial success to date, and Hugo Boss rose to become the second largest men's fragrance franchise in Europe in the second half of 2024.
However, the future of the Gucci licence seems more uncertain. As WWD points out, the parent company Kering has for several years been aiming to develop its beauty activities internally and could recover the management of Gucci perfumes when the licence expires, expected by several observers to be in 2028. This is a deadline that Coty's chief executive officer, Sue Nabi, mentioned in July 2023, stating that no discussions on licence renewals would take place for five years. Consumer beauty division: a stumbling block
While the Luxury division is attracting interest, the sale of the Consumer Beauty business is proving more difficult. According to WWD, Coty initially hoped to find a buyer in Asia, but the regional economic slowdown, combined with persistent trade tensions with the US, makes this prospect increasingly unlikely. In addition, mass-market brands such as CoverGirl and Rimmel are facing growing competition from direct-to-consumer (D2C) players, and their attractiveness is considered lower than that of premium brands in terms of valuation.
However, some sources cited by WWD believe that the division could be of interest to private equity funds. But a global takeover of Coty by a single player seems unlikely, particularly for competition reasons.
"If Coty manages to sell the Consumer Beauty division, the fragrance part will find a buyer immediately," another source told WWD. Shaky financial indicators
In the third quarter of its 2025 fiscal year, ending 31 March, revenue in the Consumer Beauty division fell by 9 percent, reflecting the segment's difficulties. Overall, Coty posted a 6 percent decline in revenue to 1.29 billion dollars, below analysts' forecasts of 1.3 billion dollars, reports Investing.com.
Coty's share price, which has fallen sharply since the beginning of the year (-30.7 percent), jumped 11 to 13 percent after the publication of the sale rumours by WWD, according to Investing.com and Bloomberg. In comparison, L'Oréal posted growth of nearly ten percent over the same period and Estée Lauder's decline was limited to 2.4 percent.
Coty's recent underperformance is also explained by the loss-making sale of Skkn by Kim, Kim Kardashian's brand, which resulted in a loss of 71.1 million dollars in the last quarter. Coty acquired a 20 percent stake in the company for 200 million dollars in 2022, but Kim Kardashian regained full control in March 2025. Coty had already had to manage similar difficulties with Kylie Cosmetics, whose growth disappointed despite a promising start in perfumery.
At the same time, the group is still seeking to fully divest itself of Wella, the hair care specialist, in which it still holds a 3.6 percent stake. An attempted sale to IGF Wealth Management failed in October 2023. Governance in suspense
Speculation is also rife about Sue Nabi's future at the helm of Coty. According to WWD, some observers envisage her departure as early as this summer. Formerly of L'Oréal and founder of Orveda, Nabi took over as chief executive officer of Coty in 2020, succeeding Peter Harf, now chairman of the board. Harf announced his retirement from JAB, Coty's main shareholder, in April 2025 after 40 years with the group. Turning the page
With a market capitalisation estimated at 4.13 billion dollars and revenue of 6.1 billion dollars in 2024 according to the WWD Beauty Inc ranking, Coty remains a major player in global beauty. But the group's future seems more open than ever. Between the possible loss of the Gucci licence, the difficulties of the Consumer Beauty division and market pressure, Coty could well be at a decisive turning point. This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Emerging markets no longer on the periphery of progress'
'Emerging markets no longer on the periphery of progress'

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

'Emerging markets no longer on the periphery of progress'

Over the past decade, many investors have looked at EM with a mixture of caution and nostalgia, haunted by memories of currency crises and political turmoil. But today's EM landscape looks very different. Structural reform, rising domestic consumption, and tech-led innovation are combining to produce companies and economies that are adaptable and profitable. This transformation is perhaps best captured by businesses like a 'super-app' used by the majority of the adult Kazak population for everything from banking and bill payments, to shopping and ride-hailing. It has fundamentally reshaped the country's economy. Or take Luckin Coffee in China, which now has many more outlets than Starbucks and continues to grow rapidly into an underpenetrated market. These aren't speculative moonshots. They are scaling in key domestic markets with improving profitability and thus operational resilience. Two key headwinds - the strong US dollar and negative sentiment towards China - have been turning. An increasing amount of EM-to-EM trade is being done in non-dollar currencies. The weak dollar is not only supportive of EM financial conditions but also creates favourable sentiment at a time when there are plenty of reasons to ask questions of the traditional safe-haven countries of the world. With over $22 trillion held by non-US investors in American assets - much of it unhedged - even a small shift in allocation could drive renewed EM demand. Meanwhile, China's trajectory is not solely about geopolitics or trade policy, as some doomsayers posit. In fact, this may be the wrong focus completely. It's about a massive, increasingly self-sufficient domestic economy. Retail sales in China are over ten times greater than its exports to the US - a fact that should redirect our focus from tariffs to the consumer. Companies like Meituan and DeepSeek are testament to China's technological resilience. And for what it's worth, over 70% of the world now trades more with China than with the US. On top of this, Chinese consumer spending is visibly starting to recover. Read more: We often talk about EM as if it were a single monolith. It is not. What binds these regions is clearly not geography or even income level. But the quality of opportunity and scale of ambition across such a vast set of countries is trending upwards and worth shouting about. There are many more world class EM companies than before, in a range of industries: in semiconductors, gaming, fintech, and green energy, to name a few. For example, CATL in electric vehicle batteries, SK Hynix in High Bandwith Memory (memory chips used for high-performance computing and AI), and Tencent and SEA in gaming. The best companies earn their place in portfolios through world-class execution, deep competitive moats, high returns on capital, and often, scarcity of competition. EM's best companies are, in many cases, the only game in town for investors seeking exposure to essential themes like electrification, digital transformation, and resource resilience. Perhaps the most dangerous risk for investors today is underexposure to this transformation. Valuations remain modest. Domestic markets are deepening. Currency, debt, and governance risks - while still present - are far better managed than in previous cycles. And most importantly, these companies are not all reliant on a rebound in global trade or commodity prices. Many are thriving in local ecosystems, with local customers, on local capital. This is not to say the path ahead is smooth. Politics is messy (though isn't that true in developed markets too?). Markets are often volatile. But the direction of travel is clear. Emerging markets are no longer on the periphery of progress - they are increasingly the protagonists. To ignore them is not caution, it's more likely negligence. Andrew Keiller is a partner at Baillie Gifford

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud
Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud

NBC News

time8 hours ago

  • NBC News

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud

Walmart has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a U.S. Federal Trade Commission civil lawsuit accusing the world's largest retailer of ignoring warning signs that fraudsters used its money transfer services to fleece consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars. The settlement was filed on Friday in Chicago federal court, and requires approval by U.S. District Judge Manish Shah. Walmart also agreed not to process money transfers it suspects are fraudulent, or help sellers and telemarketers it believes are using its services to commit fraud. 'Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it's sent, it's gone for good,' said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC consumer protection bureau. 'Companies that provide these services must train their employees to comply with the law and work to protect consumers.' The Arkansas-based retailer did not admit or deny wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. Walmart did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In its June 2022 complaint, the FTC accused Walmart of turning a blind eye to fraudsters who used its money transfer services to cash out at its stores. Walmart acts as an agent for money transfers by companies such as MoneyGram and Western Union. Money can be hard to trace once delivered. The FTC said fraudsters used many schemes that included impersonating Internal Revenue Service agents, impersonating family members who needed money from grandparents to avoid jail, and telling victims they won lotteries or sweepstakes but owed fees to collect their winnings. Shah dismissed part of the FTC case last July but let the regulator pursue the remainder. Walmart appealed from that decision. Friday's settlement would end the appeal.

Israel and Iran trade fire as Europe's diplomatic effort yields no breakthrough
Israel and Iran trade fire as Europe's diplomatic effort yields no breakthrough

Powys County Times

time10 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Israel and Iran trade fire as Europe's diplomatic effort yields no breakthrough

Israel and Iran have traded strikes a week into their war as President Donald Trump weighed US military involvement and key European ministers met Iran's top diplomat in Geneva in a scramble to de-escalate the conflict. But the first face-to-face meeting between western and Iranian officials in the week-long war concluded after four hours with no sign of an immediate breakthrough. To give diplomacy a chance, Mr Trump said he would put off deciding for up to two weeks whether to join Israel's air campaign against Iran. US participation would most likely involve strikes against Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility, considered to be out of reach to all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. Whether or not the US joins, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel's military operation in Iran would continue 'for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. Israel's top general echoed the warning, saying the Israeli military was ready 'for a prolonged campaign'. As the talks ended in Switzerland, European negotiators expressed hope for more negotiations in the future. Iran's top diplomat said he was open to further dialogue. But foreign minister Abbas Araghchi emphasised that Tehran had no interest in negotiating with the US while Israel continued attacking. Israel said its warplanes hit dozens of military targets in Iran early Friday, including missile-manufacturing facilities. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy if aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes,' he said in a statement. Iran previously agreed to limit its uranium enrichment and allow international inspectors access to its nuclear sites under a 2015 deal with the US, France, China, Russia, Britain and Germany in exchange for sanctions relief. But after Mr Trump pulled the US unilaterally out of the deal during his first term, Iran began enriching uranium up to 60% – a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% – and restricting access to its nuclear facilities. As negotiations kicked off in Geneva, Iranian missiles crashed into the northern city of Haifa, sending plumes of smoke billowing over the Mediterranean port and wounding at least 31 people. The war between Israel and Iran erupted on June 13, with Israeli air strikes targeting nuclear and military sites, top generals and nuclear scientists. At least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Iran has retaliated by firing 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. Most have been shot down by Israel's multi-tiered air defences, but at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded. Addressing an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned against attacks on Iran's nuclear reactors, particularly its only commercial nuclear power plant in the southern city of Bushehr. 'I want to make it absolutely and completely clear: In case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment,' said Rafael Grossi, chief of the UN nuclear watchdog. 'This is the nuclear site in Iran where the consequences could be most serious.' Israel has not targeted Iran's nuclear reactors, instead focusing its strikes on the main uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, centrifuge workshops near Tehran, laboratories in Isfahan and the country's Arak heavy water reactor south-west of the capital. Mr Grossi has warned repeatedly that such sites should not be military targets. After initially saying there was no damage visible from Israel's strikes on Thursday on the Arak heavy water reactor, the IAEA on Friday reported that 'key buildings at the facility were damaged', including the distillation unit. The reactor was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so the damage posed no risk of contamination, the watchdog said. Although strikes on uranium enrichment facilities can carry some risk of radiological and chemical contamination, the chance of a serious incident is far lower than at reactors such as the Russian-built Bushehr power plant. After a call with Mr Netanyahu, Russian President Vladimir Putin said he has secured Israel's promise to keep Russian workers at the plant out of harm's way. Iran has long maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. But it is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich uranium up to 60%. Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with a nuclear weapons programme but has never acknowledged it. Dozens of Israeli warplanes struck targets across the country early Friday, including industrial sites in the north, missile storage and launchers in the west and the headquarters of an advanced research institute in Tehran, known by its acronym SPND. The US alleges SPND has conducted research and testing that could be applicable to the development of nuclear explosive devices. Iranian state media reported explosions from Israeli strikes in an industrial area of Rasht, along the coast of the Caspian Sea. Israel's military had warned the public to evacuate the area around Rasht's Industrial City, south-west of the city's downtown. But with Iran's internet shut off – now for more than 48 hours – it's unclear just how many people could see the message. While praising the Israeli military's 'significant achievements' in the conflict with Iran, army Chief of Staff Lt Gen Eyal Zamir warned that 'difficult days still lie ahead'. 'We are preparing for a wide range of possible developments,' he told the public in recorded remarks, describing the offensive against Iran as the most complex in Israeli history. 'The campaign is not over.' From the ruins of the Weizmann Institute of Science hit in an Iranian missile barrage this week, Mr Netanyahu also vowed that Israel would fight as long as necessary to destroy Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missile arsenal. 'We face an existential danger,' he said. The Israeli military believes it has destroyed most of Iran's ballistic missile launchers, contributing to the steady decline in Iranian attacks. But several of the 35 missiles that Israel said Iran fired on Friday slipped through the country's vaunted aerial defence system, setting off air-raid sirens across the country and sending shrapnel flying into a residential area in the southern city of Beersheba, a frequent target of Iranian missiles where a hospital was hit on Thursday. A handful of cars were set ablaze in the attack but no one was seriously wounded, as residents had hunkered down in bomb shelters. The Israeli military said Iran had fired a missile rigged with fragmenting cluster munitions in its attack on Beersheba on Friday for the second time. In northern Israel, a projectile fell in downtown Haifa, wounding at least 31 people, according to the city's Rambam Medical Centre. Black smoke rose over the city's main port. The windows and walls of several buildings, including a mosque, were blown out by the blast.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store